Abstract
Objective
We studied the extent and value of the lymphadenectomy in surgical treatment of carcinoma of gastroesophageal junction (GEJ).
Methods
217 patients with GEJ who underwent surgical resection were retrospectively analyzed. The extent of lymphadenectomy was divided into 5 types (D0 to D4) and the curability of operation was graded as A, B and C.
Results
The patients had been treated as follows: 186 with proximal gastrectomy, 31 with total gastrectomy, 97 with a combined-visceral resection. The patients who underwent D1, D2 and D3 lymphadenectomy were respectively 158, 58 and 1. The patients who were performed with resection of grade A, B and C were 53, 107 and 57 respectively. All patients were performed with a lymphadenectomy and well registered. The lymph node metastasis occurred in 157 cases (72.4%). The lymph node metastasis rate in the group 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, 12 and 110 as well as in the pulmonary ligament group were higher than other groups. 2868 lymph nodes were removed, in which 655 (22.8%) demonstrated the existence of metastasis. The total lymph node metastatic degree in these groups was higher compared to the other groups.
Conclusion
The survival rate in the D1 lymphadenectomy and D2 is similar for all patients, and there may be some differences in the 2nd and 3rd years for the D1 lymphadenectomy and D2 in the stage-IIIb patients. The survival rate of D2 lymphadenectomy in stage IIIb is better than D1 and that of D2 lymphadenectomy is superior to D1 in stage-IV patients. The survival rate of grade A and B operation is much better than grade C, and the survival rate of grade A is also higher than B.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rüdiger Siewert J, Feith M, Werner M, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: results of surgical therapy based on anatomical/topographic classification in 1,002 consecutive patients. Ann Surg, 2000, 232: 353–361.
Siewert JR, Stein HJ. Classification of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction. Br J Surg, 1998, 85: 1457–1459.
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma, 2nd English edition. Gastric Cancer, 1998, 1: 10–24.
Sobin LH, Wittekind CH. UICC: TNM classification of malignant tumor. 6th ed. New York: Wiley-Liss, 2002. 60–64.
Japanese Society for Esophageal Disease. Guideline for clinical and pathologic studies on carcinoma of the esophagus, ninth edition: Preface, general principles, part I. Esophagus, 2004, 1: 61–88.
Hulscher JB, Van Sandick JW, Offerhaus GJ, et al. Prospective analysis of the diagnostic yield of extended en bloc resection for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or gastric cardia. Br J Surg, 2001, 88: 715–719.
van de Ven C, De Leyn P, Coosemans W, et al. Three-field lymphadenectomy and pattern of lymph node spread in T3 adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and the gastro-esophageal junction. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 1999, 15: 769–773.
Dresner SM, Lamb PJ, Bennett MK, et al. The pattern of metastatic lymph node dissemination from adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Surgery, 2001, 129: 103–109.
von Rahden Burkhard HA, Stein HJ, Feith M, et al. Lymphatic vessel invasion as a prognostic factor in patients with primary resected adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction. J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23: 874–879.
Feng SS, Qiu ZJ, Zhang YJ, et al. Clinicopathological study of 100 cases of lymph node metastasis of gastric cardia carcinoma. Chin Surg J (Chinese), 1990, 28: 544–548.
Li J, Lu SL, Liu H, et al. Approaching rational treatment of cardia cancer by metastatic regulation of lymph nodes. J Qilu Oncol (Chinese), 1997, 4: 197–198.
Zhang XF, Yang FD, Yin FZ, et al. A clinical study on the rule of lymphatic node metastasis of gastric carcinoma (analysis of 261 cases). Chin J Clin Oncol (Chinese), 1989, 16: 26–29.
Zhang XY. A Brief introduction of academic exchange in the Eleventh International Tumor Conference. Foreign Med (Oncol Fas) (Chinese), 1975, 2: 93.
Wang DY, Zhang XZ, Wu DT, et al. A comparison of results of two types radical operations for carcinoma of gastric cardia. Chin J Clin Oncol (Chinese), 1987, 14: 140–143.
Yonemura Y, Tsugawa K, Fonsecal L, et al. Lymph node metastasis and surgical management of gastric cancer invading the esophagus. Hepato-gastroenterology, 1995, 42: 37–42.
Kodama I, Kofuji K, Yano S, et al. Lymph node metastasis and lymphadenectomy for carcinoma in the gastric cardia: clinical experience. Int Surg, 1998, 83: 205–209.
Du JP, Han WZ, Zhang HW, et al. Analysis of clear paraaortic lymph node for treating cardial adenocarcinoma. Med J Chin People Health (Chinese), 2003, 15: 522–523.
Kitagawa Y, Saha S, Kubo A, et al. Sentinel node for gastrointestinal malignancies. Surg Oncol Clin N Am, 2007, 16: 71–80.
Barbour AP, Rizk NP, Gonen M, et al. Lymphadenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ): impact of adequate staging on outcome. Ann Surg Oncol, 2007, 14: 306–316.
Shimada H, Suzuki T, Nakajima K, et al. Lymph node metastasis with adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia: clinicopathological analysis and indication for D1 dissection. Int Surg, 1999, 84: 13–17.
Zhang WF, Chen JQ, Dan JX, et al. Approaching rational radical operating types by metastatic regulation of lymph nodes in gastric cancer. Chin J Oncol (Chinese), 1987, 9: 286–289.
Lin YZ. Extended gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Pract J Surg (Chinese), 1985, 5: 63–64.
Bonenkamp JJ, Hermans J, Sasako M, et al. Extended lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer. N Engl J Med, 340: 908–914.
Cuschieri A, Weeden S, Fielding J, et al. Patient survival after D1 and D2 resection for gastric cancer: long-term results of the MRC randomized surgical trial. Surgical co-operative group. Br J Cancer, 1999, 79: 1522–1530.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, X., Liu, X., Tang, P. et al. The extent and value of lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal junction carcinoma. Chin. -Ger. J. Clin. Oncol. 8, 438–442 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10330-009-0086-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10330-009-0086-7