Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of habitat on nest location and reproductive output of Montagu’s Harriers breeding in natural vegetation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ornithology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined distribution and breeding success of semi-colonial Montagu’s Harriers (Circus pygargus) in relation to habitat in Castellón province (eastern Spain). Breeding areas used by harriers at a 1-km2 scale were characterised by having intermediate percentages of scrub cover, their nesting habitat, and also had intermediate coverage of herbaceous crops and non-irrigated orchards. Out of all habitat variables considered, only the percentage of herbaceous crops within 500 m from individual nests had a positive and significant effect on breeding output of the species, suggesting that this habitat may be efficiently used by harriers to forage. Breeding output was also related to laying date and number of breeding neighbours within 500 m around nests, with pairs laying later and having a higher number of breeding neighbours showing lower fledged brood sizes. Number of neighbours (but not laying date) was positively related to scrub cover within 500 m and to cover of herbaceous crops within 2,000 m. Conservation actions for Montagu’s Harrier in the study area should be aimed at preserving areas of scrub with nearby presence of herbaceous crops or natural grasslands. However, habitat improvement for semi-colonial species such as Montagu’s Harrier may not result in a change of species distribution area, and good habitat areas may remain unoccupied, as social factors like presence of conspecifics play an important role in breeding area selection for these species.

Zusammenfassung

Wir untersuchten die Verteilung und den Bruterfolg von halb-kolonialen Wiesenweihen (Circus pygargus) in Bezug zum Habitat in der Provinz Castellón im Osten Spaniens. Das Brutgebiet der Wiesenweihen war, auf einer 1 km2-Skala betrachtet, charakterisiert durch mittlere Bedeckung mit Buschwerk. Das Nesthabitat war zusätzlich bestimmt durch mittlere Bedeckung mit krautigen Pflanzen und nicht-bewässerten Obstgärten. Von allen Habitatvariablen, die wir betrachtet hatten, hatte nur der Prozentsatz der Bedeckung mit Krautpflanzen innerhalb von 500 m um die individuellen Nester einen positiven und signifikanten Effekt auf den Bruterfolg der Art. Dies lässt vermuten, dass dieses Habitat effizient von Wiesenweihen zum Furagieren genutzt wird. Der Bruterfolg war auch mit dem Legezeitpunkt korreliert, sowie mit der Anzahl von brütenden Nachbarn innerhalb eines Umkreises von 500 m um das Nest. Spät legende Paare und die mit mehr Nachbarn hatten einen niedrigeren Bruterfolg. Die Anzahl der Nachbarn (allerdings nicht der Legezeitpunkt) war positiv korreliert mit dem Grad der Bedeckung mit Buschwerk im 500 m Umkreis und mit dem Bedeckungsgrad der Krautpflanzen im Umkreis von 2,000 m um das Nest. Schutzmaßnahmen für Wiesenweihen sollten auf Gebiete mit Buschbedeckung und Präsenz von Krautpflanzen oder natürlichen Wiesengebieten abzielen. Jedoch sollte eine solche Habitatverbesserung für halb-kolonial brütende Arten, wie die Wiesenweihe, nicht zu einer Veränderung der Verbreitung führen. Auch können Gebiete mit gutem Habitat trotzdem nicht besiedelt werden, da soziale Faktoren wie die Präsenz von Artgenossen eine wichtige Rolle für die Wahl des Nistplatzes bei solchen Arten spielen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amar A, Arroyo B, Meek E, Redpath S, Riley H (2008) Influence of habitat on breeding performance of hen harriers in Orkney. Ibis 150:400–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Arroyo B (1995) Breeding ecology and nest dispersion of Montagu’s harrier Circus pygargus in central Spain. PhD thesis, Oxford University

  • Arroyo BE, García JT, Bretagnolle V (2002) Conservation of the Montagu’s Harrier (Circus pygargus) in agricultural areas. Anim Conserv 5:283–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Arroyo B, Leckie F, Amar A, Hamilton J, McCluskie A, Redpath S (2005) Habitat use and range management on priority areas for hen harriers: 2004 report. Report to Scottish Natural Heritage, Edinburgh, UK

  • Arroyo B, Pinilla A, Mougeot F, Crystal F, Guerrero A (2008) Estudio de la ecología poblacional del aguilucho cenizo (Circus pygargus) en Extremadura. Report to Servicio de Conservación de la Naturaleza y Espacios Naturales Protegidos, Junta de Extremadura, Spain

  • Arroyo B, Amar A, Leckie F, Buchannan G, Wilson J, Redpath S (2009) Hunting habitat selection by hen harriers on moorland: implications for conservation. Biol Conserv 142:586–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton TG, Bryant DM, Cole L, Crick HQP (2002) Linking agricultural practice to insect and bird populations: a historical study over three decades. J Appl Ecol 39:673–687

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanco JC, González JL (1992) Libro Rojo de los Vertebrados de España. ICONA-M.A.P.A, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulinier T, Danchin E (1997) The use of conspecific reproductive success for breeding patch selection in terrestrial migratory species. Evol Ecol 11:505–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne SJ, Aebischer NJ, Yfantis G, Marchant JH (2004) Habitat availability and use by turtle doves Streptopelia turtur between 1965 and 1995: an analysis of Common Birds Census data. Bird Study 51:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Cade TJ, Temple SA (1995) Management of threatened bird species: evaluation of the hands-on approach. Ibis 137:S161–S172

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrete M, Sánchez-Zapata JA, Martínez JE, Calvo JF (2002) Predicting the implications of conservation management: a territorial occupancy model of Bonelli’s eagle in Murcia, Spain. Oryx 36:349–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevan A, Sutherland M (1991) Hierarchical partitioning. Am Stat 45:90–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornulier T (2005) Composants de la distribution spatiale d’un prédateur: effets respectifs de l’habitat, des ressources alimentaires et des interactions comportementales. Analyse de processus ponctuels non homogènes. PhD thesis, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon 1

  • Cornulier T, Bretagnolle V (2006) Assessing the influence of environmental heterogeneity on bird spacing patterns: a case study with two raptors. Ecography 29:240–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramp S, Simmons KEL (1980) The birds of the western Paleacrtic, vol 2. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández GJ, Posse G, Ferretti V, Gabelli FM (2004) Bird-habitat relationship for the declining Pampas meadowlark populations in the southern Pampas grasslands. Biol Conserv 115:139–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Fretwell SD, Lucas HL (1970) On territorial behaviour and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds, theoretical development. Acta Biotheor 19:16–36

    Google Scholar 

  • García JT, Arroyo BE (2005) Food-niche differentiation in sympatric hen and Montagu’s harriers. Ibis 147:144–154

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Ripollés C, López-López P, García-López F, Aguilar JM, Verdejo J (2005) Modelling nesting habitat preferences of Eurasian griffon vulture Gyps fulvus in eastern Iberian Peninsula. Ardeola 52:287–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Guixé D (2003) Caracterització de les àrees de nidificació de l’esparver cendrós a la plana de Lleida. Resultats del radioseguiment i estudi d’alimentació i selecció de l’hàbitat del nucli reproductor d’anglesola. Report to Departament De Medi Ambient i Habitatge, Generalitat de Catalunya

  • Hanski I (1999) Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiraldo F, Negro JJ, Donázar JA, Gaona P (1996) A demographic model for a population of the endangered lesser kestrel is southern Spain. J Appl Ecol 33:1085–1093

    Google Scholar 

  • Julliard R, Jiguet F, Couvet D (2004) Common birds facing global changes: what makes a species at risk? Global Chang Biol 10:148–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Limiñana R (2004) Biología reproductiva del aguilucho cenizo (Circus pygargus) en el interior de la provincia de Castellón. MSc Dissertation, Universidad de Alicante, Alicante

  • Limiñana R, Surroca M, Miralles S, Urios V, Jiménez J (2006a) Population trend and breeding biology of Montagu’s harrier Circus pygargus in a natural vegetation site in Northeast Spain. Bird Study 53:126–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Limiñana R, Soutullo A, Urios V, Surroca M (2006b) Vegetation height selection in Montagu’s harriers Circus pygargus breeding in a natural habitat. Ardea 94(2):280–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Limiñana R, Soria MC, Urios V (2008) Uso del habitat y dieta del aguilucho cenizo, C. pygargus, en el interior de la provincia de Castellón. Report, University of Alicante

  • López-Iborra GM, Limiñana R, Pavón D, Martínez-Pérez JE (2010) Modelling the distribution of short-toed eagle (Circaetus gallicus) in semi-arid Mediterranean landscapes: identifying important explanatory variables and their implications for its conservation. Eur J Wildl Res. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-010-0402-0

  • López-López P, García-Ripollés C, Aguilar JM, García-López F, Verdejo J (2006) Modelling breeding habitat preferences of Bonelli’s eagle (Hieraaetus fasciatus) in relation to topography, disturbance, climate and land use at different spatial scales. J Ornithol 147:97–107

    Google Scholar 

  • López-López P, García-Ripollés C, Soutullo A, Cadahía L, Urios V (2007) Identifying potentially suitable nesting habitat for golden eagles applied to important bird areas design. Anim Conserv 10:208–218

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNally R (2000) Regression and model-building in conservation biology, biogeography and ecology: The distinction between -and reconciliation of- “predictive” and “explanatory” models. Biodivers Conserv 9:655–671

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNally R (2002) Multiple regression and inference in ecology and conservation biology: further comments on identifying important predictor variables. Biodivers Conserv 11:139–1401

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez JA, López G, Falcó F, Campo A, de la Vega A (1999) Hábitat de caza y nidificación del aguilucho cenizo Circus pygargus en el Parque Natural de La Mata-Torrevieja (Alicante, SE de España): Efectos de la estructura de la vegetación y de la densidad de presas. Ardeola 46:205–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Mougeot F, Bretagnolle V (2006) Breeding biology of the Red kite Milvus milvus in Corsica. Ibis 148:436–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton I (1998) Population limitation in birds. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton I, Marquiss M (1984) Seasonal trend in the breeding performance of sparrowhawks. J Anim Ecol 53:809–830

    Google Scholar 

  • Oro D, Margalida A, Carrete M, Heredia R, Donazar JA (2008) Testing the goodness of supplementary feeding to enhance population viability in an endangered vulture. PLoS ONE 3(12):e4084

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pietiäinen H (1989) Seasonal and individual variation in the production of offspring in the ural owl Strix uralensis. J Anim Ecol 58:905–920

    Google Scholar 

  • Poirazidis K, Goutner V, Skartsi T, Stamou S (2004) Modelling nesting habitat as a conservation tool for the Eurasian black vulture (Aegypius monachus) in Dadia Nature Reserve, northeastern Greece. Biol Conserv 118:235–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomarol M (1994) Releasing Montagu’s harrier (Circus pygargus) by the method of hacking. J Rapt Res 28:19–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed JM, Dobson AP (1993) Behavioural constraints and conservation biology: conspecific attraction and recruitment. Trends Ecol Evol 8:253–256

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson RA, Wilson JD, Crick HQP (2001) The importance of arable habitat for farmland birds in grassland landscapes. J Appl Ecol 38:1059–1069

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamolard M, Leroux ABA, Bretagnolle V (1999) Le Busard cendré. In: Rocamora G, Jarry G, Yeatman-Berthelot D (eds) Les oiseaux à statut de conservation défavorable ou fragile en France. Listes rouges et priorités nationales. S.E.O.F., Paris

  • SAS Institute (1999) SAS/STAT users’ guide, Version 8. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergio F, Penteriani V (2005) Public information and territory establishment in a loosely colonial raptor. Ecology 86:340–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergio F, Pedrini P, Mareschi L (2003) Adaptive selection of foraging and nesting habitat by black kites (Milvus migrans) and its implications for conservation: a multi-scale approach. Biol Conserv 112:351–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergio F, Blas J, Forero MG, Donázar JA, Hiraldo F (2007) Sequential settlement and site dependence in a migratory raptor. Behav Ecol 18:811–821

    Google Scholar 

  • SNPRCN (1990) Livro vermelho dos vertebrados de Portugal. Vol 1—Mamiferos, Aves Répteis e Anfibios. Secretaria de Estado do Ambiente e Defesa do Consumidor, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • Soh MCK, Sodhi NS, Lim SLH (2006) High sensitivity of montane bird communities to habitat disturbance in Peninsular Malaysia. Biol Conserv 129:149–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Soutullo A, Limiñana R, Urios V, Surroca M, Gill JA (2006) Density-dependent regulation of population size in colonial breeders: Allee and buffer effects in the migratory Montagu’s harrier. Oecologia 149:543–552

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suárez S, Balbontin J, Ferrer M (2000) Nesting habitat selection by booted eagles Hieraaetus pennatus and implications for management. J Appl Ecol 37:215–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapia L, Domínguez J, Rodríguez L (2004) Modeling habitat use and distribution of Hen harriers (Circus cyaneus) and Montagu’s harrier (Circus pygargus) in a mountainous area in Galicia, northwestern Spain. J Raptor Res 38:133–140

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org

  • Thibault JC, Bretagnolle V, Dominici JM (1995) Recovery of a resident population of osprey on Corsica. J Raptor Res 29:204–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh C, MacNally R (2003) Hierarchical partitioning. R Project for Statistical Computing. http://cran.r-project.org/

  • Wilson MW, Irwin S, Norriss DW, Newton SF, Collins K, Kelly TC, O’Halloran J (2009) The importance of pre-thicket conifer plantations for nesting hen harriers Circus cyaneus in Ireland. Ibis 151:332–343

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to Aeropuerto de Castellón for support and funding. A part of the data presented in this work comes from the monitoring and conservation programme for Montagu’s Harrier in Castellón, and has been provided by D.G. de Gestión del Medio Natural (Consellería de Medio Ambiente, Agua, Urbanismo y Vivienda, Generalitat Valenciana). We are particularly thankful to Juan Jiménez and also to Sara Ferreras and Teresa de Chiclana for helping in the fieldwork. Finally, we are indebted to C. Trierweiler, Pascual López-López, Mark Wilson and two anonymous referees, whose comments improved a previous version of the manuscript. First author had a grant from the Generalitat Valenciana, and now has a postdoctoral grant (reference 10/12-C) co-funded by Consejería de Educación y Ciencia (Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha) and the European Social Fund. All the research done for this study complies with the current laws of Spain.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruben Limiñana.

Additional information

Communicated by F. Bairlein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Limiñana, R., Arroyo, B.E., Surroca, M. et al. Influence of habitat on nest location and reproductive output of Montagu’s Harriers breeding in natural vegetation. J Ornithol 152, 557–565 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-010-0615-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-010-0615-8

Keywords

Navigation