Skip to main content
Log in

Factors affecting the density of the middle spotted woodpecker Dendrocopos medius: a macrohabitat approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ornithology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main goals of this study were to investigate the relationships between densities of the breeding population of the middle spotted woodpecker Dendrocopos medius obtained on 19 large-scale plots, and the share of different habitats and age of forest stands. An average crude density based on an area defined arbitrarily by observers was 0.66±0.43 territories/10 ha, while the ecological density based on an area including habitats potentially used by organisms reached 1.09±0.64 territories/10 ha. Stepwise multiple regression indicated that the crude density was negatively affected by the share of coniferous forest thereby explaining 50% of variation. The ecological density was negatively correlated with the percentage of young deciduous stands (0–40 years old). This variable explained 36% of the total variation. These results suggest that on the level of macrohabitat analysis, the share of unsuitable forest stands seem to play a major role in determining the density of the middle spotted woodpecker.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angelstam P, Roberge J-M, Lõhmus A, Bergmanis M, Brazaitis G, Dönz-Breuss M, Edenius L, Kosinski Z, Kurlavicius P, Lārmanis V, Lūkins M, Mikusinski G, Račinskis E, Strazds M, Tryjanowski P (2004) Habitat modelling as a tool for landscape-scale conservation—a review of parameters for focal forest birds. In: Angelstam P, Dönz-Breuss M, Roberge J-M (eds) Targets and tools for the maintenance of forest biodiversity. Ecol Bull 51: 427−453

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker M, Heyne K-H (1994) Verbreitung und Bestandsgröße des Mittelspechts (Dendrocopos medius) im Raum Trier, westliches Rheinland-Pfalz. Dendrocopos 21:17–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibby CJ, Burgess ND, Hill DA, Mustoe SH (2000) Bird census techniques. Academic, London

  • Bühlmann J, Pasinelli G (1996) Beeinflussen kleinflächige Waldnutzung und Wetter die Siedlungsdichte des Mittelspechts Dendrocopos medius. Orn Beob 93:267–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Bühlmann J, Müller W, Pasinelli G, Weggler M (2003) Entwicklung von Bestand und Verbreitung des Mittelspechts Dendrocopos medius 1978–2002 im Kanton Zürich: Analyse der Veränderungen und Folgerungen für den Artenschutz. Orn Beob 100:343–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrads K, Conrads W (1992) Der Mittelspecht (Picoides medius) im Beller Holz (Kreis Lippe). Ber Naturwiss Ver Bielefeld 33:5–46

    Google Scholar 

  • del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J (eds) (2002) Handbook of the birds of the world, vol 7. Jacamars to Woodpeckers. Lynx, Barcelona

  • Fernandez C, Azkona P (1996) Influence of forest structure on the density and distribution of the white-backed woodpecker Dendrocopos leucotos and black woodpecker Dryocopus martius in Quinto Real (Spanish Western Pyrennes. Bird Study 43:305–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Blackburn TM, Gregory RD (1999) Does variation in census area confound density comparisons? J Appl Ecol 36:191–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutzwiller KJ, Anderson SH (1987) Multiscale associations between cavity-nesting birds and features of Wyoming streamside woodlands. Condor 89:534–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Günther E (1992) Untersuchung zum Brutbestand, zur Bestandsentwicklung und zum Habitat des Mittelspechtes (Dendrocopos medius) im nordöstlichen Harz (Sachsen-Anhalt). Orn Jber Mus Heineanum 10:31–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Günther E, Hellmann M (1997) Der Mittelspecht und die Buche: Versuch einer Interpretation seines Vorkommens in Buchenwäldern. Orn Jber Mus Heineanum 15:97–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Haila Y (1988) Calculating and miscalculating density: the role of habitat geometry. Ornis Scand 19:88–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildén O (1965) Habitat selection in birds: a review. Ann Zool Fenn 2:53–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RR, Brown BT, Haight LT, Simpson JM (1981) Playback recordings as a special avian censusing technique. In: Ralph CJ, Scott JM (eds) Estimating numbers of terrestrial birds. Stud Avian Biol 6:68–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosenko SM, Kaygorodova EY (2001) Vliyanie fragmentatsii mestoobitaniya na raspredelenie, plotnost“ naseleniya i produktivnost“ razmnozheniya srednego dyatla Dendrocopos medius (Aves, Picidae) v Nerusso-Desnyanskom Poles“e [Effect of habitat fragmentation on distribution, density and breeding performance of the middle spotted woodpecker Dendrocopos medius (Aves, Picidae) in Nerussa-Desna Polesye]. Zool Zh 80:71–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosiński Z, Winiecki A (2003) Ocena liczebności dzięcioła średniego Dendrocopos medius—porównanie metody kartograficznej z uzyciem stymulacji magnetofonowej z metodą wyszukiwania gniazd [Estimation of the middle spotted woodpecker Dendrocopos medius numbers—a comparison between the mapping technique combined with audio stimulation and nest searching method]. Not Orn 44:43–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosiński Z, Kempa M, Hybsz R (2004) The accuracy and efficiency of different techniques for censusing territorial middle spotted woodpeckers Dendrocopos medius. Acta Ornithol 39:29–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambeck RJ (1997) Focal species define landscape requirements for nature conservation. Conserv Biol 11:849–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovaty F (1980) L’abondance des oiseaux nicheurs à grands cantons dans les chênaies équiennes de la region de Moulins (Allier). Alauda 48:193–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikusiński G, Angelstam P (1997) European woodpeckers and anthropogenic habitat change: a review. Vogelwelt 118:277–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda B, Pasinelli G (2001) Habitatansprüche des Kleinspechts (Dendrocopos minor) in Wäldern der Nordost-Schweiz. J Ornithol 142:295–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller W (1982) Die Besiedlung der Eichenwälder im Kanton Zürich durch den Mittelspecht Dendrocopos medius. Orn Beob 79:105–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Noah T (2000) Siedlungsdichte, Habitat und Bestandsentwicklung der Spechte im NSG “Innerer Unterspreewald“. Otis 8:75–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasinelli G (2000) Oaks Quercus sp. and only oaks? Relations between habitat structure and home range size of the middle spotted woodpecker Dendrocopos medius. Biol Conserv 93:227–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasinelli G, Hegelbach J, Reyer H-U (2001) Spacing behavior of the middle spotted woodpecker in Central Europe. J Wild Manage 65:432–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasinelli G (2003) Dendrocopos medius middle spotted woodpecker. BWP Update 5:49–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlík Š (1994) A model of the influence of some environmental factors on the population density of the great spotted woodpecker (Dendrocopos major) and the middle spotted woodpecker (D. medius). Biologia (Bratislava) 49:767–771

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson B (1985) Extinction of an isolated population of the middle spotted woodpecker Dendrocopos medius (L.) in Sweden and its relation to general theories on extinction. Biol Conserv 32:335–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prairie YT, Bird DF (1989) Some misconceptions about spurious correlation problem in the ecological literature. Oecologia 82:285–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randler Ch (2000) Verbreitung, Bestand und Siedlungsdichte des Mittelspechts Dendrocopos medius im Stromberg, Nordwürttenberg. Orn Anz 39:197–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Robles H, Olea PP (2003) Distribution and abundance of middle spotted woodpecker Dendrocopos medius in a southern population of the Cantabrian Mountains. Ardeola 50:275–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolstad J, Løken B, Rolstad E (2000) Habitat selection as a hierarchical spatial process: the green woodpecker at the northern edge of its distribution range. Oecologia 124:116–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scherner ER (1981) Die Flächengröße als Fehlerquelle bei Brutvogel-Bestandsaufnahmen. Ökol Vögel (Ecol Birds) 3:145–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz L (1993) Distribution et habitat du Pic mar (Dendrocopos medius) en Belgique. Aves 30:145–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitznagel A (1990) The influence of forest management on woodpecker density and habitat use in floodplain forests of the Upper Rhine Valley. In: Carlson A, Aulén G (eds) Conservation and management of woodpecker populations. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Wildlife Ecology, Report 17. Uppsala, Sweden

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry. The principles and practice in statistics in biological research. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Südbeck P, Gall T (1993) Der Mittelspecht (Picoides medius) in Schleswig-Holstein—Erfassungsprobleme und ihre Konsequenzen für Bestandsschätzungen. Corax 15:211–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomiałojć L (1980) The combined version of the mapping method. In: Oelke H (ed) Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on bird census work and nature conservation, Göttingen, pp 92–106

  • Wesołowski T (1995) Value of Białowieża forest for the conservation of white-backed woodpecker Dendrocopos leucotos in Poland. Biol Conserv 71:69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are most grateful to Jan Bednorz, Karol Drab, Marek Ilków, Marcin Kempa, Paweł Ksit, Roman Kubacki, Maciej Leśniczak, Sylwester Lisek, Krystyna Śliwa, Paweł Śliwa, Dawid Tatarkiewicz, Przemysław Wylegała, Sylwia Wylegała and Jacek Wyrwał for their assistance in collection of data. We wish to express our thanks to the Regional Directorate of the State Forests in Poznań and Piła for forest maps made available to us. We thank Piotr Tryjanowski and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and Robert Kippen who improved the English.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ziemowit Kosiński.

Additional information

Communicated by F. Bairlein

Appendix

Appendix

Data for the analysed study plots

No.

Name

Area (ha)

Dominating deciduous forest stands

Type of habitat (ha)

Age classes of stands (ha)

Year

No. of territories

No. of censuses

Rough-barked

Smooth-barked

DS

CS

OA

UA

0–40

41–80

81–120

>120

<121

≥121

1

Zielona Góra

219.1

Oak–hornbeam

211.3

3.1

4.5

0.1

17.5

25.1

64.7

100.7

3.3

0.0

2001

21–23

2

2

Czarnków

72.5

Oak-hornbeam

58.6

11.0

2.1

0.9

5.0

11.8

27.1

6.1

8.6

0.0

2001

6

2

3

Świetlista Dąbrowa

79.9

Oak

59.7

15.0

0.0

5.1

7.8

0.0

0.0

51.9

0.0

0.0

2001

13

1

4

Góra

193.0

Oak–beech

97.7

87.1

8.2

0.0

10.3

25.5

34.1

10.1

10.7

7.0

2002

18

3

5

Ławica

143.0

Beech and alder

96.2

36.1

10.9

0.0

1.5

40.8

23.8

0.0

19.0

11.1

2002

5

3

6

Łoskoń

876.2

Oak and beech

568.2

233.0

72.7

2.3

101.6

108.0

94.2

29.6

108.3

126.6

2001

41–43

3

7

Nieszawa

257.4

Oak

121.2

100.2

33.1

2.9

24.1

43.6

50.1

3.4

0.0

0.0

2002

15

3

8

Pławno

304.5

Oak–hornbeam

139.1

154.3

11.1

0.0

0.0

0.5

0.4

9.6

0.0

0.0

2001

26–27

1

9

Promno

107.8

Oak–hornbeam

81.7

14.4

4.8

0.0

12.4

23.5

14.9

17.5

14.4

0.0

2003

8

2

10

Łęgi-WPN

349.5

Oak-ash-elm and willow–poplar riverine forest

61.4

222.6

65.5

0.0

28.3

16.8

3.8

0.0

12.5

0.0

2000

4

3

11

Krajkowo

154.9

Oak–hornbeam

62.1

31.0

61.1

0.7

0.0

4.4

34.8

22.9

0.0

0.0

2000

14

2

12

Miłosław-I

511.1

Alder and oak

161.7

334.3

15.2

10.0

75.5

48.5

18.4

9.1

10.3

0.0

2002

6

2

13

Miłosław-II

601.1

Oak, ash and alder

341.8

238.5

20.8

7.8

103.7

95.7

86.0

20.3

36.1

0.0

2002

11–12

2

14

Miłosław-III

889.1

Oak and alder

349.7

418.1

121.3

3.6

155.5

105.4

63.9

6.8

18.1

0.0

2002

10–11

2

15

Warta

498.4

Oak–ash–elm riverine forest, oak–hornbeam

373.4

30.5

78.9

15.5

58.7

76.7

87.0

135.5

15.5

0.0

2000

74–81

4

16

Franciszków

274.0

Oak–ash–elm riverine forest

150.9

52.1

56.1

14.9

28.8

77.4

43.1

1.6

0.0

0.0

2000

16–18

2

17

Bieniszew

484.4

Oak–hornbeam

269.1

174.3

36.5

4.5

15.3

39.0

205.1

0.0

9.7

0.0

2001

16

1

18

Stare Budy

643.5

Oak

614.7

13.3

15.6

0.0

44.9

46.6

92.8

430.4

0.0

0.0

2001

57–58

3

19

Smoszew

587.7

Oak

312.5

256.1

14.5

4.6

38.0

42.1

82.3

118.1

32.0

0.0

2001

29

3

 

Mean

381.4

 

217.5

127.6

33.3

3.8

38.4

43.8

54.5

15.7

15.7

7.6

   
 

Me

304.5

 

150.9

87.1

15.6

2.3

24.1

40.8

43.1

10.3

10.3

0.0

   
 

SD

254.7

 

169.7

125.1

33.5

4.9

42.8

34.2

48.2

24.8

24.8

29.0

   
  1. DS, deciduous stand; CS, coniferous stand; OA, open areas; UA, unidentified areas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kosiński, Z., Winiecki, A. Factors affecting the density of the middle spotted woodpecker Dendrocopos medius: a macrohabitat approach. J Ornithol 146, 263–270 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-005-0088-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-005-0088-3

Keywords

Navigation