Skip to main content
Log in

Miniaturized Analysis of Methylhexanamine in Urine by Gas Chromatography Applying In Situ Derivatization

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of stimulants by professional and amateur athletes, as well as in the general population, to enhance their athletic performance represents a human health hazard. Methylhexaneamine (MHA) is a stimulant found in numerous dietary supplements and detected frequently in urine samples. The analytical process accepted by most Drug Testing Programs that employ urine use two methods, the first is an initial screening test, followed by a more specific method for the confirmation of presumptive positive urine specimens. For this reason, two specific analytical methods were developed and validated to determine MHA in urine based on its in situ derivatization with isobutyl chloroformate; the first was salting out assisted liquid–liquid extraction (SALLE) with gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and the second headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) followed by gas chromatography with flame ionization detector (GC–FID). Both methods were evaluated for precision (relative standard deviation < 10%), linearity (r2 > 0.98), accuracy at two concentration levels (recovery > 92%) and limit of detection (5–7 ng mL−1). The methods were successfully applied to analyze athletes’ urine samples from Comisión Nacional de Cultura Física y Deporte (CONADE, Mexico). The proposed methodologies are sensitive, precise, accurate, fast, and miniaturized, and they are suitable specific methods to analyze MHA in urine for anti-doping or forensic purposes even with an affordable GC–FID system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eichner S, Maguire M, Shea LA, Fete MG (2016) Banned and discouraged-use ingredients found in weight loss supplements. J Am Pharm Assoc 56:538–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2016.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. ElSohly MA, Gul W, Tolbert C, ElSohly KM, Murphy TP, Avula B, Chittiboyina AG, Wang M, Khan IA, Yang M, Guo D, Zhang WD, Su J (2015) Methylhexanamine is not detectable in Pelargonium or Geranium species and their essential oils: a multi-centre investigation. Drug Test Anal 7:645–654. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.1726

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dos Santos MK, Walber GB, Kreutz T, Soares K, Danielli LJ, Mariotti KC, Ritter M, Jackson GP, Arroyo LE, Limberger RP (2019) Evaluation of the presence of 1,3-dimethylamylamine in pelargonium leaves and essential oils by mass spectrometric and chromatographic methods. Chromatographia 82:875–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-019-03715-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Denham BE (2017) When contaminated dietary supplements cause positive drug tests: methylhexaneamine as a doping agent in sport. Int J Sport Policy Polit 9:677–689. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2017.1348963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dunn M (2017) Have prohibition policies made the wrong decision? A critical review of studies investigating the effects of DMAA. Int J Drug Policy 40:26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.10.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Senado de la República Mexicana (2019) Gaceta: LXIV/1SPO-130/94931. https://www.senado.gob.mx/64/gaceta_del_senado/documento/94931. Accessed 06 Jan 2021

  7. World Anti-Doping Agency (2020) Prohibited List. WADA. https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/wada_2020_english_prohibited_list_0.pdf. Accessed 06 Jan 2021

  8. Sobolevsky T, Krotov G, Dikunets M, Nikitina M, Mochalova E, Rodchenkov G (2014) Anti-doping analyses at the Sochi Olympic and Paralympic Games 2014. Drug Test Anal 6:1087–1101. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.1734

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pereira HMG, Sardela VF (2014) Stimulant doping agents used in Brazil: prevalence, detectability, analytical implications, and challenges. Subst Use Misuse 49:1098–1114. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2014.907653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Archer JRH, Dargan PI, Hudson S, Wood DM (2013) Analysis of anonymous pooled urine from portable urinals in central London confirms the significant use of novel psychoactive substances. Q J Med 106:147–152. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcs219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Archer JRH, Dargan PI, Lee HMD, Hudson S, Wood DM (2014) Trend analysis of anonymised pooled urine from portable street urinals in central London identifies variation in the use of novel psychoactive substances. Clin Toxicol 52:160–165. https://doi.org/10.3109/15563650.2014.885982

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Archer JRH, Dargan PI, Lostia AM, van der Walt J, Henderson K, Drake N, Sharma S, Wood DM, Walker CJ, Kicman AT (2015) Running an unknown risk: a marathon death associated with the use of 1,3 dimethylamylamine (DMAA). Drug Test Anal 7:433–438. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.1764

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Deventer K, Roels K, Delbeke FT, Van Eenoo P (2011) Prevalence of legal and illegal stimulating agents in sports. Anal Bioanal Chem 401:421–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-4863-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Müller RK, Grosse J, Thieme D, Lang R, Teske J, Trauer H (1999) Introduction to the application of capillary gas chromatography of performance-enhancing drugs in doping control. J Chromatogr A 843:275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9673(99)00498-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kataoka H (1996) Derivatization reactions for the determination of amines by gas chromatography and their applications in environmental analysis. J Chromatogr A 733:19–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9673(95)00726-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Domínguez-Romero JC, García-Reyes JF, Molina-Díaz A (2014) Comparative evaluation of seven different sample treatment approaches for large-scale multiclass sport drug testing in urine by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1361:34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2014.07.090

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang J, Wu H, Kim E, El-Shourbagy TA (2009) Salting-out assisted liquid/liquid extraction with acetonitrile: a new high throughput sample preparation technique for good laboratory practice bioanalysis using liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. Biomed Chromatogr 23:419–425. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmc.1135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Snow NH (2000) Solid-phase micro-extraction of drugs from biological matrices. J Chromatogr A 885:445–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(00)00192-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Alsenedi KA, Morrison C (2018) Determination of amphetamine-type stimulants(ATSs) and synthetic cathinones in urine using solid phase micro-extractionfibre tips and gaschromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal Methods 10:1431–1440. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8AY00041G

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Song A, Wang J, Lu G, Jia Z, Yang J, Shi E (2018) Oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes coated fibers for headspace solid-phase microextraction of amphetamine-type stimulants in human urine. Forensic Sci Int 290:49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.06.031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Akramipour R, Fattahi N, Pirsaheb M, Gheini S (2016) Combination of counter current salting-out homogenous liquid–liquid extraction and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction as a novel microextraction of drugs in urine samples. J Chromatogr B 1012–1013:162–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2016.01.031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yanes EG, Lovett DP (2012) High-throughput bioanalytical method for analysis of synthetic cannabinoid metabolites in urine using salting-out sample preparation and LC-MS/MS. J Chromatogr B 909:42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2012.10.013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lopez-Avila V, Zorio M (2013) Identification of methylhexaneamine by GC high-resolution TOFMS and soft ionization. Forensic Sci Int 231:113–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.04.029

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Perrenoud L, Saugy M, Saudan C (2009) Detection in urine of 4-methyl-2-hexaneamine, a doping agent. J Chromatogr B 877:3767–3770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.09.013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ugland HG, Krogh M, Rasmussen KE (1997) Aqueous alkychloroformate derivatisation and solid-phase microextraction: determination of amphetamines in urine by capillary gas chromatography. J Chromatogr B 701:29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4347(97)00350-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vonaparti A, Lyris E, Angelis YS, Panderi I, Koupparis M, Tsantili-Kakoulidou A, Peters RJB, Nielen MWF, Georgakopoulos C (2010) Preventive doping control screening analysis of prohibited substances in human urine using rapid-resolution liquid chromatography/high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 24:1595–1609. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.4554

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. WADA Laboratory Expert Group (2019) Minimum required performance levels for detection and identification of non-threshold substances. https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/td2019mrpl_eng.pdf. Accessed 06 Jan 2021.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico from the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (DGAPA-UNAM) [Grant PAPIIT: IN216114-2] and Faculty of Chemistry [PAIP: 5000-9026]. The authors thank Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT) for the scholarship awarded to Félix Araujo-González (scholar number 273472), to Comisión Nacional de Cultura Física y Deporte (CONADE, México), and Dra. Evangelina Camacho for their contribution in providing the samples. The authors also thank Silvia Ocaña Rios for her support with the artwork and illustrations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Araceli Peña-Alvarez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights statement

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 530 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ocaña-Rios, I., Araujo-González, F., Olmos-Espejel, J.J. et al. Miniaturized Analysis of Methylhexanamine in Urine by Gas Chromatography Applying In Situ Derivatization. Chromatographia 85, 95–104 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-021-04116-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-021-04116-w

Keywords

Navigation