Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of SPE-TD-GC-FID with UPLC-PDA and GC-MS Methods for Analysis of Benzene, Toluene and Xylene Isomers in Solid-Liquid Mixing Paints

  • Full Short Communication
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three methods were developed for analysis of benzene, toluene, p-xylene, m-xylene and o-xylene (BTX) in a solid-liquid mixing paint. These methods were based on solid phase extraction-thermal desorption-gas chromatography with a flame ionization detector (SPE-TD-GC-FID), ultra performance liquid chromatography-photodiode array detector (UPLC-PDA) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). At their optimum conditions of operation, the developed methods were compared in terms of recovery, sensitivity, selectivity and universality. Although the time required for GC-MS analysis was shorter than for GC-FID and UPLC-PDA, it offered relatively poorer recoveries and suffered from matrix interferences. All of the mentioned methods were proven to be ideal for the analysis of targeted analytes; SPE-TD-GC-FID was particularly fit for the determination of trace level BTX residues present in the complex matrix. As one of the sample pretreatment techniques, the novel SPE also showed some selectivity towards BTX and was found to be superior to the conventional SPE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Mangani F, Lattanzi L, Rezai MA, Cecchetti G (2000) Chromatographia 52:217–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Florez Menéndez JC, Fernández Sánchez ML, Sánchez Urıa JE, Fernández Martınez EF, Sanz-Medel A (2000) Anal Chim Acta 415:9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang S, Zhao TB, Xu X, Wang HW, Miao C (2010) Chromatographia 71:1131–1135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pandey SK, Kim KH (2007) J Chromatogr A 1216:5436–5444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim KH, Pal R (2010) Environ Monit Assess 161:295–299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Campos-Candel A, Llobat-Estellés M, Mauri-Aucejo A (2009) Talanta 78:1286–1292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Djozan D, Assadi Y (1997) Chromatographia 45:183–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mangani G, Berloni A, Maione M (2003) Chromatographia 58:115–117

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Prikryl P, Kubinec R, Jurdáková H, Sevcík J, Ostrovsky I, Sliák L, Berezkin V (2006) Chromatographia 64:65–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang ST, Wang Y, You H, Yao J (2006) Chromatographia 63:365–371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sarafraz-Yazdi A, Amiri AH, Es’haghi Z (2008) Chemosphere 71:671–676

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sarafraz-Yazdi A, Amiri AH, Es’haghi Z (2009) Talanta 78:936–941

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sieg K, Fries E, Püttmann W (2008) J Chromatogr A 1178:178–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Godoi AFL, Sawada EY, Marchi MRR, Grieken RV, Godoi RHM (2009) Water Air Soil Pollut Focus 9:163–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Waters Corporation (2004) Ultra performance LC by design. Waters Corporation USA, 720000880EN:LL. &LW-UL

  16. Wu T, Wang C, Wang X, Xiao HQ, Ma Q, Zhang Q (2008) Chromatographia 68:803–806

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Güvenc A, Satir E, Coskum M (2007) Chromatographia 68:S141–S145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li X, Xiong Z, Ying X, Cui L, Zhu W, Li F (2006) Anal Chem Acta 580:170–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Guan J, Lai CM, Li SP (2007) J Pharm Biomed Anal 44:996–1000

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Qin LX, Chao J, Wei Y, Yum L, Li YM, Gang CX (2008) Chromatographia 68:57–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rivasseau C, Caude M (1995) Chromatographia 41:462–470

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Magdic S, Pawliszyn J (1996) J Chromatogr A 723:111–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dettmer K, Engewald W (2002) Anal Bioanal Chem 373:490–500

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang KL, Lo JG (1997) Chromatographia 44:405–410

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sakodynskii K, Panina L, Klinskaya N (1974) Chromatographia 7:339–344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Agelopoulos NY, Pickett JA (1998) J Chemical Ecology 24:1161–1172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Briand O, Millet M, Bertrand F, Clément M, Seux R (2002) Anal Bioanal Chem 374:848–857

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhao DY, Pignatello JJ (2004) Environ Toxicol Chem 23:1592–1599

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu JF, Li N, Jiang GB, Liu JM, Jonsson JA, Wen MJ (2005) J Chromatogr A 1066:27–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Carrion CC, Lucena R, Cárdenas S, Valcárcel M (2007) J Chromatogr A 1171:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the China 111 project no. B07012 and the National Natural Science Funds no. 20973022 for supporting the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuai Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, S., Zhao, T., Wang, H. et al. Comparison of SPE-TD-GC-FID with UPLC-PDA and GC-MS Methods for Analysis of Benzene, Toluene and Xylene Isomers in Solid-Liquid Mixing Paints. Chromatographia 74, 163–169 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-011-2029-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-011-2029-z

Keywords

Navigation