Skip to main content
Log in

Kin structure and choice of brood care in a Common Eider (Somateria m. mollissima) population

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ornithology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated the presence of kin-biased cooperative breeding in the Common Eider (Somateria m. mollissima), a colonial seaduck commonly presumed to have a high rate of natal philopatry. Based on a 23-year-long time series of individually marked mothers and daughters, we found that on average 18% of the study population consisted of first-order relatives: mothers, daughters, and female siblings. However, there were years with no or only a few first-order kin pairs present. This was due to the overall low duckling survival in this species and the high rate of natal dispersal in this population. There was no apparent tendency for timely nesting relatives (laying within 3 days of each other) to approach each other, indicating no firm kin recognition. In a 3-year sampling of DNA from egg shell membranes, the annual rate of intraspecific brood parasitism in the population varied between 25 and 67%. However, becoming parasitized had no effect on the subsequent choice of brood tending tactics, i.e., whether to tend alone or communally. Neither was the choice of brood tending tactics affected by the number of own eggs in the clutch or by the female body condition. However, becoming a communal brood-tender was jointly contributed by the presence of alien eggs in the nest and the presence of first-order kin in the colony during early breeding. The greatest effect on females favoring communal brood care instead of rearing alone was due to the number of similar-aged broods nearby at the time of nest exodus. We found no evidence of firm kin recognition among individuals in our study population.

Zusammenfassung

Verwandtschaftsstruktur und Brutpflegetaktik in einer Population der Europäischen Eiderente ( Somateria m. mollissima )

Wir haben das Auftreten von verwandtschaftsbasiertem kooperativem Brüten bei der Europäischen Eiderente (Somateria m. mollissima) untersucht, einer koloniebrütenden Meerente, bei der im Allgemeinen eine ausgeprägte Geburtsortstreue angenommen wird. Basierend auf einer 23 Jahre währenden Zeitreihe individuell markierter Mütter und Töchter fanden wir, dass durchschnittlich 18% der untersuchten Population aus Verwandten ersten Grades bestanden: Müttern, Töchtern und Schwestern. Es gab jedoch Jahre, in denen nur wenige Verwandtschaftspaare ersten Grades anwesend waren. Dies war auf die insgesamt niedrige Überlebensrate der Entenküken bei dieser Art und die hohe Rate der Abwanderung vom Geburtsort in dieser Population zurückzuführen. Verwandte, die innerhalb von drei Tagen mit der Eiablage begannen, zeigten keine offensichtliche Tendenz, sich einander zu nähern, was darauf hindeutet, dass Verwandte nicht sicher erkannt werden. Die Entnahme von DNA-Proben aus der Eischalenmembran über einen Zeitraum von drei Jahren zeigte, dass die jährliche Rate von intraspezifischem Brutparasitismus in der Population zwischen 25 und 67% variierte. Ob ein Nest parasitiert wurde oder nicht, hatte jedoch keinen Einfluss darauf, ob Brutpflege anschließend allein oder gemeinsam betrieben wurde. Die Wahl der Brutpflegetaktik wurde auch nicht durch die Anzahl der eigenen Eier im Gelege oder die Körperkondition des Weibchens beeinflusst. Das Vorhandensein fremder Eier im Nest in Kombination mit der Anwesenheit von Verwandten ersten Grades in der Kolonie während der frühen Brutphase trug jedoch zum Auftreten gemeinschaftlicher Brutpflege bei. Die Anzahl der Bruten ähnlichen Alters in der Nähe zum Zeitpunkt des Verlassens des Nests begünstigte jedoch am stärksten das Auftreten gemeinschaftlicher Brutpflege. Wir fanden keine Hinweise darauf, dass die Individuen in der untersuchten Population Verwandte sicher erkennen konnten.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderholm S, Marshall RC, van der Jeugd HP, Waldeck P, Larsson K, Andersson M (2009a) Nest parasitism in the barnacle goose: evidence from protein fingerprinting and microsatellites. Anim Behav 78:167–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderholm S, Waldeck P, van der Jeugd HP, Marshall RC, Larsson K, Andersson M (2009b) Colony kin structure and host-parasite relatedness in the barnacle goose. Mol Ecol 18:4955–4963

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M, Åhlund M (2000) Host-parasite relatedness shown by protein fingerprinting in a brood parasitic bird. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:13188–13193

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M, Waldeck P (2006) Reproductive tactics under severe egg predation: an eider’s dilemma. Oecologia 148:350–355

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M, Waldeck P (2007) Host-parasite kinship in a female-philopatric bird population: evidence from relatedness trend analysis. Mol Ecol 16:2797–2806

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørn TH, Erikstad KE (1994) Patterns of intraspecific nest parasitism in the high Arctic common eider (Somateria mollissima borealis). Can J Zool 72:1027–1034

    Google Scholar 

  • Blums P, Mednis A, Nichols JD (1994) Retention of web tags and plasticine-filled leg bands applied to day-old ducklings. J Wildl Manag 58:76–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Blums P, Davis JB, Stephens SE, Mednis A, Richardson DM (1999) Evaluation of plasticine-filled leg band for day-old ducklings. J Wildl Manag 63:656–663

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolduc F, Guillemette M (2003) Incubation constancy and mass loss in the common eider Somateria mollissima. Ibis 145:329–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown P, Zhou L (2010) MCMC for generalized linear mixed models with glmmBUGS. R J 2:13–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustnes JO, Erikstad KE (1993) Site fidelity in breeding common eider Somateria mollissima females. Ornis Fenn 70:11–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Eadie JM, Kehoe FP, Nudds TD (1988) Pre-hatch and post-hatch brood amalgamation in North American Anatidae: a review of hypothesis. Can J Zool 66:1709–1721

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikstad KE, Tveraa T (1995) Does cost of incubation set limits to clutch size in common eiders Somateria mollissima. Oecologia 103:270–274

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fields RL, Scribner KT (1997) Isolation and characterization of novel waterfowl microsatellite loci: cross-species comparisons and research applications. Mol Ecol 6:199–202

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons DW (1986) Brood parasitism and cooperative breeding in the moorhen, Gallinula chloropus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:221–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1987) Discriminating nepotism: expectable, common, overlooked. In: Fletcher DJC, Michener CD (eds) Kin recognition in animals. Wiley, Chichester, pp 417–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanssen SA, Erikstad KE, Johnsen V, Bustnes JO (2003) Differential investment and costs during avian incubation determined by individual quality: an experimental study of the common eider (Somateria mollissima). Proc R Soc Lond B 270:531–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Hario M, Rintala J (2006) Fledgling production and population trends in Finnish common eiders (Somateria m. mollissima)—evidence for density dependence. Can J Zool 84:1038–1046

    Google Scholar 

  • Hario M, Rintala J (2009) Age of first breeding in the common Eider Somateria m. mollissima population in the northern Baltic Sea. Ornis Fenn 86:81–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Hario M, Selin K (1988) Thirty-year trends in an eider population: timing of breeding, clutch size, and nest site preferences. Finn Game Res 45:3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollmén T (2002) Biomarkers of health and disease in common eiders (Somateria mollissima) in Finland. Dissertation, University of Helsinki

  • Hollmén T, Franson JC, Hario M, Sankari S, Kilpi M, Lindström K (2001) Use of serum biochemistry to evaluate nutritional status and health of incubating common eiders (Somateria mollissima) in Finland. Phys Biochem Zool 74:333–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollmén T, Franson JC, Kilpi M, Docherty DE, Hansen WR, Hario M (2002) Isolation and characterization of a reovirus from common eiders (Somateria mollissima) from Finland. Avian Dis 46:478–484

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jaatinen K (2009) Cooperation and conflict in conspecific brood parasitism, an alternative reproductive tactics. Dissertation, University of Helsinki

  • Jaatinen K, Öst M (2011) Experience attracts: the role of age in the formation of cooperative brood-rearing coalitions in eiders. Anim Behav 81:1289–1294

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaatinen K, Jaari S, O’Hara R, Öst M, Merilä J (2009) Relatedness and spatial proximity as determinants of host-parasite interactions in the brood parasitic Barrow’s goldeneye (Bucephala islandica). Mol Ecol 18:2713–2721

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones O, Wang J (2009) COLONY: a program for parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data. Mol Ecol Res 10:551–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Komdeur J, Hatchwell BJ (1999) Kin recognition: function and mechanism in avian societies. Trends Ecol Evol 14:237–241

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kruger O, de Brooke Ml (2007) Brood parasitism in birds. In: Jamieson BGM (ed) Reproductive biology and phylogeny of birds. Science Publishers, Plymouth, pp 327–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurila T, Hario M (1988) Environmental and genetic factors influencing clutch size, egg volume, date of laying and female weight in the common eider Somateria mollissima. Finn Game Res 45:19–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehikoinen A, Kilpi M, Öst M (2006) Winter climate affects subsequent breeding success of common eiders. Glob Change Biol 12:1355–1365

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehikoinen A, Öst M, Hollmén T, Kilpi M (2008) Does sex-specific duckling mortality contribute to male bias in adult common eiders? Condor 110:574–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Sepulcre A, Kokko H (2002) The role of kin recognition in the evolution of conspecific brood parasitism. Anim Behav 64:215–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunn DJ, Thomas A, Best N, Spiegelhalter D (2000) WinBUGS—a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Stat Comp 10:325–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunn D, Spiegelhalter D, Thomas A, Best N (2009) The BUGS project: evolution, critique and future directions. Stat Med 2009:3049–3067

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon L, Gilchrist HG, Scribner KT (2006) Genetic evidence for kin-based female social structure in common eiders (Somateria mollissima). Behav Ecol 17:614–621

    Google Scholar 

  • McRae S, Burke T (1996) Intraspecific brood parasitism in the moorhen: parentage and parasite-host relationships determined by DNA fingerprinting. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:115–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne H (1974) Breeding numbers and reproductive rates of eiders at the Sands of Forvie nature reserve, Scotland. Ibis 116:135–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Öst M, Ydenberg R, Kilpi M, Lindström K (2003a) Condition and coalition formation by brood-rearing common eider females. Behav Ecol 14:311–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Öst M, Ydenberg R, Lindström K, Kilpi M (2003b) Body condition and the grouping behavior of brood-caring female common eiders (Somateria mollissima). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:451–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Öst M, Vitikainen E, Waldeck P, Sundström L, Lindström K, Hollmén T, Franson C, Kilpi M (2005) Eider females form non-kin brood-rearing coalitions. Mol Ecol 14:3903–3908

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paulus KB, Tiedemann R (2003) Ten polymorphic autosomal microsatellite loci for the eider duck Somateria mollissima and their cross-species applicability among waterfowl species (Anatidae). Mol Ecol Notes 3:250–252

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson GJ (1998) Egg adoption can explain joint egg-laying in common eiders. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43:289–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruusila V, Pöysä H, Runko P (2000) Characteristics of maternal family lineages in a common Goldeneye Bucephala clangula breeding population. Ornis Fenn 77:77–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonsthagen SA, Talbot SL, Lanctot RB, McCracken KG (2010) Do common eiders nest in kin groups? Microgeographic genetic structure in a philopatric sea duck. Mol Ecol 19:647–657

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swennen C, Duiven P, Reyrink LAF (1979) Notes on the sex ratio in the common eider Somateria mollissima (L.). Ardea 67:54–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Swennen C, Ursem JHC, Duiven P (1993) Determinate laying and egg attendance in common eiders. Ornis Scand 24:48–52

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Jeugd HP, van der Veen IT, Larsson K (2002) Kin clustering in barnacle geese: familiarity or phenotype matching? Behav Ecol 13:786–790

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldeck P, Andersson M (2006) Brood parasitism and nest takeover in common eiders. Ethology 112:616–624

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldeck P, Kilpi M, Öst M, Andersson M (2004) Brood parasitism in a population of common eider (Somateria mollissima). Behaviour 141:725–739

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldeck P, Andersson M, Kilpi M, Öst M (2008) Spatial relatedness and brood parasitism in a female-philopatric bird population. Behav Ecol 19:67–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J (2002) MER (V3) A program for estimating pairwise relatedness from genetic markers. http://zoo.cam.ac.uk/ioz/people/wang.htm Accessed 5 February 2009

  • Wang J (2004) Sibship reconstruction from genetic data with typing errors. Genetics 166:1963–1979

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zink AG (2000) The evolution of intraspecific brood parasitism in birds and insects. Am Nat 155:395–405

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our sincere thanks are due to all our co-workers at Söderskär, especially to Chris Franson, Tuula Hollmén, Jukka T. Lehtonen, Outi Ovaskainen, Karl Selin, Henri Selin, and Pertti Muuronen. We greatly acknowledge the laboratory research done by Marjatta Säisä and Tuire Pankasalo. Thoughtful comments on an earlier draft were provided by two anonymous reviewers. The language was checked by Roy Siddall. This research was carried out in compliance with the current laws of Finland and received permission from the Ministry of Environment and the Animal Care committee of the University of Helsinki.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martti Hario.

Additional information

Communicated by P. H. Becker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hario, M., Koljonen, ML. & Rintala, J. Kin structure and choice of brood care in a Common Eider (Somateria m. mollissima) population. J Ornithol 153, 963–973 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-012-0825-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-012-0825-3

Keywords

Navigation