Abstract
The main goals of this study were to investigate the relationships between densities of the breeding population of the middle spotted woodpecker Dendrocopos medius obtained on 19 large-scale plots, and the share of different habitats and age of forest stands. An average crude density based on an area defined arbitrarily by observers was 0.66±0.43 territories/10 ha, while the ecological density based on an area including habitats potentially used by organisms reached 1.09±0.64 territories/10 ha. Stepwise multiple regression indicated that the crude density was negatively affected by the share of coniferous forest thereby explaining 50% of variation. The ecological density was negatively correlated with the percentage of young deciduous stands (0–40 years old). This variable explained 36% of the total variation. These results suggest that on the level of macrohabitat analysis, the share of unsuitable forest stands seem to play a major role in determining the density of the middle spotted woodpecker.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angelstam P, Roberge J-M, Lõhmus A, Bergmanis M, Brazaitis G, Dönz-Breuss M, Edenius L, Kosinski Z, Kurlavicius P, Lārmanis V, Lūkins M, Mikusinski G, Račinskis E, Strazds M, Tryjanowski P (2004) Habitat modelling as a tool for landscape-scale conservation—a review of parameters for focal forest birds. In: Angelstam P, Dönz-Breuss M, Roberge J-M (eds) Targets and tools for the maintenance of forest biodiversity. Ecol Bull 51: 427−453
Becker M, Heyne K-H (1994) Verbreitung und Bestandsgröße des Mittelspechts (Dendrocopos medius) im Raum Trier, westliches Rheinland-Pfalz. Dendrocopos 21:17–33
Bibby CJ, Burgess ND, Hill DA, Mustoe SH (2000) Bird census techniques. Academic, London
Bühlmann J, Pasinelli G (1996) Beeinflussen kleinflächige Waldnutzung und Wetter die Siedlungsdichte des Mittelspechts Dendrocopos medius. Orn Beob 93:267–276
Bühlmann J, Müller W, Pasinelli G, Weggler M (2003) Entwicklung von Bestand und Verbreitung des Mittelspechts Dendrocopos medius 1978–2002 im Kanton Zürich: Analyse der Veränderungen und Folgerungen für den Artenschutz. Orn Beob 100:343–355
Conrads K, Conrads W (1992) Der Mittelspecht (Picoides medius) im Beller Holz (Kreis Lippe). Ber Naturwiss Ver Bielefeld 33:5–46
del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J (eds) (2002) Handbook of the birds of the world, vol 7. Jacamars to Woodpeckers. Lynx, Barcelona
Fernandez C, Azkona P (1996) Influence of forest structure on the density and distribution of the white-backed woodpecker Dendrocopos leucotos and black woodpecker Dryocopus martius in Quinto Real (Spanish Western Pyrennes. Bird Study 43:305–313
Gaston KJ, Blackburn TM, Gregory RD (1999) Does variation in census area confound density comparisons? J Appl Ecol 36:191–204
Gutzwiller KJ, Anderson SH (1987) Multiscale associations between cavity-nesting birds and features of Wyoming streamside woodlands. Condor 89:534–548
Günther E (1992) Untersuchung zum Brutbestand, zur Bestandsentwicklung und zum Habitat des Mittelspechtes (Dendrocopos medius) im nordöstlichen Harz (Sachsen-Anhalt). Orn Jber Mus Heineanum 10:31–53
Günther E, Hellmann M (1997) Der Mittelspecht und die Buche: Versuch einer Interpretation seines Vorkommens in Buchenwäldern. Orn Jber Mus Heineanum 15:97–108
Haila Y (1988) Calculating and miscalculating density: the role of habitat geometry. Ornis Scand 19:88–92
Hildén O (1965) Habitat selection in birds: a review. Ann Zool Fenn 2:53–75
Johnson RR, Brown BT, Haight LT, Simpson JM (1981) Playback recordings as a special avian censusing technique. In: Ralph CJ, Scott JM (eds) Estimating numbers of terrestrial birds. Stud Avian Biol 6:68–75
Kosenko SM, Kaygorodova EY (2001) Vliyanie fragmentatsii mestoobitaniya na raspredelenie, plotnost“ naseleniya i produktivnost“ razmnozheniya srednego dyatla Dendrocopos medius (Aves, Picidae) v Nerusso-Desnyanskom Poles“e [Effect of habitat fragmentation on distribution, density and breeding performance of the middle spotted woodpecker Dendrocopos medius (Aves, Picidae) in Nerussa-Desna Polesye]. Zool Zh 80:71–78
Kosiński Z, Winiecki A (2003) Ocena liczebności dzięcioła średniego Dendrocopos medius—porównanie metody kartograficznej z uzyciem stymulacji magnetofonowej z metodą wyszukiwania gniazd [Estimation of the middle spotted woodpecker Dendrocopos medius numbers—a comparison between the mapping technique combined with audio stimulation and nest searching method]. Not Orn 44:43–55
Kosiński Z, Kempa M, Hybsz R (2004) The accuracy and efficiency of different techniques for censusing territorial middle spotted woodpeckers Dendrocopos medius. Acta Ornithol 39:29–34
Lambeck RJ (1997) Focal species define landscape requirements for nature conservation. Conserv Biol 11:849–856
Lovaty F (1980) L’abondance des oiseaux nicheurs à grands cantons dans les chênaies équiennes de la region de Moulins (Allier). Alauda 48:193–207
Mikusiński G, Angelstam P (1997) European woodpeckers and anthropogenic habitat change: a review. Vogelwelt 118:277–283
Miranda B, Pasinelli G (2001) Habitatansprüche des Kleinspechts (Dendrocopos minor) in Wäldern der Nordost-Schweiz. J Ornithol 142:295–305
Müller W (1982) Die Besiedlung der Eichenwälder im Kanton Zürich durch den Mittelspecht Dendrocopos medius. Orn Beob 79:105–119
Noah T (2000) Siedlungsdichte, Habitat und Bestandsentwicklung der Spechte im NSG “Innerer Unterspreewald“. Otis 8:75–98
Pasinelli G (2000) Oaks Quercus sp. and only oaks? Relations between habitat structure and home range size of the middle spotted woodpecker Dendrocopos medius. Biol Conserv 93:227–235
Pasinelli G, Hegelbach J, Reyer H-U (2001) Spacing behavior of the middle spotted woodpecker in Central Europe. J Wild Manage 65:432–441
Pasinelli G (2003) Dendrocopos medius middle spotted woodpecker. BWP Update 5:49–99
Pavlík Š (1994) A model of the influence of some environmental factors on the population density of the great spotted woodpecker (Dendrocopos major) and the middle spotted woodpecker (D. medius). Biologia (Bratislava) 49:767–771
Pettersson B (1985) Extinction of an isolated population of the middle spotted woodpecker Dendrocopos medius (L.) in Sweden and its relation to general theories on extinction. Biol Conserv 32:335–353
Prairie YT, Bird DF (1989) Some misconceptions about spurious correlation problem in the ecological literature. Oecologia 82:285–288
Randler Ch (2000) Verbreitung, Bestand und Siedlungsdichte des Mittelspechts Dendrocopos medius im Stromberg, Nordwürttenberg. Orn Anz 39:197–206
Robles H, Olea PP (2003) Distribution and abundance of middle spotted woodpecker Dendrocopos medius in a southern population of the Cantabrian Mountains. Ardeola 50:275–280
Rolstad J, Løken B, Rolstad E (2000) Habitat selection as a hierarchical spatial process: the green woodpecker at the northern edge of its distribution range. Oecologia 124:116–129
Scherner ER (1981) Die Flächengröße als Fehlerquelle bei Brutvogel-Bestandsaufnahmen. Ökol Vögel (Ecol Birds) 3:145–175
Schmitz L (1993) Distribution et habitat du Pic mar (Dendrocopos medius) en Belgique. Aves 30:145–166
Spitznagel A (1990) The influence of forest management on woodpecker density and habitat use in floodplain forests of the Upper Rhine Valley. In: Carlson A, Aulén G (eds) Conservation and management of woodpecker populations. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Wildlife Ecology, Report 17. Uppsala, Sweden
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry. The principles and practice in statistics in biological research. Freeman, New York
Südbeck P, Gall T (1993) Der Mittelspecht (Picoides medius) in Schleswig-Holstein—Erfassungsprobleme und ihre Konsequenzen für Bestandsschätzungen. Corax 15:211–221
Tomiałojć L (1980) The combined version of the mapping method. In: Oelke H (ed) Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on bird census work and nature conservation, Göttingen, pp 92–106
Wesołowski T (1995) Value of Białowieża forest for the conservation of white-backed woodpecker Dendrocopos leucotos in Poland. Biol Conserv 71:69–75
Acknowledgements
We are most grateful to Jan Bednorz, Karol Drab, Marek Ilków, Marcin Kempa, Paweł Ksit, Roman Kubacki, Maciej Leśniczak, Sylwester Lisek, Krystyna Śliwa, Paweł Śliwa, Dawid Tatarkiewicz, Przemysław Wylegała, Sylwia Wylegała and Jacek Wyrwał for their assistance in collection of data. We wish to express our thanks to the Regional Directorate of the State Forests in Poznań and Piła for forest maps made available to us. We thank Piotr Tryjanowski and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and Robert Kippen who improved the English.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by F. Bairlein
Appendix
Appendix
Data for the analysed study plots
No. | Name | Area (ha) | Dominating deciduous forest stands | Type of habitat (ha) | Age classes of stands (ha) | Year | No. of territories | No. of censuses | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rough-barked | Smooth-barked | |||||||||||||||
DS | CS | OA | UA | 0–40 | 41–80 | 81–120 | >120 | <121 | ≥121 | |||||||
1 | Zielona Góra | 219.1 | Oak–hornbeam | 211.3 | 3.1 | 4.5 | 0.1 | 17.5 | 25.1 | 64.7 | 100.7 | 3.3 | 0.0 | 2001 | 21–23 | 2 |
2 | Czarnków | 72.5 | Oak-hornbeam | 58.6 | 11.0 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 5.0 | 11.8 | 27.1 | 6.1 | 8.6 | 0.0 | 2001 | 6 | 2 |
3 | Świetlista Dąbrowa | 79.9 | Oak | 59.7 | 15.0 | 0.0 | 5.1 | 7.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 51.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2001 | 13 | 1 |
4 | Góra | 193.0 | Oak–beech | 97.7 | 87.1 | 8.2 | 0.0 | 10.3 | 25.5 | 34.1 | 10.1 | 10.7 | 7.0 | 2002 | 18 | 3 |
5 | Ławica | 143.0 | Beech and alder | 96.2 | 36.1 | 10.9 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 40.8 | 23.8 | 0.0 | 19.0 | 11.1 | 2002 | 5 | 3 |
6 | Łoskoń | 876.2 | Oak and beech | 568.2 | 233.0 | 72.7 | 2.3 | 101.6 | 108.0 | 94.2 | 29.6 | 108.3 | 126.6 | 2001 | 41–43 | 3 |
7 | Nieszawa | 257.4 | Oak | 121.2 | 100.2 | 33.1 | 2.9 | 24.1 | 43.6 | 50.1 | 3.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2002 | 15 | 3 |
8 | Pławno | 304.5 | Oak–hornbeam | 139.1 | 154.3 | 11.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 9.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2001 | 26–27 | 1 |
9 | Promno | 107.8 | Oak–hornbeam | 81.7 | 14.4 | 4.8 | 0.0 | 12.4 | 23.5 | 14.9 | 17.5 | 14.4 | 0.0 | 2003 | 8 | 2 |
10 | Łęgi-WPN | 349.5 | Oak-ash-elm and willow–poplar riverine forest | 61.4 | 222.6 | 65.5 | 0.0 | 28.3 | 16.8 | 3.8 | 0.0 | 12.5 | 0.0 | 2000 | 4 | 3 |
11 | Krajkowo | 154.9 | Oak–hornbeam | 62.1 | 31.0 | 61.1 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 4.4 | 34.8 | 22.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2000 | 14 | 2 |
12 | Miłosław-I | 511.1 | Alder and oak | 161.7 | 334.3 | 15.2 | 10.0 | 75.5 | 48.5 | 18.4 | 9.1 | 10.3 | 0.0 | 2002 | 6 | 2 |
13 | Miłosław-II | 601.1 | Oak, ash and alder | 341.8 | 238.5 | 20.8 | 7.8 | 103.7 | 95.7 | 86.0 | 20.3 | 36.1 | 0.0 | 2002 | 11–12 | 2 |
14 | Miłosław-III | 889.1 | Oak and alder | 349.7 | 418.1 | 121.3 | 3.6 | 155.5 | 105.4 | 63.9 | 6.8 | 18.1 | 0.0 | 2002 | 10–11 | 2 |
15 | Warta | 498.4 | Oak–ash–elm riverine forest, oak–hornbeam | 373.4 | 30.5 | 78.9 | 15.5 | 58.7 | 76.7 | 87.0 | 135.5 | 15.5 | 0.0 | 2000 | 74–81 | 4 |
16 | Franciszków | 274.0 | Oak–ash–elm riverine forest | 150.9 | 52.1 | 56.1 | 14.9 | 28.8 | 77.4 | 43.1 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2000 | 16–18 | 2 |
17 | Bieniszew | 484.4 | Oak–hornbeam | 269.1 | 174.3 | 36.5 | 4.5 | 15.3 | 39.0 | 205.1 | 0.0 | 9.7 | 0.0 | 2001 | 16 | 1 |
18 | Stare Budy | 643.5 | Oak | 614.7 | 13.3 | 15.6 | 0.0 | 44.9 | 46.6 | 92.8 | 430.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2001 | 57–58 | 3 |
19 | Smoszew | 587.7 | Oak | 312.5 | 256.1 | 14.5 | 4.6 | 38.0 | 42.1 | 82.3 | 118.1 | 32.0 | 0.0 | 2001 | 29 | 3 |
Mean | 381.4 | 217.5 | 127.6 | 33.3 | 3.8 | 38.4 | 43.8 | 54.5 | 15.7 | 15.7 | 7.6 | |||||
Me | 304.5 | 150.9 | 87.1 | 15.6 | 2.3 | 24.1 | 40.8 | 43.1 | 10.3 | 10.3 | 0.0 | |||||
SD | 254.7 | 169.7 | 125.1 | 33.5 | 4.9 | 42.8 | 34.2 | 48.2 | 24.8 | 24.8 | 29.0 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kosiński, Z., Winiecki, A. Factors affecting the density of the middle spotted woodpecker Dendrocopos medius: a macrohabitat approach. J Ornithol 146, 263–270 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-005-0088-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-005-0088-3