Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is the effect of farming practices on songbird communities landscape dependent? A case study of olive groves in southern Spain

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ornithology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Extensive farming practices and landscape heterogeneity promote biodiversity in agroecosystems. However, the effect of such practices might be landscape dependent; specifically, the effect might be greatest where the loss of heterogeneity has been the largest. In recent decades, agricultural intensification and landscape simplification have dramatically affected the Mediterranean region, where olive groves are one of the predominant crops. For instance, in Spain from 1996 to 2008, the amount of land dedicated to olive groves increased by 300,000 ha (12 %). In conventional olive farming, herbicides are applied intensively to minimize competition between crops and swards for water; however, to prevent erosion, many farmers are maintaining swards within crops. This practice likely benefits farmland biodiversity, although the heterogeneity of the surrounding landscape might influence the extent of these effects. This study assessed the effects of herbaceous cover on the abundance and species richness of songbird communities in six matched pairs of olive groves (ground cover or bare ground) in homogeneous and heterogeneous landscapes over a 3-year period. We predicted that (1) the presence of ground cover and landscape heterogeneity would have a positive effect on songbird communities, and (2) the effect would be greatest in homogeneous environments. Although bird community composition differed among landscape types and farming practices in the olive groves in southern Spain, the effect of ground cover was not landscape dependent. The presence of ground cover had a positive effect on the abundance and richness of songbirds, including sensitive species, but landscape heterogeneity did not have an effect. This study underscores the important role of agricultural practices in preserving farmland bird communities, while it also suggests that landscape heterogeneity might not be very important in Mediterranean perennial farming systems. The positive effects of ground cover can be important for preserving the wintering quarters of numerous European bird species, including species of conservation concern.

Zusammenfassung

Sind die Auswirkungen landwirtschaftlicher Methoden auf Singvogelgemeinschaften von der Landschaftsform abhängig? Eine Fallstudie an Olivenhainen in Südspanien

Extensive Anbaumethoden und heterogene Landschaften fördern die Biodiversität in agrarischen Ökosystemen. Die Auswirkungen solcher Methoden können allerdings von der jeweiligen Landschaft abhängen; dieser Effekt könnte vor allem dort besonders stark sein, wo die Verluste an Heterogenität am größten sind. In den letzten Jahrzehnten haben Intensivierung der Landwirtschaft und Flurbereinigung den Mittelmeerraum, wo Olivenhaine eine der prägenden Kulturen sind, dramatisch verändert. So hat sich zum Beispiel in Spanien die als Olivenhaine ausgewiesene Landfläche zwischen 1996 und 2008 um 300,000 ha (12 %) vergrößert. Beim konventionellen Olivenanbau werden intensiv Herbizide ausgebracht, um die Konkurrenz zwischen den Anbaupflanzen und der Grasflur um Wasser zu minimieren; allerdings belassen viele Farmer zur Erosionsvermeidung Grasfluren zwischen den Kulturen, von denen die Biodiversität der Ackerlandschaft vermutlich profitiert, obwohl die Heterogenität der umgebenden Landschaft das Ausmaß dieser Auswirkungen beeinflussen könnte. In dieser Studie untersuchten wir über einen Zeitraum von drei Jahren die Auswirkungen der Bodenbedeckung auf die Häufigkeit und den Artenreichtum von Singvogelgemeinschaften in sechs vergleichbaren Paaren von Olivenhainen (Bodenbedeckung oder kahler Boden) in homogenen und heterogenen Landschaften. Wir machten die Voraussagen, dass (1) das Vorhandensein von Bodenbedeckung und die Heterogenität der Landschaft einen positiven Effekt auf die Singvogelgemeinschaften hätten, und dass (2) dieser Effekt in einem homogenen Umfeld am stärksten sein müsste. Obgleich sich die Zusammensetzung der Vogelgemeinschaften in den südspanischen Olivenhainen zwischen den Landschaftstypen und Anbaumethoden unterschied, hing der Effekt der Bodenbedeckung nicht von der Landschaftsform ab. Das Vorhandensein von Bodenbedeckung wirkte sich positiv auf Häufigkeit und Artenreichtum der Singvögel aus, darunter auch sensible Arten; die Heterogenität der Landschaft zeigte allerdings keinen Effekt. Diese Studie unterstreicht die wichtige Rolle landwirtschaftlicher Methoden für den Erhalt der Vogelgemeinschaften der Agrarlandschaft, deutet aber gleichzeitig darauf hin, dass eine heterogene Landschaft im Fall der dauerhaften Anbauformen des Mittelmeerraumes von geringerer Bedeutung sein könnte. Der positive Einfluss der Bodenbedeckung kann für den Erhalt der Winterquartiere vieler europäischer Vogelarten, darunter auch solche, die schutzbedürftig sind, von Belang sein.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Aust Ecol 26:32–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Arlettaz R, Maurer ML, Mosimann-Kampe P, Nusslé S, Abadi F, Schaub M (2012) New vineyard cultivation practices create patchy ground vegetation, favouring Woodlarks. J Ornithol 153:229–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barea F, Ruiz P (2009) Estrategias de futuro para el sector oleícola andaluz. In: Gómez JA (ed) Sostenibilidad de la producción de olivar en Andalucía. Consejería de Agricultura y Pesca-Junta de Andalucía, Sevilla

    Google Scholar 

  • Batáry P, Matthiesen T, Tscharntke T (2010) Landscape-moderated importance of hedges in conserving farmland bird diversity of organic vs. conventional croplands and grasslands. Biol Conserv 143:2020–2027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batáry P, Báldi A, Kleijn D, Tscharntke T (2011) Landscape-moderated biodiversity effects of agri-environmental management: a meta-analysis. Proc R Soc B 278:1894–1902

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beaufoy G (2000) The olive oil regime. In: Brouwer F, Lowe P (eds) CAP regimes and European countryside: prospects for integration between agricultural, regional and environmental policies. CABI, Wallingford

  • Beaufoy G (2001) The environmental impact of olive oil production in the European Union: practical options for improving the environmental impact. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/agriculture/pdf/oliveoil.pdf

  • Bengtsson J, Ahnström J, Weibull AC (2005) The effects of organic agriculture on biodiversity and abundance: a meta-analysis. J Appl Ecol 42:261–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benton TG, Vickery JA, Wilson JD (2003) Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol Evol 18:182–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BirdLife International (2004) Birds in Europe: population estimates, trends and conservation status. BirdLife International, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretagnolle V, Villers A, Denonfoux L, Cornulier T, Inchausti P, Badenhausser I (2011) Rapid recovery of a depleted population of Little Bustards Tetrax tetrax following provision of alfalfa through an agri-environment scheme. Ibis 153:4–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breton C, Medail F, Pinatel C, Berville A (2006) From olive to oleaster: origin and domestication of Olea europaea L. in the Mediterranean basin. Cahiers Agric 15:329–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruggisser OT, Schmidt-Entling MS, Bacher S (2010) Effects of vineyard management on biodiversity at three trophic levels. Biol Conserv 143(6):1521–1528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Concepción ED, Díaz M, Baquero RA (2008) Effects of landscape complexity on the ecological effectiveness of agri-environment schemes. Lands Ecol 23:135–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Concepción ED, Diaz M, Kleijn D, Báldi A, Batáry P, Clough Y et al (2012) Interactive effects of landscape context constrain the effectiveness of local agri-environmental management. J Appl Ecol 49:695–705

    Google Scholar 

  • Debussche M, Isenmannn P (1985) Le regime alimentarie de la Grive musicienne (Turdus philomelos) en auntomne et en hiver dans les Garrigues de Montpellier (France Mediterraneenne) et ses relations avec l’ornithochorie. La Terre et la Vie 40:379–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald PF, Sanderson FJ, Burfield IJ, Van Bommel FPJ (2006) Further evidence of continent-wide impacts of agricultural intensification on European farmland birds, 1990–2000. Agric Ecosyst Environ 116:189–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L, Baudry J, Brotons L, Burel FG, Crist TO, Fuller RJ, Sirami C, Siriwardena GM, Martin JL (2011) Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Ecol Lett 14:101–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falcucci A, Maiorano L, Boitani L (2007) Changes in land-use/land-cover patterns in Italy and their implications for biodiversity conservation. Lands Ecol 22:617–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster BL, Smith VH, Dickson TL, Hildebrand T (2002) Invasibility and compositional stability in a grassland community: relationships to diversity and extrinsic factors. Oikos 99:300–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francia JR, Martínez A, Ruiz S (2000) Erosión en suelos de olivar en fuertes pendientes. Comportamiento de distintos manejos de suelo. Edafología 7:147–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Freemark KE, Kirk DA (2001) Birds on organic and conventional farms in Ontario: partitioning effects of habitat and practices on species composition and abundance. Biol Conserv 101:337–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González F, Rodrıguez E, Fernandez F, Civantos M, Campos M (2004) Influencia del Manejo del Suelo en las Poblaciones de Artrópodos en el Cultivo del Olivo. In: III Jornadas Técnicas del Aceite de Oliva. INIA, Madrid

  • Gregory RD, Van Strien A, Vorisek P, Meyling AW, Noble DG, Foppen RPB, Gibbons DW (2005) Developing indicators for European birds. Philos T R Soc B 360:269–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath M, Raymem M (2003) Using bird data to develop biodiversity indicators for agriculture. In: Agriculture and biodiversity. Developing indicators for policy analysis. OECD, Paris

  • Herrera CM (1984) A study of avian frugivores, bird-dispersed plants and their interactions in Mediterranean scrublands. Ecol Monogr 54:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzschuh A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Kleijn D, Tscharntke T (2007) Diversity of flower-visiting bees in cereal fields: effects of farming system, landscape composition and regional context. J Appl Ecol 44:41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jambari A, Azhar B, Ibrahim NL, Jamian S, ChongLeong P, Noor HM, Yusof E, Zakaria M (2012) Avian biodiversity and conservation in Malaysian oil palm production areas. J Oil Palm Res 24:1277–1286

    Google Scholar 

  • Kizos T, Koulouri M (2006) Agricultural landscape dynamics in the Mediterranean: Lesvos (Greece) case study using evidence from the last three centuries. Environ Sci Policy 9:330–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleijn D, Baquero RA, Clough Y, Diaz M, De Esteban J, Fernandez F, Gabriel D, Herzog F, Holzschuh A, Johl R, Knop E, Marshall EJP, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T, Verhulst J, West TM, Yela JL (2006) Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries. Ecol Lett 9:243–254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre, P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2011) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.0-2. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan

  • Madroño A, González C, Atienza JC (2004) Libro Rojo de las Aves de España. Dirección General para la Biodiversidad-SEO/BirdLife, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Matson PA, Parton WJ, Power AG, Swift MJ (1997) Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277:504–509

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin A, Mineau P (1995) The impact of agricultural practices on biodiversity. Agric Ecosyst Environ 55:201–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno B, García-Rodriguez S, Cañizares R, Castro J, Benítez E (2009) Rain-fed olive farming in southeastern Spain: long-term effect of soil management on biological indicators of soil quality. Agric Ecosyst Environ 131:333–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Cobo J (2009) Olivar y biodiversidad. In: Sostenibilidad de la producción de Olivar en Andalucia. Junta de Andalucia. http://hdl.handle.net/10261/24985

  • Perkins AJ, Maggs HE, Wilson JD, Watson A, Smout C (2008) Targeted management intervention reduces rate of population decline of Corn Buntings Emberiza calandra in eastern Scotland. Bird Study 55:52–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philpott SM, Arendt WJ, Armbrecht I, Bichier P, Diestch TV, Gordon C (2008) Biodiversity loss in Latin American coffee landscapes: review of the evidence on ants, birds, and trees. Conserv Biol 22:1093–1105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pujadas-Salvá A (1989) Flora arvense y ruderal de la provincia de Córdoba. Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba

    Google Scholar 

  • Purtauf T, Roschewitz I, Dauber J, Thies C, Tscharntke T, Wolters V (2005) Landscape context of organic and conventional farms: influences on carabid beetle diversity. Agric Ecosyst Environ 108:165–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pywell RF, Heard MS, Bradbury RB (2012) Wildlife-friendly farming benefits rare birds, bees and plants. Biol Lett 8(5):772–775

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org

  • Rey PJ (1993) The role of olive orchards in the wintering of frugivorous birds in Spain. Ardea 81:151–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Rey PJ (2011) Preserving frugivorous birds in agro-ecosystems: lessons from Spanish olive orchards. J Appl Ecol 48:228–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rey PJ, Valera F (1999) Diet plasticity in blackcap (Sylvia atricapilla): the ability to overcome nutritional constraints imposed by agricultural intensification. Ecoscience 6:429–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roschewitz I, Gabriel D, Tscharntke T, Thies C (2005) The effects of landscape complexity on arable weed species diversity in organic and conventional farming. J Appl Ecol 42:873–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rundlöf M, Smith HG (2006) The effect of organic farming on butterfly diversity depends on landscape context. J Appl Ecol 43:1121–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SEO/BirdLife (2003) Tendencias de las Poblaciones de Aves Comunes Reproductoras en España (1996–2003). Programa SACRE. SEO/BirdLife, Madrid

  • Smith HG, Dänhardt J, Lindström A, Rundlöf M (2010) Consequences of organic farming and landscape heterogeneity for species richness and abundance of farmland birds. Oecologia 162:1071–1079

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Symonds MRE, Moussalli A (2011) A brief guide to model selection, multimodel inference and model averaging in behavioural ecology using Akaike’s information criterion. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett 8:857–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valera F, Wagner RH, Romero-Pujante M, Gutiérrez JE, Rey PJ (2005) Dietary specialization on high protein seeds by adult and nestling serins. Condor 107:29–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vavrek M (2012) Palaeoecological and palaeogeographical analysis tools. http://matthewvavrek.com/programs-and-code/fossil/

  • Vickery JA, Feber RE, Fuller RJ (2009) Arable field margins managed for biodiversity conservation: a review of food resource provision for farmland birds. Agric Ecosyst Environ 133:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther BA, Morand S (1998) Comparative performance of species richness estimation methods. Parasitology 116:395–405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weibull AC, Bengtsson J, Nohlgren E (2000) Diversity of butterflies in the agricultural landscape: the role of farming system and landscape heterogeneity. Ecography 23:743–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JD, Morris AJ, Arroyo BE, Clark SC, Bradbury RB (1999) A review of the abundance and diversity of invertebrate and plant foods of granivorous birds in northern Europe in relation to agricultural change. Agric Ecosyst Environ 75:13–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood SN (2006) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

  • Zuur AF, Leno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank all the farmers who gave us permission to work in their fields. Special thanks go to C. G. Bueno for useful discussions and statistical advice, and B. MacWhirter for improving the English version of the manuscript. The University of Córdoba funded this project. ICB was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship provided by the Consejería de Educación, Ciencia y Cultura (JCCM, Spain) and the European Social Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. C. Castro-Caro.

Additional information

Communicated by T. Gottschalk.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (KMZ 1 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Castro-Caro, J.C., Barrio, I.C. & Tortosa, F.S. Is the effect of farming practices on songbird communities landscape dependent? A case study of olive groves in southern Spain. J Ornithol 155, 357–365 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-013-1010-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-013-1010-z

Keywords

Navigation