Journal of Ornithology

, 151:211 | Cite as

Potential impact of grey squirrels Sciurus carolinensis on woodland bird populations in England

Original Article

Abstract

Several woodland bird species have declined markedly in abundance in England over the past 40 years, whilst the grey squirrel Sciurus carolinensis, a non-native nest predator, has increased. Given the timing, there has been concern that grey squirrels have driven these declines, although there is little data to support this view. Using novel analytical methods and extensive national bird and grey squirrel monitoring data, we examine whether there is evidence that woodland bird populations in England have been depressed by grey squirrels and whether there is a relationship between nest failure and squirrel numbers. Our results indicate that grey squirrels are very unlikely to have driven observed declines of woodland birds in recent years, although the number of associations, positive as well as negative, between grey squirrels and woodland birds is greater than expected by chance. For this reason, we cannot exclude the possibility that the populations of a small number of bird species, principally increasing species, have been depressed to some degree at sites where a greater number of grey squirrels were present. Of these species, perhaps the most convincing evidence is for Common Blackbird Turdus merula and Eurasian Collared Dove Streptopelia decaocto where nest record data also identified a positive relationship between nest failure at the egg stage and squirrel abundance.

Keywords

Grey squirrel Predation Rates of population change Nest failure Woodland birds 

References

  1. Aebischer NJ (1999) Multi-way comparisons and generalised linear models of nest success: extensions of the Mayfield method. Bird Study 46(Suppl):S22–S31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amar A, Hewson CM, Thewlis RM, Smith KW, Fuller RJ, Lindsell JA, Conway G, Butler S, MacDonald MA (2006) What’s happening to our woodland birds? Long-term changes in the populations of woodland birds. BTO Research Report no. 169, British Trust for Ornithology, ThetfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Baillie SR, Marchant JH, Crick HQP, Noble DG, Balmer DE, Barimore C, Coombes RH, Downie IS, Freeman SN, Joys AC, Leech DI, Raven MJ, Robinson RA, Thewlis RM (2007) Breeding Birds in the Wider Countryside: their conservation status 2006. BTO Research Report no. 470. Thetford, British Trust for Ornithology. http://www.bto.org/birdtrends
  4. Bayne EM, Hobson KA, Fargey P (1997) Predation of artificial nests in relation to forest type: contrasting the use of quail and plasticine eggs. Ecography 20:233–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chiles J, Delfiner P (1999) Geostatistics. Modeling spatial uncertainty. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Crawley MJ (1993) Glim for ecologists. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Crick HQP (1992) A bird-habitat coding system for use in Britain and Ireland incorporating aspects of land management and human activity. Bird Study 39:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crick HQP, Baillie SR, Leech DI (2003) The UK Nest Record Scheme: its value for science and conservation. Bird Study 50:254–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Freeman SN, Newson SE (2008) On a log-linear approach to detecting ecological interactions in monitored populations. Ibis 150:250–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gregory RD, Wilkinson NI, Noble DG, Robinson JA, Brown AF, Hughes J, Procter D, Gibbons DW, Galbraith CA (2002) The population status of birds in the United Kingdom, Channel Islands and Isle of Man: an analysis of conservation concern 2002–2007. Br Birds 95:410–450Google Scholar
  11. Haines-Young RH, Barr CJ, Black HIJ, Briggs DJ, Bunce RGH, Clarke RT, Cooper A, Dawson FH, Firbank LG, Fuller RM, Furse MT, Gillespie MK, Hill R, Hornung M, Howard DC, McCann T, Morecroft MD, Petit S, Sier ARJ, Smart SM, Smith GM, Stott AP, Stuart RC, Watkins JW (2000) Accounting for nature: assessing habitats in the UK countryside. DETR, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Harris S, Morris P, Wray S, Yalden D (1995) A review of British mammals: population estimates and conservation status of British mammals other than cetaceans. JNCC, PeterboroughGoogle Scholar
  13. Haskell A (1993) A reevaluation of the effects of forest fragmentation on rates of bird–nest predation. Conserv Biol 9:1316–1318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heske EJ, Robinson SK, Brawn JD (2001) Nest predation and neotropical migrant songbirds: piecing together the fragments. Wildl Soc Bull 29:52–61Google Scholar
  15. Hewson, CM, Fuller RJ (2003) Impacts of grey squirrels on woodland birds: an important predator of eggs and young? BTO Research Report no. 328, British Trust for Ornithology, ThetfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Hewson C, Fuller R, Mayle B, Smith K (2004) Possible impacts of grey squirrel on birds and other wildlife. Br Wildl 15:183–191Google Scholar
  17. Hewson CM, Amar A, Lindsell JA, Thewlis RM, Butler S, Smith K, Fuller RJ (2007) Recent changes in bird populations in British broadleaved woodland. Ibis 149:14–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnston K, Ver Hoef JM, Krivoruchko K, Lucas N (2001) Using ArcGIS Geostatistical Analyst. ESRI, RedlandsGoogle Scholar
  19. Kenward RE, Holm JL (1993) On the replacement of the red squirrel in Britain: a phylotaxic explanation. Proc R Soc Lond B 251:187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Langston R, Gregory R, Adams R (2002) The status of the Hawfinch in the UK 1975–1999. Br Birds 95:166–173Google Scholar
  21. Lever C (1977) The naturalized animals of the British Isles. Longman, London, p 487Google Scholar
  22. Macdonald D, Barrett P (1993) Collins field guide: mammals of Britain and Europe. Harper Collins, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Martin TE (1992) Breeding productivity considerations: what are the appropriate features for management? In: Hagen JM, Johnston DW (eds) Ecology and conservation of neotropical migrant landbirds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp 455–473Google Scholar
  24. Mayfield H (1961) Nesting success calculated from exposure. Wilson Bull 73:255–261Google Scholar
  25. Mayfield H (1975) Suggestions for calculating nest success. Wilson Bull 87:456–466Google Scholar
  26. Moller H (1983) Food and foraging behaviour of red (Scirus vulgaris) and grey (Scirus carolinensis) squirrels. Mammal Rev 13:81–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Møller AP (1989) Nest site selection across field-woodland ecotones: the effect of nest predation. Oikos 56:240–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Monckton AS (1991) Grey squirrel control. Q J For 85:268–269Google Scholar
  29. Moran MD (2003) Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studies. Oikos 100:403–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Newson SE, Noble DG (2006) The production of population trends for UK mammals using BBS mammal data, 1995–2004 update. BTO Research Report no. 428, British Trust for Ornithology, ThetfordGoogle Scholar
  31. Newton I (1993) Predation and limitation of bird numbers. Curr Ornithol 11:143–198Google Scholar
  32. Nour N, Matthysen E, Dhont AA (1993) Artificial nest predation and habitat fragmentation: different trends in bird and mammal predators. Ecography 16:111–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pepper H, Bryce J, Cartmel S (2001) Co-existence of red squirrels and grey squirrels. Forest Research Annual Report and Accounts 1999–2000, 26–29. The Stationary OfficeGoogle Scholar
  34. Raven MJ, Noble DG, Baillie SR (2006) The Breeding Bird Survey 2005. BTO Research Report no. 439, British Trust for Ornithology, ThetfordGoogle Scholar
  35. SAS Institute (2001) SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 8.02. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  36. Thomson DL, Green RE, Gregory RD, Baillie SR (1998) The widespread declines of songbirds in rural Britain do not correlate with the spread of their avian predators. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:2057–2062CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.British Trust for OrnithologyThetfordUK
  2. 2.Natural EnglandCambridgeUK
  3. 3.Science and Evidence TeamNatural EnglandPeterboroughUK

Personalised recommendations