Abstract
The recently introduced Kinetex C18 column packed with core-shell 2.6 μm particles is declared to provide similar efficiency and short analysis as Acquity BEH C18 column with 1.7 μm porous particles. Unlike Acquity BEH C18 column, Kinetex C18 column exhibited lower column backpressure making this column compatible to conventional LC systems. The performance of Kinetex C18 column (2.1 × 50 mm) and Acquity BEH C18 column (2.1 × 50 mm) for gradient separation of tetracyclines under acidic conditions (oxytetracycline, tetracycline, chlortetracycline, and doxycycline) and macrolides under alkaline conditions (tylosin, clarithromycin, roxithromycin, and carbomycin) was studied. The columns were compared by evaluation of their experimental peak capacity and its dependence on linear velocity and gradient slope. The maximal experimental peak capacities for analysis of tetracyclines were 51.8 (Acquity BEH C18 column) and 48.4 (Kinetex C18 column). This indicated that Kinetex C18 was a suitable alternative to Acquity BEH C18 column for the analysis of tetracyclines under acidic conditions. On the contrary, the maximal experimental peak capacities for analysis of macrolides on Acquity BEH C18 column was higher (46.7) than that on Kinetex C18 column (36.9). Moreover, application of Kinetex C18 column for the analysis of macrolides under alkaline conditions was limited with respect to its decreasing performance with growing number of injections on the column.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Stroh JG, Petucci CJ, Brecker SJ, Nogle LM (2008) J Sep Sci 31:3698–3703
Pragst F, Herzler M, Erxleben BT (2004) Clin Chem Lab Med 42:1325–1340
Vogeser M, Seger C (2008) Clin Biochem 41:649–662
Klein EJ, Rivera SL (2000) J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol 23:2097–2121
Mellors JS, Jorgenson J (2004) Anal Chem 76:5441–5450
Swartz ME (2005) J Liq Chrom 28:1253–1263
Cunliffe JM, Maloney TD (2007) J Sep Sci 30:3104–3109
Way WK, Brandes H (2008) LC GC North Am Suppl S:64–64
DeStefano JJ, Langlois TJ, Kirkland JJ (2008) J Chromatogr Sci 46:254–260
Koerner P, Mathews T (2010) LC GC North Am. Suppl. S:55–59
Abrahim A, Al-Sayah M, Skrdla P, Bereznitski Y, Chen Y, Wu N (2010) J Pharm Biomed Anal 51:131–137
Gritti F, Guiochon G (2010) J Chromatogr A 1217:1604–1615
Gritti F, Leonardis I, Shock D, Stevenson P, Shalliker A, Guiochon G (2010) J Chromatogr A 1217:1589–1603
Gritti F, Leonardis I, Abia J, Guiochon G (2010) J Chromatogr A 1217:3819–3843
Oláh E, Fekete S, Fekete J, Ganzler K (2010) J Chromatogr A 1217:3642–3653
Batt AL, Aga DS (2005) Anal Chem 77:2940–2947
Gomis DB, Nunez NS, Garcia EA, Abrodo PA, Alvarez MDG (2006) J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol 29:1861–1875
Snyder LR, Dolan JW (2007) High-performance gradient elution—the practical application of linear-solvent-strength model. Wiley, New Jersey, pp 15–18
Snyder L (1986) High performance liquid chromatography–advances and perspectives. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Snyder LR, Dolan JW, Gant JR (1979) J Chromatogr 165:3–30
Dolan JW, Gant JR, Snyder LR (1979) J Chromatogr 165:31–58
Olsovska J, Kamenik Z, Cajthaml T (2009) J Chromatogr A 1216:5774–5778
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Research Projects 1M06011 and MSM0021620857 of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport of the Czech Republic, Research Project SVV261204 and by Institutional Research Concept No. AV0Z50200510.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tylová, T., Kameník, Z., Flieger, M. et al. Comparison of LC Columns Packed with 2.6 μm Core-Shell and Sub-2 μm Porous Particles for Gradient Separation of Antibiotics. Chromatographia 74, 19–27 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-011-2021-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-011-2021-7