Advertisement

Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 160–169 | Cite as

Numerical Analysis of Mindlin Shell by Meshless Local Petrov-Galerkin Method

  • Di Li
  • Zhongqin Lin
  • Shuhui Li
Article

Abstract

The objectives of this study are to employ the meshless local Petrov-Galerkin method (MLPGM) to solve three-dimensional shell problems. The computational accuracy of MLPGM for shell problems is affected by many factors, including the dimension of compact support domain, the dimension of quadrture domain, the number of integral cells and the number of Gauss points. These factors’ sensitivity analysis is to adopt the Taguchi experimental design technology and point out the dimension of the quadrature domain with the largest influence on the computational accuracy of the present MLPGM for shells and give out the optimum combination of these factors. A few examples are given to verify the reliability and good convergence of MLPGM for shell problems compared to the theoretical or the finite element results.

Key words

meshless methods meshless local Petrov-Galerkin method moving least square shell 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Krysl, P. and Belytschko, T., Analysis of thin shells by the element-free Galerkin method. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1996, 33: 3057–3080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Noguchi, H., Kawashima, T. and Miyamura, T., Element free analysis of shell and spatial structures. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2000, 47: 1215–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Atluri, S.N. and Zhu, T., A new meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) approach in computational mechanics. Computational Mechanics, 1998, 22(1): 117–127.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Atluri, S.N., Cho, J.Y. and Kim, H.G., Analysis of thin beams, using the meshless local Petrov-Galerkin method, with generalized moving least squares interpolation. Computational Mechanics, 1999, 24(4): 334–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Xiong, Y.B. and Long, S.Y., Local Petrov-Galerkin method for a thin plate. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2004, 25(2): 189–196 (in Chinese).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Xiong, Y.B., Long, S.Y., Hu, D.A. and Li, G.Y., A meshless local Petrov-Galerkin method for geometrically nonlinear problems. Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica, 2005, 18(4): 348–356.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Phadke, M.S., Quality Engineering using Robust Design. Prentice-Hall International Editions, 1989.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Timoshenko, S., Theory of Plates and Shells. McGraw-HillBook Company, Inc, 1959.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Simo, J.C., Fox, D.D. and Rifai, M.S., On a stress resultant geometrically exact shell model—Part II, The linear theory; Computational aspects. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1989, 73: 53–92.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Liu, G.R., Meshfree Methods Moving beyond the Finite Element method. CRC Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Hinton, E. and Owen, D.R.J., Finite Element Software for Plate and Shells. Swansea: Pineridge Press, 1984.zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Chinese Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics and Technology 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Di Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zhongqin Lin
    • 1
  • Shuhui Li
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringShanghai Jiaotong UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.School of Transportation and Vehicle EngineeringShandong University of TechnologyZiboChina

Personalised recommendations