Advertisement

Journal of Ornithology

, Volume 146, Issue 1, pp 14–23 | Cite as

Effects of changes in farming of subalpine meadows on a grassland bird, the whinchat (Saxicola rubetra)

  • Mathis Müller
  • Reto SpaarEmail author
  • Luc Schifferli
  • Lukas Jenni
Original Article

Abstract

The increasing intensity of farming of meadows is supposed to be the major cause for strong declines of many meadow breeding birds. The whinchat, Saxicola rubetra, a Palaearctic migratory bird, is an indicator species of open grassland farmed at a low intensity. Originally widespread throughout Switzerland, it is now restricted to mountain and subalpine grassland. We document the changes in meadow cultivation in subalpine farmland from 1988 to 2002, and the breeding performance and density of the whinchat. We explored the impact of habitat degradation on the population dynamics of this meadow bird. The cultivation of hay meadows changed markedly within the 15 years: the onset of mowing was shifted forward by about 20 days, and farmers applied new techniques such as silage and irrigation. This shift was more pronounced in the favourable farmland in the valley bottom (Pradellas) than on the slopes (Vnà). The percentage of successful whinchat broods, ranging from 5% to 78% in different years, strongly depended on mowing date on both sites. In spite of earlier mowing, birds did not change their time schedule of breeding. Breeding success in Pradellas was too low to compensate for mortality (sink population), but because of immigration the number of breeding pairs did not decrease untill 2000. Population size may therefore be a misleading indicator of local population viability. Based on the breeding schedule of whinchats at different altitudes, we recommend mowing dates in agreement with the reproductive cycle of ground nesting meadow birds.

Keywords

Agricultural practice Alps Ground-nesting songbird Meadow cultivation Saxicola rubetra 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the late M. Leuenberger, R. Wüst, P. Lustenberger and R. Pfüller for their field assistance. M. Schaub helped with the statistical analyses of survival rates. World Wildlife Found Switzerland, Pro Natura Switzerland, BirdLife Switzerland, Karl-Mayer foundation, Däniker foundation, and the Animal Protection Society of the canton Zurich supported the field study in the Engadine in 1987 and 1988.

References

  1. Ackermann L (1999) Suivi d’une population de Tarier des prés (Saxicola rubetra) dans la haute vallée de la Doller (Haut-Rhin). Ciconia 23:81–100Google Scholar
  2. Basore NS, Best LB, Wooley JB Jr (1986) Birds nesting in Iowa notillage and tilled cropland. J Wildlife Manage 50:19–28Google Scholar
  3. Bastian A, Bastian HV (1996) Das Braunkehlchen: Opfer der ausgeräumten Kulturlandschaft. Aula, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  4. Beintema AJ, Müskens GJDM (1987) Nesting success of birds breeding in Dutch agricultural grasslands. J Appl Ecol 24:743–758Google Scholar
  5. Best LB (1986) Conservation tillage: ecological traps for nesting birds? Wildlife Soc Bull 14:308–317Google Scholar
  6. Bezzel E, Stiel K (1977) Zur Biologie des Braunkehlchens Saxicola rubetra in den Bayerischen Alpen. Anz Ornithol Ges Bayern 16:1–9Google Scholar
  7. Bibby CJ, Burgess ND, Hill DA (1992) Bird census techniques. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Blondel J, Perret P, Maistre M, Dias PC (1992) Do harlequin mediterranean environments function as a source sink for blue tits (Parus caeruleus L.)? Landscape Ecol 6:213–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boddy M (1993) Whitethroat Sylvia communis population studies during 1981–1991 at a breeding site on the Lincolnshire coast. Ringing Migration 14:73–83Google Scholar
  10. Boddy M (1994) Survival/return rates and juvenile dispersal in an increasing population of lesser whitethroats Sylvia curruca. Ringing Migration 15:65–78Google Scholar
  11. Boughton DA (1999) Empirical evidence for complex source-sink dynamics with alternative states in a butterfly metapopulation. Ecology 90:2727–2739Google Scholar
  12. Bradbury RB, Kyrkos A, Morris AJ, Clark SC, Perkins AJ, Wilson JD (2000) Habitat associations and breeding success of yellowhammers on lowland farmland. J Appl Ecol 37:789–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brawn JD, Robinson SK (1996) Source-sink population dynamics may complicate the interpretation of long-term census data. Ecology 77:3–12Google Scholar
  14. Brickle NW, Harper DGC, Aebischer NJ, Cockayne SH (2000) Effects of agricultural intensification on the breeding success of corn buntings Miliaria calandra. J Appl Ecol 37:742–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (1998) Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  16. Chamberlain DE, Crick HQP (1999) Population declines and reproductive performance of skylarks Alauda arvensis in different regions and habitats of the United Kingdom. Ibis 141:38–51Google Scholar
  17. Choquet R, Reboulet A-M, Pradel R, Lebreton J-D (2001) U-CARE (Utilities—capture-recapture) user’s guide. Typoscript. CEFE/CNRS, MontpellierGoogle Scholar
  18. Delibes M, Ferrera P, Gaona P (2001) Attractive sinks, or how individual behavioural decisions determine source-sink dynamics. Ecol Lett 4:401–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Di Giulio M, Edwards PJ, Meister E (2001) Enhancing insect diversity in agricultural grasslands: the roles of management and landscape structure. J Appl Ecol 38:310–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dias PC (1996) Sources and sinks in population biology. Trends Ecol Evol 11:326–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dias PC, Blondel J (1996) Local specialization and maladaptation in the Mediterranean blue tit (Parus caeruleus). Oecologia 107:79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diffendorfer JE (1998) Testing models of source-sink dynamics and balanced dispersal. Oikos 81:417–433Google Scholar
  23. Donovan TM, Lamberson RH, Kimber A, Thompson FR III, Faaborg J (1995) Modeling the effects of habitat fragmentation on source and sink demography of Neotropical migrant birds. Conserv Biol 9:1396–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Glutz von Blotzheim UN, Bauer KM (1988) Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas. Passeriformes (2. Teil): Turdidae. Aula, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  25. Gundersen G, Johannesen E, Andreassen HP, Ims RA (2001) Source-sink dynamics: how sinks affect demography of sources. Ecol Lett 4:14–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hagemeijer EJM, Blair MJ (1997) The EBCC Atlas of European breeding birds. Poyser, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Klomp H (1954) Habitat selection in the lapwing Vanellus vanellus (L.). Ardea 42:1–139Google Scholar
  28. Labhardt A (1984) Biometrie des Braunkehlchens Saxicola rubetra: variationen in den Flügelmassen und im Körpergewicht zur Brutzeit. Ornithol Beob 81:233–247Google Scholar
  29. Labhardt A (1988) Siedlungsstruktur von Braunkehlchen-Populationen auf zwei Höhenstufen der Westschweizer Voralpen. Beih Veröffentlich Naturschutz Landschaftspfl Baden-Württemberg 51:139–158Google Scholar
  30. Lawn MR (1994) Site fidelity and annual survival of territorial male Willow Warblers Phylloscopus trochilus at four adjacent sites in Surrey. Ringing Migration 15:1–7Google Scholar
  31. Lebreton JD, Burnham KP, Clobert J, Anderson DR (1992) Modeling survival and testing biological hypothesis using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecol Monogr 62:67–118Google Scholar
  32. Luder R (1981) Die Avifauna der Gemeinde Lenk. Ornithol Beob 78:193–208Google Scholar
  33. Manuel F, Beaud P (1982) L’installation de silos à herbe et ses répercussions sur un échantillonnage de Traquet tariers, Saxicola rubetra, nicheurs du Pays d’Enhaut. Nos Oiseaux 36:277–281Google Scholar
  34. Müller M (1996) Das Engadin: Lebensraum für Brutvögel der offenen und halboffenen Kulturlandschaft. Jahresber Naturforsch Ges Graubünden 108:39–119Google Scholar
  35. Peach WJ, Thompson PS, Coulson JC (1994) Annual and long-term variation in the survival rates of British lapwings Vanellus vanellus. J Anim Ecol 63:60–70Google Scholar
  36. Pulliam HR (1988) Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am Nat 132:652–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pulliam HR (1996) Sources and sinks: empirical evidence and population consequences. Rhodes OEJ, Chesser RK, Smith MH (eds) Population dynamics in ecological space and time. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 45–69Google Scholar
  38. Pulliam HR, Danielson BJ (1991) Sources, sinks and habitat selection: a landscape perspective on population dynamics. Am Nat 137:S50–S66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Remeš V (2000) How can maladaptive habitat choice generate source-sink population dynamics. Oikos 91:579–582Google Scholar
  40. Schifferli L (2000) Changes in agriculture and the status of birds breeding in European farmland. In: Aebischer NJ, Evans AD, Grice PV, Vickery JA (eds) Ecology and conservation of lowland farmland birds. Proceedings of the British Ornithologist’s Union conference 1999. British Ornithologist’s Union, Tring, pp 17–25Google Scholar
  41. Schifferli L, Fuller RJ, Müller M (1999) Distribution and habitat use of bird species breeding on Swiss farmland in relation to agricultural intensification. Vogelwelt 120[Suppl]:151–161Google Scholar
  42. Schmid H, Feller V, Blaser P (1994) Hat das Braunkehlchen Saxicola rubetra als Wiesenbrüter im Berner Oberland noch eine Chance? Mitteilungen der Naturwissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft Thun, H. 12:109–120Google Scholar
  43. Schmid H, Luder R, Naef-Daenzer B, Graf R, Zbinden N (1998) Schweizer Brutvogelatlas. Verbreitung der Brutvögel in der Schweiz und im Fürstentum Liechtenstein 1993–1996. Schweizerische Vogelwarte, SempachGoogle Scholar
  44. Schmidt K, Hantge E (1954) Studien an einer farbig beringten Population des Braunkehlchens (Saxicola rubetra). J Ornithol 95:130–173Google Scholar
  45. Schwaiger H, Burbach K (1998) Landesweite Wiesenbrüterkartierung in Bayern 1998. Bayerisches Landesamt für Umweltschutz, FreisingGoogle Scholar
  46. Siriwardena GM, Baillie SR, Wilson JD (1998) Variation in the survival rates of some British passerines with respect to their population trends on farmland. Bird Study 45:276–292Google Scholar
  47. Svensson L (1984) Identification guide to European passerines. Lars Svensson, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  48. Thomas CD, Kunin WE (1999) The spatial structure of populations. J Anim Ecol 68:647–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tucker GM, Heath MF (1994) Birds in Europe: their conservation status. BirdLife International, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  50. Uhl H (1996) Braunkehlchen in Oberösterreich oder vom unauffälligen Sterben eines bunten Vogels. Öko L 18:15–25Google Scholar
  51. Van Horne B (1983) Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. J Wildlife Manage 47:893–901Google Scholar
  52. Watkinson AR, Sutherland WJ (1995) Sources, sinks and pseudo-sinks. J Anim Ecol 64:126–130Google Scholar
  53. White GC, Burnham KP (1999) Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46[Suppl]:120–139Google Scholar
  54. Yeatman-Berthelot D, Jarry G (1994) Nouvel atlas des oiseaux nicheurs de France 1985–1989. Société Ornithologique de France, ParisGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mathis Müller
    • 1
  • Reto Spaar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Luc Schifferli
    • 1
  • Lukas Jenni
    • 1
  1. 1.Schweizerische VogelwarteSwiss Ornithological InstituteSempachSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations