Advertisement

Journal of Ornithology

, Volume 156, Supplement 1, pp 115–124 | Cite as

Eco-evolutionary dynamics: investigating multiple causal pathways linking changes in behavior, population density and natural selection

  • Renée A. DuckworthEmail author
  • Stepfanie M. Aguillon
Review

Abstract

Correlations between population density, natural selection and phenotypic change are widespread and may comprise an eco-evolutionary feedback loop, yet we still know very little about the causes of connections between them. Isolating the mechanistic links in eco-evolutionary feedback loops, both in terms of identifying sources of variation in traits and in terms of determining how and why natural selection varies with population density, can provide key insight into avian population dynamics. Here, we summarize more than a decade of findings in western bluebirds (Sialia mexicana) to illustrate the multiple and potentially interacting mechanisms that can cause simultaneous changes in traits and population density. In previous work, we discovered correlated changes in aggression, population density and natural selection during the process of colonization. Here we provide evidence that density-dependent selection, maternal effects and demographic consequences of selection on aggression may all play a role in driving feedback between phenotypic change and population density. Thus, this system provides an example of the multiple mechanistic links that can produce such feedback loops and emphasizes the importance of investigating alternative hypotheses for correlated patterns of ecological and phenotypic change even when there is strong evidence that natural selection is acting on a trait. Ultimately, identifying these mechanisms is crucial, as eco-evolutionary feedback have the potential to explain avian population cycles, range dynamics, population persistence, and even patterns of species coexistence.

Keywords

Phenotype-dependent dispersal Maternal effects Rapid evolution Sialia Passerine bird 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Niels Dingemanse and Pim Edelaar for inviting us to participate in their symposium and an anonymous reviewer for comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. Members of Mountain Bluebird Trails and residents of the Hayes Creek neighborhood kindly allowed us to monitor nests on their properties. This work was supported by grants from the US National Science Foundation (DEB-0918095 and DEB-1350107 to RAD) and the US National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program (DGE 1143953 to SMA).

References

  1. Adams ES (2001) Approaches to the study of territory size and shape. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:277–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal AA, Johnson MTJ, Hastings AP, Maron JL (2013) A field experiment demonstrating plant life-history evolution and its eco-evolutionary feedback to seed predator populations. Am Nat 181:S35–S45. doi: 10.1086/666727 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aguillon SM, Duckworth RA (2015) Kin aggression and resource availability influence phenotype-dependent dispersal in a passerine bird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:625–633. doi: 10.1007/s00265-015-1873-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Badyaev AV (2011) Origin of the fittest: link between emergent variation and evolutionary change as a critical question in evolutionary biology. Proc R Soc Biol Sci 278:1921–1929. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0548 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brawn JD, Balda RP (1988) Population biology of cavity nesters in northern Arizona: do nest sites limit breeding densities? Condor 90:61–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chitty D (1967) The natural selection of self-regulatory behavior in animal populations. Proc Ecol Soc Aust 2:51–78Google Scholar
  7. Donohue K (2005) Niche construction through phenological plasticity: life history dynamics and ecological consequences. New Phytol 166:83–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01357.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duckworth RA (2006a) Aggressive behavior affects selection on morphology by influencing settlement patterns in a passerine bird. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:1789–1795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duckworth RA (2006b) Behavioral correlations across breeding contexts provide a mechanism for a cost of aggression. Behav Ecol 17:1011–1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duckworth RA (2008) Adaptive dispersal strategies and the dynamics of a range expansion. Am Nat 172:S4–S17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duckworth RA (2009a) Maternal effects and range expansion: a key factor in a dynamic process? Philos Trans R Soc B 364:1075–1086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duckworth RA (2009b) The role of behavior in evolution: a search for mechanism. Evol Ecol 23:513–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duckworth RA (2012) Evolution of genetically integrated dispersal strategies. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duckworth RA (2014) Human-induced changes in the dynamics of species coexistence: an example with two sister species. In: Gil D, Brumm H (eds) Avian urban ecology: behavioural and physiological adaptations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 181–191Google Scholar
  15. Duckworth RA, Badyaev AV (2007) Coupling of aggression and dispersal facilitates the rapid range expansion of a passerine bird. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:15017–15022PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duckworth RA, Kruuk LEB (2009) Evolution of genetic integration between dispersal and colonization ability in a bird. Evolution 63:968–977Google Scholar
  17. Duckworth RA, Sockman KW (2012) Proximate mechanisms of behavioural inflexibility: implications for the evolution of personality traits. Funct Ecol 26:559–566. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.01966.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Duckworth RA, Belloni V, Anderson SR (2015) Cycles of species replacement emerge from locally induced maternal effects on offspring behavior in a passerine bird. Science 374:875–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dunlop ES, Heino M, Dieckmann U (2009) Eco-genetic modeling of contemporary life-history evolution. Ecol Appl 19:1815–1834. doi: 10.1890/08-1404.1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ellner SP, Geber MA, Hairston NG (2011) Does rapid evolution matter? Measuring the rate of contemporary evolution and its impacts on ecological dynamics. Ecol Lett 14:603–614. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01616.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ezard TH, Cote SD, Pelletier F (2009) Eco-evolutionary dynamics: disentangling phenotypic, environmental and population fluctuations. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 364:1491–1498. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fussmann GF, Loreau M, Abrams PA (2007) Eco-evolutionary dynamics of communities and ecosystems. Funct Ecol 21:465–477. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01275.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ginzburg L (1998) Inertial growth: population dynamics based on maternal effects. In: Mousseau TA, Fox CW (eds) Maternal effects as adaptations. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Ginzburg L, Colyvan M (2004) Ecological orbits: how planets move and populations grow. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Gomulkiewicz R, Kirkpatrick M (1992) Quantitative genetics and the evolution of reaction norms. Evolution 46:390–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guinan JA, Gowaty PA, Eltzroth EK (2000) Western bluebird (Sialia mexicana). Birds N Am 510:1–31Google Scholar
  27. Gustafsson L (1986) Inter- and intraspecific competition for nest holes in a population of the Collared Flycatcher Ficedula albicollis. Ibis 130:11–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hadfield JD, Wilson AJ, Garant D, Sheldon BC, Kruuk LE (2010) The misuse of BLUP in ecology and evolution. Am Nat 175:116–125. doi: 10.1086/648604 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hairston NG Jr, Ellner SP, Geber MA, Yoshida T, Fox JA (2005) Rapid evolution and the convergence of ecological and evolutionary time. Ecol Lett 8:1114–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hanski I (2012) Eco-evolutionary dynamics in a changing world. Ann NY Acad Sci 1249:1–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06419.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hanski I, Mononen T (2011) Eco-evolutionary dynamics of dispersal in spatially heterogeneous environments. Ecol Lett 14:1025–1034PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hawkes C (2009) Linking movement behaviour, dispersal and population processes: is individual variation a key? J Anim Ecol 78:894–906. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01534.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Horvitz CC, Coulson T, Tuljapurkar S, Schemske DW (2010) A new way to integrate selection when both demography and selection gradients vary over time. Int J Plant Sci 171:945–959. doi: 10.1086/657141 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hutto RL (1995) Composition of bird communities following stand-replacement fires in northern rocky mountain (U.S.A.) conifer forests. Conserv Biol 9:1041–1058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kawecki TJ, Stearns SC (1993) The evolution of life histories in spatially heterogeneous environments––optimal reaction norms revisited. Evol Ecol 7:155–174. doi: 10.1007/bf01239386 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kokko H, Lopez-Sepulcre A (2007) The ecogenetic link between demography and evolution: can we bridge the gap between theory and data? Ecol Lett 10:773–782. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01086.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kotliar NB, Kennedy PL, Ferree K (2007) Avifaunal responses to fire in southwestern montane forests along a burn severity gradient. Ecol Appl 17:491–507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kruuk LEB (2004) Estimating genetic parameters in natural populations using the ‘animal model’. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 359:873–890. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1437 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Luo SS, Koelle K (2013) Navigating the devious course of evolution: the importance of mechanistic models for identifying eco-evolutionary dynamics in nature. Am Nat 181:S58–S75. doi: 10.1086/669952 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McNamara JM (1998) Phenotypic plasticity in fluctuating environments: consequences of the lack of individual optimization. Behav Ecol 9:642–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Miner BG, Sultan SE, Morgan SG, Padilla DK, Relyea RA (2005) Ecological consequences of phenotypic plasticity. Trends Ecol Evol 20:685–692. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.08.002 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moss R, Parr R, Lambin X (1994) Effects of testosterone on breeding density, breeding success and survival of red grouse. Proc R Soc Lond B 258:175–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mougeot F, Redpath SM, Leckie F, Hudson PJ (2003) The effect of aggressiveness on the population dynamics of a territorial bird. Nature 421:737–739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mueller LD (1988) Density-dependent population growth and natural selection in food-limited environments: the Drosophila model. Am Nat 132:786–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Newton I (1994) The role of nest sites in limiting the numbers of hole-nesting birds––a review. Biol Conserv 70:265–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pelletier F, Clutton-Brock T, Pemberton J, Tuljapurkar S, Coulson T (2007) The evolutionary demography of ecological change: linking trait variation and population growth. Science 315:1571–1574. doi: 10.1126/science.1139024 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pelletier F, Garant D, Hendry AP (2009) Eco-evolutionary dynamics. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 364:1483–1489. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Piersma T, Drent J (2003) Phenotypic flexibility and the evolution of organismal design. Trends Ecol Evol 18:228–233. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(03)00036-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Power HW, Lombardo MP (1996) Mountain Bluebird. In: Poole A, Gill F (eds) The birds of North America, vol 222., Birds of North America IncPhiladelphia, PA, pp 1–21Google Scholar
  50. Reznick DN (2013) A critical look at reciprocity in ecology and evolution: introduction to the symposium. Am Nat 181:S1–S8. doi: 10.1086/670030 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Reznick DN, Ghalambor CK (2001) The population ecology of contemporary adaptations: what empirical studies reveal about the conditions that promote adaptive evolution. Genetica 112–113:183–198. doi: 10.1023/A:1013352109042 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reznick DN, Rodd H, Nunney L (2004) Empirical evidence for rapid evolution. In: Ferrière R, Dieckman U, Couvet D (eds) Evolutionary conservation biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 101–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rossiter MC (1991) Environmentally-based maternal effects: a hidden force in insect population dynamics? Oecologia 87:288–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Saab VA, Russell RE, Dudley JG (2007) Nest densities of cavity-nesting birds in relation to postfire salvage logging and time since wildfire. Condor 109:97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schieck J, Song SJ (2006) Changes in bird communities throughout succession following fire and harvest in boreal forests of western North America: literature review and meta-analysis. Can J For Res 36:1299–1318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schoener TW (2011) The newest synthesis: understanding the interplay of evolutionary and ecological dynamics. Science 331:426–429. doi: 10.1126/science.1193954 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Slatkin M (1979) The evolutionary response to frequency- and density-dependent interactions. Am Nat 114:384–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sokolowski MB, Pereira HS, Hughes K (1997) Evolution of foraging behavior in Drosophila by density-dependent selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:7373–7377PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sultan SE, Spencer HG (2002) Metapopulation structure favors plasticity over local adaptation. Am Nat 160:271–283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Svendsen GE (1974) Behavioral and environmental factors in the spatial distribution and population dynamics of a yellow-bellied marmot population. Ecology 55:760–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thomas CD, Bodsworth EJ, Wilson RJ, Simmons AD, Davies ZG, Musche M, Conradt L (2001) Ecological and evolutionary processes at expanding range margins. Nature 411:577–581PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Townsend SE, Newey S, Thirgood SJ, Haydon DT (2011) Dissecting the drivers of population cycles: interactions between parasites and mountain hare demography. Ecol Model 222:48–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.08.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Turcotte MM, Reznick DN, Hare JD (2011a) Experimental assessment of the impact of rapid evolution on population dynamics. Evol Ecol Res 13:113–131Google Scholar
  64. Turcotte MM, Reznick DN, Hare JD (2011b) The impact of rapid evolution on population dynamics in the wild: experimental test of eco-evolutionary dynamics. Ecol Lett 14:1084–1092. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01676.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vasseur DA, Amarasekare P, Rudolf VH, Levine JM (2011) Eco-evolutionary dynamics enable coexistence via neighbor-dependent selection. Am Nat 178:E96–E109. doi: 10.1086/662161 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Watson A, Moss R, Parr R, Mountford MD, Rothery P (1994) Kin landownership, differential aggression between kin and non-kin, and population fluctuations in red grouse. J Anim Ecol 63:39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Weese DJ, Schwartz AK, Bentzen P, Hendry AP, Kinnison MT (2011) Eco-evolutionary effects on population recovery following catastrophic disturbance. Evol Appl 4:354–366. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00169.x PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Werner EE (1992) Individual behavior and higher-order species interactions. Am Nat 140:S5–S32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. West-Eberhard M (2003) Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Corson HallCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations