Paddy and Water Environment

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 439–455 | Cite as

The projected changes in water status of the Mae Klong Basin, Thailand, using WEAP model

  • Alamgir Khalil
  • Areeya Rittima
  • Yutthana Phankamolsil


River basin management has become more dynamic and challenging due to increased competition among different water use sectors. Mae Klong Basin is rich in term of water availability, but increasing water demands in future due to inter-basin-based water management policy addressed by the national government may strongly influence the changes in water status. WEAP model was implemented to assess the current water supply and demand situations for this basin. Six different scenarios were established to evaluate the response of the basin to increasing demands under two SRES scenarios A2 and B2. The simulated results have shown that currently the water resources in the basin are sufficient to meet the existing needs in the wet season, but water shortage has occurred in the dry periods of 2014 and 2015 due to less rainfall in these years. The results have also shown that more water shortages have occurred under A2 scenario as compared to B2 scenario. Water shortages have occurred in all the developed scenarios indicating that the basin will face water scarcity particularly in the scenario five where transferring water to the adjoining area is difficult to possibly be implemented. The scenario six where a new hydropower project is proposed is considered feasible under both A2 and B2 scenarios and can help in meeting hydropower demands in the basin. It is pertinent to shape more effective policies and regulations in the basin for effective water resources management in reducing water shortage as well as achieving downstream water needs and power benefit in future.


Mae Klong Basin WEAP model Water resources management 


  1. Al-Omari A, Al-Quraan S, Al-Salihi A, Abdulla F (2009) A water management support system for Amman Zarqa Basin in Jordan. Water Resour Manag 23(15):3165–3189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Omari AS, Al-Karablieh EK, Al-Houri ZM, Salman AZ, Al-Weshah RA (2015) Irrigation water management in the Jordan Valley under water scarcity. Fresenius Environ Bull 24:1176–1188Google Scholar
  3. Ali MF, Saadon A, Rahman NA, Khalid K (2014) An assessment of water demand in malaysia using water evaluation and planning system. In: InCIEC 2013. Springer, Singapore, pp 743–755Google Scholar
  4. Bejranonda W, Koch M, Koontanakulvong S (2013) Surface water and groundwater dynamic interaction models as guiding tools for optimal conjunctive water use policies in the central plain of Thailand. Environ Earth Sci 70(5):2079–2086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biltonen E, Kwanyuen B, Kositsakulchai E, Pattani S (2003) Development of water-management institutions in the Mae Klong River Basin, Thailand. In: Bruns B, Bandaragoda DJ (eds) Governance for integrated water resources management in a river-basin context. Proceedings of a regional seminar, Bangkok, May, 2002, IWMI, Colombo, pp 109–137Google Scholar
  6. Demertzi KA, Papamichail DM, Georgiou PE, Karamouzis DN, Aschonitis VG (2014) Assessment of rural and highly seasonal tourist activity plus drought effects on reservoir operation in a semi-arid region of Greece using the WEAP model. Water Int 39(1):23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations. (1999) CROPWAT 8.0. Retrieved From
  8. Hamlat A, Errih M, Guidoum A (2013) Simulation of water resources management scenarios in western Algeria watersheds using WEAP model. Arab J Geosci 6(7):2225–2236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hoff H, Bonzi C, Joyce B, Tielbörger K (2011) A water resources planning tool for the Jordan River Basin. Water 3(3):718–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ingol-Blanco E, McKinney DC (2012) Development of a hydrological model for the Rio Conchos Basin. J Hydrol Eng 18(3):340–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Japan International Cooperation Agency, JICA (1997) Western Seaboard Regional Development Master Plan. Final report, vol 9Google Scholar
  12. Kasetsart University (2016) Hydrology for Mae Klong River Basin. Retrieved from Accessed on 04 Apr 2016
  13. Kulsuwan B (1999) Application of AQUARIUS for the Mae Klong River Basin. Engineering Project, Kasetsart University, Nakhon PathomGoogle Scholar
  14. LeRoy E (2005) Application of the WEAP system, Olifant catchment. MSc, thesis, Republic of South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  15. Lévite H, Sally H, Cour J (2003) Water demand management scenarios in a water-stressed basin in South Africa. In: Proceedings of the 3rd WARFSA/WaterNet Symp, pp 15–17Google Scholar
  16. Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans Asabe 50(3):885–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Royal Irrigation Department (RID) (2006) Chao Phraya Delta: Paddy Field Irrigation Area in Tidal Deposit. Retrieved from Accessed on 04 Apr 2016
  18. Royal Irrigation Department (RID) (2011a) Crop coefficient of 40 varieties; office of hydrology and water management. Bangkok, Royal Irrigation DepartmentGoogle Scholar
  19. Royal Irrigation Department (RID) (2011b) Reference crop evapotranspiration by Penmen Monteith; office of hydrology and water management. Bangkok, Royal Irrigation DepartmentGoogle Scholar
  20. Shrestha S (2014) Assessment of water availability under climate change scenarios in Thailand. In: Climate change impacts and adaptation in water resources and water use sectors. Springer, pp 9–23Google Scholar
  21. Shumet AG, Mengistu KT (2016) Assessing the impact of existing and future water demand on economic and environmental aspects (Case study from Rift Valley Lake Basin: Meki-Ziway Sub Basin), Ethiopia. Int J Waste Resour 6:223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stockholm Environment Institute, SEI (2015) WEAP (water evaluation and planning): user’s guide. Retrieved from Accessed on 04 Apr 2016
  23. Swiech T, Ertsen MW, Pererya CM (2012) Estimating the impacts of a reservoir for improved water use in irrigation in the Yarabamba Region, Peru. Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C 47:64–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vongvisessomjai S (2005) Chao Phraya Delta: paddy field irrigation area in tidal deposit. In: 19th international congress and 56th international executive council of ICID (10–18 September 2005), THAICID-Multifunctional roles of irrigation water in ThailandGoogle Scholar
  25. Vudhivanich V, Pajongkitkran S, Bunpian A, Cherdchanpipat N (2002) Irrigation efficiency of the greater Chao Phraya and the greater Mae Klong irrigation projects. Kasetsart J Nat Sci 36:110–118Google Scholar
  26. Yoo C (2006) Long term analysis of wet and dry years in Seoul, Korea. J Hydrol 318(1):24–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Society of Paddy and Water Environment Engineering and Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alamgir Khalil
    • 1
    • 3
  • Areeya Rittima
    • 1
  • Yutthana Phankamolsil
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringMahidol UniversityPhutthamonthonThailand
  2. 2.Environmental Engineering and Disaster Management ProgramMahidol UniversityKanchanaburiThailand
  3. 3.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of Engineering and TechnologyPeshawarPakistan

Personalised recommendations