Abstract
In extending human MR to field strengths approaching 10 T, the wavelength of electromagnetic radiation at the proton Larmor frequency becomes less than human body size and conventional radio-frequency coil circumference. Consequently, radio-frequency magnetic fields are better generated by an array of small coils than by one large coil. In this article, the primary problem of array coil interactions during transmission is examined, and a standard proposed whereby secondary induced currents should be less than 1% of the primary coil current. The use of cancellation methods and of power amplifiers with high output impedance to reduce interactions is examined in the light of this standard and found wanting. Non-magnetic Cartesian feedback transceivers functioning at the magnet entrance are then proposed as a solution that both reduces instrumentation cost and increases the bandwidth over which the standard may be met. The compromises inherent in instrument design are detailed and examples given of the innovative circuitry used. It is shown experimentally that when connected to interacting coils, two Cartesian feedback instruments function stably in accord with theory and such that the proposed standard is typically attained over a bandwidth of 22 kHz during transmission (much greater during signal reception)—enough for all current MR protocols.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hoult DI, Chen C-N and Sank VJ (1986). The field dependence of NMR imaging. Magn Reson Med 3: 730–746
Hoult DI (2000). Sensitivity and power deposition in a high-field imaging experiment. J Magn Reson Imaging 12: 46–67
Sacolick LI, Rothman DL, de Graaf RA (2007) Adiabatic refocusing pulses for volume selection in magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. Magn Reson Med 57:548–553 and references therein
Roemer PB, Edelstein WA, Hayes CE, Sousa SP and Mueller OM (1990). The NMR phased array. Magn Reson Med 16: 192–225
Pruessman KP, Weiger M, Wiesinger F and Boesiger P (2002). An investigation into the role of coil coupling in parallel imaging. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med 10: 186
Ohliger MA, Ledden P, McKenzie CA and Sodickson DK (2004). Effects of inductive coupling on parallel MR image reconstructions. Magn Reson Med 52: 628
Andrew ER (1955) Nuclear magnetic resonance. Cambridge University Press, London, pp 56–63 and references therein
Duensing GR, Brooker HR and Fitzsimmons JR (1996). Maximizing signal-to-noise ratio in the presence of coil coupling. J Magn Reson Ser B 11: 230–235
Duensing GR, Peterson DM, Wolverton BL and Fitzsimmons JR (1998). Transceive phased array designed for imaging at 3.0 T. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med 6: 441
King SB, Duensing GR, Varosi S, Peterson DM and Molyneaux DA (2001). A four channel tranceive phased array head coil for 3 T. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med 9: 12
Wang J (1996). A novel method to reduce the signal coupling of surface coils for MRI. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med 4: 1434
Takahashi T, Matsunaga Y, Takeuchi H and Nishimura H (1996). Four-channel wrap-around coil with inductive decoupler for 1.5 T body imaging. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med 4: 1418
Schetgen R (ed) (1996). The ARRL handbook for radio amateurs. The American Radio Relay League, Newington
Straw RD (ed) (2000). The ARRL antenna book. The American Radio Relay League, Newington
Lange S and Nguyen QN (2006). Cables and electrodes can burn patients during MRI. Nursing 36: 18
Lee RF, Giaquinto RO and Hardy CJ (2002). Coupling and decoupling theory and its application to the MRI phased array. Magn Reson Med 48: 203–213
Jevtic J (2001). Ladder networks for capacitive decoupling in phased-array coils. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med 9: 17
Dorf RC (ed) (1993). The electrical engineering handbook. CRC, Boca Raton
Hutchison JMS, Edelstein WA and Johnson G (1980). A whole-body NMR imaging machine. J Phys E: Sci Instrum 13: 947–955
Hoult DI (1979). Fast recovery, high sensitivity probe and preamplifier for low frequencies. Rev Sci Instrum 50: 193–200
Hoult DI (1984). Fast recovery with a conventional probe. J Magn Reson 57: 394–403
Hoult DI and Ginsberg NS (2001). The quantum origins of the free induction decay signal and spin noise. J Magn Reson 148: 182–199
Kurpad KN, Boskamp EB and Wright SM (2004). Implementation of coil integrated RF power MOSFET as voltage controlled current source in a transmit phased array coil. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med 12: 1585
Chen C-N and Hoult DI (1989). Biomedical magnetic resonance technology. Adam Hilger, Bristol
Hoult DI (1991). Instrumentation and pulse sequences. Proc Eur Soc Magn Reson Med Biol, Zürich
Hoult DI, Kolansky G and Kripiakevich D (2004). A ‘Hi-Fi-Cartesian feedback spectrometer for precise quantitation and superior performance. J Magn Reson 171: 57–63
Hoult DI, Kolansky G, Kripiakevich D and King SB (2004). The NMR multi-transmit phased array: a Cartesian feedback approach. J Magn Reson 171: 64–70
Graeme JG, Tobey GE, Huelsman LP (eds) (1971). Operational amplifiers: design and applications. McGraw-Hill, New York
Hoult DI and Richards RE (1975). Critical factors in the design of sensitive high resolution nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometers. Proc R Soc Lond A 344: 311–340
Morris RL, Miller JR (eds) (1971). Designing with TTL integrated circuits. Mc-Graw Hill, New York
Mitchell MW and Chiao RY (1998). Causality and negative group delays in a simple band-pass filter. Am J Phys 66: 14–19
Hickman I (1993). Newnes practical RF handbook. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
Koste G, Frey R, Nielsen M, Tolliver T, Watkins R (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging, a commercial application for analog photonics. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on avionics fiber-optics and photonics
International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland. Standard IEC 60601-2-33
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hoult, D.I., Foreman, D., Kolansky, G. et al. Overcoming high-field RF problems with non-magnetic Cartesian feedback transceivers. Magn Reson Mater Phy 21, 15 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-007-0089-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-007-0089-8