Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of LC Columns Packed with 2.6 μm Core-Shell and Sub-2 μm Porous Particles for Gradient Separation of Antibiotics

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recently introduced Kinetex C18 column packed with core-shell 2.6 μm particles is declared to provide similar efficiency and short analysis as Acquity BEH C18 column with 1.7 μm porous particles. Unlike Acquity BEH C18 column, Kinetex C18 column exhibited lower column backpressure making this column compatible to conventional LC systems. The performance of Kinetex C18 column (2.1 × 50 mm) and Acquity BEH C18 column (2.1 × 50 mm) for gradient separation of tetracyclines under acidic conditions (oxytetracycline, tetracycline, chlortetracycline, and doxycycline) and macrolides under alkaline conditions (tylosin, clarithromycin, roxithromycin, and carbomycin) was studied. The columns were compared by evaluation of their experimental peak capacity and its dependence on linear velocity and gradient slope. The maximal experimental peak capacities for analysis of tetracyclines were 51.8 (Acquity BEH C18 column) and 48.4 (Kinetex C18 column). This indicated that Kinetex C18 was a suitable alternative to Acquity BEH C18 column for the analysis of tetracyclines under acidic conditions. On the contrary, the maximal experimental peak capacities for analysis of macrolides on Acquity BEH C18 column was higher (46.7) than that on Kinetex C18 column (36.9). Moreover, application of Kinetex C18 column for the analysis of macrolides under alkaline conditions was limited with respect to its decreasing performance with growing number of injections on the column.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stroh JG, Petucci CJ, Brecker SJ, Nogle LM (2008) J Sep Sci 31:3698–3703

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pragst F, Herzler M, Erxleben BT (2004) Clin Chem Lab Med 42:1325–1340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Vogeser M, Seger C (2008) Clin Biochem 41:649–662

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Klein EJ, Rivera SL (2000) J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol 23:2097–2121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mellors JS, Jorgenson J (2004) Anal Chem 76:5441–5450

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Swartz ME (2005) J Liq Chrom 28:1253–1263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cunliffe JM, Maloney TD (2007) J Sep Sci 30:3104–3109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Way WK, Brandes H (2008) LC GC North Am Suppl S:64–64

  9. DeStefano JJ, Langlois TJ, Kirkland JJ (2008) J Chromatogr Sci 46:254–260

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Koerner P, Mathews T (2010) LC GC North Am. Suppl. S:55–59

  11. Abrahim A, Al-Sayah M, Skrdla P, Bereznitski Y, Chen Y, Wu N (2010) J Pharm Biomed Anal 51:131–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gritti F, Guiochon G (2010) J Chromatogr A 1217:1604–1615

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gritti F, Leonardis I, Shock D, Stevenson P, Shalliker A, Guiochon G (2010) J Chromatogr A 1217:1589–1603

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gritti F, Leonardis I, Abia J, Guiochon G (2010) J Chromatogr A 1217:3819–3843

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Oláh E, Fekete S, Fekete J, Ganzler K (2010) J Chromatogr A 1217:3642–3653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Batt AL, Aga DS (2005) Anal Chem 77:2940–2947

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gomis DB, Nunez NS, Garcia EA, Abrodo PA, Alvarez MDG (2006) J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol 29:1861–1875

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Snyder LR, Dolan JW (2007) High-performance gradient elution—the practical application of linear-solvent-strength model. Wiley, New Jersey, pp 15–18

  19. Snyder L (1986) High performance liquid chromatography–advances and perspectives. Elsevier, Amsterdam

  20. Snyder LR, Dolan JW, Gant JR (1979) J Chromatogr 165:3–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dolan JW, Gant JR, Snyder LR (1979) J Chromatogr 165:31–58

    Google Scholar 

  22. Olsovska J, Kamenik Z, Cajthaml T (2009) J Chromatogr A 1216:5774–5778

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Research Projects 1M06011 and MSM0021620857 of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport of the Czech Republic, Research Project SVV261204 and by Institutional Research Concept No. AV0Z50200510.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zdeněk Kameník.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tylová, T., Kameník, Z., Flieger, M. et al. Comparison of LC Columns Packed with 2.6 μm Core-Shell and Sub-2 μm Porous Particles for Gradient Separation of Antibiotics. Chromatographia 74, 19–27 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-011-2021-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-011-2021-7

Keywords

Navigation