Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of the risk of competition and predation on large secondary cavity breeders

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Ornithology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of competition and risk of predation on secondary cavity breeders were examined between the 2008 and 2009 breeding seasons using an experimental design manipulating two nest entrance sizes (large entrances allowed Barn Owls (Tyto alba) to enter, while the small entrances excluded them). During the 2009 breeding season, the entrance sizes of nest boxes were exchanged, so that if during one year a nest box in a particular location had a small entrance, the second year it had a large entrance and vice versa. Barn Owls and Eurasian Kestrels (Falco tinnunculus) occupied 67.3 and 17.3%, respectively, of large entrance nest boxes. Significantly more Jackdaws (Corvus monedula), House Sparrows (Passer domesticus) and Scops Owls (Otus scops) bred in nest boxes with small than with large entrances. After nest box entrance sizes were exchanged, Barn Owls and smaller species did not breed in the same nest boxes with the new entrance size. Jackdaws probably did not breed in large entrance nest boxes due both to exploitation competition (Barn Owls and Eurasian Kestrels occupied the majority of large entrance nest boxes), and may also have avoided empty nest boxes because of the risk of interference competition; whereas smaller species may have also avoided large entrance nest boxes due to risk of predation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Barba E, Gil-Delgado JA (1990) Competition for nest-boxes among four vertebrate species: an experimental study in orange groves. Ecography 13:183–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechard MJ, Bechard JM (1996) Competition for nest boxes between American Eurasian kestrels and European starlings in an agricultural area of southern Idaho. In: Bird DM, Varland DE, Negro JJ (eds) Raptors in human landscapes. Academic, San Diego, California, pp 155–161

  • Browne SJ (2006) Effect of nestbox construction and colour on the occupancy and breeding success of nesting tits Parus spp. Bird Study 53:187–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger GV (1969) Response of gray squirrels to nest boxes at Remington Farms, Maryland. J Wildl Manag 33:796–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson A, Sandstrom U, Olsson K (1998) Availability and use of natural tree holes by cavity nesting birds in a Swedish deciduous forest. Ardea 86:109–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Charter M, Izhaki I, Bouskila A, Leshem Y (2007a) The effect of different nest types on the breeding success of Eurasian kestrels (Falco tinnunculus) in a rural ecosystem. J Raptor Res 41:143–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charter M, Izhaki I, Shapira L, Leshem Y (2007b) Diets of urban breeding barn owls (Tyto Alba) in Tel Aviv, Israel. Wilson J Ornithol 119:484–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charter M, Izhaki I, Meyrom K, Motro Y, Leshem Y (2009) Diets of barn owls differ in the same agricultural region. Wilson J Ornithol 121:378–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhondt AA, Eyckerman R (1980) Competition and the regulation of numbers in great and blue tits. Ardea 68:121–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Génot JC, Van Nieuwehuyse D (2002) Athene noctua little owl. BWP Update 4:1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson L (1988) Inter- and intraspecific competition for nest-entrances in a population of the collared flycatcher icedula albicollis. Ibis 130:11–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakkarainen H, Korpimäki E (1996) Competitive and predatory interactions among raptors: an observational and experimental study. Ecology 77:1134–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold DJ (1994) Influence of nest-site competition between European starlings and woodpeckers. Wilson Bull 106:227–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempenaers B, Dhondt AA (1991) Competition between blue and great tit for roosting sites in winter: an aviary experiment. Ornis Scand 22:73–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korpimäki E (1987) Dietary shifts, niche relationships and reproductive output of coexisting Eurasian kestrels and long-eared owls. Oecologia 74:277–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krüger O (2002) Interactions between common buzzard Buteo buteo and goshawk Accipiter gentilis: trade-offs revealed by a field experiment. Oikos 96:441–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima S, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löhrl H (1977) Nistökologische und ethologische Anpassungserscheinungen bei Höhlenbrütern. Vogelwarte 29:92–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens JAL (1977) Thermal conditions for successful breeding in great tits (Parus major). II. Thermal properties of nest and their importance for range of temperature tolerance in Great Tit broods. Oecologia 28:31–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mátics R, Bank L, Varga S, Klein A, Hoffmann G (2008) Interspecific offspring killing in owls. Biol J Linn Soc 95:488–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer BA (1984) Interference and exploitation in bird communities. Wilson Bull 96:380–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Menge BA, Sutherland JP (1976) Species diversity gradients: synthesis of the roles of predation, competition, and temporally heterogeneity. Am Nat 110:351–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merilä J, Wiggins DA (1995) Interspecific competition for nest entrances causes adult mortality in the collared flycatcher. Condor 97:445–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyrom K, Motro Y, Leshem Y, Aviel S, Izhaki I, Argyle F, Charter M (2009) Nest-box use by the barn owl Tyto alba in a biological pest control program in the Beit She’an valley, Israel. In: Johnson DH, Van Nieuwenhuyse D, Duncan JR (eds) Proc. Fourth World Owl Conf. Oct–Nov 2007, Groningen, The Netherlands. Ardea 97: 97–101

  • Nilsson IN (1984) Prey weight, food overlap, and reproductive output of potentially competing long-eared and tawny owls. Ornis Scand 15:176–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pokines JT, Peterhans JK (1997) Barn owls Tyto alba taphonomy in the Negev Desert, Israel. Isr J Zool 43:19–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes B, O’donnell C, Jamieson I (2009) Microclimate of natural cavity nests and its implications for a threatened secondary-cavity-nesting passerine of New Zealand, the South Island saddleback. Condor 111(3):462–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roulin A (2002) Tyto alba barn owl. BWP Update 4:115–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarà M, Milazzo A, Falletta W, Bellia E (2005) Exploitation competition between entrance-nesters (Muscardinus avellanarius, Mammalia and Parus caeruleus, Aves) in Mediterranean woodlands. J Zool 265:347–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1983) Field experiments on interspecific competition. Am Nat 102:240–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sih S, Crowley P, McPeek M, Petranka J, Strohmeier K (1985) Predation, competition, and prey communities: a review of field experiments. Annu Rev Ecol Systemat 16:269–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenhof K (1987) Assessing raptor reproductive success and productivity. In: Giron Pendleton BA, Millsap BA, Cline KW, Bird DM (eds) Raptor management techniques manual. Natl. Wildl. Fed, Washington, DC, pp 157–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Tores M, Yom-Tov Y (2003) The diet of the barn owl (Tyto alba) in the Negev Desert. Isr J Zool 49:233–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tores M, Motro Y, Motro U, Yom-Tov Y (2005) The barn owl—a selective opportunist predator. Isr J Zool 51:349–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weigl PD (1978) Resource overlap, interspecific interactions and the distribution of the flying squirrels, Glaucomys volans and G. sabrinus. Am Midl Nat 100:83–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yom-Tov Y, Wool D (1997) Do the contents of barn owl pellets accurately represent the proportion of prey species in the field? Condor 99:972–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuberogoitia I, Martínez JA, Zabala J, Martínez JF (2005) Interspecific aggression and nest site competition in a European owl community. J Raptor Res 39:156–159

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Amir Ezer and Shay Halevi for assistance in the field and to Naomi Paz for editorial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Motti Charter.

Additional information

Communicated by P. H. Becker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Charter, M., Izhaki, I. & Leshem, Y. Effects of the risk of competition and predation on large secondary cavity breeders. J Ornithol 151, 791–795 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-010-0514-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-010-0514-z

Keywords