Skip to main content
Log in

Ultrasonic-Assisted Magnetic Solid-Phase Dispersive Extraction for Determination of Chlorpyrifos and Triclosan in Wastewater Samples prior to Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Detection

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present study, carbon nanodots (CNDs) were successfully anchored on magnetite (Fe3O4) under magnetic stirring and the nanocomposite prepared was assessed as a new adsorbent for ultrasonic-assisted magnetic solid-phase dispersive extraction of chlorpyrifos (CPF) and triclosan (TCS) in water samples. Detection was achieved using ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). The prepared magnetic CNDs were characterised by transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared and X-ray diffraction. The investigation and optimisation of the main experimental variables having an influence on the analytical response were performed using a multivariate approach. The factors studied were sample pH, mass of adsorbent and extraction time. The selection of desorption solvent and desorption time were examined and optimised univariately. By appropriating the optimum experimental conditions, the developed method was validated for accuracy using real environmental water samples. The average percentage recoveries obtained using influent and effluent spiked wastewater samples ranged between 76–108% and 79–96% for CPF and TCS, respectively. A good linearity (R2 > 0.995) was established ranging between 5 and 100 µg L−1. The limit of detection and limit of quantification were in the range of 0.024–0.081 µg L−1 and 0.057–0.192 µg L−1, respectively. The repeatability and reproducibility expressed as % relative standard deviation were less than 4.7%. The developed method exhibited good method performance, is rapid, simple, inexpensive and environmentally friendly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guo J, Iwata H (2017) Risk assessment of triclosan in the global environment using a probabilistic approach. Ecotox Environ Saf 143:111–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.05.020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Halden RU (2014) On the need and speed of regulating triclosan and triclocarban in the United States. ACS Publications, Washington, D.C.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Caldas SS, Rombaldi C, de Oliveira Arias JL, Marube LC, Primel EG (2016) Multi-residue method for determination of 58 pesticides, pharmaceuticals and personal care products in water using solvent demulsification dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction combined with liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Talanta 146:676–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2015.06.047

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Celano R, Piccinelli AL, Campone L, Rastrelli L (2014) Ultra-preconcentration and determination of selected pharmaceutical and personal care products in different water matrices by solid-phase extraction combined with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction prior to ultra high pressure liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry analysis. J Chromatogr A 1355:26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2014.06.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Asati A, Satyanarayana GNV, Patel DK (2017) Comparison of two microextraction methods based on solidification of floating organic droplet for the determination of multiclass analytes in river water samples by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry using Central Composite Design. J Chromatogr A 1513:157–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2017.07.048

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Caldas SS, Bolzan CM, Guilherme JR, Silveira MAK, Escarrone ALV, Primel EG (2013) Determination of pharmaceuticals, personal care products, and pesticides in surface and treated waters: method development and survey. Environ Sci Pollut R 20(8):5855–5863

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Demoliner A, Caldas SS, Costa FP, Gonçalves FF, Clementin RM, Milani MR, Primel EG (2010) Development and validation of a method using SPE and LC–ESI–MS–MS for the determination of multiple classes of pesticides and metabolites in water samples. J Brazil Chem Soc 21(8):1424–1433

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhao R-S, Wang X, Sun J, Hu C, Wang X-K (2011) Determination of triclosan and triclocarban in environmental water samples with ionic liquid/ionic liquid dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction prior to HPLC–ESI–MS/MS. Microchim Acta 174(1):145–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-011-0607-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Prieto A, Rodil R, Quintana JB, Rodríguez I, Cela R, Möder M (2012) Evaluation of low-cost disposable polymeric materials for sorptive extraction of organic pollutants in water samples. Anal Chim Acta 716:119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2011.12.023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Domínguez I, Arrebola FJ, Romero-González R, Nieto-García A, Martínez Vidal JL, Garrido Frenich A (2017) Solid phase microextraction and gas chromatography coupled to magnetic sector high resolution mass spectrometry for the ultra-trace determination of contaminants in surface water. J Chromatogr A 1518:15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2017.08.061

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rocío-Bautista P, Martínez-Benito C, Pino V, Pasán J, Ayala JH, Ruiz-Pérez C, Afonso AM (2015) The metal–organic framework HKUST-1 as efficient sorbent in a vortex-assisted dispersive micro solid-phase extraction of parabens from environmental waters, cosmetic creams, and human urine. Talanta 139:13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2015.02.032

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Assadi Y, Farajzadeh MA, Bidari A (2012) 2.10—dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction. In: Pawliszyn J (ed) Comprehensive sampling and sample preparation. Academic Press, Oxford, pp 181–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-381373-2.00051-X

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Dimpe KM, Mpupa A, Nomngongo PN (2018) Microwave assisted solid phase extraction for separation preconcentration sulfamethoxazole in wastewater using tyre based activated carbon as solid phase material prior to spectrophotometric determination. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 188:341–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2017.07.039

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wierucka M, Biziuk M (2014) Application of magnetic nanoparticles for magnetic solid-phase extraction in preparing biological, environmental and food samples. Trends Anal Chem 59:50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2014.04.007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Herrero-Latorre C, Barciela-García J, García-Martín S, Peña-Crecente RM, Otárola-Jiménez J (2015) Magnetic solid-phase extraction using carbon nanotubes as sorbents: a review. Anal Chim Acta 892:10–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2015.07.046

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Aguilar-Arteaga K, Rodriguez J, Barrado E (2010) Magnetic solids in analytical chemistry: a review. Anal Chim Acta 674(2):157–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mannoor MS, Tao H, Clayton JD, Sengupta A, Kaplan DL, Naik RR, Verma N, Omenetto FG, McAlpine MC (2012) Graphene-based wireless bacteria detection on tooth enamel. Nat Commun 3:763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guo Y, Wang D, Liu X, Wang X, Liu W, Qin W (2014) Synthesis and characterization of the nickel@ carbon dots hybrid material and its application in the reduction of Cr(VI). New J Chem 38(12):5861–5867

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gedda G, Pandey S, Bhaisare ML, Wu H-F (2014) Carbon dots as nanoantennas for anti-inflammatory drug analysis using surface-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry in serum. RSC ADV 4(72):38027–38033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bhaisare ML, Gedda G, Khan MS, Wu H-F (2016) Fluorimetric detection of pathogenic bacteria using magnetic carbon dots. Anal Chim Acta 920:63–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sun A-C (2018) Synthesis of magnetic carbon nanodots for recyclable photocatalytic degradation of organic compounds in visible light. Adv Powder Technol 29(3):719–725

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ahmadian-Fard-Fini S, Salavati-Niasari M, Ghanbari D (2018) Hydrothermal green synthesis of magnetic Fe3O4-carbon dots by lemon and grape fruit extracts and as a photoluminescence sensor for detecting of E. coli bacteria. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 203:481–493

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang H, Shen J, Li Y, Wei Z, Cao G, Gai Z, Hong K, Banerjee P, Zhou S (2014) Magnetic iron oxide–fluorescent carbon dots integrated nanoparticles for dual-modal imaging, near-infrared light-responsive drug carrier and photothermal therapy. Biomater Sci 2(6):915–923

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu Z, Liu Y, Yao K, Ding Z, Tao J, Wang X (2002) Synthesis and magnetic properties of Fe3O4 nanoparticles. J Mater Synth Process 10(2):83–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lu AH, EeL S, Schüth F (2007) Magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, protection, functionalization, and application. Angew Chem Int Ed 46(8):1222–1244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gwebu S, Nomngongo P, Mashazi P, Nyokong T, Maxakato N (2017) Platinum nanoparticles supported on carbon nanodots as anode catalysts for direct alcohol fuel cells. Int J Electrochem Sci 12:6365–6378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Guo Y, Qian J, Iqbal A, Zhang L, Liu W, Qin W (2017) Pd nanoparticles immobilized on magnetic carbon dots@Fe3O4 nanocubes as a synergistic catalyst for hydrogen generation. Int J Hydrog Energy 42(22):15167–15177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.04.253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sinha SN (2011) Liquid chromatography mass spectrometer (LC–MS/MS) study of distribution patterns of base peak ions and reaction mechanism with quantification of pesticides in drinking water using a lyophilization technique. Am J Analyt Chem 2(05):511

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Liao H-T, Hsieh C-J, Chiang S-Y, Lin M-H, Chen P-C, Wu K-Y (2011) Simultaneous analysis of chlorpyrifos and cypermethrin in cord blood plasma by online solid-phase extraction coupled with liquid chromatography-heated electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B 879(21):1961–1966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2011.05.028

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Chung SWC, Chan BTP (2010) Validation and use of a fast sample preparation method and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry in analysis of ultra-trace levels of 98 organophosphorus pesticide and carbamate residues in a total diet study involving diversified food types. J Chromatogr A 1217(29):4815–4824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2010.05.043

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Quintana JB, Reemtsma T (2004) Sensitive determination of acidic drugs and triclosan in surface and wastewater by ion-pair reverse-phase liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 18(7):765–774

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Madikizela LM, Muthwa SF, Chimuka L (2014) Determination of Triclosan and Ketoprofen in river water and wastewater by solid phase extraction and high performance liquid chromatography. S Afr J Chem 67:14

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nomngongo PN, Ngila JC (2015) Multivariate optimization of dual-bed solid phase extraction for preconcentration of Ag, Al, As and Cr in gasoline prior to inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometric determination. Fuel 139:285–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.08.046

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mpupa A, Mashile GP, Nomngongo PN (2018) Ultrasound-assisted dispersive solid phase nanoextraction of selected personal care products in wastewater followed by their determination using high performance liquid chromatography-diode array detector. J Hazard Mater 370:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kasprzyk-Hordern B, Dinsdale RM, Guwy AJ (2008) Multiresidue methods for the analysis of pharmaceuticals, personal care products and illicit drugs in surface water and wastewater by solid-phase extraction and ultra performance liquid chromatography–electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 391(4):1293–1308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-008-1854-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Benijts T, Dams R, Lambert WE, De Leenheer A (2004) Countering matrix effects in environmental liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry water analysis for endocrine disrupting chemicals. J Chromatogr A 1029(1–2):153–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2003.12.022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rodricks JV, Swenberg JA, Borzelleca JF, Maronpot RR, Shipp AM (2010) Triclosan: a critical review of the experimental data and development of margins of safety for consumer products. Crit Rev Toxicol 40(5):422–484

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Salvatierra-stamp V, Muñiz-Valencia R, Jurado JM, Ceballos-Magaña SG (2018) Hollow fiber liquid phase microextraction combined with liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry for the analysis of emerging contaminants in water samples. Microchem J 140:87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2018.04.012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Mpupa A, Mashile GP, Nomngongo PN (2017) Vortex assisted-supramolecular solvent based microextraction coupled with spectrophotometric determination of triclosan in environmental water samples. Open Chem 15(1):255–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Zohrabi P, Shamsipur M, Hashemi M, Hashemi B (2016) Liquid-phase microextraction of organophosphorus pesticides using supramolecular solvent as a carrier for ferrofluid. Talanta 160:340–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2016.07.036

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Farajzadeh MA, Mogaddam MRA, Esrafili L (2015) Surfactant-less water emulsion based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction for determination of organophosphorus pesticides in aqueous samples. Anal Methods 7(18):7899–7906

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang H, West D, Shi H, Ma Y, Adams C, Eichholz T (2019) Simultaneous determination of selected trace contaminants in drinking water using solid-phase extraction-high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Water Air Soil Pollut 2:28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the University of Johannesburg and Water Research Commission (WRC) Project no. K5/2563 for funding. Dr Riaan Meyer and Mr Darryl Harris from Shimadzu South Africa are highly thanked for their technical assistance. The authors also acknowledge NRF incentive grant for rated researchers awarded to JC Ngila used as partial running cost. The use of the NEP Physical Properties Measurements on Cryogenic Cryogen free Measurement System at UJ, obtained with the financial support from the SA NRF (Grant no.: 88080) and the Faculty of Science, University of Johannesburg (UJ), South Africa, is acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vallerie A. Muckoya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muckoya, V.A., Njobeh, P.B., Nomngongo, P.N. et al. Ultrasonic-Assisted Magnetic Solid-Phase Dispersive Extraction for Determination of Chlorpyrifos and Triclosan in Wastewater Samples prior to Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Detection. Chromatographia 83, 373–383 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-019-03848-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-019-03848-0

Keywords

Navigation