Journal of Ornithology

, Volume 158, Issue 2, pp 351–361

Multilocus barcoding confirms the occurrence of Elegant Terns in Western Europe

  • Paul Dufour
  • Jean-Marc Pons
  • J. Martin Collinson
  • Julien Gernigon
  • J. Ignacio Dies
  • Patricia Sourrouille
  • Pierre-André Crochet
Original Article

Abstract

We used sequences from one mitochondrial gene and six nuclear loci to confirm genetically the presumed identity of four large terns with an orange bill seen in Western Europe over the past decades. This multilocus genotyping (multilocus barcoding) approach confirmed that one bird was a Lesser Crested Tern Sterna bengalensis, as suspected based on its phenotype, and identified the three other birds as pure Elegant Terns Sterna elegans. This last result was again in accordance with the appearance of these birds even if their identity had long been considered as unproven. In comparison with traditional (single-locus) barcoding, our approach allowed us to unambiguously exclude that these birds were first-generation hybrids or backcrosses involving Elegant Terns or other species of orange-billed terns.

Keywords

Genetic identification Nuclear DNA Hybridization Long-range vagrancy 

Zusammenfassung

Multi-locus DNS-Barcoding bestätigt das Vorkommen der Schmuckseeschwalbe (Sterna elegans) in Westeuropa Wir benutzten Sequenzen eines mitochondrialen Gens und von Intron-Regionen aus sechs Kernloci, um mit molekulargenetischen Methoden die bereits vermutete Identität von vier großen Seeschwalben mit orangenen Schnäbeln zu bestätigen, die in den vergangenen Jahrzehnten in Westeuropa gesehen worden waren. Mit diesem “multi-locus Barcoding”-Ansatz zur Bestimmung des Genotyps konnte bestätigt werden, dass einer der Vögel eine Rüppellseeschwalbe (Sterna bengalensis), die anderen drei eindeutig Schmuckseeschwalben (Sterna elegans) waren. Dieses Ergebnis entsprach dem Auftreten dieser Vögel, wenngleich ihre Identität lange als unbewiesen gegolten hatte. Im Vergleich zum sonst üblichen (single-locus) Barcoding erlaubte uns unser Ansatz, eindeutig auszuschließen zu können, dass die Vögel Hybriden in erster Generation waren oder Rückkreuzungen von Schmuckseeschwalben oder anderen Seeschwalben-Arten mit orangenen Schnäbeln.

Supplementary material

10336_2016_1380_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1032 kb)

References

  1. Boesman P (1992) Sierlijke Stern te Zeebruge in Juni-Juli 1988. Dutch Bird 14:161–169Google Scholar
  2. BOU (2014) British Ornithologists’ Union Records Committee: 42nd report (October 2013). Ibis 156:236–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradić M, Costa J, Chelo IM (2011) Genotyping with Sequenom. In: Orgogozo V, Rockman MV (eds) Molecular methods for evolutionary genetics. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 193–210Google Scholar
  4. Bridge ES, Jones AW, Baker AJ (2005) A phylogenetic framework for the Terns (Sternini) inferred from mtDNA sequences: implications for taxonomy and plumage evolution. Mol Phylogenet Evol 35:459–469CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Collins CT (1997) Hybridization of a Cabot’s and Elegant Tern in California. Western Birds 28:169–173Google Scholar
  6. Cuppen E (2007) Genotyping by allele-specific amplification (KASPar). Cold Spring Harbor Protoc 2007. doi:10.1101/pdb.prot4841 Google Scholar
  7. Dies JI (2001) Bare-part colours of juvenile hybrid Lesser Crested × Sandwich Tern. Br Birds 94:42Google Scholar
  8. Dies JI, Dies B (1998) Hybridization between Lesser Crested and Sandwich Terns in Valencia, Spain, and plumage of offspring. Br Birds 91:165–170Google Scholar
  9. Efe MA, Tavares ES, Baker AJ, Bonatto SL (2009) Multigene phylogeny and DNA barcoding indicate that the Sandwich Tern complex (Thalasseus sandvicensis, Laridae, Sternini) comprises two species. Mol Phylogenet Evol 52:263–267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gay L, Defos du Rau P, Mondain-Monval JY, Crochet PA (2004) Phylogeography of a game species: the Red-Crested Pochard (Netta rufina) and consequences for its management. Mol Ecol 13:1035–1045CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gutiérrez R (1998) Elegant Tern in Llobregat delta, Spain, in April 1993. Dutch Bird 20:1–5Google Scholar
  12. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270:313–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heslewood MM, Elphinstone MS, Tidemann SC, Baverstock PR (1998) Myoglobin intron variation in the Gouldian Finch Erythrura gouldiae assessed by temperature gradient gel electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 19:142–151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jackson DG, Emslie SD, van Tuinen M (2012) Genome skimming identifies polymorphism in Tern populations and species. BMC Res Notes 5:94CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Kimball RT, Braun EL, Barker FK, Bowie RCK, Braun MJ, Chojnowski JL, Hackett SJ, Han KL, Harshman J, Heimer-Torres V, Holznagel W, Huddleston CJ, Marks BD, Miglia KJ, Moore WS, Reddy S, Sheldon FH, Smith JV, Witti CC, Yuri T (2009) A well-tested set of primers to amplify regions spread across the avian genome. Mol Phylogenet Evol 50:654–660CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. McCarthy EM (2006) Handbook of avian hybrids of the world. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Milne P, McAdams DG (2005) Irish rare bird report. http://www.irbc.ie/reports/irbr/2005_IRBR.pdf. Accessed 4 Aug 2016
  18. Moralez-Silva E, Del Lama SN (2014) Colonization of Brazil by the Cattle Egret (Bubulcusibis) revealed by mitochondrial DNA. NeoBiota 21:49–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moritz C, Cicero C (2004) DNA barcoding: promise and pitfalls. PLoS Biol 2:1529–1531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Paul RT, Paul AF, Pranty B, Hodgson AB, Powell DJ (2003) Probable hybridization between Elegant Tern and Sandwich Tern in west-central Florida: the first North American nesting record of Elegant Tern away from the Pacific Coast. N Am Birds 57:280–282Google Scholar
  21. Saiki RK, Gelfand DH, StoffelS Scharf SJ, Higuchi R, Horn GT, Mullis KB, Erlich HA (1988) Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. Science 239:487–491CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Sangster G, Collinson JM, Crochet P-A, Knox AG, Parkin DT, SvenssonL Votier SC (2011) Taxonomic recommendations for British birds: seventh report. Ibis 153:883–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shannon TJ, McGowan RY, Zonfrillo B, Piertney S, Collinson M (2014) A genetic screen of the island races of Wren Troglodytes troglodytes in the North-east Atlantic. Bird Study 61:135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Slade RW, Moritz C, Heideman A, Hale PT (1993) Rapid assessment of single-copy nuclear DNA variation in diverse species. Mol Ecol 2:359–373CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Sorenson MD, Ast JC, Dimcheff DE, Yuri T, Mindell DP (1999) Primers for a PCR-based approach to mitocondrial genome sequencing in birds and other vertebrates. Mol Phylogenet Evol 12:105–114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30:2725–2729CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. van Duivendijk N (2010) Advanced bird ID guide: the Western Palearctic. New Holland, TurinGoogle Scholar
  28. Velarde E, Rojo P (2012) Presumed hybrid Elegant × Cabot’s Terns Thalasseus elegans × T. acuflavida in Isla Rasa, Gulf of California, Mexico. Mar Ornithol 40:25–29Google Scholar
  29. Whitworth TL, Dawson RD, Magalon H, Baudry E (2007) DNA barcoding cannot reliably identify species of the blowfly genus Protocalliphora (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 274:1731–1739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wright S (1940) Breeding structure of populations in relation to speciation. Am Nat 74:232–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Dufour
    • 1
  • Jean-Marc Pons
    • 2
    • 3
  • J. Martin Collinson
    • 4
  • Julien Gernigon
    • 5
  • J. Ignacio Dies
    • 6
  • Patricia Sourrouille
    • 1
  • Pierre-André Crochet
    • 1
  1. 1.CEFE UMR 5175, CNRS - Université de Montpellier - Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier - EPHEMontpellier Cedex 5France
  2. 2.Département Systématique et Evolution, Muséum National d’Histoire NaturelleUMR 7205 Institut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité, CNRS, MNHN, UPMC, EPHE, Sorbonne UniversitésParis Cedex 05France
  3. 3.UMS MNHN/CNRS 2700 Outils et Méthodes de la Systématique Intégrative (OMSI), Muséum National d’Histoire NaturelleParis Cedex 05France
  4. 4.School of Medical Sciences, Institute of Medical SciencesUniversity of AberdeenAberdeenUK
  5. 5.Les Portes-en-RéFrance
  6. 6.Servicio Devesa-AlbuferaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations