Advertisement

A novel MR-compatible sensor to assess active medical device safety: stimulation monitoring, rectified radio frequency pulses, and gradient-induced voltage measurements

  • Thérèse Barbier
  • Sarra Aissani
  • Nicolas Weber
  • Cédric Pasquier
  • Jacques Felblinger
Research Article
  • 79 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the function of an active implantable medical device (AIMD) during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. The induced voltages caused by the switching of magnetic field gradients and rectified radio frequency (RF) pulse were measured, along with the AIMD stimulations.

Materials and methods

An MRI-compatible voltage probe with a bandwidth of 0–40 kHz was designed. Measurements were carried out both on the bench with an overvoltage protection circuit commonly used for AIMD and with a pacemaker during MRI scans on a 1.5 T (64 MHz) MR scanner.

Results

The sensor exhibits a measurement range of ± 15 V with an amplitude resolution of 7 mV and a temporal resolution of 10 µs. Rectification was measured on the bench with the overvoltage protection circuit. Linear proportionality was confirmed between the induced voltage and the magnetic field gradient slew rate. The pacemaker pacing was recorded successfully during MRI scans.

Conclusion

The characteristics of this low-frequency voltage probe allow its use with extreme RF transmission power and magnetic field gradient positioning for MR safety test of AIMD during MRI scans.

Keywords

Low-frequency sensor Induced voltage Active medical device MR safety Malfunction 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank the F.E.D.E.R. as well as the Région Lorraine for financial support and Sorin CRM SAS for the devices lending.

Authors’ contribution

Study conception and design: Thérèse Barbier, Sarra Aissani, Nicolas Weber. Acquisition of data: Thérèse Barbier, Sarra Aissani. Analysis and interpretation of data: Thérèse Barbier, Sarra Aissani. Drafting of manuscript: Sarra Aissani, Jacques Felblinger. Critical revision: Cédric Pasquier.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    De Wilde JP, Grainger D, Price DL, Renaud C (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging safety issues including an analysis of recorded incidents within the UK. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 51:37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shinbane JS, Colletti PM, Shellock FG (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac pacemakers: era of “MR Conditional” designs. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 13:63CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nazarian S, Halperin HR (2009) How to perform magnetic resonance imaging on patients with implantable cardiac arrhythmia devices. Heart Rhythm 6:138–143CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jung W, Zvereva V, Hajredini B, Jäckle S (2011) Initial experience with magnetic resonance imaging-safe pacemakers. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 32:213–219CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duru F, Luechinger R, Scheidegger MB, Lu TF, Lüscher TF, Boesiger P, Candinas R (2001) Pacing in magnetic resonance imaging environment: clinical and technical considerations on compatibility. Eur Heart J 22:113–124CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kugel H, Bremer C, Püschel M, Fischbach R, Lenzen H, Tombach B, Van Aken H, Heindel W (2003) Hazardous situation in the MR bore: induction in ECG leads causes fire. Eur Radiol 13:690–694PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dempsey MF, Condon B (2001) Thermal injuries associated with MRI. Clin Radiol 56:457–465CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    New PF, Rosen BR, Brady TJ, Buonanno FS, Kistler JP, Burt CT, Hinshaw WS, Newhouse JH, Pohost GM, Taveras JM (1983) Potential hazards and artifacts of ferromagnetic and nonferromagnetic surgical and dental materials and devices in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Radiology 147:139–148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shellock FG, Crues J (1988) High-field-strength MR imaging and metallic biomedical implants: an ex vivo evaluation of deflection forces. Am J Roentgenol 151:389–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shellock FG (2009) Reference manual for magnetic resonance safety: 2016 edition. Biomedical Research Publishing Group, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    ISO/TS 10974:2012(E) (2012) Assessment of the safety of magnetic resonance imaging for patients with an active implantable medical deviceGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barbier T, Piumatti R, Hecker B, Odille F, Felblinger J, Pasquier C (2014) An RF-induced voltage sensor for investigating pacemaker safety in MRI. Magn Reson Mater Phy 27:539–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nordbeck P, Weiss I, Ehses P, Ritter O, Warmuth M, Fidler F, Herold V, Jakob PM, Ladd ME, Quick HH, Bauer WR (2009) Measuring RF-induced currents inside implants: impact of device configuration on MRI safety of cardiac pacemaker leads. Magn Reson Med 61:570–578CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zanchi MG, Venook R, Pauly JM, Scott GC (2010) An optically coupled system for quantitative monitoring of MRI-induced RF currents into long conductors. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 29:169–178CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tandri H, Zviman MM, Wedan SR, Lloyd T, Berger RD, Halperin H (2008) Determinants of gradient field-induced current in a pacemaker lead system in a magnetic resonance imaging environment. Heart Rhythm 5:462–468CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mattei E, Censi F, Triventi M, Napolitano A, Genovese E, Cannatà V, Calcagnini G (2015) An optically coupled sensor for the measurement of currents induced by MRI gradient fields into endocardial leads. Magn Reson Mater Phy 28:291–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu H, Matson G (2013) Accurate measurement of magnetic resonance imaging gradient characteristics. Materials 7:1–15CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    ASTM F2182-11A (2011) Measurement of radio frequency induced heating on or near passive implants during magnetic resonance imaging. ASTM, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    International Electrotechnical Commission (2010) Medical equipment—IEC 60601-2-33: particular requirements for the safety of magnetic resonance equipment, 3rd edn. International Electrotechnical Commission, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Glover PM (2009) Interaction of MRI field gradients with the human body. Phys Med Biol 54:R99–R115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu F, Zhao H, Crozier S (2003) On the induced electric field gradients in the human body for magnetic stimulation by gradient coils in MRI. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 50:804–815CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Langman DA, Goldberg IB, Finn JP, Ennis DB (2011) Pacemaker lead tip heating in abandoned and pacemaker-attached leads at 1.5 Tesla MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 33:426–431CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mattei E, Calcagnini G, Censi F, Triventi M, Bartolini P (2012) Role of the lead structure in MRI-induced heating: in vitro measurements on 30 commercial pacemaker/defibrillator leads. Magn Reson Med 67:925–935CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ferreira AM, Costa F, Tralhão A, Marques H, Cardim N, Adragão P (2014) MRI-conditional pacemakers: current perspectives. Med Devices Auckl NZ 7:115–124Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Irnich W (2002) Electronic security systems and active implantable medical devices. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 25:1235–1258CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Irnich W (2010) The terms “Chronaxie” and “Rheobase” are 100 years old. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 33:491–496CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stevenson RA (1998) Feedthrough EMI filter with ground isolation for cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators. In: Proceedings of the 20th annual international conference of IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol 20 Biomedical Engineering Year 2000 Cat No. 98CH36286, vol 6, p 3319–3323Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ESMRMB 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thérèse Barbier
    • 1
    • 3
  • Sarra Aissani
    • 1
  • Nicolas Weber
    • 1
  • Cédric Pasquier
    • 1
  • Jacques Felblinger
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.IADI, U947, INSERMUniversité de LorraineNancyFrance
  2. 2.CIC 1433 Innovation Technologique, INSERMCHRU NancyNancyFrance
  3. 3.Axon’ CableMontmirailFrance
  4. 4.IADI (Université de Lorraine-INSERM), Bâtiment Recherche (anciennement EFS), Rez-de-ChausséCHRU de Nancy BraboisVandoeuvre CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations