Skip to main content
Log in

Stealing food from conspecifics: spatial behavior of kleptoparasitic Common Terns Sterna hirundo within the colony site

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ornithology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Amongst seabirds, kleptoparasitism is one of the most common types of exploitation in which individuals compete for food already procured by another forager. Here, we analyzed the within-colony spatial movements and foraging of transponder-marked Common Terns (Sterna hirundo) during the chick-rearing period in relation to the terns’ trophic strategy (kleptoparasitic vs. honest). Attendance patterns (time spent at the colony site per day, number and locations of resting platforms used) were compared between kleptoparasitic (N = 11) and honest individuals (N = 26). A total of 725 kleptoparasitic attacks were recorded during the chick-rearing period at the colony site. We found sex differences in the tactic used for stealing food and the area chosen for attacks: females attacked in the vicinity of their nest, while males attacked further away. Significant differences were found between both groups in the spatial pattern: kleptoparasites (particularly males) used more resting platforms and moved more widely across the colony site than honest individuals, and parasitic females were present in the colony longer during the day than honest ones. Our results show a differential use of the colony site dependent on the foraging strategy. Parasitic birds used the colony site as a foraging patch, monitoring the colony and looking for kleptoparasitic feeding opportunities without compromising their parental roles. In contrast, honest individuals spent much time outside the colony foraging for their chicks.

Zusammenfassung

Futter stehlen bei Artgenossen: Räumliches Verhalten von kleptoparasitischen Flussseeschwalben Sterna hirundo innerhalb der Kolonie

Kleptoparasitismus ist bei Seevögeln eine wichtige Strategie zur Nahrungsbeschaffung, wobei Individuen um Nahrung konkurrieren, die ein anderer Vogel bereits erbeutet hat. In dieser Studie haben wir das räumliche Verhalten von transponder-markierten Flussseeschwalben (Sterna hirundo) in der Kolonie während der Küken-Aufzuchtsphase untersucht. Zusätzlich wurden Fütterungsbeobachtungen in Relation zur Strategie der Individuen (kleptoparasitisch vs. nicht-kleptoparasitisch) durchgeführt. Die Anwesenheitsmuster (verbrachte Zeit pro Tag in der Kolonie, Anzahl der aufgesuchten Rastplätze) zwischen kleptoparasitischen (N = 11) und nicht-kleptoparasitischen (N = 26) Individuen wurden verglichen. Insgesamt konnten 725 kleptoparasitische Attacken während der Aufzuchtsphase in der Kolonie registriert werden. Bei den Kleptoparasiten haben wir geschlechtsabhängige Unterschiede sowohl bei der angewandten Taktik als auch dem Gebiet, indem die Attacken stattfanden, beobachtet: Während die Weibchen den Artgenossen die Beute vorwiegend in der Nähe ihres eigenen Nestes streitig machten, nutzen Männchen auch weiter weg gelegene Gebiete der Kolonie. Außerdem wurden auch Differenzen im räumlichen Verhalten der beiden Gruppen gefunden: Kleptoparasitische Männchen nutzen mehr Rastplätze und bewegten sich weiter durch die Kolonie als nicht-kleptoparasitische Männchen. Auf der anderen Seite hielten sich die kleptoparasitischen Weibchen pro Tag länger in der Kolonie auf als die nicht-kleptoparasitischen. Unsere Ergebnisse zeigen deutlich eine unterschiedliche Nutzung der Kolonie abhängig von der Strategie bei der Nahrungssuche. Kleptoparasitische Individuen nutzen die Kolonie selbst als Jagdgebiet und warteten bis sich eine Gelegenheit zum Futter stehlen ergab, ohne dabei die elterliche Fürsorge ihrer Jungen zu beeinträchtigen. Im Gegensatz dazu müssen die ehrlich jagenden Flussseschwalben viel Zeit außerhalb der Kolonie zur Nahrungssuche aufwenden, um den Nachwuchs aufzuziehen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker PH, Wink M (2003) Influences of sex, sex composition of brood and hatching order on mass growth in Common Terns Sterna hirundo. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:136–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belisle M (1998) Foraging group size: models and a test with jaegers kleptoparasitizing terns. Ecology 79:1922–1938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benttinen J, Preisser EL (2009) Avian kleptoparasitism of the digger wasp Sphex pensylvanicus. Canadian Entomol 141:604–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockmann HJ, Barnard CJ (1979) Kleptoparasitism in birds. Anim Behav 27:487–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabot D, Nisbet I (2013) Tern. Harper Collins, London

  • Carbone C, Rowcliffe JM, Frame L, Frame G, Malcolm J, Fanshawe J, FitzGibbon C, Schaller G, Gordon IJ, Du Toit JT (2005) Feeding success of African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) in the Serengeti: the effects of group size and kleptoparasitism. J Zool 266:153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WE, Pérez-Mellado V (2003) Kleptoparasitism in the Balearic lizard, Podarcis lilfordi. Amphibia-Reptilia 24:219–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dies J, Dies B (2005) Kleptoparasitism and host responses in a Sandwich Tern colony of eastern Spain. Waterbirds 28:167–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dittmann T, Ezard T, Becker PH (2007) Prospectors’ colony attendance is sex-specific and increases future recruitment chances in a seabird. Behav Process 76:198–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs E (1977) Kleptoparasitism of Sandwich Terns Sterna sandvicensis by Black-headed Gulls Larus ridibundus. Ibis 119:183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furness RW (1987) Kleptoparasitism in seabirds. In: Croxal JP (ed) Seabirds, feeding biology and role in marine ecosystem. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 77–99

    Google Scholar 

  • García GO, Favero M, Vassallo AI (2010) Factors affecting kleptoparasitism by gulls in a multi-species seabird colony. Condor 112:521–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García GO, Becker PH, Favero M (2011) Kleptoparasitism during courtship in Sterna hirundo and its relationship with female reproductive performance. J Ornithol 152:103–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García GO, Favero M, Becker PH (2013) Intraspecific kleptoparasitism improves chick growth and reproductive output in Common Terns Sterna hirundo. Ibis 155:338–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giraldeau LA, Caraco T (2000) Social foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton

  • González-Solís J, Becker PH, Wendeln H (1999) Divorce and asynchronous arrival in Common Terns, Sterna hirundo. Anim Behav 58:1123–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Solís J, Sokolov E, Becker PH (2001) Courtship feedings, copulations and paternity in Common Terns Sterna hirundo. Anim Behav 61:1125–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton IM, Dill LM (2003) The use of territorial gardening versus kleptoparasitism by a subtropical reef fish (kyphosus cornelii) is influenced by territory defendability. Behav Ecol 14:561–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar EV (2004) Host-specific performance and host use in the kleptoparasitic marine snail Trichotropis cancellata. Oecologia 138:628–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr AM (2005) Behavior of web-invading spiders Argyrodes argentatus (Theridiidae) in Argiope appensa (Araneidae) host webs in Guam. J Arachnol 33:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig SC, Becker PH (2006) Waiting for the mate? Spatial behaviour of common terns, Sterna hirundo, during courtship. Anim Behav 72:1093–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwigs JD (1998) Kleptoparasitismus bei der Flußseeschwalbe Sterna hirundo als Anzeiger für. Nahrungsmangel. Vogelwelt 119:193–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Oro D (1996) Interspecific kleptoparasitism in Audouin’s Gull Lams audouinii at the Ebro Delta, northeast Spain: a behavioural response to low food availability. Ibis 138:218–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org

  • Rothschild M, Clay T (1952) Fleas, flukes and cuckoos: a study of bird ectoparasites. Collins Son and Co., London

  • Shealer DA, Spendelow JA, Hatfield JS, Nisbet ICT (2005) The adaptive significance of stealing in a marine bird and its relationship to parental quality. Behav Ecol 16:371–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stienen EWM, Brenninkmeijer A, Geschiere KE (2001) Living with gulls: the consequences for Sandwich Terns of breeding in association with Black-headed Gulls. Waterbirds 24:68–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudmann SR (1998) Wie dicht können Flußseeschwalben Sterna hirundo brüten? Extremsituationen auf Brutflößen. Vogelwelt 119:181–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Triplet P, Stillman RA, Goss-Custard JD (1999) Prey abundance and the strength of interference in a foraging shorebird. J Anim Ecol 68:254–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendeln H (1997) Body mass of female Common Terns (Sterna hirundo) during courtship: relationship to male quality, egg mass, diet, laying date and age. Waterbirds 20:235–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendeln H, Becker PH (1996) Body mass change in breeding Common Terns Sterna hirundo. Bird Study 43:85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendeln H, Nagel R, Becker PH (1996) A technique to spray dyes on birds. J Field Ornithol 67:442–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins DA, Morris RD (1987) Parental care of the Common Tern Sterna hirundo. Ibis 129:533–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Götz Wagenknecht, Lesley Szostek, Sabrina Hoffmann, Benedikt Holtmann, and all other team members in this long-term project for providing logistic assistance during the study. Thanks to anonymous reviewers, Hans Källander, and Jane Ashworth (language editing) for significant contributions to revisions of the manuscript. G.G. was supported by the Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst (DAAD, Germany) and a postdoctoral scholarship from the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET, Argentina). This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Be 916/8-3 and 9), and Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (AGENCIA, grant PICT 2011-0174).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Germán O. García.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

García, G.O., Riechert, J., Favero, M. et al. Stealing food from conspecifics: spatial behavior of kleptoparasitic Common Terns Sterna hirundo within the colony site. J Ornithol 155, 777–783 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-014-1066-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-014-1066-4

Keywords

Navigation