Skip to main content

Equal water sharing in scarcity conditions: the case of the Chaisombat Muang Fai Irrigation System in Thailand

Abstract

With increasing water conflicts arising from competing demands and global climate changes, it has become paramount to understand how the available water resources can be judiciously utilized for sustaining life. This article extends the previous studies on equal water sharing in water-abundant conditions to water-scarce conditions. On the basis of a case study of the self-managed Chaisombat Muang Fai irrigation group in Chiang Rai Province of northern Thailand, the article analyzes the factors that helped the group in successfully sharing water equally when they faced dry-season water scarcity caused by the competing demands of upstream irrigation systems. Interview data on Muang Fai development and management obtained from all levels of Muang Fai managers and field observations reveal three major success factors. First, Muang Fai managers across all levels recognized that water scarcity is a common problem and that, in their capacity as delegates accountable to all members, they must decide how intense competition for water and extensive crop failure can be prevented. Second, the Muang Fai organization provided a large number of farmers of diverse backgrounds with two-way communication and resilient implementation mechanisms for reaching a mutual agreement and synchronically adapting to a new water environment. Third, the group was ready to constantly update and employ socio-technical information to maximize the total benefit, so that all members obtain a proportionately larger share. These results reveal that in addition to social organization and traditional practices related to the normal condition, in the scarcity condition, it is essential to understand the “common” nature of the problem and acquire skills in extracting, updating, communicating, and using socio-technical information for decision making on equal water sharing. Therefore, these capacities should be built, or knowledge on building them should at least be developed, before the water scarcity problem worsens.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Atharn P (1995) The adaptation of community irrigation management organizations to government interventions on public systems: the case of irrigation management in the upper Ping basin. Master’s degree thesis, Chiang Mai University

  • Charoenmuang T (1994) The governance of water allocation problems in Thailand: four case studies for the upper Northern region. In: Thailand Development Research Institute (ed) Water Conflicts. Bangkok, Natural Resources and Environment Program, TDRI and Queen’s University, Canada, pp 111–147

  • Chiang Rai Cultural Office (2009) Information on education, religion, and culture in Amphoe Wiengchai (in Thai language)

  • Chiang Rai Provincial Irrigation Office (2001) Documents on Chaisombat—Right Bank Water Users’ Group (in Thai language)

  • Chiangkul V (2005) Thai economy: problem and solution (in Thai language). Saitharn, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishii Y (1978) History and rice growing. In: Ishii Y (ed) Thailand: a rice growing society. The University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanjanaphan A (2000) Dynamisms of communal resources management: paradigm and policy. Thailand Research Fund, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Khaosa-ard M (2000) The impacts of economic crisis on rural regions in Thailand (in Thai language). In: Sethakul R (ed) A century of community economy of Northern Thai villages. Thailand Development Research Institute, Sangsan

    Google Scholar 

  • Lertvicha P, Vichiankheiw A (2003) The village community of the Khan River Basin. Thanpanya, Bangkok

  • Lertvicha P, Methin S, Namthep N (2009) Chiang Mai-Lamphun cultural economy—dynamics and developments. Thanpanya, Bangkok

  • Meteorological Department of Thailand (2009) Anomalies and climate change. http://www.tmd.go.th. October 15, 2010

  • Miller B (1992) Collective action and rational choice: place, community, and the limits to individual self-interest. Econ Geogr 68(1):22–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ounvichit T (2008) Structural approach in the participatory Muang Fai irrigation management. J Dev Sustain Agric 1(3):40–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Ounvichit T, Satoh M, Chantanusart S, Yamaoka K (2006) Cost sharing and sustainability of Pongsak Muang Fai irrigation system. Paddy Water Environ 4:81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ounvichit T, Wattayu S, Masayoshi S (2008) Participatory management structure of large-scale people’s irrigation system: the case of the Soprong Muang Fai irrigation system, northern Thailand. Southeast Asian Stud 46(1):145–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigg J (1991) Grass-roots development in rural Thailand: a lost cause? World Dev 19(2/3):199–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato Y (2008) Thai villager organization from the perspective of social capital. In: Suzuki N, Srisontisuk S (eds) Civil society: movement and development in northeast Thailand. Khon Kaen University Book, Khon Kaen

    Google Scholar 

  • Satoh M, Kono S, Ounvichit T (2007) Principles and methods for participatory irrigation management. J Jpn Soc Irrig Drain Rural Eng 75(7):53–58 (published in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1997) Maximization and the act of choice. Econometrica 65(4):745–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surarerks V (1986) Historical development and management of irrigation systems in northern Thailand. Charoenwit, Chiang Mai

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan-Kim-Yong U (1995) Resources mobilization in people’s irrigation systems of upland and lowland communities in Northern Thailand. In: Muang Fai communities are for people: institutional strength and potential. Social Research Institute, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, pp 1–50

  • Upper Northern Hydrology and Water Management Office (2007) http://hydro-1.net Sept 15, 2010

  • World Health Organization (2007) World Water Day www.unwater.org/wdd07 July 10, 2010

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is a continued study on equal water-sharing practices in different scenarios of water availability. The author acknowledges Prof. Dr. Masayoshi Satoh of the Graduate School of Life and Environmental Science, University of Tsukuba, Japan, for his ideas on equal water sharing, which he has jointly developed with the author in previous studies. The author is grateful to the Chaisombat Muang Fai members, Chiang Rai Irrigation Office, and Chiang Rai Cultural Office for generously devoting their time and providing information for the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tassanee Ounvichit.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ounvichit, T. Equal water sharing in scarcity conditions: the case of the Chaisombat Muang Fai Irrigation System in Thailand. Paddy Water Environ 9, 325–332 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-010-0245-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-010-0245-z

Keywords

  • Water management
  • Water users’ organization
  • Rational choice
  • Water institution
  • Water scarcity
  • Muang Fai