Skip to main content
Log in

Do nine-primaried passerines have nine or ten primary feathers? The evolution of a concept

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ornithology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The number of primary feathers in a bird’s wing has been used as a systematic character since the first half of the nineteenth century. During the years, though, the definition of which feathers to count as a primary has changed and today the species historically denoted as having only nine primaries are instead said to have, for example, nine ‘functional’ primaries. In this study, I investigated the borderline between ‘nine-primaried’ and ‘ten-primaried’ birds to search for a proper definition of the term ‘nine-primaried’. A total of 161 specimens of 104 bird species, mainly passerines, were examined. All species examined had ten primaries although the ‘nine-primaried’ species had primary ten more or less concealed under primary covert nine. The number of primary coverts has decreased over time, with ten primary coverts as the ancestral state within Passeriformes and nine primary coverts among most oscine species. In conclusion, a proper definition of ‘nine-primaried’ might be “with primary ten concealed by primary covert nine”. This definition includes all taxa historically denoted ‘nine-primaried’, i.e. systematically it is a definition of a paraphyletic group. The term ‘nine-primaried’ is thus too inclusive to be of more than very limited systemtic value and, consequently, the New World nine-primaried oscines group might gain from a new denotation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashmole NP, Dorward DF, Stonehouse B. (1961) Numbering of primaries. Ibis 103a:297–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Beecher WJ (1953) A phylogeny of the oscines. Auk 70:270–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks DR, McLennan DA (1991) Phylogeny, ecology, and behaviour: a research program in comparative biology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell B, Lack E (1985) A dictionary of birds. Poyser, Calton

    Google Scholar 

  • Coues E (1890) Field and general ornithology. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramp S, Perrins CM (1994a) The Birds of the Western Palearctic, vol VIII. Oxford University Press, New York

  • Cramp S, Perrins CM (1994b) The birds of the western Palearctic, vol. IX. Oxford University Press, New York

  • Ericson PGP, Johansson US (2003) Phylogeny of Passerida (Aves: Passeriformes) based on nuclear and mitochondrial sequence data. Mol Phyl Evol 29:126–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ericson PGP, Johansson US, Parsons TJ (2000) Major divisions in oscines revealed by insertions in the nuclear gene c-myc: a novel gene in avian phylogenetics. Auk 117:1069–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericson PGP, Christidis L, Irestedt M, Norman JA (2002) Systematic affinities of the lyrebirds (Passeriformes: Menura), with a novel classification of the major groups of passerine birds. Mol Phyl Evol 25:53–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gadow H (1888) Remarks on the numbers and the phylogenetic development of the remiges of birds. Proc Zool Soc Lond 1888:655–667

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill FB (1990) Ornithology. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginn HB, Melville DS (1983) Moult in Birds. BTO guide 19. British Trust for Ornithology, Tring

    Google Scholar 

  • Groth JG (1998) Molecular phylogenetics of finches and sparrows: consequences of character state remowal in cytochrome b sequences. Mol Phyl Evol 10:377–390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries JA (1881) On the number of primaries in birds. Bull Nuttall Ornith Club 6:156–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenni L, Winkler R (1994) Moult and ageing of European Passerines. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Klicka J, Johnson KP, Lanyon SM (2000) New world nine-primaried oscine relationships: constructing a mitochondrial DNA framework. Auk 117:321–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas AM, Stettenheim PR (1972) Avian anatomy, integument. Agriculture handbook 362, Washington DC

  • Mead C (1974) Bird ringing. BTO guide 16. British Trust for Ornithology, Tring

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountjoy DJ, Leger DW (2001) Vireo song repertoires and migratory distance: three sexual selection hypotheses fail to explain the correlation. Behav Ecol 12:98–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson F (1889) Sundevall’s tentamen. Porter, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitzsch CL (1840) System der Pterylographie. Halle. (In German, for translation see Sclater 1867).

  • Pettingill OS (1956) A laboratory and field manual of ornithology. Burgess, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyle P (1997) Identification guide to North American birds, part I. Slate Creek Press, Bolinas

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyle P, Howell SNG, Yunick RP, DeSante DF (1987) Identification guide to North American Passerines. Slate Creek Press, Bolinas

    Google Scholar 

  • Raikow RJ (1978) Appendicular myology and relationships of the new world nine-primaried oscines (Aves: Passeriformmes). Bull Carnegie Mus Nat Hist 7:1–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Raikow RJ, Bledsoe AH (2000) Phylogeny and evolution of the Passerine birds. BioScience 50:487–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuh RT (2000) Biological systematics: principles and applications. Cornell University, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Sclater PL (ed) (1867) Nitzsch’s Pterylography. Hardwicke, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE (1990) Phylogeny and classification of birds. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley CG, Monroe BL (1990) Distribution and taxonomy of birds of the world. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer R (1972) The ringer’s manual. British Trust for Ornithology, Tring

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmann B (1962) Die verkümmerte distale Handschwinge des Vogelflügels. J Ornithol 103:50–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan B (1970a) Über Vorkommen und Funktion des Remicle. Beitr Vogelkd 16:372–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan B (1970b) Eutaxie, Diastataxie und andere Probleme der Befiederung des Vogelflügels. Mitt Zool Mus Berlin 46:339–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan B (1997) Reduktion von Fingerkrallen, Phalangen und Handschwingen. Mitt Zool Mus Berlin 73(Suppl: Ann Orn 21):45–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Stresemann E (1927–1934) Handbuch der Zoologie. de Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Stresemann E (1963) Variations in the number of primaries. Condor 65:449–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stresemann E, Stephan B (1968) Uber das Remicle. J Ornithol 3:315–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stresemann E, Stresemann V (1966) Die Mauser der Vögel. J Ornithol 107:Sonderheft

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundevall CJ (1872) Methodi naturalis avium disponendarum tentamem. Samson and Wallin, Stockholm. (In Latin, for translation see Nicholson 1889).

  • Sundevall CJ (1886) On the wings of birds. Ibis 16: 389–457 (Translated from the original article in Swedish from 1843).

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson L (1992) Identification Guide to European Passerines. Lars Svensson, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Tyne J, Berger AJ (1976) Fundamentals of ornithology, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace AR (1874) On the arrangement of the families constituting the Order Passeres. Ibis 4:406–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler H, Leisler B (1992) On the ecomorphology of migrants. Ibis 134(suppl 1):21–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Witherby HF, Jourdain FCR, Ticehurst NF, Tucker BW (1938–1941) The handbook of British birds, vol I. Witherby, London

  • Wray RS (1887) On some points in the morphology of the wings of birds. Proc Zool Soc Lond 1887:343–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuri T, Mindell D (2002) Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Fringillidae, “New World nine-primaried oscines” (Aves: Passeriformes). Mol Phyl Evol 23:229–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The majority of the birds examined came from the Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm but some birds were provided by Tovetorp Zoological Research Station, Stockholm University. I am grateful to Michael Diemer, Thord Fransson and Rinse Wassenaar for help with translation of the German sources, and to Peter Mortensen, Ingrid Cederholm, Anders Hansson, Erik Åhlander and Olavi Grönwall for help with practical matters during my work in the bird collection at the National Museum of Natural History. I am also indebted to Per Ericson, Thord Fransson, Birgitta Tullberg and Walter Bock for valuable comments and support during the process of writing this manuscript. Finally, I would like to thank Ulf Johansson for several years of discussions around this topic.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Susanna S. Hall.

Additional information

Communicated by A.J. Helbig

Electronic Supplementary Material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hall, K.S.S. Do nine-primaried passerines have nine or ten primary feathers? The evolution of a concept. J Ornithol 146, 121–126 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-004-0070-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-004-0070-5

Keywords

Navigation