Skip to main content
Log in

Development of a Straightforward and Cheap Ethyl Acetate Based Method for the Simultaneous Determination of Pesticides and Veterinary Drugs Residues in Bovine Liver and Muscle

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The optimization and validation study of a qualitative and quantitative multiclass, ethyl acetate (EtOAc) multi-residue method to straightforward monitor 48 compounds in liver (6 veterinary drugs and 42 pesticides) and 54 in muscle (5 veterinary drugs and 49 pesticides) followed by high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC–MS/MS) and gas chromatography mass-spectrometry determination (GC–MS) is presented. Several clean-up sorbents were evaluated looking for the best strategy for the removal of the matrix co-extractives. A combination of aluminium oxide, (Al2O3), C-18 and magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) yielded the best analytical results in terms of precision and accuracy. The method was validated at three fortification levels: 10, 100 and 250 µg kg−1. The percentages of recovery were between 70 and 114 % for bovine muscle and 70–118 % for liver. Repeatability and intermediate precision percentages were below 20 % for both matrices. Most of the compounds under study presented good linearity and quantification limits below their corresponding European Union (EU) and Codex Alimentarius maximum residue levels (MRLs). Twenty-two randomly taken real samples were analyzed with the validated methodology, trying to prove its effectiveness and suitability for routine analysis. The validated methodology represents a fast and cheap alternative for the simultaneous analysis of pesticides and veterinary drugs which can be easily extend to other compounds and matrices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MacLachlan DJ (2011) Estimating the transfer of contaminants in animal feedstuffs to livestck tissues, milk and eggs: a review. Anim Prod Sci 51:1067–1078

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. LeDoux M (2011) Analytical methods applied to the determination of pesticide residues in foods of animal origin. A review of the past two decades. J Chromatogr A 1218:1021–1036

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. van Pamel E, Daeseleire E (2015) A multi residue liquid chromatographic/tandem mass spectrometric method for the detection and quantitation of 15 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in bovine meat and milk. Anal Bioanal Chem 407:4485–4494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Codex Alimentarius Commission, CodexPesticides Residues in Food Online Database, Updated up to and including its 36th Session (July 2013), http://www.codexalimentarius.net/pestres/data/commodities/details.html?id=191. Accesed 20 June 2015

  5. European Commission, Regulation (EC) No.299/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No. 396/2005 on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of Plant and animal origin, Off J Eur Commun L9

  6. Codex Alimentarius Commission, Codex Veterinary Drug Residue in Food Online Database, Updated up to the 38th Session of the Codex Alimentarius Commission (July 2015), http://www.codexalimentarius.org/standards/vetdrugs/veterinary-drugs/en/. Accessed 25 July 2015

  7. European Commission, Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 of the Commission of 22 December 2009 on pharmacologically active substances and their classification as regards the maximum residue limits in foodstuffs of animal origin. L 15:1, pp 1–72

  8. US, Department of Agriculture, Foreing Agricultural Service, Maximum Residue Limit Database, 2014. http://www.fas.usda.gov/maximum-residue-limits-mrl-database. Accessed 25 July 2015

  9. Ministerio de Ganadería Agricultura y Pesca, MGAP, Manual del Programa Nacional de Residuos Biológicos, http://www.mgap.gub.uy/portal/page.aspx?2,dgsg,dgsg-programa-nacional-de-control-de-residuos-de-medicamentos-veterinarios-y-contaminantes-en-alimentos-de-origen-animal,O,es,0. Accessed 25 June 2015

  10. Schneider MJ, Lehotay SJ, Lightfield AR (2012) Evaluation of a multi-class, multi-residue liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for analysis of 120 veterinary drugs in bovine kidney. Drug Test Anal 4:91–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lehotay SJ, Lightfield AR, Geis-Asteggiante L, Schneider MJ, Dutko T, Ng C, Bluhm L, Mastovska K (2012) Development and validation of a streamlined method designed to detect residues of 62 veterinary drugs in bovine kidney using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Drug Test Anal 1:75–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schneider MJ, Lehotay SJ, Lightfield AR (2015) Validation of a streamlined multiclass, multi residue method for determination of veterinary drug residues in bovine muscle by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 407:4423–4435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Geis-Asteggiante L, Lehotay SJ, Lightfield AR, Dutko T, Ng C, Bluhm L (2012) Ruggedness testing and validation of a practical analytical method for >100 veterinary drug residues in bovine muscle by ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1258:43–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. García de Llasera MP, Reyes-Reyes ML (2009) A validate matrix solid phase dispersion method for the extraction of organophosphorus pesticides from bovine samples. Food Chem 114:1510–1516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kang J, Fan C, Chang Q, Bu M, Zhao Z, Wang W, Pang G (2014) Simultaneous determination of multi-class veterinary drug residues in different muscle tissues by modified QuEChERS combined with HPLC–MS/MS. Anal Methods 6:6285–6293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gutiérrez TM, García de Llasera MP (2011) Determination of organophosphorus pesticides in bovine tissue by an on-line coupled matrix solid-phase dispersion-solid phase extraction-high performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection method. J Chromatogr A 1218:6869–6877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kinsella B, Whelan M, Cantwell H, McCormack M, Furey A, Lehotay SJ, Danaher M (2011) A dual validation approach to detect anthelmintic residues in bovine liver over an extended concentration range. Talanta 83:14–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Martins MT, Barreto F, Hoff RB, Jank L, Arsand JB, Correa Feijó T, Scherman Schapoval EE (2015) Determination of quinolones and fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines and sulfonamides in bovine, swine and poultry liver using LC–MS/MS. Food Addit Contam A 32:333–341

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Vanden Bussche J, Decloedt A, Van Meulebroek L, De Clercq N, Lock S, Stahl-Zeng J, Vanhaecke L (2014) A novel approach to the quantitative detection of anabolic steroids in bovine muscle tissue by means of a hybrid quadrupole time-of-flight-mass spectrometry instrument. J Chromatogr A 1360:229–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Frenich AG, Romero-González R, Del Mar Aguilera-Luiz M (2014) Comprehensive analysis of toxics (pesticides, veterinary drugs and mycotoxins) in food by UHPLC–MS. Trends Anal Chem 63:158–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mol HGJ, Plaza-Bolaños P, Zomer P, de Rijk TC, Stolker AAM, Mulder PPJ (2008) Toward a generic extraction method for simultaneous determination of pesticides, mycotoxins, plant toxins, and veterinary drugs in feed and food matrixes. Anal Chem 80:9450–9459

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wei H, Tao Y, Chen D, Xie S, Pan Y, Liu Z, Huang L, Yuan Z (2015) Development and validation of a multi-residue screening method for veterinary drugs, their metabolites and pesticides in meat using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Food Addit Contam A 32:686–701

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. European Commission DG-SANCO (2013), Method validation and quality control procedures for pesticide residue analysis in food and feed, Document No. N° SANCO/12751/2013.http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/pesticides/guidance_documents/docs/qualcontrol_en.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2015

  24. Ahn YG, Shina JH, Kim H, Khimb J, Leec M, Hongc J (2007) Application of solid-phase extraction coupled with freezing-lipid filtration clean-up for the determination of endocrine-disrupting phenols in fish. Anal Chim Acta 603:67–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sobhanzadeh E, Abu Bakar NK, Bin Abas MR, Nemati K (2011) A simple and efficient multi-residue method based on QuEChERS for pesticides determination in palm oil by liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Environ Monit Assess 184:5821–5828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. CVUA Stuttgart, Clean-up options. http://quechers.cvua-stuttgart.de/pdf/cleanup.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2015

  27. Codex Alimentarius Commission, Procedural Manual, 17 Edition, (2007). Guidelines on analytical terminology (CAC/GL 72-2009). www.codexalimentarius.org/input./cxg_072e.pdf. Accessed 28 November 2015

  28. Kmellar B, Fodor P, Pareja L, Ferrer C, Martínez-Uroz MA, Valverde A, Fernández-Alba AR (2008) Validation and uncertainty study of a comprehensive list of 160 pesticide residues in multi-class vegetables by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1215:37–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Avoiding LC–MS signal suppression. http://www.chromacademy.com/chromatography-LCMS-Signal-Suppression.html. Accessed 25 June 2015

  30. Solvents and Caveats for LC/MS. http://www.waters.com/waters/es_ES/Solvents-and-Caveats-for-LC-MS/nav.htm?cid=10091173&locale=es_ES. Accessed 25 June 2015

  31. The correlation between nutritional value indicators of meat and liver, Technical University of Moldova. http://www.utm.md/meridian/2011/MI_4_2011/5.%20Art.%20Sandulachi.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2015

  32. Water in Meat and Poultry, United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service. http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/food-safety-education/get-answers/food-safety-fact-sheets/meat-preparation/water-in-meat-and-poultry/ct_index. Accessed 25 June 2015

  33. Chapter 3, Reynolds SL (2005). In: Fernández-Alba AR, Barceló D (ed), Chromatographic-mass spectrometric food analysis for trace determination of pesticides residues, Volume XLIII, Comprehensive Analytical Chemistry. Elsevier, Amsterdam

  34. Mol HGJ, Rooseboom A, Van Dam R, Roding M, Arondeus K, Sunarto S (2007) Modification and re-validation of the ethyl acetate-based multi-residue method for pesticides in produce. Anal Bioanal Chem 389:1715–1754

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge funding support from PEDECIBA Química (Programa de Desarrollo de las Ciencias Básicas, Uruguay), ANII (Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación) and CSIC-PAIE (Apoyo a la Investigación Estudiantil, Comisión Sectorial de Investigación Científica, Universidad de la República).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Pareja.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Statement about involving Human and/or Animals participants

No research involving human participants and/or animals has been conducted.

Additional information

Published in the topical collection 5th Latin American Pesticide Residue Workshop with guest editor Steven J. Lehotay.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 23 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Souza, R., Pareja, L., Cesio, M.V. et al. Development of a Straightforward and Cheap Ethyl Acetate Based Method for the Simultaneous Determination of Pesticides and Veterinary Drugs Residues in Bovine Liver and Muscle. Chromatographia 79, 1101–1112 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-016-3026-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-016-3026-z

Keywords

Navigation