Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of plastic-hole mulching on effective rainfall and readily available soil moisture under soybean (Glycine max) cultivation

  • Article
  • Published:
Paddy and Water Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plasticulture is becoming popular to control soil temperature and increase water-use efficiency in rain-fed agriculture. Non-perforated plastic mulching reduces effective rainfall by preventing infiltration, while perforated plastic mulching (plastic-hole mulching) increases effective rainfall by enhancing infiltration; both mulching control soil temperature. The comparative performance of these mulching is not, however, well investigated yet. So, a field experiment was conducted by cultivating soybean (Glycine max) under non-perforated plastic mulching (hereafter denoted by P), plastic-hole mulching (hereafter denoted by PH) and bare soil to investigate soil temperature, effective rainfall, total readily available soil moisture (TRAM), soil-moisture extraction pattern (SMEP) and yield of soybean. The mulching treatments reduced soil temperature by 2 °C at 5 cm depth compared to the bare treatment and created a favorable environment for soybean growth under high air temperature during summer in Japan. The PH treatment increased effective rainfall by as much as 9% of total rainfall compared to the P treatment. The SMEP in the 0- to 30-cm soil profile revealed that soil moisture was consumed, mostly, from the upper soil layer in the bare treatment, while in the P and PH treatments, soil-moisture consumption occurred both from the upper and from the lower soil layers. Consequently, the P and PH treatments provided greater TRAM (57.3 and 54.0 mm) than the bare treatment (48.0 mm), indicating that mulching contributed increasing soil-moisture availability in the root zone. The mulching treatments augmented plant height, number of nodulations per plant, and seed and biomass yields; the PH treatment produced the maximum seed yield.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen R, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop requirements. Irrig Drain Pap No 56. FAO. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2010.12.001

    Google Scholar 

  • Awe GO, Reichert JM, Timm LC, Wendroth OO (2014) Temporal processes of soil water status in a sugarcane field under residue management. Plant Soil 387:395–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandyopadhyay PK, Mallick S (2003) Actual evapotranspiration and crop coefficients of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under varying moisture levels of humid tropical canal command area. Agric Water Manag 59:33–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouyoucos GJ (1962) Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analysis of soils. Agron J 54:464–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty D, Nagarajan S, Aggarwal P et al (2008) Effect of mulching on soil and plant water status, and the growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in a semi-arid environment. Agric Water Manag 95:1323–1334. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2008.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djaman K, Irmak S (2012) Soil water extraction patterns and crop, irrigation, and evapotranspiration water use efficiency of maize under full and limited irrigation and rainfed settings. Trans ASABE 55:1223–1238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farré I, Faci JM (2006) Comparative response of maize (Zea mays L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) to deficit irrigation in a Mediterranean environment. Agric Water Manag 83:135–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filipović V, Romić D, Romić M et al (2016) Plastic mulch and nitrogen fertigation in growing vegetables modify soil temperature, water and nitrate dynamics: experimental results and a modeling study. Agric Water Manag 176:100–110. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2016.04.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh PK, Dayal D, Bandyopadhyay KK, Mohanty M (2006) Evaluation of straw and polythene mulch for enhancing productivity of irrigated summer groundnut. F Crop Res 99:76–86. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2006.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irmak S, Specht JE, Odhiambo LO et al (2014) Soybean yield, water productivity, evapotranspiration, and soil water extraction response to subsurface drip irrigation. Trans ASABE 57:729–748

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasirajan S, Ngouajio M (2012) Polyethylene and biodegradable mulches for agricultural applications: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 32:501–529. doi:10.1007/s13593-011-0068-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MJ, Monke EJ, Foster GR (1988) Mulch cover and canopy effect on soil loss. T ASAE 13:706–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komariah Ito K, Onishi T, Senge M (2011) Soil properties affected by combinations of soil solarization and organic amendment. Paddy Water Environ 9:357–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont WJ (1993) Plastic mulches for the production of vegetable crops. Horttechnology 3:35–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenka S, Singh AK, Lenka NK (2009) Water and nitrogen interaction on soil profile water extraction and ET in maize–wheat cropping system. Agric Water Manag 96:195–207. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2008.06.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-López R, Antonio Inzunza-Ibarra M, Sánchez-Cohen I et al (2015) Water use efficiency and productivity of habanero pepper (Capsicum chinense Jacq.) based on two transplanting dates. Water Sci Technol 71:885–891

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mahrer Y (1991) Physical principles of solar heating of soils by plastic mulching in the field and in glasshouses and simulation models. In: Katan J, DeVay JE (eds) Soil solarization. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 75–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker ML, Meyer JR (1996) Peach tree vegetative and root growth respond to orchard floor management. HortScience 3:330–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishna A, Tam HM, Wani SP, Long TD (2006) Effect of mulch on soil temperature, moisture, weed infestation and yield of groundnut in northern Vietnam. F Crop Res 95:115–125. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2005.01.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russel MB, Richards LA (1938) The determination of soil moisture energy relations by centrifugation. Soil Sci Soc Proc 3:65–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar S, Goswami SB, Mallick S, Nanda MK (2008) Different indices to characterize water use pattern of micro-sprinkler irrigated onion (Allium cepa L.). Agric Water Manag 95:625–632. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2008.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekhon NK, Hira GS, Sidhu AS, Thind SS (2005) Response of soyabean (Glycine max Mer.) to wheat straw mulching in different cropping seasons. Soil Use Manag 21:422–426. doi:10.1079/SUM2005356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siczek A, Lipiec J (2011) Soybean nodulation and nitrogen fixation in response to soil compaction and surface straw mulching. Soil Tillage Res 114:50–56. doi:10.1016/j.still.2011.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siczek A, Horn R, Lipiec J et al (2015) Effects of soil deformation and surface mulching on soil physical properties and soybean response related to weather conditions. Soil Tillage Res 153:175–184. doi:10.1016/j.still.2015.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Sharma RR, Goyal RK (2007) Interacting effects of planting time and mulching on “Chandeler” strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.). Sci Hortic 111:344–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinkevičienė A, Jodaugienė D, Pupalienė R, Urbonienė M (2009) The influence of organic mulches on soil properties and crop yield. Agron Res 7:485–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmetz Z, Wollmann C, Schaefer M et al (2016) Plastic mulching in agriculture. Trading short-term agronomic benefits for long-term soil degradation? Sci Total Environ 550:690–705. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Storer DA (1984) A simple high sample volume ashing procedure for determining soil organic matter. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 15:759–772

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari KN, Singh A, Mal PK (2003) Effect of drip irrigation on yield of cabbage (Brassica oleracea L., va. Capitata) under mulch and non-mulch conditions. Agric Water Manag 58:19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uchino H, Uozumi S, Touno E et al (2016) Soybean growth traits suitable for forage production in an Italian ryegrass living mulch system. F Crop Res 193:143–153. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2016.04.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Zhao X, Wu P, Chen X (2015) Effects of water limitation on yield advantage and water use in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)/maize (Zea mays L.) strip intercropping. Eur J Agron 71:149–159. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2015.09.007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Jia Z, Liang L et al (2016) Impacts of manure application on soil environment, rainfall use efficiency and crop biomass under dryland farming. Sci Rep 6:20994. doi:10.1038/srep20994

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Xiukang W, Zhanbin L, Yingying X (2015) Effects of mulching and nitrogen on soil temperature, water content, nitrate-N content and maize yield in the Loess Plateau of China. Agric Water Manag 161:53–64. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2015.07.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang N, Sun Z, Feng L et al (2015) Plastic film mulching for water-efficient agricultural applications and degradable films materials development research. Mater Manuf Process. doi:10.1080/10426914.2014.930958

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao JM (1998) Studies on water-osmotic film and dryland farming. J Nat Resour 13:368–370 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin W, Feng F, Zhao C et al (2016) Integrated double mulching practices optimizes soil temperature and improves soil water utilization in arid environments. Int J Biometeorol. doi:10.1007/s00484-016-1134-y

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang GS, Hu XB, Zhang XX, Li J (2015) Effects of plastic mulch and crop rotation on soil physical properties in rain-fed vegetable production in the mid-Yunnan plateau, China. Soil Tillage Res 145:111–117. doi:10.1016/j.still.2014.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao YC, Wang P, Li JL et al (2009) The effects of two organic manures on soil properties and crop yield on a temperate calcareous soil under a wheat–maize cropping system. Eur J Agron 3:36–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H, Wang RY, Ma BL et al (2014) Ridge-furrow with full plastic film mulching improves water use efficiency and tuber yields of potato in a semiarid rainfed ecosystem. F Crop Res 161:137–148. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2014.02.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully thank the River Basin Research Centre of Gifu University and the Kubota Fund for providing financial support during the Master’s program of the first author in Japan

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masateru Senge.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kader, M.A., Senge, M., Mojid, M.A. et al. Effects of plastic-hole mulching on effective rainfall and readily available soil moisture under soybean (Glycine max) cultivation. Paddy Water Environ 15, 659–668 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-017-0585-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-017-0585-z

Keywords