Characterization of Novel Polymer-Based Pyridine Stationary Phases for Supercritical Fluid Chromatography
2-Ethylpyridine-bonded silica is one of the most famous stationary phases employed in supercritical fluid chromatography, especially for the analysis of basic compounds and even without an additive in the mobile phase. In the present paper, we present the synthesis and characterization of three original stationary phases based on poly(vinylpyridine) polymers supported on silica. The position of nitrogen atom relative to the polymer chain was varied to be in the 2, 3, or 4 position. All these phases were prototypes, while the poly(4-vinylpyridine) phase was subsequently commercialized (DCPak P4VP from Daicel Corporation). The stationary phases obtained are characterized in supercritical fluid chromatography with carbon dioxide—methanol mobile phase, with a modified version of the solvation parameter model, to take account of ionic interactions. The three phases are also compared to a 2-ethylpyridine-bonded silica phase and a 2-picolylamine-bonded silica phase. It appears that the polymer-based pyridine phases are significantly more retentive than brush-type pyridine phases and adequately shield residual silanol groups to prevent unwanted interactions with basic compounds. The different selectivities and chromatographic performances are also evidenced with sample applications on pharmaceutical compounds, notably with a selection of 140 drug candidates.
KeywordsSupercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) Linear solvation energy relationships (LSER) Quantitative structure–retention relationships (QSRR) Solvation parameter model Polymeric stationary phases
Waters Corporation is warmly acknowledged for continuous support provided to Univ Orleans through the Centers of Innovation program. CW acknowledges the support of the Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), of which she is a Junior member.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
- 6.Grand-Guillaume Perrenoud AG-G, Farrell WP, Aurigemma CM et al (2014) Evaluation of stationary phases packed with superficially porous particles for the analysis of pharmaceutical compounds using supercritical fluid chromatography. J Chromatogr A 1360:275–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2014.07.078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Grand-Guillaume Perrenoud A, Boccard J, Veuthey J-L, Guillarme D (2012) Analysis of basic compounds by supercritical fluid chromatography: attempts to improve peak shape and maintain mass spectrometry compatibility. J Chromatogr A 1262:205–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2012.08.091 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Crepier J, Le Masle A, Charon N et al (2018) Ultra-high performance supercritical fluid chromatography hyphenated to atmospheric pressure chemical ionization high resolution mass spectrometry for the characterization of fast pyrolysis bio-oils. J Chromatogr B 1086:38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2018.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Teubel J, Wüst B, Schipke CG et al (2018) Methods in endogenous steroid profiling—a comparison of gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC–MS) with supercritical fluid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (SFC–MS/MS). J Chromatogr A 1554:101–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2018.04.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.du Toit T, Bloem LM, Quanson JL et al (2017) Profiling adrenal 11β-hydroxyandrostenedione metabolites in prostate cancer cells, tissue and plasma: UPC2-MS/MS quantification of 11β-hydroxytestosterone, 11keto-testosterone and 11keto-dihydrotestosterone. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 166:54–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2016.06.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Liu J, Sun S, Huang W, Zhang M (2017) Rapid determination of 15 antioxidants in polyolefins by ultra-performance convergence chromatography. Petrochem Technol 46:364–370Google Scholar
- 18.Laboureur L, Bonneau N, Champy P et al (2017) Structural characterisation of acetogenins from Annona muricata by supercritical fluid chromatography coupled to high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry: structural characterization of acetogenins by SFC-HRMS/MS. Phytochem Anal. https://doi.org/10.1002/pca.2700 Google Scholar
- 19.Wang M, Wang Y-H, Avula B et al (2017) Quantitative determination of cannabinoids in Cannabis and cannabis products using ultra-high-performance supercritical fluid chromatography and diode array/mass spectrometric detection. J Forensic Sci 62:602–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13341 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Desfontaine V, Veuthey J-L, Guillarme D (2016) Evaluation of innovative stationary phase ligand chemistries and analytical conditions for the analysis of basic drugs by supercritical fluid chromatography. J Chromatogr A 1438:244–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2016.02.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Shi X, Yang W, Qiu S et al (2018) Systematic profiling and comparison of the lipidomes from Panax ginseng, P. quinquefolius, and P. notoginseng by ultrahigh performance supercritical fluid chromatography/high-resolution mass spectrometry and ion mobility-derived collision cross section measurement. J Chromatogr A 1548:64–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2018.03.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.González-Mariño I, Thomas KV, Reid MJ (2018) Determination of cannabinoid and synthetic cannabinoid metabolites in wastewater by liquid-liquid extraction and ultra-high performance supercritical fluid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: cannabinoid derivatives in wastewater by UHPSFC-MS/MS. Drug Test Anal 10:222–228. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.2199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Lemasson E, Bertin S, Hennig P et al (2015) Development of an achiral supercritical fluid chromatography method with ultraviolet absorbance and mass spectrometric detection for impurity profiling of drug candidates. Part I: optimization of mobile phase composition. J Chromatogr A 1408:217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2015.07.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Nagai K, Shinkura S (2016) Stationary phase for supercritical fluid chromatography. WO2016/152996Google Scholar
- 31.Lemasson E, Bertin S, Hennig P et al (2015) Development of an achiral supercritical fluid chromatography method with ultraviolet absorbance and mass spectrometric detection for impurity profiling of drug candidates. Part II. Selection of an orthogonal set of stationary phases. J Chromatogr A 1408:227–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2015.07.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Lemasson E, Bertin S, Hennig P et al (2016) Comparison of ultra-high performance methods in liquid and supercritical fluid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization—mass spectrometry for impurity profiling of drug candidates. J Chromatogr A 1472:117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2016.10.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar