An example of a two-tiered agri-environment scheme designed to deliver effectively the ecological requirements of both localised and widespread bird species in England

Abstract

Intensification of agricultural practices over the last 50 years has resulted in the impoverishment of the wildlife associated with lowland farmland across much of Western Europe. This is perhaps best documented in birds. In England, populations of 15 species associated with lowland farmland have fallen by between 50% and 100%. Several species have become rare and localised. Others, formerly abundant and ubiquitous, remain relatively common and widespread, but nonetheless in need of conservation action. Agri-environment schemes are widely held as a solution to this generic problem, but the track record of many prototype schemes in delivering biodiversity is far from good. The efficacy of any scheme in recovering the population of a given species will depend upon deployment of effective prescriptive management at the right time and in the right place. We argue that a two-tiered approach is required in the design of any scheme, to cope with the requirements of both localised and widespread species. We illustrate this by using case studies of two ground-nesting bird species, Stone-curlew Burhinus oedicnemus and Skylark Alauda arvensis, whose populations have declined for similar reasons, but for which the prescriptive management solutions and the means of their deployment differ radically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Aebischer NJ, Green RE, Evans AD (2000) From science to recovery: four cases of how research has been translated into conservation action in the UK. In: Aebischer NJ, Evans AD, Grice PV, Vickery JA (eds) Ecology and conservation of lowland farmland birds. British Ornithologist’s Union, Tring, pp 43–56

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baker H, Stroud DA, Aebischer NJ, Cranswick PA, Gregory RD, McSorley CA, Noble DG, Rehfisch MM (2006) Population estimates of birds in Great Britain and the United Kingdom. Br Birds 99:25–44

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bradbury RB, Browne SJ, Stevens DK, Aebischer NJ (2004) Five-year evaluation of the impact of the pilot Arable Stewardship scheme on birds. Ibis 146(Suppl 2):171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Buckwell A, Armstrong-Brown S (2004) Changes in farming and future prospects. Ibis 146(Suppl 2):14–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Butler SJ, Vickery JA, Norris K (2007) Farmland biodiversity and the footprint of agriculture. Science 315:381–384

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chamberlain DE, Fuller RJ, Bunce RGH, Duckworth JC, Shrubb M (2000) Changes in the abundance of farmland birds in relation to the timing of agricultural intensification in England and Wales. J Appl Ecol 37:771–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. DEFRA (2005a) Entry level stewardship handbook, http://www.defra.gov.uk/erdp/pdfs/es/els-handbook.pdf

  8. DEFRA (2005b) Higher level stewardship handbook, http://www.defra.gov.uk/erdp/pdfs/es/hls-handbook.pdf

  9. Donald PF (2004) The Skylark. Poyser, London

    Google Scholar 

  10. Donald PF, Morris AJ (2005) Saving the Sky Lark: new solutions for a declining farmland bird. Br Birds 98:570–579

    Google Scholar 

  11. Donald PF, Evans AD, Buckingham DL, Muirhead LB, Wilson JD (2001) Factors affecting the distribution of skylarks Alauda arvensis breeding on lowland farmland. Bird Study 48:271–278

    Google Scholar 

  12. Donald PF, Evans AD, Muirhead LB, Buckingham DL, Kirby WB, Schmitt SIA (2002) Survival rates, causes of failure and productivity of Skylark Alauda arvensis nests on lowland farmland. Ibis 144:652–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Evans AD, Armstrong-Brown S, Grice PV (2002) The role of research and development in the evolution of a ‘smart’ agri-environment scheme. Aspects Appl Biol 67:253–264

    Google Scholar 

  14. Evans AD, Vickery J, Shrubb M (2004) Importance of over-wintered stubble for farmland bird recovery: a reply to Potts. Bird Study 51:94–96

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gibbons DW, Reid JB, Chapman RA (1993) The new atlas of breeding birds of Britain and Ireland: 1988–1991. Poyser, London

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gillings S, Newson SE, Noble DG, Vickery JA (2005) Winter availability of cereal stubbles attracts declining farmland birds and positively influences breeding population trends. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:733–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Green RE (1978) Factors affecting the diet of farmland skylarks Alauda arvensis. J Anim Ecol 47:913–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Green RE (1988) Stone-curlew conservation. RSPB Conserv Rev 2:30–33

    Google Scholar 

  19. Green RE, Griffiths GH (1994) Use of preferred nesting habitat by Stone-curlews Burhinus oedicnemus in relation to vegetation structure. J Zool 233:457–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Green RE, Tyler GA, Bowden CGR (2000) Habitat selection, ranging behaviour and diet of the stone curlew (Burhinus oedicnemus) in southern England. J Zool 250:161–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gregory RD, Wilkinson NI, Noble DG, Robinson JA, Brown AF, Hughes J, Procter DA, Gibbons DW, Galbraith CA (2002) The population status of birds in the United Kingdom, Channel Islands and Isle of Man: an analysis of conservation concern 2002–2007. Br Birds 95:410–450

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gregory RD, Noble DG, Custance J (2004) The state of play of farmland birds; population trends and conservation status of lowland farmland birds in the United Kingdom. Ibis 146(Suppl 2):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Grice P, Evans A, Osmond J, Brand-Hardy R (2004) Science into policy: the role of research in the development of a recovery plan for farmland birds in England. Ibis 146(Suppl 2):239–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jeffs C, Evans A (2004) Cirl buntings: the road to recovery. Biologist 51:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kleijn D, Sutherland WJ (2003) How effective are European agri-environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity? J Appl Ecol 40:947–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Morris AJ, Holland JM, Smith B, Jones NE (2004) Sustainable Arable Farming For an Improved Environment (SAFFIE): managing winter wheat sward structure for Skylarks Alauda arvensis. Ibis 146(Suppl 2):155–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Newton I (2004) The recent declines of farmland bird populations in Britain: an appraisal of causal factors and conservation actions. Ibis 146:579–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Odderskaer P, Prang A, Poulsen JG, Andersen PN, Elmegaard N (1997) Skylark Alauda arvensis utilisation of micro-habitats in spring barley fields. Agric Ecosyst Environ 62:21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Potts GR (1986) The partridge. Pesticides, predation and conservation. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  30. Robinson RA, Wilson JD, Crick HQP (2001) The importance of arable habitat for farmland birds in grassland habitats. J Appl Ecol 38:1059–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Schläpfer A (1988) Populationsökologie der Feldlerche Alauda arvensis in der intensive genutzten Agrarlandschaft. Ornithol Beob 85:309–371

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shrubb M (2003) Birds, scythes and combines. A history of birds and agricultural change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  33. Smallshire D, Robertson P, Thompson P (2004) Policy into practice: the development and delivery of agri-environment schemes and supporting advice in England. Ibis 146(Suppl 2):250–258

    Google Scholar 

  34. Stevens DK, Bradbury RB (2006) Effects of the Arable Stewardship Pilot Scheme on breeding birds at field and farm scales. Agric Ecosyst Environ 112:283–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Vickery JA, Evans AD, Grice PV, Aebischer NJ, Brand-Hardy R (eds) (2004a) Ecology and conservation of lowland farmland birds II: the road to recovery. Ibis 146 (Suppl 2)

  36. Vickery JA, Bradbury RB, Henderson IG, Eaton MA, Grice PV (2004b) The role of agri-environment schemes and farm management practices in reversing the decline of farmland birds in England. Biol Conserv 119:19–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Tony Morris and Nick Adams for providing data. RSPB and English Nature (now Natural England) have been long-term partners and co-funders of the Stone-curlew recovery project. Much of the Skylark data has been collected as part of the Sustainable Arable LINK project LK0926—Sustainable Arable Farming For an Improved Environment (SAFFIE). We thank Tony Morris and Richard Bradbury for their constructive comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. D. Evans.

Additional information

Communicated by F. Bairlein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Evans, A.D., Green, R.E. An example of a two-tiered agri-environment scheme designed to deliver effectively the ecological requirements of both localised and widespread bird species in England. J Ornithol 148, 279–286 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-007-0216-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Ground-nesting birds
  • Lowland farmland
  • Skylark
  • Stone-curlew
  • Recovery