Advertisement

Journal of Ornithology

, Volume 148, Supplement 2, pp 287–293 | Cite as

Response of breeding waders to agri-environmental schemes may be obscured by effects of existing hydrology and farming history

  • Johnny KahlertEmail author
  • Preben Clausen
  • Jens Peder Hounisen
  • Ib Krag Petersen
Original Article

Abstract

The initiation of agri-environmental schemes (AES) to improve habitats for breeding waders may not show expected benefits in all situations. We show this, using results from a study of breeding waders on 469 grassland fields in the Danish Wadden Sea area. Numbers of breeding waders were not restored to levels of the recent past, even though Lapwings Vanellus vanellus, Black-tailed Godwits Limosa limosa and Redshanks Tringa totanus were drawn to wet permanent grasslands with AES. We had expected that more waders would be attracted by improved surface water retention during the breeding period due to the AES. However, AES were not introduced to all fields, and this measure did not dramatically change the water regime in part of the breeding fields. Furthermore, dry grasslands and fields that had been cultivated or drained before did not attract more waders, despite the introduction of the AES. The results suggest that the interplay between surface water retention and former farming history are important determinants of the habitat choice for breeding waders. The study emphasises the need for pre-defined success criteria, thorough analysis of the nature of the habitat and consideration of population processes before initiation of an AES, so that realistic management goals are defined and expected benefits can be achieved.

Keywords

Cultivation Draining Meadow birds Sustainable agriculture Wetness 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Our hearty thanks to the Danish Forest and Nature Agency, the County of Southern Jutland and the landowner board of Ydre Koge for fruitful collaboration. Also a thank you to I. Gram and L.M. Rasmussen for undertaking the enormous task of developing field methods and compiling control phase data, and to T.K. Christensen, T.E. Holm and S. Pihl for helping with counts. Finally, thanks to A.D. Fox, K. Laursen and two anonymous referees for insightful comments and discussion. The study was carried out in compliance with current Danish laws.

References

  1. Ausden M, Sutherland WJ, James R (2001) The effects of flooding lowland wet grassland on soil macroinvertebrate prey of breeding wading birds. J Appl Ecol 38:320–338. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00600.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beintema AJ, Müskens GJDM (1987) Nesting success of birds breeding in Dutch agricultural grasslands. J Appl Ecol 24:743–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berg A, Lindberg T, Kallebrink KG (1992) Hatching success of lapwings on farmland––differences between habitats and colonies of different sizes. J Anim Ecol 61:469–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clausen P, Kahlert J, Hounisen JP, Petersen IK (2005) Tøndermarskens ynglefugle 2004, Naturovervågning. Technical Note 209, National Environmental Research Institute, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  5. Cramp S, Simmons KEL (1983) The birds of the Western Palearctic, vol III: Waders to Gulls. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Danish Forest and Nature Agency (1990) Fuglene i Tøndermarsken. Report from the Danish Forest and Nature Agency, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  7. Danish Forest and Nature Agency (2000) Beskyttelse og benyttelse af de Ydre Koge i Tøndermarsken––Redegørelse 1999. Report from the Danish Forest and Nature Agency, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  8. Donald PF, Green RE, Heath MF (2001) Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populations. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:25–29. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1325 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Glutz von Blotzheim UN (1999) Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas, Band 6. Charadriiformes, Teil 1. Aula, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  10. Gunnarsson TG, Gill JA, Appleton GF, Gislason H, Gardarsson A, Watkinson AR, Sutherland WJ (2006) Large-scale habitat associations of birds in lowland Iceland: implications and conservation. Biol Cons 128:265–275. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hälterlein D, Fleet DM, Henneberg HR, Mennebaeck T, Rasmussen LM, Südbeck P, Thorup O, Vogel, RL (1995) Guidelines for monitoring breeding birds. Wadden Sea Ecosystem 3, Common Wadden Sea SecretariatGoogle Scholar
  12. Jacobsen NK (1964) Træk af Tøndermarskens naturgeografi med særligt henblik på morfogenesen. Reitzels, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  13. Johansson OC, Blomquist D (1996) Habitat selection and diet of lapwing Vanellus vanellus chicks on coastal farmland in SW Sweden. J Appl Ecol 33:1030–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kleijn D, Sutherland WJ (2003) How effective are european agri-environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity? J Appl Ecol 40:947–969. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2003.00868.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kleijn D, van Zuijlen GJC (2004) The conservation effects of meadow bird agreement on farmland in Zeeland, The Netherlands, in the period 1989–1995. Biol Conserv 117:443–451. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2003.08.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kleijn D, Berendse F, Smit R, Gilissen N (2001) Agri-environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes. Nature 413:723–725. doi: 10.1038/35099540 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kleijn D, Berendse F, Smit R, Gilissen N, Smit J, Brak B, Groeneveld R (2004) Ecological effectiveness of agri-environment schemes in different agricultural landscapes in The Netherlands. Conserv Biol 18:775–786. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00550.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Koffijberg K, Dijksen L, Hälterlein B, Laursen K, Potel P, Südbeck, P (2006) Breeding Birds in the Wadden Sea in 2001. Results of the total survey in 2001 and trends in numbers between 1991 and 2001. Wadden Sea Ecosystem 22, Common Wadden Sea SecretariatGoogle Scholar
  19. Krebs JR, Wilson JD, Bradbury RB, Siriwardena GM (1999) The second silent spring? Nature 400:611–612 doi: 10.1038/23127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. MAFF (Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food) (1998) Economic evaluation of the nitrate sensitive areas scheme. Final Report by ENTEC, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, UKGoogle Scholar
  21. Milsom TP, Hart JD, Parkin WK, Peel S (2002) Management of coastal grazing marshes for breeding waders: the importance of surface topography and wetness. Biol Conserv 103:199–207. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00122-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Newton I (2004) The recent declines of farmland bird populations in Britain: an appraisal of causal factors and conservation actions. Ibis 146:579–600. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00375.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. O’Brien M, Self M (1994) Changes in the numbers of breeding waders on lowland wet grassland in the UK. RSBP Conserv Rev 8:38–44Google Scholar
  24. Ottvall R, Smith HG (2006) Effects of an agri-environment scheme on wader populations of coastal meadows of southern Sweden. Agric Ecosyst Environ 113:264–271. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2005.10.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pywell RF, Bullock JM, Hopkins A, Walker KJ, Sparks TH, Burke MJW, Peel S (2002) Restoration of species-rich grassland on arable land: assessing the limiting processes using multi-site experiment. J Appl Ecol 39:294–309. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00718.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ratcliffe N, Schmitt S, Whiffin M (2005) Sink or swim? Viability of a black-tailed godwit population in relation to flooding. J Appl Ecol 42:834–843 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01076.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Salek M, Smilauer P (2002) Predation on northern lapwing Vanellus vanellus nests: the effect of population density and spatial distribution of nests. Ardea 90:51–60Google Scholar
  28. Smart J, Gill JA, Sutherland WJ, Watkinson AR (2006) Grassland-breeding waders: identifying key habitat requirements for management. J Appl Ecol 43:454–463 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01166.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Teunissen W, Schekkerman H, Willems F (2005) Predatie bij weidevogels. Op zoek naar de mogelijke effecten van predatie op de weidevogelstand. Sovon-onderzoeksrapport 2005/11. Sovon Vogelonderzoek Nederland, Beek-Ubbergen. Alterra-Document 1292, Alterra, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  30. Thompson PS, Baines D, Coulson JC, Longrigg G (1994) Age of first breeding, philopatry and breeding site fidelity in the lapwing Vanellus vanellus. Ibis 136:474–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Weis J (2001) Naturschutzfachliche Erfolgskontrolle des Vertragsnaturschutzes am Beispiel der Nördlichen Eifel. PhD thesis, University BonnGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johnny Kahlert
    • 1
    Email author
  • Preben Clausen
    • 1
  • Jens Peder Hounisen
    • 1
  • Ib Krag Petersen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Wildlife Ecology and BiodiversityNational Environmental Research Institute, Århus UniversityRøndeDenmark

Personalised recommendations