Journal of Ornithology

, 149:555 | Cite as

Predation of Lapwing Vanellus vanellus nests on lowland wet grassland in England and Wales: effects of nest density, habitat and predator abundance

Original Article

Abstract

There is concern that predation of Lapwing Vanellus vanellus nests may create additional pressure on declining populations of this species in Europe. At seven sites in England and Wales, daily nest predation rates on 1,390 nests were related to variables using Generalised Linear Mixed Models. The strongest predictor was Lapwing nest density (number of nests within 100 m): predation rates declined as nest density increased. Since nocturnal species, probably mammals, have been identified as the major predators of Lapwing nests at these sites, these results suggest that Lapwings are able to deter mammalian predators or may settle to nest at high densities in areas with low predation pressure. At the site level, there was no relationship between Lapwing nesting density and fox density, and a positive relationship with Carrion Crow Corvus corone nesting density. There was a weaker effect of distance to field boundary: nests closer to boundaries were more likely to be predated. Weak interactive effects between crow density and both nest visibility and distance to vantage point were identified in models using a reduced subset of nests. These were counter-intuitive, did not persist in the larger data set, and do not have obvious explanations. If Lapwings nesting at high density are able to deter predators, there are implications for land management. Smaller areas could be managed within potential breeding habitat to encourage Lapwings to nest in dense colonies. Selection of larger fields for such management, where nests could be located far from the field boundary should improve the value of such measures.

Keywords

Lapwing Nest predation Wet grassland Field boundary Nest density 

References

  1. Aebischer NJ (1999) Multi-way comparisons and generalized linear models of nest success: extensions of the Mayfield method. Bird Study 46:522–531Google Scholar
  2. Bellebaum J (2001) Breeding success of lapwing Vanellus vanellus at two German wetland reserves: stable numbers in spite of high predation rates. Wader Study Group Bull 96:21Google Scholar
  3. Bellebaum J (2002) Prädation als Gefährdung bodenbrüter Vögel in Deutschland - eine Übersicht (in German with English summary: Predation as a threat to ground-nesting birds in Germany—a review). Ber Vogelsch 39:95–117Google Scholar
  4. Berg Å (1996) Predation on artificial, solitary and aggregated wader nests on farmland. Oecologia 107:343–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berg Å, Lindberg T, Kallebrink KG (1992) Hatching success of lapwings on farmland: differences between habitats and colonies of different sizes. J Anim Ecol 61:469–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blühdorn I (2002) Bestandsentwicklung und Brutbiologie einer Kiebitzkolonie (Vanellus vanellus) während der Extensivierung ihres Brutgebietes [in German with an English summary]. PhD thesis, Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universitat, MünsterGoogle Scholar
  7. Bolton M, Tyler G, Smith KW, Bamford R (2007) The impact of experimental fox and crow control on lapwing Vanellus vanellus breeding success on wet grassland nature reserves. J Appl Ecol 44:534–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boschert M (2005) Analysis of nest losses of the Eurasian Curlew Numenius arquata in the upper Rhine Valley of Baden—a comparison between results from 2000 to 2002 and former periods with focus on predation (in German with an English summary). Vogelwelt 126:321–332Google Scholar
  9. Chamberlain DE, Crick HP (2003) Temporal and spatial associations in aspects of reproductive performance of lapwings Vanellus vanellus in the United Kingdom, 1962–1999. Ardea 91:183–196Google Scholar
  10. Colwell MA (1992) Wilson’s phalarope nest success is not influenced by vegetation concealment. Condor 94:767–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elliot RD (1982) Nesting dispersion of lapwings in relation to predation and anti-predator defence. PhD thesis, University of AberdeenGoogle Scholar
  12. Galbraith H (1987) Marking and visiting lapwing Vanellus vanellus nests does not affect clutch survival. Bird Study 34:137–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Galbraith H (1988) Effects of agriculture on the breeding ecology of lapwings Vanellus vanellus. J Appl Ecol 25:487–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grant MC, Orsman C, Easton J, Lodge C, Smith M, Thompson G, Rodwell S, Moore N (1999) Breeding success and causes of breeding failure of curlew Numenius arquata in Northern Ireland. J Appl Ecol 36:59–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Green RE (1984) Nomograms for estimating the stage of incubation of wader eggs in the field. Wader Study Group Bull 42:36–39Google Scholar
  16. Green RE (1988) Effects of environmental factors on the timing and success of breeding of common snipe Gallinago gallinago (Aves: Scolopacidae). J Appl Ecol 25:79–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Green RE, Hirons GJ, Kirby JS (1990) The effectiveness of nest defence by black-tailed godwits Limosa limosa. Ardea 78:405–413Google Scholar
  18. Hart JD, Milsom TP, Baxter A, Kelly PF, Parkin WF (2002) The impact of livestock on lapwing Vanellus vanellus breeding densities and performance on coastal grazing marsh. Bird Study 49:67–78Google Scholar
  19. Hodson NL (1962) Lapwing’s persistent attack on fox. Br Birds 55:590Google Scholar
  20. Johansson T (2001) Habitat selection, nest predation and conservation biology in a black-tailed godwit (Limosa limosa) population. PhD thesis, University of UppsalaGoogle Scholar
  21. Junker S, Düttman H, Ehrnsberger R (2006) Hatching success and chick survival of lapwings (Vanellus vanellus) breeding in grasslands with different agricultural management—results of a long-term study in the Stollhammer Wisch (Wesermarsch district, Lower Saxony). Paper presented at Ökologie und Schutz von Wisenvögeln in Mitteleuropa, Vechtaer Fachdidaktische Forschungen und BerichteGoogle Scholar
  22. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD (1996) SAS system for mixed models. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  23. Manolis JC, Andersen DE, Cuthbert FJ (2000) Uncertain nest fates in songbird studies and variation in Mayfield estimation. Auk 117:615–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mayfield H (1961) Nesting success calculated from exposure. Wilson Bull 73:255–261Google Scholar
  25. Mayfield H (1975) Suggestions for calculating nest success. Wilson Bull 87:456–466Google Scholar
  26. Milsom TP (2005) Decline of northern lapwing Vanellus vanellus breeding on arable farmland in relation to loss of spring tillage. Bird Study 52:297–306Google Scholar
  27. Moore RP, Robinson WD (2004) Artificial bird nests, external validity, and bias in ecological field studies. Ecology 85:1562–1567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. O’Brien MG (2001) Factors affecting breeding wader populations on upland enclosed farmland in northern Britain. Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  29. Olsen H (2002) Patterns of predation on ground nesting birds. PhD thesis, Royal Veterinarian and Agricultural University, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  30. Ottvall R (2005) Breeding success and adult survival of redshank Tringa totanus on coastal meadows in SE Sweden. Ardea 93:225–236Google Scholar
  31. Ottvall R, Larsson K, Smith HG (2005) Nesting success in redshank Tringa totanus breeding on coastal meadows and the importance of habitat features used as perches by avian predators. Bird Study 52:289–296Google Scholar
  32. Peach WJ, Thompson PS, Coulson JC (1994) Annual and long-term variation in the survival rates of British lapwings Vanellus vanellus. J Anim Ecol 63:60–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Phillips ML, Clark WR, Nusser SM, Sovada MA, Greenwood RJ (2004) Analysis of predator movement in prairie landscapes with contrasting grassland composition. J Mammal 85:187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sasvári L, Hegyi Z (2000) Avian predators influence the daily time budget of lapwings Vanellus vanellus. Folia Zool 49:211–219Google Scholar
  35. Seymour AS (1999) The ecology of nest predation by red foxes Vulpes vulpes. PhD thesis, University of BristolGoogle Scholar
  36. Seymour AS, Harris S, Ralston C, White PCL (2003) Factors influencing the nesting success of lapwing Vanellus vanellus and behaviour of red fox Vulpes vulpes in lapwing nesting sites. Bird Study 50:39–46Google Scholar
  37. Sharpe FE (2006) Productivity and population trends of northern lapwing (Vanellus vanellus) in Britain. PhD thesis, University of BathGoogle Scholar
  38. Sheldon RD (2002) Factors affecting the distribution, abundance and chick survival of the lapwing (Vanellus vanellus). PhD thesis, Harper Adams University College, NewportGoogle Scholar
  39. Shrubb M (1990) Effects of agricultural change on nesting lapwings Vanellus vanellus in England and Wales. Bird Study 37:115–127Google Scholar
  40. Smart J (2005) Strategies of sea-level rise mitigation for breeding redshank. PhD thesis, University of East AngliaGoogle Scholar
  41. Stillman RA, MacDonald MA, Bolton MR, Durell SEA, le V dit, Caldow AWG, West AD (2006) Management of wet grassland habitat to reduce the impact of predation on breeding waders: Phase 1. Report to DEFRA. CEH, Winfrith, DorsetGoogle Scholar
  42. Teunissen W, Schekkerman H, Willems F (2005) Predatie bij weidevogels: Op zoek naar de mogelijke effecten van predatie op de weidevogelstand (in Dutch with an English summary): Sovon Vogelonderzoek NederlandGoogle Scholar
  43. Thyen S, Exo K-M (2005) Interactive effects of time and vegetation on reproduction of redshanks (Tringa totanus) breeding in Wadden Sea salt marshes. J Ornithol 146:215–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Valkama J, Currie D, Korpimäki E (1999) Differences in the intensity of nest predation in the curlew Numenius arquata: a consequence of land use and predator densities? Ecoscience 6:497–504Google Scholar
  45. Vickery PD, Hunter MLJ, Wells JV (1992) Evidence of incidental nest predation and its effects on nests of threatened grassland birds. Oikos 63:281–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Webbon C, Baker PJ, Harris S (2004) Faecal density counts for monitoring changes in red fox numbers in rural Britain. J Appl Ecol 41:768–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Whittingham MJ, Evans KL (2004) The effects of habitat structure on predation risk of birds in agricultural landscapes. Ibis 146(Suppl. 2):210–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilson AM, Ausden M, Milsom TP (2004) Changes in breeding wader populations on lowland wet grasslands in England and Wales: causes and potential solutions. Ibis 146(Suppl. 2):32–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Conservation Science, RSPB UK HeadquartersSandyUK

Personalised recommendations