Skip to main content
Log in

Central venous port placement in advanced breast cancer patients: comparison of the anatomic-landmark and ultrasound-guided techniques

  • Published:
The Chinese-German Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the anatomic-landmark and ultrasound-guided techniques in the placement of an internal jugular vein port in patients with advanced breast cancer.

Methods

Between March 2010 and October 2010, 60 patients with advanced breast cancer underwent central venous port placement for the delivery of chemotherapy, preferably through the internal jugular vein. Patients were randomly assigned to either the anatomic-landmark or the ultrasound-guided group. Failure on first attempt, number of attempts until successful catheterization, time to successful placement, the accordance of the two placement approaches, and the demographics of each patient were recorded.

Results

The consistency of the direction of two lines drawn using the anatomic-landmark and ultrasound-guided techniques or of the diameter of the internal jugular vein as determined by the two approaches was 85% (51/60). The rate of successful placement at first attempt was higher in the ultrasound group than in the anatomic-landmark group (P < 0.05). A greater number of attempts and longer time to successful port placement were needed in the latter (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The findings of this study indicate that, in the placement of an internal jugular vein port, the ultrasound (US)-guided technique has several advantages over the anatomic-landmark technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Legha SS, Haq M, Rabinowits M, et al. Evaluation of silicone elastomer catheters for long-term intravenous chemotherapy. Arch Intern Med, 1985, 145: 1208–1211.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ishizuka M, Nagata H, Takagi K, et al. Right internal jugular vein is recommended for central venous catheterization. J Invest Surg, 2010, 23: 110–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mirza B, Vanek VW, Kupensky DT. Pinch-off syndrome: case report and collective review of the literature. Am Surg, 2004, 70: 635–644.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Leung J, Duffy M, Finckh A. Real-time ultrasonographically-guided internal jugular vein catheterization in the emergency department increases success rates and reduces complications: a randomized, prospective study. Ann Emerg Med, 2006, 48: 540–547.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Milling TJ Jr, Rose J, Briggs WM, et al. Randomized, controlled clinical trial of point-of-care limited ultrasonography assistance of central venous cannulation: the Third Sonography Outcomes Assessment Program (SOAP-3) Trial. Crit Care Med, 2005, 33: 1764–1769.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dudrick SJ, Wilmore DW, Vars HM, et al. Long-term total parenteral nutrition with growth, development, and positive nitrogen balance. Surgery, 1968, 64: 134–142.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ingram J, Weitzman S, Greenberg ML, et al. Complications of indwelling venous access lines in the pediatric hematology patient: a prospective comparison of external venous catheters and subcutaneous ports. Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol, 1991, 13: 130–136.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yip D, Funaki B. Subcutaneous chest ports via the internal jugular vein. A retrospective study of 117 oncology patients. Acta Radiol, 2002, 43: 371–375.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhou WP, Wu MC, Yao XP, et al. The effects of combined hepatectomy and immunochemotherapy on postoperative recurrence of primary liver cancer. Chinese-German J Clin Oncol, 2005, 1: 163–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yonei A, Nonoue T, Sari A. Real-time ultrasonic guidance for percutaneous puncture of the internal jugular vein. Anesthesiology, 1986, 64: 830–831.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Randolph AG, Cook DJ, Gonzales CA, et al. Ultrasound guidance for placement of central venous catheters: a meta-analysis of the literature. Crit Care Med, 1996, 24: 2053–2058.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Machi J, Takeda J, Kakegawa T. Safe jugular and subclavian venipuncture under ultrasonographic guidance. Am J Surg, 1987, 153: 321–323.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Funaki B, Szymski GX, Hackworth CA, et al. Radiologic placement of subcutaneous infusion chest ports for long-term central venous access. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1997, 169: 1431–1434.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Caridi JG, Hawkins IF Jr, Wiechmann BN, et al. Sonographic guidance when using the right internal jugular vein for central vein access. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1998, 171: 1259–1263.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Beaulieu Y, Marik PE. Bedside ultrasonography in the ICU: part 2. Chest, 2005, 128: 1766–1781.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Troianos, CA, Jobes DR, Ellison N. Ultrasound-guided cannulation of the internal jugular vein. A prospective, randomized study. Anesth Analg, 1991, 72: 823–826.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nanyan Rao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rao, N., Wu, J., Li, S. et al. Central venous port placement in advanced breast cancer patients: comparison of the anatomic-landmark and ultrasound-guided techniques. Chin. -Ger. J. Clin. Oncol. 10, 695–698 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10330-011-0842-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10330-011-0842-3

Key words

Navigation