Abstract
The preference for foraging in groups and the effect of physiognomic factors of a habitat on its use by foraging Whinchats (Saxicola rubetra) was studied during spring migration stopover in a mosaic cultural landscape at the SE Adriatic coast. Every record of spatially distinct Whinchats, either a solitary individual or a group, was referred to as a Whinchat unit. The units were classified as intensively foraging, less intensively foraging or non-foraging and divided into four size classes. The effect of physiognomic habitat factors on use of habitat by foraging Whinchat units was modelled. All possible additive models using logit link function were constructed from five independent physiognomic variables: (1) natural perches (NP), (2) artificial perches (AP), (3) high herbal vegetation (HHV), (4) open bushes (OB) and (5) heterogeneity of vegetation types (HVT). Variables HHV and OB were included simultaneously in the models. Models that were substantially supported by the data were selected according to second order Akaike’s information criterion AICc. Two such models contained variable(s) (1) NP and (2) NP + AP. The relative importance weights of physiognomic variables NP, AP, HVT, HHV and OB were 1, 0.38, 0.24, 0.13 and 0.13, respectively. Perches were thus the most important physiognomic habitat factor affecting habitat use by Whinchats in a mosaic cultural landscape. The great majority of Whinchats foraged in groups and the proportion of intensively foraging Whinchat units increased with unit size, leading to the conclusion that Whinchats preferred social to solitary foraging on the spring stopover at the SE Adriatic coast.




Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Alerstam T, Hedenström A (1998) The development of bird migration theory. J Avian Biol 29:343–369
Alerstam T, Lindström A (1990) Optimal bird migration: the relative importance of time, energy, and safety. In: Gwinner E (ed) Bird migration: physiology and ecophysiology. Springer, Berlin, pp 331–351
Bairlein F (1983) Habitat selection and associations of species in European passerine birds during southward, post-breeding migrations. Ornis Scand 14:239–245
Bairlein F (1992) Morphology - habitat relationships in migrating songbirds. In: Hagan JMI, Johnston DW (eds) Ecology and conservation of Neotropical migrant landbirds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp 356–369
Bastian A, Bastian H-V (1996) Das Braunkehlchen: Opfer der ausgeräumten Kulturlandschaft. AULA, Wiesbaden
Bibby CJ, Green RE (1981) Autumn migration strategies of reed and sedge Warblers. Ornis Scand 12:1–12
BirdLife International (2004) Birds in Europe: population estimates trends and conservation status. BirdLife International, Cambridge
Block WM, Brennan LA (1993) The habitat concept in ornithology: theory and applications. Curr Ornithol 11:35–91
Britschgi A, Spaar R, Arlettaz R (2006) Impact of grassland farming intensification on the breeding ecology of an indicator insectivorous passerine, the whinchat Saxicola rubetra: lessons for overall Alpine meadowland management. Biol Conserv 130:193–205
Bruderer B (1997) The study of bird migration by radar. Part 2: major achievements. Naturwissenschaften 84:45–54
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference. A practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Chernetsov N (2006) Habitat selection by nocturnal passerine migrants en route: mechanisms and results. J Ornithol 147:185–191
Crawley MJ (2007) The R Book. Wiley, Chichester
Delingat J, Dierschke J (2000) Habitat utilization by northern wheatears (Oenanthe oenanthe) stopping over on an offshore island during migration. Vogelwarte 40:271–278
Denac D (2007) Populacijska dinamika repaljščice (Saxicola rubetra) v mozaiku nižinskih habitatnih tipov. Univerza v Mariboru, Maribor
Dennis P, Young MR, Gordon IJ (1998) Distribution and abundance of small insects and arachnids in relation to structural heterogeneity of grazed, indigenous grasslands. Ecol Entomol 23:253–264
Dierschke V, Delingat J, Schmaljohann H (2003) Time allocation in migrating northern wheatears (Oenanthe oenanthe) during stopover: is refuelling limited by food availability or metabolically? J Ornithol 144:33–44
Donovan TM, Thompson FRI (2001) Modeling the ecological trap hypothesis: a habitat and demographic analysis for migrant songbirds. Ecol Appl 11:871–882
Draulans D, van Vessem J (1982) Flock size and feeding behaviour of migrating whinchats Saxicola rubetra. Ibis 124:347–351
Duckworth JW (1994) Habitat selection by migrants redstarts Phoenicurus phoenicurus and whinchat Saxicola rubetra in lowland English farmland. Ringing Migrat 15:119–122
Ekman J, Hake M (1988) Avian flocking reduces starvation risk: an experimental demonstration. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:91–94
Giraldeau L-A, Caraco T (2000) Social foraging theory, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Chichester
Glutz von Blotzheim UN (1988) Saxicola rubetra (Linnaeus 1758) - Braunkehlchen. In: Glutz von Blotzheim UN (ed) Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas, 11/I. AULA, Wiesbaden, pp 392–446
Hedenström A, Alerstam T (1997) Optimum fuel loads in migratory birds: distinguishing between time and energy minimization. J Theor Biol 189:227–234
Horch P, Rehsteiner U, Berger-Flückiger A et al (2008) Bestandsrückgang des Braunkehlchens Saxicola rubetra in der Schweiz, mögliche Ursachen und Evaluation von Fördermassnahmen. Ornithol Beob 105:267–298
Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Hutto RL (1985a) Habitat selection by nonbreeding, migratory land birds. In: Cody ML (ed) Habitat selection in birds. Academic, New York, pp 455–476
Hutto RL (1985b) Seasonal changes in the habitat distribution of transient insectivorous birds in southeastern Arizona: competition mediated? Auk 102:120–132
Johnson JB, Omland KS (2004) Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 19:101–108
Keating KA, Cherry S (2004) Use and interpretation of logistic regression in habitat-selection studies. J Wild Manag 68:774–789
Krebs CJ (1999) Ecological Methodology, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, New York
Labhardt A (1988) Siedlungsstruktur von Braunkelchen-Populationen auf zwei Höhenstufen der Westschweizer Voralpen. Beih Veröff Naturschutz Landschaftspflege Bad-Württ 51:139–158
López-López P, García-Ripollés C, Aguilar JM et al (2006) Modelling breeding habitat preferences of Bonelli’s eagle (Hieraaetus fasciatus) in relation to topography, disturbance, climate and land use at different spatial scales. J Ornithol 147:97–106
Maccarone AD, Brzorad JN (2005) Foraging microhabitat selection by wading birds in a tidal estuary, with implications for conservation. Waterbirds 28:383–391
Martin TE, Karr JR (1986) Patch utilization by migrating birds: resource oriented? Ornis Scand 17:165–174
Montgomery DC, Peck EA (1982) Introduction to regression analysis. Wiley, New York
Moore FR, Gauthreaux SA Jr, Kerlinger P et al (1995) Habitat requirements during migration: important link in conservation. In: Martin TE, Finch DM (eds) Ecology and management of Neotropical migratory birds: a synthesis and review of critical issues. Oxford University Press, New York, USA, pp 121–144
Müller M, Spaar R, Schifferli L et al (2005) Effects of changes in farming of subalpine meadows on a grassland bird, the whinchat (Saxicola rubetra). J Ornithol 146:14–23
Neter J, Wasserman W, Kunter MH (1990) Applied linear statistical models, 3rd edn. Irwin, Columbus
Newton I (2008) The migration ecology of birds. Elsevier, London
Oppermann R (1990) Suitability of different vegetation structure types as habitat for the whinchat (Saxicola rubetra). Plant Ecol 90:109–116
Schaub M, Jenni L (2000) Fuel deposition of three passerine bird species along the migration route. Oecologia 122:306–317
Schneider-Jacoby M, Schwarz U, Sackl P (eds) (2006) Rapid assessment of the ecological value of the Bojana-Buna delta (Albania / Montenegro). Euronatur, Radolfzell
Schwilch R, Piersma T, Holmgren NMA et al (2002) Do migratory birds need a nap after long non-stop flight? Ardea 90:149–154
Suhonen J (1993) Predation risk influences the use of foraging sites by tits. Ecology 74:1197–1203
Szekely T, Sozou PD, Houston AI (1991) Flocking behaviour of passerines: a dynamic model for the non-reproductive season. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:203–213
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2001) Using multivariate statistics, 4th edn. Allyn and Bacon, Boston
Walther BA, Gosler AG (2001) The effects of food availability and distance to protective cover on the winter foraging behaviour of tits (Aves: Parus). Oecologia 129:312–320
Wikelski M, Tarlow EM, Raim A et al (2003) Avian metabolism: costs of migration in free-flying songbirds. Nature 423:704
Yong W, Finch DM, Moore FR et al (1998) Stopover ecology and habitat use of migratory Wilson’s warblers. Auk 115:829–842
Acknowledgments
The study was supported by the Slovenian Research Agency, through the programme of financing the postgraduate education of junior researchers, and by Euronatur foundation. We thank the Montenegrin National Institute for Protection of Nature for enabling us to carry out the fieldwork. We thank Borut Štumberger and Tomaž Skrbinšek for advice during the research and to dr. Reto Spaar, dr. Davorin Tome and an anonymous reviewer for their valuable comments on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by F. Bairlein.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koce, U., Denac, D. Social foraging and habitat use by a long-distance passerine migrant, Whinchat Saxicola rubetra, at a spring stopover site on the SE Adriatic coast. J Ornithol 151, 655–663 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-010-0506-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-010-0506-z


