Paddy and Water Environment

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 55–69 | Cite as

Institutional capacity and rural community planning in Japan: an event history analysis

  • Li-Pei Peng
  • Yasuaki Kuki
  • Shizuka Hashimoto
  • Yeu-Sheng Hsieh
Article
  • 554 Downloads

Abstract

Bottom-up and governance paradigms are becoming more prevalent in rural community planning in East Asia. Rural communities must enhance their institutional capacities, which are the baseline for planning future changes. However, few studies have analyzed the relationship between institutional capacity and rural community planning. Using a quantitative method of event history analysis, we compared the hazards of establishing conferences and plan approval from the Sato-dzukuri of Kobe City, Japan. We examined the effect of institutional capacity on rural community planning for the conference establishment and plan approval. We found that knowledge resources and relational resources are related to the proxy mobilization capacity for conference establishment. These resources are related to plan approval, although no relationship exists between conference establishment and plan approval. Conferences can be planned more rapidly than plans for approval can be, although both require substantial time. Communities with rural contexts present more rapid conference establishment than do suburban areas, whereas there are no significant differences in plan approval. This suggests that rural communities require more effort for the plan approval process. Rural community planning should judiciously address issues of institutional capacity regarding restrained knowledge resources and progress management, and should maintain vigilance regarding administration to achieve local governance.

Keywords

Governance Institutional capacity Rural planning Community development Event history analysis Kobe 

References

  1. Akita N, Koizumi H, Okata J (2004) A study on the development control through the rural community plans: case study on the Machizukuri ordinance of Kobe city, for urbanization control area (in Japanese). J City Plan Inst Jpn 39(3):463–468Google Scholar
  2. Albrechts L, Healey P, Kunzmann K (2003) Strategic spatial planning and regional governance in Europe. J Am Plan Assoc 69:113–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berry F, Berry W (1990) State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: an event history analysis. Am Political Sci Rev 84(2):395–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Box-Steffensmeier JM, Jones BS (2004) Event history modeling: a guide for social scientists. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cox DR (1972) Regression model and life-tables. J R Stat Soc 34(2):187–220Google Scholar
  6. Evans N (2002) Machi-zukuri as a new paradigm in Japanese urban planning: reality or myth? Jpn Forum 14(3):443–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Funck C (2007) Machizukuri, civil society, and the transformation of Japanese city planning: cases from Kobe. In: Sorensen A, Funck C (eds) Living cities in Japan: citizens’ movements. Machizukuri and local environments, Routledge, pp 137–156Google Scholar
  8. Futagami M, Shibata Y, Sawaki M (2007) A study on the effect of rural-urban interchange based on the rural community plans: a case study on Kobe City (in Japanese). J City Plan Inst Jpn 42(3):877–882Google Scholar
  9. Gkartzios M, Norris M (2011) ‘If You Build It, They Will Come’: governing property-led rural regeneration in Ireland. Land Use Policy 28:486–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hashimoto S, Sato Y (2008) Participatory rural planning in Japan: promises and limits of NAs. Paddy Water Environ 6:199–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Healey P (1997) Collaborative planning: shaping places in fragmented societies. UBC, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  12. Healey P (1998) Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning. Environ Plan A 30:1531–1546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Healey P (2003) Collaborative planning in perspective. Plan Theor 2:101–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Healey P (2008) Developing neighbourhood management capacity in Kobe, Japan: interactions between civil society and formal planning institutions. Unpublished case study prepared for the global report on human settlements 2009. http://www.unhabitat.org/grhs/2009. Accessed 28 June 2012
  15. Healey P, Khakee A, Motte A, Needham B (1999) European developments in strategic spatial planning. Eur Plan Stud 7(3):339–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Healey P, Magalhaes Cd, Madanipour A, Pendlebury J (2002) Shaping city centre future: conservation, regeneration and institutional capacity: regeneration in Grainger Town, Newcastle. CREUE. School of Architecture, Planning, and Landscape, University of Newcastle, NewcastleGoogle Scholar
  17. Hodge I (2001) Beyond agri-environmental policy: towards an alternative model of rural environmental governance. Land Use Policy 18:99–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoshino S (2002) People’s enthusiasm toward the community planning and its prescribing factors: case study of K village in Kita-ku (North ward) of Kobe City (in Japanese). T Rural Plan 4:133–138Google Scholar
  19. Hoshino S (2004) Significance of behavioral science approach in participatory rural planning: analysis on influential factors of community planning (in Japanese). T Rural Plan 6:229–234Google Scholar
  20. Houwelingen PV (2012) NAs and social capital in Japan. Urban Aff Rev 48(4):467–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. John PC (2001) Local governance in Western Europe. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Jun KN (2007) Event history analysis of the formation of Los Angeles Neighborhood Councils. Urban Aff Rev 43(1):107–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kobe City (2012) The symbiosis zone for human and nature (in Japanese). Kobe City office. http://www.city.kobe.lg.jp/information/project/industry/symbiosis/index.html. Accessed 28 June 2012
  24. Kuki Y, Hoshino S, Hashimoto S, Miyake Y (2010a) Influence of support bodies in the planning methods and forms of rural community plans: a case study of “Satodzukuri” plans of Kobe City (in Japanese). J Rural Plan 29:317–322Google Scholar
  25. Kuki Y, Miyake Y, Kudo Y (2010b) Characteristics of the rural landscape conservation activities based on the ordinance (in Japanese). J JSIDRE 78(8):693–698Google Scholar
  26. Lane MB (2006) The role of planning in achieving indigenous land justice and community goals. Land Use Policy 23:385–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li TM (2002) Engaging simplifications: community-based resource management, market processes and state agendas in upland Southeast Asia. World Dev 30(2):265–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Magalhaes Cd, Healey P, Madanipour A (2002) Assessing institutional capacity for city centre regeneration: Newcastle’s Grainger town. In: Healey P, Cars G, Madanipour A, de Magalhaes C (eds) Urban governance, institutional capacity and social milieux. Ashgate, London, pp 45–64Google Scholar
  29. Midgley JL, Shucksmith DM, Birnie RV, Geddes A, Bayfield N, Elston D (2005) Rural development policy and community data needs in Scotland. Land Use Policy 22:163–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mizugaki G (2004) An event history analysis of consolidation of municipalities in Japan (in Japanese). J Socio Cult Res Inst, Ryukoku Univ 6:43–55Google Scholar
  31. Nunokawa H (2007) Machizukuri and historical awareness in the old town of Kobe. In: Sorensen A, Funck C (eds) Living cities in Japan: citizens’ movements. Machizukuri and local environments, Routledge, pp 172–186Google Scholar
  32. Pekkanen R (2000) Japan’s new politics: the case of the NPO Law. J Jpn Stud 26:111–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pekkanen R (2006) Japan’s dual civil society? The third sector and the state in contemporary Japan. SUNY, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Peng LP (2013) Effects of anti-dam campaigns on institutional capacity: a case study of Meinung from Taiwan. Paddy Water Environ 11:353–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Scott M (2004) Building institutional capacity in rural Northern Ireland: the role of partnership governance in the LEADER II programme. J Rural Stud 20:49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shibata Y, Futagami M, Sawaki M (2008) A study on organization and continuity of rural-urban interchange based on the rural community plans in Kobe (in Japanese). J Jpn Inst Landsc Archit 71(5):755–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wada O (1999) Land use planning of rural settlement in urbanization control area: a case study in Kobe City (in Japanese). City Plan Rev 32:277–282Google Scholar
  38. Watanabe SJ (2007a) Comparative history of urban planning in Japan, Korea and Taiwan: a challenge from Machizukuri. Proceedings of the conference of Asian city planning 2007, Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  39. Watanabe SJ (2007b) Toshi keikaku vs machizukuri: emerging paradigm of civil society in Japan. In: Sorensen A, Funck C (eds) Living cities in Japan: citizens’ movements. Machizukuri and local environments, Routledge, pp 39–55Google Scholar
  40. Yamaoka K, Tomosho T, Mizoguchi M, Sugiura M (2008) Social capital accumulation through public policy systems implementing paddy irrigation and rural development projects. Paddy Water Environ 6:115–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Li-Pei Peng
    • 1
  • Yasuaki Kuki
    • 2
  • Shizuka Hashimoto
    • 3
  • Yeu-Sheng Hsieh
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Bio-Industry Communication and DevelopmentNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Graduate School of Environmental and Life Science, Okayama UniversityKita-kuJapan
  3. 3.Graduate School of Global Environmental Studies, Kyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations