Journal of Ornithology

, Volume 157, Issue 3, pp 853–860 | Cite as

Seasonal and daily patterns of nocturnal singing in the Field Sparrow (Spizella pusilla)

  • Antonio Celis-Murillo
  • Kirk W. Stodola
  • Brian Pappadopoli
  • Jessica M. Burton
  • Michael P. Ward
Original Article

Abstract

Nocturnal singing in diurnal birds is poorly described in the literature and is not well understood. Most research has been limited to the documentation of the behavior, with little information regarding the patterns and function of nocturnal song. We used autonomous acoustic recording units and automated detection and classification algorithms to examine the seasonal and nocturnal patterns of song in the Field Sparrow, Spizella pusilla, a diurnal songbird. We used a generalized linear mixed model to investigate the patterns in the probability of recording each of the two song types described for the species (simple and complex) at night from 7938 10-min recordings from 14 different individuals singing in six different grassland patches. We fit different models investigating the influence of date within the season and time period during the night, and compared models using the Bayesian information criterion. Male Field Sparrows sang both simple and complex songs during the early stages of territory settlement and mate acquisition. However, as the breeding season progressed, we detected fewer instances of simple song, while the occurrence of complex song increased, reaching its peak during the height of reproductive activity. The seasonal pattern of simple and complex songs suggests that they may have a similar function at night and during the day, with simple songs used for inter-sexual interactions and complex songs used for intrasexual functions. Consequently, the role and function of nocturnal song may be more important for reproductive activities than previously assumed.

Keywords

Birdsong Nocturnal vocalizations Nocturnal singing Acoustic recording Automatic recognition Field Sparrow 

Zusammenfassung

Saisonale und tägliche Muster des nächtlichen Gesangs bei Klapperammern ( Spizella pusilla )

Der nächtliche Gesang tagaktiver Vögel ist unzureichend beschrieben und wenig untersucht. Der Großteil der Forschung beschränkte sich auf die Dokumentation dieses Verhaltens mit wenig Informationen zu Mustern und Funktion des nächtlichen Gesangs. Wir nutzen autonome akustische Aufnahmeeinheiten und automatisierte Erfassungs- und Klassifikationsalgorithmen zur Untersuchung der saisonalen und nächtlichen Muster des Gesangs von Klapperammern, Spizella pusilla, einer tagaktiven Singvogelart. In 7938 nächtlichen 10-Minuten-Aufnahmen von 14 verschiedenen singenden Individuen in sechs unterschiedlichen Grünlandflächen analysierten wir die Muster der Aufnahmewahrscheinlichkeit für jeden der beiden Gesangstypen, die für die Art (einfach und komplex) beschrieben sind, mit Hilfe eines generalisierten linearen gemischten Modells. Wir passten verschiedene Modelle an, um den Einfluss des Datums innerhalb der Saison und der zeitlichen Periode während der Nacht zu ermitteln und verglichen die Modelle mit Hilfe des Bayesischen Informationskriteriums. Männliche Klapperammern singen sowohl einfache als auch komplexe Strophen während der frühen Phasen der Revierbesetzung und Partnerwahl. Allerdings stellten wir mit fortschreitender Brutsaison weniger Fälle von einfachem Gesang fest, während das Auftreten von komplexen Gesängen anstieg und seinen Höhepunkt erreichte, als die reproduktive Aktivität am größten war. Das saisonale Muster von einfachen und komplexen Gesängen lässt ähnliche Funktionen während der Nacht und des Tages vermuten, wo einfache Gesänge für intersexuelle Interaktionen und komplexe Gesänge für intrasexuelle Funktionen eingesetzt werden. Folglich könnte die Rolle und Funktion des nächtlichen Gesangs weitaus wichtiger sein für die Reproduktion, als bisher angenommen.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the assistants and undergraduate students for their help in the field and laboratory. We also thank the Vermilion County Conservation District for permission to conduct research at Kennekuk Cove County Park.

Funding

This research is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF-DDIG-14070801), the Illinois Department of Natural Resources (DNR), and the Illinois Ornithological Society (IOS).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This research was conducted under the University of Illinois Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, IACUC protocol #10127, and a USGS bird banding permit (23577).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

10336_2015_1318_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (10 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 9 kb)

References

  1. Aho K, Derreberry D, Peterson T (2014) Model selection for ecologists: the worldviews of AIC and BIC. Ecology 95:631–636CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Åkesson S, Walinder G, Karlsson L, Ehnbom S (2001) Reed warbler orientation: initiation of nocturnal migratory flight in relation to visibility of celestial cues at dusk. Anim Behav 61:181–189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Alessi MG, Benson TJ, Ward MP (2010) Nocturnal social cues attract migrating Yellow-breasted Chats. Wilson J Ornithol 122:780–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amrhein V, Korner P, Naguib M (2002) Nocturnal and diurnal singing activity in the Nightingale: correlations with mating status and breeding cycle. Anim Behav 64:939–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amrhein VP, Kunc HP, Naguib M (2003) Non-territorial nightingales prospect territories during the dawn chorus. Proc R Soc B 271:S167–S169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Amrhein VP, Kunc HP, Naguib M (2004) Seasonal patterns of singing activity vary with time of day in the Nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos). Auk 121:110–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arcese P (1987) Age, intrusion pressure and defense against floaters by territorial-male song sparrows. Anim Behav 35:773–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barclay RMR, Leonard MA, Friesen G (1985) Nocturnal singing by March Wrens. Condor 87:418–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Best LB (1977) Nestling biology of the Field Sparrow. Auk 94:308–319Google Scholar
  10. Best LB (1978) Field Sparrow reproductive success and nesting ecology. Auk 95:9–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Betts MG, Hadley AS, Rodenhouse N, Nocera JJ (2008) Social information trumps vegetation structure in breeding-site selection by a migrant songbird. Proc R Soc B 275:2257–2263CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Carey M, Burhans DE, Nelson DA (2008) Field Sparrow (Spizella pusilla). In: Poole A, Gill F (ed) The birds of North America No 103 American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  13. Carter GM, Legare ML, Breininger DR, Oddy DM (2007) Nocturnal nest predation: a potential obstacle to recovery of a Florida scrub-jay population. J Field Ornithol 78:390–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Catchpole CK, Slater PJB (1995) Bird song. University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Celis-Murillo A, Deppe JL, Allen M (2009) Using soundscape recordings to estimate bird species abundance, richness, and composition. J Field Ornithol 80:64–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fuller RA, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2007) Daytime noise predicts nocturnal singing in urban robins. Biol Lett 3:368–370CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Gerard PD, Smith DR, Weerakkody G (1998) Limits of retrospective power analysis. J Wildl Manag 62:801–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Koublec B, Capek M Jr (2000) Diurnal, nocturnal, and seasonal patterns of singing activity in Marsh Warblers. Biol Bratisl 55:185–193Google Scholar
  19. Koublec B, Capek M Jr (2005) Seasonal and diel budgets of song: a study of Savi’s warbler (Locustella luscinioides). J Ornithol 146:206–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kroodsma DE, Byers BE (1991) The function(s) of bird song. Am Zool 31:318–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kunc HP, Amrhein V, Naguib M (2005) Acoustic features of song categories of the nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos) and its implications for communication. Behaviour 142:1083–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. La VT (2012) Diurnal and nocturnal birds vocalize at night: a review. Condor 114:245–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lougheed SC, Handford P (1989) Night songs in the Rufous-collared Sparrow. Condor 91:462–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller MW (2006) Apparent effects of light pollution on singing behavior of American Robins. Condor 108:130–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Møller AP (1991) Why mated songs sing so much: mate guarding and male announcement of mate fertility status. Am Nat 138:994–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mukhin A (1999) Nocturnal restlessness in caged juvenile reed warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus. Avian Ecol Behav 3:91–97Google Scholar
  27. Mukhin A (2004) Night movements of young reed warblers (Acrocephalus scirpaceus) in summer: Is it post-fledging dispersal? Auk 121:203–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mukhin A, Kosarev V, Ktitorov P (2005) Nocturnal life of young songbirds long before migration. Proc R Soc B 272:1535–1539CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Naguib M (1999) Effects of song overlapping and alternating on nocturnally singing nightingales. Anim Behav 58:1061–1067CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Naguib M, Altenkamp R, Griebmann B (2001) Nightingales in space: song and extra-territorial forays of radio tagged songbirds. J Ornithol 142:306–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Naguib M, Mundry R, Hultsch H, Todt D (2002) Responses to playback of whistle songs and normal songs in male nightingales: effects of song category, whistle pitch, and distance. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:216–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Naguib M, Kunc HP, Sprau P, Roth T, Amrhein V (2011) Communication networks and spatial ecology in Nightingales. Adv Stud Behav 43:239–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nelson DA (1988) Feature weighting in species song recognition by Field Sparrows (Spizella pusilla). Behaviour 106:158–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nelson DA (1989) Song frequency as a cue for recognition of species and individuals in the field sparrow (Spizella pusilla). J Comp Psychol 103:171–176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Nelson DA, Croner LJ (1991) Song categories and their functions in the field sparrow (Spizella pusilla). Auk 108:42–52Google Scholar
  36. Otter K, Chruszcz B, Ratcliffe L (1997) Honest advertisement and song output during the dawn chorus of black-capped chickadees. Behav Ecol 8:167–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Perrault K, Lobert LM, Ehnes M, Foote JR (2014) Nocturnal singing in a temperate bird community. J Ornithol 155(4):1059–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Petter SC, Miles DB, White MM (1990) Genetic evidence of mixed reproductive strategy in a monogamous bird. Condor 92:702–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria ISBN: 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org
  40. Roth T, Sprau P, Schmidt R, Naguib M, Amrhein V (2009) Sex-specific timing of mate searching and territory prospecting in the nightingale: nocturnal life of females. Proc R Soc B 276:2045–2050CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Schwarz GE (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6(2):461–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Slay CM, Ellison KS, Ribic CA, Smith KG, Schmitz CM (2012) Nocturnal activity of nesting shrubland and grassland passerines. Stud Avian Biol 43:105–116Google Scholar
  43. Southern LK, Patton SR, Southern WE (1982) Nocturnal predation on Larus gulls. Colon Waterbirds 5:169–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sprau P, Roth T, Amrhrein V, Naguib M (2014) Effects of previous intrusion pressure on territorial responses in nightingales. J Ornithol 155:111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thomas RJ, Drewitt EJA, Kelly DJ, Marples NM, Semple S (2003) Nocturnal playbacks reveal hidden differences in singing behavior between populations of Robin Erithacus rubecula. Bird Study 50:84–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tyler GA, Green RE (1996) The incidence of nocturnal song by male Corncrakes Crex crex is reduced during pairing. Bird Study 43:214–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Walk JW, Kershner EL, Wagner RE (2000) Nocturnal singing in grassland birds. Wilson Bull 112(2):289–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ward MP, Alessi M, Benson TJ, Chiavacci SJ (2014) The active nightlife of diurnal birds: extraterritorial forays and nocturnal activity patterns. Anim Behav 88:175–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. York JE, Young AJ, Radford AN (2014) Singing in the moonlight: dawn song performance of a diurnal bird varies with lunar phase. Biol Lett 10:20130970CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Yorzinski YL, Platt ML (2012) The difference between night and day: antipredator behavior in birds. J Ethol 30:211–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zeger SL, Liang KY, Albert PS (1988) Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics 44:1049–1060CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhang VY, Celis-Murillo A, Ward MP (2015) Conveying information with one song type: changes in dawn song performance correspond to different female breeding stages. Bioacoustics. doi: 10.1080/09524622.2015.1076348 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Natural Resources and Environmental SciencesUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations