Abstract
The detrimental effect of the interaction between basic analytes and silanol groups on the stationary phases during high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) separations has been well characterized, and many new stationary phases have been developed to minimize this effect. Similar interactions can happen between basic analytes and silanol groups on glassware surfaces during sample preparation but are often neglected. In this study, we used amitriptyline and its impurity, nortriptyline, as an example to study the effects of sample diluents on their quantitation by HPLC with four different types of glass HPLC vials. Three diluents were studied including water, 100 mM sodium chloride, and 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. The method performance was evaluated in terms of linearity, precision and accuracy. Low sensitivity and high variability was observed for sample solutions prepared in water, which can be attributed to random adsorption of basic analytes onto the silanol groups of the glassware surfaces. Addition of sodium chloride to increase the ionic strength improved the method performance for both assay and impurity level measurements but did not completely eliminate the interaction with silanols. The most accurate and precise results across all concentration ranges regardless of HPLC vial type were obtained using 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid as the diluent.
Graphical Abstract
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Snyder LR, Kirkland JJ, Glajch JL (1997) Practical HPLC method development. Wiley, New York
Lunn G, Schmuff NR (1997) HPLC methods for pharmaceutical analysis. Wiley, New York
Bard AJ, Faulkner LR (1980) Electrochemical Methods, fundamentals and applications. Wiley, New York, pp 488–510
Buszewski B, Bocian S, Rychlicki G, Matyska M, Pesek J (2012) Determination of accessible silanols groups on silica gel surfaces using microcalorimetric measurements. J Chromatogr A 1232:43–46
Nawrocki J (1997) The silanol group and its role in liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A 779:29–71
Marshall DB, Cole CL, Connolly DE (1986) Variable reactivity in the chemical modification of silica: effects of initial deactivation on high-performance liquid chromatographic performance. J Chromatogr A 361:71–82
Bocian S, Buszewski B (2012) Residual silanols at reversed-phase silica in HPLC—a contribution for a better understanding. J Sep Sci 35:1191–1200
Murakoshi M, Fukuzawa K, Sato Y, Asakawa N (2018) Adsorption phenomenon and development of low adsorption vials for LC and LC/MS. https://www.shimadzu.com/an/sites/shimadzu.com.an/files/ckeditor/an/hplc/support/vial/adsorption_phenomenon.pdf. Accessed 16 Oct 2018
Guo X, Bruins AP, Covey TR (2006) Characterization of typical chemical background interferences in atmospheric pressure ionization liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 20:3145–3150
Mei H, Hsieh Y, Nardo C, Xu X, Wang S, Ng K, Korfmacher WA (2003) Investigation of matrix effects in bioanalytical high-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric assays: application to drug discovery. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 17:97–103
van Hout MW, Niederlander HA, de Zeeuw RA, de Jong GJ (2003) Ion suppression in the determination of clenbuterol in urine by solid-phase extraction atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation ion-trap mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 17:245–250
2017 U.S. Pharmacopoeia-National Formulary [USP 40 NF 35]. Volume 1. Rockville, Md: United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc; page 2531–2532 for abacavir sulfate, page 2758–2759 for amitriptyline hydrochloride, page 2782–2784 for amoxapine, and page 2913–2914 for azatadine maleate
Neue UD, Serowik E, Iraneta P, Alden BA, Walter TH (1999) Universal procedure for the assessment of the reproducibility and the classification of silica-based reversed-phase packings: I. Assessment of the reproducibility of reversed-phase packings. J Chromatogr A 849:87–100
Neue UD, Alden BA, Walter TH (1999) Universal procedure for the assessment of the reproducibility and the classification of silica-based reversed-phase packings: II. Classification of reversed-phase packings. J Chromatogr A 849:101–116
Xu XN, Yeung E (1998) Long-range electrostatic trapping of single-protein molecules at a liquid-solid interface. Science 281:1650–1653
Wang L, Zheng J, Gong X, Hartman R, Antonucci V (2015) Efficient HPLC method development using structure-based database search, physico-chemical prediction and chromatographic simulation. J Pharm Biomed Anal 104:49–54
Tornblom JK, Bureyko TF, MacKinnon CD (2005) Simulating phenol high-performance liquid chromatography retention times as the pH Changes: mobile phase pH vs. buffer pH. J Chromatogr A 1095:68–73
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank David Lavrich for the discussions on data analysis. The authors also would like to thank Tessa Carducci, Erik Regalado, Xiaohua Zhang and Paul Oram for careful review of the manuscript and invaluable discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest in relation to this research.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zheng, J., Wang, L., Antonucci, V. et al. Effect of Sample Diluents on the Quantitation of Basic Compounds by High Performance Liquid Chromaography. Chromatographia 81, 1631–1639 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-018-3638-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-018-3638-6