Power Law Approach as a Convenient Protocol for Improving Peak Shapes and Recovering Areas from Partially Resolved Peaks
- 282 Downloads
Separation techniques have developed rapidly where sub-second chromatography, ultrahigh resolution recycling chromatography, and two-dimensional liquid chromatography have become potent tools for analytical chemists. Despite the popularity of high-efficiency materials and new selectivity columns, peak overlap is still observed because as the number of analytes increases, Poisson statistics predicts a higher probability of peak overlap. This work shows the application of the properties of exponential functions and Gaussian functions for virtual resolution enhancement. A mathematical protocol is derived to recover areas from overlapping signals and overcomes the previously known limitations of power laws of losing area and height information. This method also reduces noise and makes the peaks more symmetrical while maintaining the retention time and selectivity. Furthermore, it does not require a prior knowledge of the total number of components as needed in curve fitting techniques. Complex examples are shown using chiral chromatography for enantiomers, and twin-column recycling HPLC of IgG aggregates and with tailing or fronting peaks. The strengths and weaknesses of the power law protocol for area recovery are discussed with simulated and real examples.
KeywordsSignal processing Peak area recovery Power laws Exponential functions Peak purity Recycling HPLC
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 4.The United States Pharmacopeia Convention (2012) “<621> Chromatography”, vol 1, USP35-NF30 Google Scholar
- 7.Dyson N (1998) Chromatographic Integration Methods, 2nd edn. Royal Society of Chemistry, CornwallGoogle Scholar
- 24.Wilks DS (2011) Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences. Academic press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 25.Gritti F, Wahab MF (2018) LCGC North Am 36(2):82–98Google Scholar
- 31.Jansson PA (1984) Deconvolution with applications in spectroscopy. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 33.Weber HJ, Arfken GB (2003) Essential mathematical methods for physicists, ISE. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar