Advertisement

Journal of Ornithology

, Volume 148, Issue 3, pp 347–355 | Cite as

Range of the Greater Flamingo, Phoenicopterus roseus, metapopulation in the Mediterranean: new insights from Turkey

  • Özge BalkızEmail author
  • Uygar Özesmi
  • Roger Pradel
  • Christophe Germain
  • Mehmet Sıkı
  • Juan A. Amat
  • Manuel Rendón-Martos
  • Nicola Baccetti
  • Arnaud Béchet
Original Article

Abstract

Metapopulation conservation should rely on a flyway approach aiming at assessing the spatial range of metapopulations by estimating the level of exchanges among local populations. In the western Mediterranean, Greater Flamingos have been shown to constitute a metapopulation with natal and breeding dispersal among colonies. In this paper, we examine whether this metapopulation reaches Turkey using a band-resighting study. Our results are the first evidence of natal and breeding dispersal from the western Mediterranean to Turkey, and suggest that the Gediz Delta, one of the two Turkish breeding colonies, can play a significant role in the recruitment of flamingos from the western Mediterranean. In 2003 and 2004, breeders of western Mediterranean origin accounted for more than 1.2 and 1.9% of the estimated breeding population of the Gediz Delta, respectively. Our observations also indicate that the western Mediterranean and Southwest Asia may constitute two sets of populations, which overlap in Turkey. Finally, the resightings of flamingos banded in Turkey show that post-fledging dispersal from Turkey reaches both the eastern and western Mediterranean wetlands. Future data on the natal and breeding dispersal of flamingos born in Turkey could clarify further the connection between Turkey and the western Mediterranean metapopulation.

Keywords

Capture-recapture Colonial waterbirds Conservation Dispersal Gediz Delta 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Luc Hoffmann and Alan Johnson for their enthusiasm for wildlife conservation and for creating the opportunities to start this project in Turkey. On behalf of all dedicated conservationists, we would like to thank Antoine Arnaud from Station Biologique de la Tour du Valat, Burcu Arık from Doğa Derneği and Ortaç Onmuş from the Aegean Nature Society for their continuous support. In Turkey, the flamingo project was conducted under the leadership of Doğa Derneği, Station Biologique de la Tour du Valat, Erciyes University, Ege University, with the support of the following partner organizations: Aegean Nature Society, Turkish Bird Research Society (KAD), İzmir Nature Protection and National Parks—Game and Wildlife Department, Kuşadası Nature Protection and National Parks, Ankara and Mersin Specially Protected Areas Directorates (ÖÇKK). We would like to thank all the Turkish and foreign birdwatchers who participated in the population counts, bandings and resightings of flamingos; the personnel of Gediz Delta Visitor Center for their continuous support for the field surveys since the start of the project; and Lauriane Rouan for her help with statistical analyses. This project was supported financially by the Station Biologique de la Tour du Valat, Tubitak—Programme of Integrated Actions (PIA) “Bosphorus”, İzmir Bird Paradise Conservation and Development Union and Turkish Bird Research Society (KAD) Small Support Program.

References

  1. Amat JA, Rendón MA, Rendón-Martos M, Garrido A, Ramirez JM (2005) Ranging behaviour of greater flamingos during the breeding and post-breeding periods: linking connectivity to biological processes. Biol Conserv 125:183–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbraud C, Johnson AR, Bertault G (2003) Phenotypic correlates of post-fledging dispersal in a population of greater flamingos: the importance of body condition. J Anim Ecol 72:246–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Behrouzi-Rad B (1992) On the movements of the Greater Flamingo, Phoenicopterus ruber, in Iran. Zool Middle East 6:21–27Google Scholar
  4. BirdLife International (2004) Birds in Europe: population estimates, trends and conservation status. BirdLife conservation series no. 12. BirdLife International, Cambridge Google Scholar
  5. Boere GC, Taylor D (2004) Global and regional governmental policy and treaties as tools towards the mitigation of the effect of climate change on waterbirds. Ibis 146:111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown JH, Kodric-Brown A (1977) Turnover rates in insular biogeography—effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology 58:445–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cézilly F, Johnson AR (1995) Re-mating between and within breeding season in the Greater Flamingo Phoenicopterus ruber roseus. Ibis 137:543–546Google Scholar
  8. Cézilly F, Viallefont A, Boy V, Johnson AR (1996) Annual variation in survival and breeding probability in Greater Flamingos. Ecology 77:1143–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DHKD (1999) Midwinter waterfowl counts in Turkey. Doğal Hayatı Koruma Derneği, İstanbulGoogle Scholar
  10. Esler D (2000) Applying metapopulation theory to conservation of migratory birds. Conserv Biol 14:366–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Green RE, Hirons GJM, Johnson AR (1989) The origin of long-term cohort differences in the distribution of Greater Flamingos Phoenicopterus ruber roseus in winter. J Anim Ecol 58:543–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Greenwood PJ (1980) Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Anim Behav 28:1140–1162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanski I (1999) Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Hanski I, Gilpin M (1991) Metapopulation dynamics—brief-history and conceptual domain. Biol J Linn Soc 42:3–16Google Scholar
  15. Jalving R, Vos R (2003) Waterbirds in Lake Orumieh, Iran, September 2000. WIWO Report 79. Stichting WIWO, Zeist Google Scholar
  16. Johnson AR (1989) Movements of Greater Flamingos (Phoenicopterus ruber roseus) in the western Palearctic. Revue d’Ecologie (Terre Vie) 44:75–94Google Scholar
  17. Johnson AR (1990) Taking a closer look at the flamingos on Cyprus in winter. Ucelli Ital 15:5–10Google Scholar
  18. Johnson AR (1991) Report on mission to Turkey, June 9–16, 1991. Station Biologique de la Tour du Valat, ArlesGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson AR (1992) Mission report: Turkey, 16–23 June 1992. Station Biologique de la Tour du Valat, ArlesGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson AR (1995) IWRB Flamingo Specialist Group newsletter no. 7. Annual reports 1991–1994. Station Biologique de la Tour du Valat, ArlesGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson AR (1997a) Long term studies and conservation of greater flamingos in the Camargue and Mediterranean. Colon Waterbirds 20:306–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnson AR (1997b) Phoenicopterus ruber Greater Flamingo. BWP Update 1:15–23Google Scholar
  23. Johnson AR (2000) An overview of the Greater Flamingo ringing program in the Camargue (southern France) and some aspects of the species breeding biology studied using marked individuals. Waterbirds 23 (Spec Publ):2–8Google Scholar
  24. Johnson AR, de Boer B (1988) IWRB/ICBP Flamingo Research Specialist Group newsletter no.4. Station Biologique de la Tour du Valat, ArlesGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnson AR, Cézilly F, Boy V (1993) Plumage development and maturation in the Greater Flamingo Phoenicopterus ruber roseus. ARDEA 81(1):25–34Google Scholar
  26. Kahl MP (1975) Distribution and numbers–a summary. In: Kear J, Dublaix-Hall N (eds) Flamingos. Poyser, Berkamsted, pp 93–102Google Scholar
  27. Kasparek M, van der Ven J (1983) Birds of Turkey 1: Erçek Lake. Max Kasparek Verlag, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  28. Mills LS, Allendorf FW (1996) The one-migrant-per-generation rule in conservation and management. Conserv Biol 10:1509–1518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nager RG, Johnson AR, Boy V, Rendón-Martos M, Calderon J, Cézilly F (1996) Temporal and spatial variation in dispersal of Greater Flamingo (Phoenicopterus ruber roseus). Oecologia 107:204–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Opdam P (1991) Metapopulation theory and habitat fragmentation: a review of Holarctic breeding bird studies. Landsc Ecol 5:93–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Opdam P, Foppen R, Reijnen R, Schotman A (1995) The landscape ecological approach in bird conservation—integrating the metapopulation concept into spatial planning. Ibis 137:S139–S146Google Scholar
  32. Pradel R, Johnson AR, Viallefont A, Nager RG, Cézilly F (1997) Local recruitment in the greater flamingo: a new approach using capture-mark-recapture data. Ecology 78:1431–1445Google Scholar
  33. Rendón MA, Garrido A, Ramirez JM, Rendón-Martos M, Amat JA (2001) Despotic establishment of breeding colonies of Greater Flamingos, Phoenicopterus ruber, in southern Spain. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:55–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Scott DA (1975) Iran. In: Kear J, Dublaix-Hall N (eds) Flamingos. Poyser, Berkamsted, pp 28–32Google Scholar
  35. Sıkı M (1985) Çamaltı Tuzlası-Homa Dalyanı Kuş Türleri ve Bazı Türlerin Biyolojileri Üzerine Araştırmalar. Ph.D. Thesis, Ege Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi, İzmirGoogle Scholar
  36. Stacey PB, Taper ML, Johnson VA (1997) Migration within metapopulation, the impact upon local population dynamics. In: Hanski I, Gilpin ME (eds) Metapopulation biology, ecology, genetics and evolution. Academic, London, pp 266–291Google Scholar
  37. Tavecchia G, Pradel R, Boy V, Johnson AR, Cézilly F (2001) Sex- and age-related variation in survival and cost of first reproduction in greater flamingos. Ecology 82:165–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wetlands International (2002) Waterbird population estimates, 3rd edn. Global series no. 12. Wetlands International, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  39. YEKOM Consulting Engineers (2002) Management plan for the Lake Uromiyeh ecosystem. Report 1 of the EC-IIP Environmental Management Project for Lake Uromiyeh, Iran. YEKOM Consulting Engineers, TehranGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Özge Balkız
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Uygar Özesmi
    • 4
  • Roger Pradel
    • 2
  • Christophe Germain
    • 1
  • Mehmet Sıkı
    • 5
  • Juan A. Amat
    • 6
  • Manuel Rendón-Martos
    • 7
  • Nicola Baccetti
    • 8
  • Arnaud Béchet
    • 1
  1. 1.Station Biologique de la Tour du ValatArlesFrance
  2. 2.CEFE, Equipe Biometrie et Biologie des PopulationsMontpellierFrance
  3. 3.Doğa DerneğiAnkaraTurkey
  4. 4.Engineering Faculty, Environmental Engineering DepartmentErciyes UniversityKayseriTurkey
  5. 5.Biology DepartmentAegean UniversityİzmirTurkey
  6. 6.Estación Biológica de Doñana, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones CientíficasSevillaSpain
  7. 7.Reserva Naturel Laguna de Fuente de Piedra, Consejeria de Medio AmbienteFuente de Piedra (Málaga)Spain
  8. 8.Istituto Nazionale per la Fauna SelvaticaOzzano Emilia (BO)Italy

Personalised recommendations