Skip to main content
Log in

Quantifying magnetic nanoparticles in non-steady flow by MRI

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

This work compares the measured \({{R}_{2}^*}\) of magnetic nanoparticles to their corresponding theoretical values in both gel phantoms and dynamic water flows on the basis of the static dephasing theory.

Materials and methods

The magnetic moment of a nanoparticle solution was measured by a magnetometer. The \({{R}_{2}^*}\) of the nanoparticle solution doped in a gel phantom was measured at both 1.5 and 4.7 T. A total of 12 non-steady state flow experiments with different nanoparticle concentrations were conducted. The \({{R}_{2}^*}\) at each time point was measured.

Results

The theoretical \({{R}_{2}^*}\) on the basis of the magnetization of nanoparticles measured by the magnetometer agree within 11% of MRI measurements in the gel phantom study, a significant improvement from previous work. In dynamic flow experiments, the total \({{R}_{2}^*}\) calculated from each experiment agrees within 15% of the theoretical \({{R}_{2}^*}\) for 10 of the 12 cases. The MRI phase values are also reasonably predicted by the theory. The diffusion effect does not seem to contribute significantly.

Conclusions

Under certain situations with known \({{R}_{2}^*}\) , the static dephasing theory can be used to quantify the susceptibility or concentration of nanoparticles in either a static or dynamic flow environment at a given time point. This approach may be applied to in vivo studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bowen CV, Zhang X, Saab G, Gareau PJ, Rutt BK (2002) Application of the static dephasing regime theory to superparamagnetic iron-oxide loaded cells. Magn Reson Med 48: 52–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lebel RM, Menon RS, Bowen CV (2006) Relaxometry model of strong dipolar perturbers for balanced-SSFP: application to quantification of SPIO loaded cells. Magn Reson Med 55: 583–591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown RJS (1961) Distribution of fields from randomly placed dipoles: free-precession signal decay as result of magnetic grains. Phys Rev 121: 1379–1382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yablonskiy DA, Haacke EM (1994) Theory of NMR signal behavior in magnetically inhomogeneous tissues: the static dephasing regime. Magn Reson Med 32: 749–763

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bjørnerud A, Johansson L, Briley-Saebø K, Ahlström H (2002) Assessment of T1 and T2* effects in vivo and ex vivo using iron oxide nanoparticles in steady state—dependence on blood volume and water exchange. Magn Reson Med 47: 461–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. van Osch M, Vonken E, Viergever M, van der Grond J, Bakker C (2003) Measuring the arterial input function with gradient echo sequences. Magn Reson Med 49: 1067–1076

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wismer GL, Buxton RB, Rosen BR, Fisel CR, Oot RF, Brady TJ, Davis KR (1988) Susceptibility induced MR line broadening: applications to brain iron mapping. J Comput Assist Tomogr 12(2): 259–265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Li D, Wang Y, Waight DJ (1998) Blood oxygen saturation assessment in vivo using \({T_{2}^*}\) estimation. Magn Reson Med 39: 685–690

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Silvennoinen MJ, Clingman CS, Golay X, Kauppinen RA, van Zijl PCM (2003) Comparison of the dependence of blood R 2 and \({{R}_{2}^*}\) on oxygen saturation at 1.5 and 4.7 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 49: 47–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng Y-CN, Haacke EM, Yu Y-J (2001) An exact form for the magnetic field density of states for a dipole. Magn Reson Imaging 19(7): 1017–1023

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Greil G, Geva T, Maier S, Powell A (2002) Effect of acquisition parameters on the accuracy of velocity encoded cine magnetic resonance imaging blood flow measurements. J Magn Reson Imaging 15: 47–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ramnath HP (2006) Quantification of velocity and tracking micron sized particles using MRI and CFD. M.S. thesis, Wayne State University Detroit

  13. Gillis P, Koenig SH (1987) Transverse relaxation of solvent protons induced by magnetized spheres: application to ferritin, erythrocytes, and magnetite. Magn Reson Med 5: 323–345

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ziener CH, Bauer WR, Jakob PM (2005) Transverse relaxation of cells labeled with magnetic nanoparticles. Magn Reson Med 54: 702–706

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ziener CH, Kampf T, Melkus G, Herold V, Weber T, Reents G, Jakob PM, Bauer WR (2007) Local frequency density of states around field inhomogeneities in magnetic resonance imaging: effects of diffusion. Phys Rev E 76: 031915

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Marques JP, Bowtell R (2005) Application of a Fourier-based method for rapid calculation of field inhomogeneity due to spatial variation of magnetic susceptibility. Concepts Magn Reson B (Magn Reson Eng) 25B(1): 65–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Condon EU, Odishaw H (1958) Handbook of Physics, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 4–128

  18. Bozorth RM (1951) Ferromagnetism. Van Nostrand, Princeron

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jackson JD (1999) Classical Electrodynamics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-Chung N. Cheng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shen, Y., Cheng, YC.N., Lawes, G. et al. Quantifying magnetic nanoparticles in non-steady flow by MRI. Magn Reson Mater Phy 21, 345–356 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-008-0140-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-008-0140-4

Keywords

Navigation