Analysis by numerical experiments of desalinization of a salt-affected paddy field using a rice husk underdrainage system

  • Koji InosakoEmail author
  • Tadaomi Saito
  • Kana Omachi


In a monsoon climate, salt accumulates not only in drylands, but also in paddy fields during the dry season. Because natural desalinization by gravitational drainage is very difficult in paddy fields, drainage facilities are needed to remove salts from affected paddy fields. A rice husk underdrainage system (RHUS) is one applicable method. Although this system is simple and reasonable, there is an unfortunate lack of available information for its practical realization. In this study, we conducted numerical field-scale experiments with an RHUS using HYDRUS 2D/3D software to obtain information for designing such a system. Our results clarified the effect of outlet size, rice husk drain (RHD) width, and RHD gradient on the amount of discharged soil water/salts and saline water movement in the paddy field. We summarized our results as follows: (1) outlet size did not affect the system’s drainage ability; (2) small-width RHD discharged saline soil water at a greater rate than large-width RHD when using the same amount of leaching water; (3) because the RHD worked as a bypass of saline water movement from the plow layer to the lower soil layer, the amount of saline water removed from the plow layer was larger with the large-width RHD than with the small-width RHD; and (4) the large gradient of the RHD was advantageous in increasing the amount of discharged saline soil water, but the effect was small, so it appears unnecessary for practical application.


Leaching Salinity Solute transport HYDRUS 



This study was financially supported by the Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research of JSPS and the Tottori University International Platform for Dryland Research and Education.


  1. Darzi-Naftchali A, Karandish F, Šimůnek J (2018) Numerical modeling of soil water dynamics in subsurface drained paddies with midseason drainage or alternate wetting and drying management. Agric Water Manag 197:67–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Durner W (1994) Hydraulic conductivity estimation for soils with heterogeneous pore structure. Water Resour Res 30(2):211–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Erahimuan H, Noory H (2015) Modeling paddy field subsurface drainage using HYDRUS-2D. Paddy Water Environ, 13:477–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. FAO (2011) The state of the world’s land and water resources for food and agriculture. Earthscan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Filipović V, Mallmann FJK, Coquet Y, Šimůnek J (2014) Numerical simulation of water flow in tile and mole drainage system. Agric Water Manag 146:105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Forkutes I, Sommer R, Shirokova I, Lamers JPA, Kienzler K, Tischbein B, Martius C, Vlek PLG (2009) Modeling irrigated cotton with shallow groundwater in the Aral Sea Basin of Uzbekistan: II. Soil salinity dynamics. Irrig Sci 27:319–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grünberger O, Macaigne P, Michelot JL, Hartmann C, Sukchan S (2008) Salt crust development in paddy fields owing to soil evaporation and drainage: contribution of chloride and deuterium profiles analysis. J Hydrol 348:110–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hanson BR, Šimůnek J, Hopmans JW (2006) Evaluation of ura-ammonium fertigation with drip irrigation using numerical modeling. Agric Water Manag 86:102–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haws NW, Rao PSC, Simunek J, Poyer IC (2005) Single-porosity and dual-porosity modeling of water flow and solute transport in subsurface-drained fields using effective field-scale parameters. J Hydrol 313:257–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Inosako K, Ohara K (2004) Desalinization of salt-affected field of Mombo area in Tanzania. In: Proceedings of annual meeting of JSIDRE in 2004, pp 502–503 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  11. Inosako K, Yasunaga K, Takeshita N, Saito T, Inoue M (2012) Desalinization of a salt-affected field using a rice husk underdrainage system. J Arid Land Stud 22(1):143–146Google Scholar
  12. Kitamura Y (2009) Status of secondary salinization on irrigated farmland and characteristics of salinized soils. In: Sunada K (ed) Study on Asian river basin. Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), Tokyo, pp III-3–III-7Google Scholar
  13. Kitamura Y, Oweis TY (2018) Agricultural water management in the drylands: New paradigm to cope with scarcity and climate change. Gihodo Shuppan, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  14. Mirjat MS, Mughal AQ, Chandio AS (2014) Simulating water flow and salt leaching under sequential flooding between subsurface drains. Irrig Drain 63:112–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moroizumi T, Horino H (2004) Tillage effects on subsurface drainage. SSSAJ 68:1138–1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Priesack E, Durner W (2006) Closed-form expression for the multi-model unsaturated conductivity function. Vadose Zone J 5:121–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Qadir M, Ghafoor A, Murtaza G (2000) Amelioration strategies for saline soils: a review. Land Degrad Dev 11:501–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Šimůnek J, van Genuchten MTh, Šejna M (2012) The HYDRUS software package for simulating the two- and three-dimensional movement of water, heat and multiple solute in variably-saturated media. Technical Manual Version 2.0. PC Progress, PragueGoogle Scholar
  19. Siyal AA, van Genuchten MTh, Skaggs TH (2013) Solute transport in a loamy soil under subsurface porous clay pipe irrigation. Agric Water Manag 121:73–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tao Y, Wang S, Xu D, Yuan H, Chen H (2017) Field and numerical experiment of an improved subsurface drainage system in Huaibei plain. Agric Water Manag 194:24–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Society of Paddy and Water Environment Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of AgricultureTottori UniversityTottoriJapan

Personalised recommendations