Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multi-target field control for matrix gradient coils

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Conventional single-target field control for matrix gradient coils will add control complexity in MRI spatial encoding, such as designing specialized fields and sequences. This complexity can be reduced by multi-target field control, which is realized by optimizing the coil structure according to target fields.

Methods

Based on the principle of multi-target field control, the X, Y and Z gradient fields can be set as target fields, and all coil elements can then be divided into three groups to generate these fields. An improved simulated annealing algorithm is proposed to optimize the coil element distribution of each group to generate the corresponding target field. In the improved simulated annealing process, two swapping modes are presented, and randomly selected with certain probabilities that are set to 0.25, 0.5 and 0.75, respectively. The flexibility of the final designed structure is demonstrated by a spherical harmonic basis up to the full second order with single-target field control. An experimental platform is built to measure the gradient fields generated by the designed structure with multi-target target control.

Results

With three probabilities of swapping modes, three similar coil element distributions are optimized, and their maximum magnetic field errors for generating X, Y and Z gradients are all below 5%. The structure selected for the final design is the one with a probability of 0.75, considering the coil performance and structural symmetry. The maximum error for all target fields generated by single-target field control is also below 5%. The experimental results show that the measured gradient fields along the axes have enough strength and high linearity.

Conclusions

With the proposed improved simulated annealing algorithm and swapping modes, multi-target field control for matrix gradient coils is verified and achieved in this study by optimizing the coil element distribution. Moreover, this study provides a solution to simplify the complexity of controlling the matrix gradient coil in spatial encoding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Wintzheimer S, Driessle T, Ledwig M, Jakob PM, Fidler F (2010) A 50-channel matrix gradient system: a feasibility study. In: Proceedings of the joint annual meeting ISMRM-ESMRMB, Stockholm, Sweden, p 3937

  2. Juchem C, Nixon TW, McIntyre S, Rothman DL, de Graaf RA (2010) Magnetic field modeling with a set of individual localized coils. J Magn Reson 204:281–289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. While PT, Korvink JG (2014) Designing MR shim arrays with irregular coil geometry: theoretical considerations. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 61:1614–1620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kroboth S, Layton KJ, Jia F, Littin S, Yu H, Hennig J, Zaitsev M (2018) Optimization of coil element configurations for a matrix gradient coil. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 37:284–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zivkovic I, Mirkes C, Scheffler K (2016) B0 shimming at 9.4T using a multicoil approach: coil design with genetic algorithm. In: 24th Annual Meeting and Exhibition of the ISMRM, Singapore, p 1152

  6. Zivkovic I, Tolstikhin I, Schölkopf B, Scheffler K (2016) B0 matrix shim array design-optimization of the position, geometry and the number of segments of individual coil elements. In: 33rd Annual Scientific Meeting Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, Vienna, Austria, S36

  7. Jia F, Littin S, Layton KJ, Kroboth S, Yu H, Hennig J, Zaitsev M (2017) Design of a shielded coil element of a matrix gradient coil. J Magn Reson 281:217–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Littin S, Jia F, Layton KJ, Kroboth S, Yu H, Hennig J, Zaitsev M (2018) Development and implementation of an 84-channel matrix gradient coil. Magn Reson Med 79:1181–1191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen W, Chen J, Sun H, Chen Z (2019) Simulation and analysis of irregular multicoil B0 shimming in C-type permanent magnets using genetic algorithm and simulated annealing. Appl Magn Reson 50:227–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Aghaeifar A, Zhou J, Heule R, Tabibian B, Schölkopf B, Jia F, Zaitsev M, Scheffler K (2020) A 32-channel multi-coil setup optimized for human brain shimming at 9.4T. Magn Reson Med 83:749–764

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu YJ, Yu P, Jia F, Wang Y, Yu YC, Yang XD, Zaitsev M (2022) A spherical harmonics decomposition method (SHDM) for irregular Matrix Coils design. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 69:1292–1301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Turner R (1993) Gradient coil design: a review of methods. Magn Reson Imaging 11:903–920

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Juchem C, Nahhass OM, Nixon TW, de Graaf RA (2015) Multi-slice MRI with the dynamic multi-coil technique. NMR Biomed 28:1526–1534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Panych LP, Madore B (2017) The physics of MRI safety. J Magn Reson Imaging 47:28–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Juchem C, Green D, de Graaf RA (2013) Multi-coil magnetic field modelling. J Magn Reson 236:95–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. He HY, Wei SF, Wang HX, Yang WH (2022) Analysis of coil element distribution and dimension for matrix gradient coils. Magn Reson Mater Phys Biol Med 35:967–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220:671–680

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Poole M, Bowtell R (2007) Novel gradient coils designed using a boundary element method. Concepts Magn Reson Part B (Mag Reson Eng) 31B:162–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Marler RT, Arora JS (2004) Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering. Struct Multidiscip Optim 26:369–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Major Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant NO. 52293423 and NO. 52293425), the Major Science and Technology Innovation Program of Shandong (No. 2021CXGC010504), and the Science and Technology Program of Baoding (NO. 2211G004).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Electrical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China

    Hongyan He, Shufeng Wei, Huixian Wang & Wenhui Yang

  2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

    Hongyan He & Wenhui Yang

Authors
  1. Hongyan He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shufeng Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Huixian Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wenhui Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenhui Yang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical standards

The manuscript does not contain clinical studies, patient, or volunteer data.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, H., Wei, S., Wang, H. et al. Multi-target field control for matrix gradient coils. Magn Reson Mater Phy 37, 185–198 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-023-01143-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-023-01143-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation