Journal of Ornithology

, Volume 154, Issue 4, pp 1127–1133 | Cite as

Phylogenetic relationships of the genus Mohoua, endemic hosts of New Zealand’s obligate brood parasitic Long-tailed Cuckoo (Eudynamys taitensis)

  • Zachary AidalaEmail author
  • Nicola Chong
  • Michael G. Anderson
  • Luis Ortiz-Catedral
  • Ian G. Jamieson
  • James V. Briskie
  • Phillip Cassey
  • Brian J. Gill
  • Mark E. Hauber
Short Note


The three species of New Zealand’s endemic Mohoua genus are sole hosts of the obligate brood parasitic Long-tailed Cuckoo (Eudynamys taitensis), making their intrageneric phylogenetic relationships particularly important for coevolutionary studies. Also, recent molecular phylogenetic analyses have not identified the family-level placement of this genus. To resolve both intrageneric and family relationships, we generated new nuclear and mitochondrial sequence data and conducted phylogenetic analyses using Bayesian inference among representatives of endemic New Zealand passerines and Australasian ‘core Corvoidea’ lineages. The results establish strong intrageneric relationships of all three Mohoua species, confirm the monophyly of the genus, and suggest its placement in a re-erected monotypic family: Mohouidae.


Core Corvoidea Pachycephalidae Phylogenetics 


Phylogenetische Beziehungen der Gattung Mohuoa , endemische Wirte des neuseeländischen obligat brutparasitischen Langschwanzkoels ( Eudynamys taitensis )

Die drei Arten der für Neuseeland endemischen Gattung Mohoua sind die alleinigen Wirte des obligat brutparasitischen Langschwanzkoels (Eudynamys taitensis), was die phylogenetischen Beziehungen innerhalb der Gattung besonders wichtig für co-evolutionäre Studien macht. Neuere molekulare phylogenetische Analysen erlaubten keine Einordnung dieser Gattung auf Familienebene. Um sowohl die Beziehungen innerhalb der Gattung als auch die Familienzugehörigkeit zu klären, haben wir neue Kern- und Mitochondrien-DNA-Sequenzdaten gewonnen und phylogenetische Analysen von Vertretern endemischer neuseeländischer Sperlingsvögel und australasiatischer „Core- Corvoidea“ mittels Bayesscher Statistik durchgeführt. Die Ergebnisse etablieren solide intragenerische Beziehungen aller drei Mohoua Arten, bestätigen die Monophylie der Gattung und schlagen ihre Einordnung in die wieder eingerichtete monotypische Familie Mohouidae vor.



We thank the Human Frontier Science Program (M.E.H., P.C.) and the National Science Foundation (Z.A.) for funding. All DNA samples were collected under institutional and governmental research permits in New Zealand.


  1. Aidala Z, Huynen L, Brennan PLR, Musser J, Fidler A, Chong N, Machovsky Capuska GE, Anderson MG, Talaba A, Lambert D, Hauber ME (2012) Ultraviolet visual sensitivity in three avian lineages: paleognaths, parrots, and passerines. J Comp Physiol A 198:495–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson MG, Ross HA, Brunton DH, Hauber ME (2009) Begging call matching between a specialist brood parasite and its host: a comparative approach to detect co-evolution. Biol J Linn Soc 98:208–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barker FK, Cibois A, Schikler P, Feinstein J, Cracraft J (2004) Phylogeny and diversification of the largest avian radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:11040–11045PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Briskie JV (2003) Frequency of egg rejection by potential hosts of the New Zealand cuckoos. Condor 105:719–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. del Hoyo J, Elliott A (eds) (2007) Handbook of the birds of the world. vol 12, Picathartes to tits and chickadees. Lynx, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  6. Driskell A, Christidis L, Gill BJ, Boles WE, Barker FK, Longmore NW (2007) A new endemic family of New Zealand passerine birds: adding heat to a biodiversity hotspot. Aust J Zool 55:73–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ewen JG, Flux I, Ericson PGP (2006) Systematic affinities of two enigmatic New Zealand passerines of high conservation priority, the hihi or stitchbird Notiomystis cincta and the kokako Callaeas cinerea. Mol Phylogenet Evol 40:281–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gibb JA (1961) Ecology of the birds of Kaingaroa forest. Proc NZ Ecol Soc 8:29–38Google Scholar
  9. Gill BJ (ed) (2010) Checklist of the birds of New Zealand, 4th edn. Ornithological Society of New Zealand, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  10. Gill BJ, McLean IG (1986) Morphometrics of the whitehead Mohoua albicilla on Little Barrier Island, New Zealand. NZ J Zool 13:267–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gill F, Wright M (2006) Birds of the world: recommended English names. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  12. Higgins PJ, Peter JM (eds) (2002) Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic birds. 6. Pardalotes to Shrike-thrushes. Oxford University Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  13. Jetz W, Thomas GH, Joy JB, Hartmann K, Mooers AO (2012) The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 491:444–448PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jønsson KA, Fabre P, Ricklefs RE, Fjeldså J (2011) Major global radiation of Corvoid birds originated in the proto-Papuan archipelago. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:2328–2333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Keast A (1977) The relationships of Finschia and Mohoua (Family Muscicapidae). Notornis 24:50–52Google Scholar
  16. Lanfear R, Bromham L (2011) Estimating phylogenies for species assemblages: a complete phylogeny for the past and present native birds of New Zealand. Mol Phylogenet Evol 61:958–963PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mathews GM (1946) A working list of Australian birds including the Australian quadrant and New Zealand. Shepherd and Newman, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  18. Mayr E, Traylor MA et al (1986) Check-list of the birds of the world. A continuation of the work of James L Peters. vol 11. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  19. McLean IG, Waas JR (1987) Do cuckoo chicks mimic the begging calls of their hosts? Anim Behav 35:1896–1898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Norman JA, Ericson PGP, Jonsson KA, Fjeldsaa J, Christidis L (2009) A multi-gene phylogeny reveals novel relationships for aberrant general of Australo-Papuan core Corvoidea and polyphyly of the Pachycephalidae and Psophodidae (Aves: Passeriformes). Mol Phylogenet Evol 52:488–497PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Olson SR (1990a) Comments on the osteology and systematics of the New Zealand passerines of the genus Mohoua. Notornis 37:157–160Google Scholar
  22. Olson SR (1990b) Osteology and systematic of the fernbirds (Bowdleria: Sylviidae). Notornis 37:161–171Google Scholar
  23. Ranjard L, Anderson MG, Rayner MJ, Payne RB, McLean IG, Briskie JV, Ross HA, Brunton DH, Woolley SMN, Hauber ME (2010) Bioacoustic distances between the begging calls of parasites and their host species: a comparison of metrics and techniques. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:1915–1926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Read AF (1988a) Habitat use by yellowheads, Mohoua ochrocephala (Aves: Muscicapidae), in the Hawdon River Valley, Arthur’s Pass National Park. 2. Time budgets and foraging behaviour. NZ J Zool 15:471–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Read AF (1988b) Habitat use by yellowheads, Mohoua ochrocephala (Aves: Muscicapidae), in the Hawdon River Valley, Arthur’s Pass National Park. 1. Habitat preferences. NZ J Zool 15:461–470Google Scholar
  26. Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE (1987) The relationships of four species of New Zealand passerine birds. Emu 87:63–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE (1990) Phylogeny and classification of birds: a study in molecular evolution. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  28. Sorenson MD, Ast JC, Dimcheff DE, Yuri T, Mindell DP (1999) Primers for a PCR-based approach to mitochondrial genome sequencing in birds and other vertebrates. Mol Phylogenet Evol 12:105–114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stiller P (2001) Time budget, foraging activities, diet and occurrence of aspergillosis in captive yellowheads (Mohoua ochrocephala). NZ J Zool 28:343–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zachary Aidala
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Nicola Chong
    • 3
  • Michael G. Anderson
    • 4
  • Luis Ortiz-Catedral
    • 4
    • 5
  • Ian G. Jamieson
    • 6
  • James V. Briskie
    • 7
  • Phillip Cassey
    • 8
  • Brian J. Gill
    • 9
  • Mark E. Hauber
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Biopsychology and Behavioral Neuroscience Subprogram in PsychologyThe Graduate Center of City University of New YorkNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyHunter College of City University of New YorkNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  4. 4.Ecology, Behaviour and Conservation Group, Institute of Natural and Mathematical SciencesMassey University, Albany CampusAucklandNew Zealand
  5. 5.Charles Darwin FoundationPuerto AyoraEcuador
  6. 6.Allan Wilson Centre of Molecular Ecology and Evolution, Department of ZoologyUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
  7. 7.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand
  8. 8.School of Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
  9. 9.Auckland War Memorial MuseumAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations