Skip to main content
Log in

QSRR Study on Flavor Compounds of Diverse Structures on Different Columns with the Help of New Chemometric Methods

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A quantitative structure–retention relationship study was performed for 286 flavor compounds with highly structural diversity on different stationary phases of different polarities. Firstly, the structure–retention relationship was statistically explored using constitutional, topological, molecular properties, charge descriptors and quantum chemical descriptors. Some recently developed chemometric methods, such as the ones for robust analysis and variable selection were firstly employed to predict accurately the gas chromatographic retention indices. The stability and validity of models have been tested by internal and external validation, and good robustness and predictive ability were obtained. The resulting QSRR models were well correlated, with the square of correlation coefficient for cross validation, Q 2, values of 0.9847, 0.9838, 0.9745 and 0.9646 on stationary phase DB5, OV101, OV17 and C20M, respectively. The molecular properties known to be relevant for GC retention index, such as molecular size, branching, electron density distribution and hydrogen bond effect were well covered by generated descriptors. The descriptors used in models on four stationary phases were compared, and some reasonable explanations about gas chromatographic retention mechanism were obtained. The developed model may be useful for the prediction of flavor compounds while experimental data are unavailable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kovàts E (1958) Helv Chim Acta 41:1915–1932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Den Dool H, Kratz PD (1963) J Chromatogr A 11:463–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Luan F, Xue CX, Zhang RS, Zhao CY, Liu MC, Hu ZD, Fan BT (2005) Anal Chim Acta 537:101–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhao HX, Xue XY, Xu Q, Zhang FF, Liang XM (2006) J Chromatogr A 1107:248–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hu RJ, Liu HX, Zhang RS, Xue CX (2005) Talanta 68:31–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Amboni RDM, Junkes BS, Heinzen VEF, Yunes RA (2002) J Mol Struct (Theochem) 579:53–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mjøs SA, Nielsen OG (2006) J Chromatogr A 1110:171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Isidorov VA, Szczepaniak L (2009) J Chromatogr A 1216:8998–9007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lu CH, Guo WM, Yin CS (2006) Anal Chim Acta 561:96–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Garkani-Nejad Z, Karlovits M, Demuth W (2004) J Chromatogr A 1028:287–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Héberger K (2007) J Chromatogr A 1158:273–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaliszan R (1987) Quantitative structure–chromatographic retention relationships. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Farkas O, Zenkevich IG, Stout F, Kalivas JH, Héberger K (2008) J Chromatogr A 1198–1199:188–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sutter JM, Peterson TA, Jurs PC (1997) Anal Chim Acta 342:113–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ren B (2003) Chemometer Intell Lab Syst 66:29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yan J, Cao DS, Guo FQ, Zhang LX, He M, Huang JH, Xu QS, Liang YZ (2012) J Chromatogr A 1223:118–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Acree T, Arn H (2004) Flavornet and human odor space. http://www.flavornet.org/

  18. Ávila M, Zougagh M, Escarpa A, Ríos A (2009) J Chromatogr A 1216:7179–7185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Saison D, Schutter DP, Uyttenhove B, Delvaux F, Delvaux FR (2009) Food Chem 114:1206–1215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rochat S, Egger J, Chaintreau A (2009) J Chromatogr A 1216:6424–6432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ryan D, Shellie R, Tranchida P, Casilli A, Mondello L, Marriott P (2004) J Chromatogr A 1054:57–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rocha SM, Coelho E, Zrostlíková J, Delgadillo I, Coimbra MA (2007) J Chromatogr A 1161:292–299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Babushok VI, Zenkevich IG (2009) Chromatographia 69:257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lin XY (2007) Perfumery. Chemical Industry Press (CIP), Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  25. MDL Information Systems, Inc (2004) MDL Isis Draw 2.5. The successor named as Accelrys Draw 4.1. Available at http://accelrys.com/products/informatics/cheminformatics/draw

  26. Skrbic B, Onjia A (2006) J Chromatogr A 1108:279–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tian FF, Yang L, Lv FL, Zhou P (2009) Anal Chim Acta 644:10–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen HF (2008) Anal Chim Acta 609:24–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cao DS, Liang YZ, Xu QS, Li HD, Chen X (2010) J Comput Chem 31:592–602

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rousseeuw PJ (1985) In: Grossmann W, Pflug G, Vincze I (eds) Mathematical statistics and applications, vol B. Reidel, Dordrecht

  31. Rocke DM, Woodruff DL (1996) J Am Stat Assoc 91:1047–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rousseeuw PJ (1983) In: Grossman W, Pflug G, Vincze I, Wertz W (eds) Proceedings of the 4th pannonian symposiumon mathematics and statistics. Reidel Publishing Co, Dordrecht

  33. Rousseeuw PJ, Katrien VD (1999) Technometrics 41:212–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Egan WJ, Morgan SL (1998) Anal Chem 70:2372–2379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Huber PJ (1981) Robust statistics. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Walczak B, Massart DL (1995) Chemom Intell Lab Syst 27:41–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang MH, Xu QS, Massart DL (2003) Chemom Intell Lab Syst 67:175–185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Li HD, Xu QS, Liang YZ (2012) Anal Chim Acta 740:20–26

    Google Scholar 

  39. Li HD, Liang YZ, Xu QS, Cao DS (2009) J Chemometr 24:418–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Li HD, Liang YZ, Xu QS, Cao DS (2012) Model population analysis and its applications in chemical and biological modeling. TrAC. doi:10.1016/j.trac.2011.11.007

  41. Sung JC, Hermsmeier MA (2002) J Chem Inf Comput Sci 42:927–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sutter JM, Dixon SL, Jurs PC (1995) J Chem Inf Comput Sci 35:77–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2008) The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  44. Weaver S, Gleeson MP (2008) J Mol Graph Model 26:1315–1326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Tetko IV, Sushko I, Pandey AK, Zhu H, Tropsha A, Papa E, Oberg T, Todeschini R, Fourches D, Varnek A (2008) J Chem Inf Model 48:1733–1746

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Ellison CM, Sherhod R, Cronin MTD, Enoch SJ, Madden JC, Judson PN (2011) J Chem Inf Model 51:975–985

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Sushko I, Novotarskyi S, Körner R, Pandey AK, Cherkasov A, Li JZ, Gramatica P, Hansen K, Schroeter T, Müller KR, Xi L, Liu HX, Yao XJ, Öberg T, Hormozdiari F, Dao P, Sahinalp C, Todeschini R, Polishchuk P, Artemenko A, Kuz’min V, Martin TM, Young DM, Fourches D, Muratov E, Tropsha A, Baskin I, Horvath D, Marcou G, Muller C, Varnek A, Prokopenko VV, Tetko IV (2010) J Chem Inf Model 50:2094–2111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is financially supported by the National Nature Foundation Committee of PR China (grants no. 21275164 and 21075138), the Key Laboratory of Separation Sciences for Analytical Chemistry, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics of Chinese Academy of Sciences and the international cooperation project on traditional Chinese medicines of ministry of science and technology of China (grant no. 2007DFA40680). The studies meet with the approval of the university’s review board.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi-Zeng Liang.

Additional information

Published in the topical collection Chemometrics in Chromatography with guest editors B. Jančić-Stojanović and Y. Dotsikas.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, X., Li, HD., Guo, FQ. et al. QSRR Study on Flavor Compounds of Diverse Structures on Different Columns with the Help of New Chemometric Methods. Chromatographia 76, 241–253 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-012-2349-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-012-2349-7

Keywords

Navigation