Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The pooled analysis of single gemcitabine for non-small cell lung cancer patients with elderly age

  • Published:
The Chinese-German Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Objective

Gemcitabine, used as single agent for elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), was demonstrated effective in this population based on phase II studies. The aim of this study was to summarize all those phase II studies with the hope to get a comprehensive understanding of gemcitabine efficacy.

Methods

The PubMed database was used to search all the papers on NSCLC associated with gemcitabine used as single agent in the first line setting till to March 31st, 2010. And the medians and their 95% CI of overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were calculated.

Results

1. There were 7 papers including 410 patients with performance status (PS) ≤ 2 and advanced stage collected. 2. The dose-intensities of gemcitabine were 843.75 mg/m2/week-1125 mg/m2/week in the 4-week schedule, and 666.7 mg/m2/week in the 3-week schedule. 3. The median age was 73.8 (95% CI was 72.44, 75.16) years old; 36.1% (95% CI: 31.4%, 40.7%) of patients with stage IIIB and 60.5% (95% CI: 55.8%, 65.2%) of patients with stage IV; 35.9% (95% CI: 31.2%, 40.5%) patients were adenocarcinomas and 43.7% (95% CI: 38.9%, 48.5%) patients were squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). 4. The ORR, DCR, PFS/TTP, and OS were 22.3% (95% CI: 18.2%, 26.5%), 58.4% (95% CI: 53.5%, 63.4%), 3.6 (95% CI: 2.9, 5.15) months and 6.68 (95% CI: 5.4, 8.11) months, respectively.

Conclusion

Gemcitabine as single agent applied in this special population was effective and can be well tolerated under different doses and usage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Avery EJ, Kessinger A, Ganti AK. Therapeutic options for elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Treat Rev, 2009, 35: 340–344.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Langer CJ. Neglected and underrepresented subpopulations: elderly and performance status 2 patients with advanced-stage non-smallcell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer, 2006, 4: S126–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hainsworth JD, Spigel DR, Farley C, et al. Weekly docetaxel versus docetaxel/gemcitabine in the treatment of elderly or poor performance status patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network. Cancer, 2007, 110: 2027–2034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gaspari F, Cravedi P, Mandalà M, et al. Predicting cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury by urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin excretion: a pilot prospective case-control study. Nephron Clin Pract, 2010, 115: c154–c160.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Saleh S, Ain-Shoka AA, El-Demerdash E, et al. Protective effects of the angiotensin II receptor blocker losartan on cisplatin-induced kidney injury. Chemotherapy, 2009, 55: 399–406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gridelli C. The ELVIS trial: a phase III study of single-agent vinorelbine as first-line treatment in elderly patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer. Elderly Lung Cancer Vinorelbine Italian Study. Oncologist, 2001, 1: 4–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gridelli C, De Maio E, Barbera S, et al. The MILES-2G phase 2 study of single-agent gemcitabine with prolonged constant infusion in advanced non-small cell lung cancer elderly patients. Lung Cancer, 2008, 61: 67–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Quoix E, Breton JL, Ducoloné A, et al. First line chemotherapy with gemcitabine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer elderly patients: a randomized phase II study of 3-week versus 4-week schedule. Lung Cancer, 2005, 47: 405–412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baka S, Ashcroft L, Anderson H, et al. Randomized phase II study of two gemcitabine schedules for patients with impaired performance status (Karnofsky performance status </= 70) and advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23: 2136–2144.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rossi D, Dennetta D, Ugolini M, et al. Weekly paclitaxel in elderly patients (aged > or = 70 years) with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: an alternative choice? Results of a phase II study. Clin Lung Cancer, 2008, 9: 280–284.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fidias P, Supko JG, Martins R, et al. A phase II study of weekly paclitaxel in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res, 2001, 7: 3942–3949.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lilenbaum R, Rubin M, Samuel J, et al. A randomized phase II trial of two schedules of docetaxel in elderly or poor performance status patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol, 2007, 2: 306–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Leong SS, Toh CK, Lim WT, et al. A randomized phase II trial of single-agent gemcitabine, vinorelbine, or docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who have poor performance status and/or are elderly. J Thorac Oncol, 2007, 2: 230–236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kudoh S, Takeda K, Nakagawa K, et al. Phase III study of docetaxel compared with vinorelbine in elderly patients with advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer: results of the West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group Trial (WJTOG 9904). J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24: 3657–3663.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shepherd FA, Abratt RP, Anderson H, et al. Gemcitabine in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Semin Oncol, 1997, 24: S7-50–S7-55.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ricci S, Antonuzzo A, Galli L, et al. Gemcitabine monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter phase II study. Lung Cancer, 2000, 27: 75–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Anderson H, Lund B, Bach F, et al. Single-agent activity of weekly gemcitabine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study. J Clin Oncol, 1994, 12: 1821–1826.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gatzmeier U, Shepherd FA, Le Chevalier T, et al. Activity of gemcitabine in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a multicentre, extended phase II study. Eur J Cancer, 1996, 32A: 243–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Martoni A, Di Fabio F, Guaraldi M, et al. Prospective phase II study of single-agent gemcitabine in untreated elderly patients with stage IIIB/ IV non-small-cell lung cancer. Am J Clin Oncol, 2001, 24: 614–617.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bianco V, Rozzi A, Tonini G, et al. Gemcitabine as single agent chemotherapy in elderly patients with stages III–IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a phase II study. Anticancer Res, 2002, 22: 3053–3056.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tibaldi C, Ricci S, Russo F, et al. Increased dose-intensity of gemcitabine in advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a multicenter phase II study in elderly patients from the “polmone toscano group” (POLTO). Lung Cancer, 2005, 48: 121–127.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Neubauer MA, Reynolds CH, Joppert MG, et al. Results of a phase II trial of gemcitabine in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and a performance status of 2. Clin Lung Cancer, 2005, 6: 245–249.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Altavilla G, Adamo V, Buemi B, et al. Gemcitabine as single agent in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res, 2000, 20: 3675–3678.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Xia LP, Yuan ZY, Wang X, et al. Characteristics of Chinese male patients with breast cancer: summary of the published papers. Chinese-German J Clin Oncol, 2010, 9: 311–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Furuse K. Gemcitabine in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer for elderly patients. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho (Japanese), 1999, 26: 890–897.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hesketh PJ, Chansky K, Lau DH, et al. Sequential vinorelbine and docetaxel in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients age 70 and older and/or with a performance status of 2: a phase II trial of the Southwest Oncology Group (S0027). J Thorac Oncol, 2006, 1: 537–544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Beretta GD, Michetti G, Belometti MO, et al. Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in elderly or unfit patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer, 2000, 83: 573–576.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Comella P, Frasci G, Carnicelli P, et al. Gemcitabine with either paclitaxel or vinorelbine vs paclitaxel or gemcitabine alone for elderly or unfit advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Br J Cancer, 2004, 91: 489–497.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Anderson H, Hopwood P, Stephens RJ, et al. Gemcitabine plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer — a randomized trial with quality of life as the primary outcome. UK NSCLC Gemcitabine Group. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Br J Cancer, 2000, 83: 447–453.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liangping Xia.

Additional information

Support by a grant from Major Science and Technology Project of “National Significant New Drug Creation” (No. 2008ZX09312-002).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, F., Xia, L., Guo, G. et al. The pooled analysis of single gemcitabine for non-small cell lung cancer patients with elderly age. Chin. -Ger. J. Clin. Oncol. 9, 683–687 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10330-010-0708-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10330-010-0708-0

Key words

Navigation