Skip to main content
Log in

Juvenile coloration of Florida Scrub-Jays (Aphelocoma coerulescens) is sexually dichromatic and correlated with condition

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ornithology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Florida Scrub-Jay is a monogamous cooperative breeder in which both males and females display extensive structurally based blue plumage. Juveniles of this species exhibit blue tail and wing feathers that they begin growing as nestlings, and some of these feathers are retained throughout their first year. Although the birds appear to be sexually monochromatic, we assessed whether cryptic dichromatism exists in both the magnitude and pattern of coloration in tail feathers of juvenile Florida Scrub-Jays. We then determined whether variation in plumage coloration is associated with nutritional condition during molt. Tails of juvenile male Florida Scrub-Jays exhibit a greater proportion of UV reflectance than those of females. Mass at age 11 days and ptilochronology of the juvenile tail feathers were used as measures of individual nutritional condition during feather growth, and the latter was found to be positively associated with UV chroma. These data demonstrate that Florida Scrub-Jays are sexually dichromatic and suggest that variation in plumage color may be condition dependent, although we cannot rule out alternative explanations. Juvenile plumage coloration, therefore, has the potential to function as a signal of individual quality in both males and females.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bancroft GT, Woolfenden GE (1982) The molt of scrub jays and blue jays in Florida. Ornithological monograph 29. American Ornithologist’s Union, Washington, DC

  • Eaton MD (2005) Human vision fails to distinguish widespread sexual dichromatism among sexually “monochromatic” birds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:10942–10946

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1958) The genetical theory of natural selection, 2nd edn. Dover, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths R, Double MC, Orr K, Dawson RJG (1998) A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol Ecol 7:1071–1075

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grubb TC (1989) Ptilochronology: feather growth bars as indicators of nutritional status. Auk 106:314–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubb TC, Woolfenden GE, Fitzpatrick JW (1998) Factors affecting nutritional condition of fledgling Florida Scrub-Jays: a ptilochronology approach. Condor 100:753–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD, Zuk M (1982) Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science 218:384–386

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoelzer G (1989) The good parent process of sexual selection. Anim Behav 38:1067–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill G (1991) Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality. Nature 350:337–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill GE, McGraw KJ (2006) Preface. In: Hill GE, McGraw KJ (eds) Bird coloration. Mechanisms and measurements, vol 1. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 7–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill GE, Montgomerie R (1994) Plumage colour signals nutritional condition in the house finch. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 25:47–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacot A, Kempenaers B (2007) Effects of nestling condition on UV plumage traits in blue tits: an experimental approach. Behav Ecol 18:34–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins KD, Hawley DM, Farabaugh CS, Cristol DA (2001) Ptilochronology reveals differences in condition of captive White-throated Sparrows. Condor 103:579–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen A, Delhey K, Andersson S, Kempenaers B (2003) Plumage colour in nestling blue tits: sexual dichromatism, condition dependence and genetic effects. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 270:1263–1270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilner RM (1999) Family conflicts and the evolution of nestling mouth colour. Behav 126:779–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilner RM (2006) Function and evolution of color in young birds. In: Hill GE, McGraw KJ (eds) Bird coloration: function and evolution, vol 2. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 201–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodric-Brown A, Brown J (1984) Truth in advertising: the kind of traits favored by sexual selection. Am Nat 124:309–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs EA, Putland DA (2004) Chic chicks: the evolution of chick ornamentation in rails. Behav Ecol 15:946–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon BE, Eadie JM, Hamilton LD (1994) Parental choice selects for ornamental plumage in American Coot chicks. Nature 37:240–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mennill DJ, Doucet SM, Montgomerie R, Ratcliffe LM (2003) Achromatic color variation in black-capped chickadees Poecile atricapilla: black and white signals of sex and rank. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 53:350–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michener H, Michener JR (1938) Bars in flight feathers. Condor 40:149–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters A, Delhey K, Johnsen A, Kempenaers B (2007) The condition-dependent development of carotenoid-based and structural plumage in nestling blue tits: males and females differ. Am Nat 169:S122–S136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Py I, Ducrest A-L, Duvoisin N, Fumagalli L, Roulin A (2006) Ultraviolet reflectance in a melanin-based plumage trait is heritable. Evol Ecol Res 8:483–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn JS, Woolfenden GE, Fitzpatrick JW, White BN (1999) Multi-locus DNA fingerprinting supports genetic monogamy in Florida scrub-jays. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 45:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohwer S (1975) The social significance of avian winter plumage variability. Evolution 29:593–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roulin A., Biz P, Ravussin P-A, Broch L (2004) Genetic and environmental effects on the covariation between colour polymorphism and a life history trait. Evol Ecol Res 6:1253–1260

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe C (1999) Receiver psychology and the evolution of multicomponent signals. Anim Behav 58:921–931

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shawkey MD, Estes AM, Siefferman LM, Hill GE (2003) Nanostructure predicts intraspecific variation in structural plumage colour. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:1455–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon B, Andersson S, Griffith S, Ornborg J, Sendecka J (1999) Ultraviolet colour variation influences blue tit sex ratios. Nature 402:874–877

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siefferman L, Hill GE (2003) Structural and melanin plumage coloration indicate parental effort and reproductive success in male eastern bluebirds. Behav Ecol 14:855–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siefferman L, Hill GE (2007) The effect of rearing environment on blue structural coloration of eastern bluebirds (Sialia sialis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1839–1846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soler MJ, Martinez JG, Soler JJ, Møller AP (1995) Preferential allocation of food by Magpies Pica pica to Great Spotted Cuckoo Clamator glandarius chicks. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 37:7–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL, Willard DE (1973) Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science 179:90–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woolfenden GE (1978) Growth and survival of young Florida Scrub-Jays. Wilson Bull 90:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolfenden GE, Fitzpatrick JW (1984) The Florida Scrub-Jay: demography of a cooperative-breeding bird. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolfenden GE, Fitzpatrick JW (1986) Sexual asymmetries in the life history of the Florida Scrub-Jay. In: Rubenstein D, Wrangham RW (eds) Ecological aspects of social evolution: birds and mammals. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 97–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolfenden GE, Fitzpatrick JW (1996) Florida Scrub-Jay. In: Poole A, Gill FB (eds) The birds of North America. American Ornithologists’ Union and Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, pp 1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi A (1975) Mate selection—a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol 53:205–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to C. Brand and R. Montgomerie for spectral processing programs and to the staff and scientists at Archbold Biological Station and G. Hill for support during the course of this research. A. Roulin, T. W. P. Friedl and anonymous reviewers greatly improved the quality of the manuscript. The data collected in this paper comply with the current laws of the USA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynn Siefferman.

Additional information

Communicated by T. Friedl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Siefferman, L., Shawkey, M.D., Bowman, R. et al. Juvenile coloration of Florida Scrub-Jays (Aphelocoma coerulescens) is sexually dichromatic and correlated with condition. J Ornithol 149, 357–363 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-008-0289-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-008-0289-7

Keywords

Navigation