Skip to main content
Log in

Sugar preferences and digestive efficiency in an opportunistic avian nectarivore, the Dark-capped Bulbul Pycnonotus tricolor

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Ornithology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has recently been recognized that flowers pollinated by generalist opportunistic nectarivores tend to have different nectar properties to those pollinated by specialist nectarivores (including both hummingbirds and specialist passerines). While renewed interest in specialist avian nectarivore sugar preferences and digestive physiology has helped explain the concentrated sucrose-dominated nectar of plants they feed on, there has been little progress in understanding why generalist or occasional nectar-feeding birds tend to be associated with flowers that have dilute hexose-dominated nectar. We examined sugar preferences and assimilation efficiencies over a range of concentrations, and concentration preferences, in Dark-capped Bulbuls Pycnonotus tricolor, one of the more common occasional avian nectarivores in southern Africa. Dark-capped Bulbuls showed significant preference for hexose sugar solutions, irrespective of concentration, when given a choice between hexose and sucrose solutions in equicaloric pair-wise choice tests conducted at five different concentrations (5–25%). This contrasts with results from specialist nectarivore groups which generally show a significant concentration-dependant switch in preference from hexose at low concentrations to sucrose at high concentrations for equicaloric solutions. In addition, Dark-capped Bulbuls showed an unusual lack of preference for solutions of higher sugar concentration when simultaneously offered four solutions varying in concentration from 10 to 25%. Dark-capped bulbuls also showed a unique effect of concentration on sugar assimilation efficiency, assimilating relatively more energy on 5% diets than on 25% diets. Although able to assimilate sucrose effectively, assimilation rates of hexose sugars were marginally higher. These results shed new light on pollination systems involving occasional nectarivores and, in particular, help to explain the prevalence of low concentration hexose-dominated nectars in flowers pollinated by these birds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blem CR, Blem LB (2000) Rufous hummingbirds sucrose preference: precision of selection varies with concentration. Condor 102:235–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Blem CR, Blem LB, Cosgrove CC (1997) Field studies of Rufous Hummingbird sucrose preference: does source height affect test results? J Ornithol 68:245–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Botes C, Johnson SD, Cowling RM (2008) Coexistence of succulent tree aloes: partitioning of bird pollinators by floral traits and flowering phenology. Oikos 117:875–882

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown KJ, Downs CT (2003) Digestive efficiency of a generalist avian feeder, the Cape White-eye (Zosterops pallidus). Comp Biochem Physiol Part A 134:739–748

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown M, Downs CT, Johnson SD (2008) Sugar preferences of nectar feeding birds—a comparison of experimental techniques. J Avian Biol 39:479–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown M, Downs CT, Johnson SD (2009) Pollination of the red-hot poker Kniphofia caulescens by short-billed opportunistic avian nectarivores. S Afr J Bot 75:707–712

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown M, Downs CT, Johnson S (2010) Concentration dependent sugar preferences of the malachite sunbird Nectarinia famosa. Auk 127:151–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruden RW, Toledo VM (1977) Oriole pollination of Erythrina breviflora (Leguminosae): evidence for a polytypic view of ornithophily. Plant Syst Evol 126:393–403

    Google Scholar 

  • De la Barrera E, Nobel PS (2004) Nectar: properties, floral aspects, and speculations on origin. Trends Plant Sci 9:65–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs CT (1997) Sugar digestion efficiencies of Gurney’s sugarbirds, malachite sunbirds, and black sunbirds. Physiol Zool 70:93–99

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming PA, Bakken BH, Lotz CN, Nicolson SW (2004) Concentration and temperature effects on sugar intake and preferences in a sunbird and a hummingbird. Funct Ecol 18:223–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming PA, Xie S, Napier K, Mcwhorter TJ, Nicolson SW (2008) Nectar concentration affects sugar preferences in two Australian honeyeaters and a lorikeet. Funct Ecol 22:599–605

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke E, Jackson S, Nicolson S (1998) Nectar sugar preferences and absorption in a generalist African frugivore, the Cape white-eye Zosterops pallidus. Ibis 140:501–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman CE, Worthington RD, Jackson MS (1991) Floral nectar sugar composition of some south and southeast Asian species. Biotropica 23:568–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatica CDL, Gonzalez SP, Vasquez RA, Sabat P (2006) On the relationship between sugar digestion and diet preference in two Chilean avian species belonging to the Muscicapoidea superfamily. Rev Chil Hist Nat 79:287–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Hainsworth FR, Wolf LL (1976) Nectar characteristics and food selection by hummingbirds. Oecologia 25:101–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson S, Nicolson SW, Lotz CN (1998a) Sugar preferences and “side bias” in Cape sugarbirds and lesser double-collared sunbirds. Auk 115:156–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson S, Nicolson SW, Van Wyk BE (1998b) Apparent absorption efficiencies of nectar sugars in the Cape sugarbird, with a comparison of methods. Physiol Zool 71:106–115

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson SD, Nicolson SW (2008) Evolutionary associations between nectar properties and specificity in bird pollination systems. Biol Lett 4:49–52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson SD, Hargreaves AL, Brown M (2006) Dark, bitter-tasting nectar functions as a filter of flower visitors in a bird-pollinated plant. Ecology 87:2709–2716

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd P (2005) Dark-capped Bulbul. In: Hockey PAH, Dean WRJ, Ryan PG (eds) Robert’s birds of Southern Africa, VII edn. The trustees of the John Voelcker Bird Book Fund, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotz CN, Nicolson SW (1996) Sugar preferences of a nectarivorous passerine bird, the Lesser Double-collared Sunbird (Nectarinia chalybea). Funct Ecol 10:360–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotz CN, Schondube JE (2006) Sugar preferences in nectar- and fruit-eating birds: behavioural patterns and physiological causes. Biotropica 38:3–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcarney HL, Martinez Del Rio C, Apanius V (1994) Sucrose intolerance in birds: simple nonlethal diagnostic methods and consequences for assimilation of complex carbohydrates. Auk 111:170–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Markman S, Tadmor-Melamed H, Arieli A, Izhaki I (2006) Sex differences in food intake and digestive constraints in a nectarivorous bird. J Exp Biol 209:1058–1063

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez Del Rio C (1990) Sugar preferences in hummingbirds: the influence of subtle chemical differences on food choice. Condor 92:1022–1030

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez Del Rio C, Stevens BR (1989) Physiological constraint on feeding behavior: intestinal membrane disaccharidases of the starling. Science 243:794–796

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mata A, Bosque C (2004) Sugar preferences, absorption efficiency and water influx in a Neotropical nectarivorous passerine, the bananaquit (Coereba flaveola). Comp Biochem Physiol Part A 139:395–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcwhorter TJ, Lopez-Calleja MV (2000) The intergration of diet, physiology and ecology of nectar-feeding birds. Rev Chil Hist Nat 73:451–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcwhorter TJ, Bakken BH, Karasov WH, Martinez del Rio C (2006) Hummingbirds rely on both paracellular and carrier-mediated intestinal glucose absorption to fuel high metabolism. Biol Lett 2:131–134

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mendonca LD, Anjos LD (2006) Feeding behaviour of hummingbirds and perching birds on Erythrina speciosa Andrews (Fabaceae) in an urban area, Londrina, Parana, Brazil. Rev Bras Zool 23:42–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Napier KR, Purchase C, Mcwhorter TJ, Nicolson SW, Fleming PA (2008) The sweet life: diet sugar concentration influences paracellular glucose absorption. Biol Lett 4:530–533

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolson SW, Fleming PA (2003) Energy balance in the whitebellied sunbird Nectarinia talatala: constraints on compensatory feeding, and consumption of supplementary water. Funct Ecol 17:3–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocca MA, Sazima M (2008) Ornithophilous canopy species in the Atlantic rain forest of southeastern Brazil. J Ornithol 79:130–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocca MA, Sazima M, Sazima I (2006) Woody woodpecker enjoys soft drinks: the blond-crested woodpecker seeks nectar and pollinates canopy plants in south-eastern Brazil. Biota Neotrop 6:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Rodriguez MC, Valido A (2008) Opportunistic nectar-feeding birds are effective pollinators of bird-flowers from Canary Islands: experimental evidence from Isoplexix canariensis (Scrophulariaceae). Am J Bot 95:1408–1415

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roxburgh L, Pinshow B (2002) Ammonotely in a passerine nectarivore: the influence of renal and post-renal modification on nitrogenous waste product excretion. J Exp Biol 205:1735–1745

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Lebuhna AN, Schwerdtfegera M, Kesslera M, Lohaus G (2007) Phylogenetic constraints vs. ecology in the nectar composition of Acanthaceae. Flora 202:62–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Schondube JE, Martinez Del Rio C (2003) Concentration-dependent sugar preferences in nectar-feeding birds: mechanisms and consequences. Funct Ecol 17:445–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromberg MR, Johnsen PB (1990) Hummingbird sweetness preferences: taste or viscosity? Condor 92:606–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Symes CT, Nicolson SW, Mckechnie AE (2008) Response of avian nectarivores to the flowering of Aloe marlothii: a nectar oasis during dry South African winters. J Ornithol 149:13–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamm S, Gass CL (1986) Energy intake rates and nectar concentration preferences by hummingbirds. Oecologia 70:20–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Toledo VM (1977) Pollination of Some rain forest plants by non-hovering birds in Veracruz, Mexico. Biotropica 9:262–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Valtuena FJ, Ortega-Olivencia A, Rodrıguez-Riano TS (2007) Nectar production in Anagyris foetida (Fabaceae): two types of concentration in flowers with hanging droplet. Int J Plant Sci 168:627–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicentini A, Fischer EA (1999) Pollination of Moronobea coccinea (Clusiaceae) by the golden-winged parakeet in the Central Amazon. Biotropica 31:692–696

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellmann AE, Downs CT (2009) Sugar preferences and digestion by Cape white-eyes, Zosterops virens, fed artificial diets. Afr Zool 44:106–116

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Tamsanqa Majwara is thanked for his assistance in animal capture and care. Birds were captured under permit from Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife. The project was approved by the animal ethics committee of the University of KwaZulu-Natal.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Brown.

Additional information

Communicated by C. G. Guglielmo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, M., Downs, C.T. & Johnson, S.D. Sugar preferences and digestive efficiency in an opportunistic avian nectarivore, the Dark-capped Bulbul Pycnonotus tricolor . J Ornithol 151, 637–643 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-010-0498-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-010-0498-8

Keywords

Navigation