Abstract
A recent debate on the taxonomic identification of the monkeys depicted in a fresco from Room 6 of Building Complex Beta in the Bronze Age town of Akrotiri, Thera (Greece) has triggered a multitude of different interpretations deriving from a fruitful exchange of diverse academic approaches. Thus, Pareja et al. (Primates 61:159–168, 2020a) identified those Aegean monkeys as Asian langurs (Semnopithecus spp.), whereas Urbani and Youlatos (Antiquity 94:e9, 2020a) and Binnberg et al. (J Gr Archaeol 6:in press, 2021) argued for the identification as African vervets (Chlorocebus spp.), and recently Pruetz and Greenlaw (Primates 62:703-707, 2021) introduced the African L’Hoest’s monkeys (Allochrocebus lhoesti) and Diana monkeys (Cercopithecus diana) into the debate. This comment intends to present thoughts on the latter contention. In this context, our approach encompassed the morphological analysis of specific features of the face and torso, the cultural context of the use of the blue color for representing the Aegean monkeys, the detailed artistic rendering of Aegean painters, the geographical distribution ranges of the potential candidate monkey species, and the historical context of trading monkeys or exchanging monkey imageries in the eastern Mediterranean region and Africa. All this evidence supports our contention that vervets still represent the most parsimonious models for the monkeys depicted in Room 6. This debate, based on multidisciplinary research, stands as a constructive example for the perspectives that need to be followed for the development of archeoprimatology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Binnberg J (2019) Like a duck to water – birds and liquids in the Aegean Bronze Age. Annu Br Sch at Athens 114:41–78
Binnberg J, Urbani B, Youlatos D (2021) Langurs in the Aegean Bronze Age? A review of a recent debate on archaeoprimatology and animal identification in ancient iconography. J Gr Archaeol 6:in press
Binnberg J (2017) Animal identification in iconography: An interdisciplinary approach combining zoology, anthropology, and archaeology. In: O’Sullivan R, Marini C, Binnberg J (eds) Interaction, integration and division: Archaeological approaches to breaking boundaries. Proceedings of the Graduate Archaeology of Oxford (GAO) conferences 2015–16: British Archaeological Reports, Oxford, pp 279–289
Binnberg, J (2021) Metamorphosis, transformation, and regeneration – butterflies, bees, and beetles in the Aegean Bronze Age. J Preh Relig 27:in press
Bright W (ed) (1992) Southern Paiute and Ute linguistics and ethnography. The collected works of Edward Sapir, De Gruyter Mouton, New York
Bury HPR (1967) Analysis of mammalian bones at Hagfet. In: McBurney CBM (ed) The Haua Fteah (Cyrenaica) and the Stone Age of the south-east Mediterranean. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 354–357
Chaix L (1994) Nouvelles données de l’archéozoologie du nord du Soudan. In: Berger CM, Clerc G, Grimal NC (eds) Nouvelles données de l’archéozoologie du nord du Soudan. Hommages à Jean Leclant. Vol 2. Nubie, Soudan, Ethiopie. Institut Français d'Archéologie Orientale, Cairo, pp 105–110
Deutsher G (2010) Through the language glass: Why the world looks different in other languages. Metropolitan Books, New York
Dominy NJ, Ikram S, Moritz GL, Wheatley PV, Christensen JN, Chipman JW, Koch PL (2020) Mummified baboons reveal the far reach of early Egyptian mariners. Elife 9:e60860
Doumas C (1992) The wall-paintings of Thera. The Thera Foundation-Petros M, Nomikos, Athens
Fortescue M (2016) The colours of the artic. Amerindia 38:25–46
Gill MAV (1985) Some observations on representations of marine animals in Minoan art, and their identification. Bull Corresp Hellen Suppl 11:63–81
Gladstone WE (1858) Studies on Homer and the Homeric age. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Goudsmit J, Brandon-Jones D (1999) Mummies of olive baboons and Barbary macaques in the Baboon Catacomb of the sacred animal necropolis at north Saqqara. J Egypt Archaeol 85:45–53
Goudsmit J, Brandon-Jones D (2000) Evidence from the baboon catacomb in north Saqqara for a West Mediterranean monkey trade route to Ptolemaic Alexandria. J Egypt Archaeol 86:111–119
Greenlaw C (2005) How monkeys evolved in Egyptian and Minoan art and culture. In: Briault C, Green J, Kaldelis A, Stellatou A (eds) SOMA 2003 symposium on mediterranean archaeology. Archaeopress, Oxford, pp 71–73
Greenlaw C (2011) The representation of monkeys in the art and thought of Mediterranean cultures: A new perspective on ancient primates. Archaeopress, Oxford
Groves C (2008) Extended family, long lost cousins: A personal look at the history of primatology. Conservation International, Arlington
Groves CP (1972) Primate remains from Saqqara. Unpublished manuscript
Ikram S (2005) Divine creatures: Animal mummies in ancient Egypt. American University in Cairo Press, Cairo
Ikram S, Iskander N (2002) Catalogue general of Egyptian antiquities in the Cairo Museum: non-human mummies. Supreme Council of Antiquities Press, Cairo
IUCN Ssc Antelope Specialist Group (2016) Nanger soemmerringii. IUCN Red List Threatened Spec 2016:E.T63541A50197739
IUCN Ssc Antelope Specialist Group (2017) Nanger granti ssp granti. IUCN Red List Threatened Spec 2017:e.T651187222A83149360
Kessler D, Nur-el-Din AH (2005) Tuna al-Gebel: Millions of ibises and other animals. In: Ikram S (ed) Divine creatures: animal mummies in ancient Egypt. American University in Cairo Press, Cairo, pp 120–163
Kessler D (1989) Die heiligen tiere und der könig. VIl. I. Beiträge zu organization, kult und theologie der spätzeintlichen tierfriedhöfe. Otto Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden
Kleinsgütl D (2000) Some remarks on the felids of Thera. In: Sherratt S (ed) The wall paintings of Thera, vol I. Proceedings of the First International Symposium, August 30–4 September 1997. Petros M. Nomikos Centre-Thera Foundation, Athens, pp 699–708
Koné I, McGraw S, Gonedelé-Bi S, Oates JF (2019) Cercopithecus diana. IUCN Red List Threatened Spec 2019:e.T4245A9384250
Masseti M (1997) Representation of birds in Minoan art. Int J Osteoarchaeol 7:354–363
Masseti M (2003) Taxonomic and behavioural aspects of the representation of mammals in Aegean Bronze Age art. In: Kotjabopoulou E, Hamilakis Y, Halstead P, Gamble C, Elefanti P (eds) Zooarchaeology in Greece. Recent advances, British School at Athens, Athens, pp 267–275
McGraw WS (2002) Diversity of guenon positional behavior. In: Glenn ME, Cords M (eds) The guenons: diversity and adaptation in African monkeys. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, pp 113–131
McGraw WS (2007) Positional behavior and habitat use of Taï forest monkeys. In: McGraw WS, Zuberbühler K, Noë R (eds) Monkeys of the Taï Forest. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 223–255
McLaughlin C (2013) A Lakota war book from the little bighorn: the pictographic “autobiography of half moon.” Harvard/Peabody Museum Press, Cambridge
Merceron G (2003) The diet of the captive baboons: Results of dental microwear analysis. Nekhen News 15:13–14
Mittermeier R, Rylands AB, Wilson DE (eds) (2013) Handbook of the mammals of the world. Primates, Lynx Edicions, Barcelona
Nerlich AG, Parsche F, Von Den Driesch A, Löhrs U (1993) Osteopathological findings in mummified baboons from ancient Egypt. Int J Osteoarchaeol 3:189–198
Osypinska M, Skibniewski M, Osypinski P (2021) Ancient pets. The health, diet and diversity of cats, dogs and monkeys from the Red Sea port of Berenice (Egypt) in the 1st-2nd centuries AD. World Archaeol https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2020.1870545
Ottoni C, Guellil M, Ozga AT, Stone AC, Kersten O et al (2019) Metagenomic analysis of dental calculus in ancient Egyptian baboons. Sci Rep 9:19637
Panagiotopoulos D (2001) Keftiu in context: Theban tomb-paintings as a historical source. Oxf J Archaeol 20:263–283
Pareja MN, McKinney T, Mayhew JA, Setchell JM, Nash SD, Heaton R (2020a) A new identification of the monkeys depicted in Bronze Age wall paintings from Akrotiri, Thera. Primates 61:159–168
Pareja MN, McKinney T, Setchell JM (2020b) Aegean monkeys and the importance of cross-disciplinary collaboration in archaeoprimatology: A reply to Urbani and Youlatos. Primates 61:767–774
Porter R (1996) The Cretan wild goat (Capra aegagrus cretica) and the ‘Theran antelopes.’ In: Reese DS (ed) Pleistocene and Holocene fauna of Crete and its first settlers. Prehistory Press, Madison WI, pp 295–314
Pruetz JD, Greenlaw C (2021) Occam’s razor revisited: guenon species morphology supports evidence for an African influence in Bronze Age Aegean fresco primate iconography from Akrotiri. Primates, Thera. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-021-00930-w
Roberson D, Davinoff J, Davies IRL, Shapiro LR (2006) Colour categories and category acquisition in Himba and English. In: Pitchford N, Biggam CP (eds) Progress in colour studies, vol II. Psychological aspects. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 159–172
Ukizintambara T, Olupot W, Hart J (2019) Allochrocebus lhoesti. IUCN Red List Threatened Spec 2019:92345122
Urbani B, Youlatos D (2012) Aegean monkeys: From a comprehensive view to a reinterpretation. In: Legakis A, Georgiadis C, Pafilis P (eds) Abstracts of the International Congress on the Zoogeography, Ecology and Evolution of Southeastern Europe and the Eastern Mediterranean, 18–22 June 2012, Athens. Hellenic Zoological Society, Athens, Greece, p 160
Urbani B, Youlatos D (2020a) A new look at the Minoan ‘blue’ monkeys. Antiquity 94(374):e9
Urbani B, Youlatos D (2020c) On the earliest representations of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Were African apes traded to Bronze Age Elam? Int J Primatol 41:654–663
Urbani B, Youlatos D, Antczak AT (eds) (2022) World archaeoprimatology: Interconnections of humans and nonhuman primates in the past. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (in press)
Urbani B, Youlatos D (2020b) Occam’s razor, archeoprimatology, and the ‘blue’ monkeys of Thera: A reply to Pareja et al. (2020). Primates 61:757–765
Urbani B, Youlatos D (2022) Minoan monkeys: Re-examining the archaeoprimatological evidence. In: Urbani B, Youlatos D, Antczak AT (eds) World archaeoprimatology. Interconnections of humans and nonhuman primates in the past. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, in press
Urbani B (2021) Archaeoprimatology: The longue durée interface between humans and nonhuman primates. Annu Rev Anthropol in press
Van Neer W, Udrescu M, Linseele V, De Cupere B, Friedman R (2017) Traumatism in the wild animals kept and offered at Predynastic Hierakonpolis, Upper Egypt. Int J Osteoarchaeol 27:86–105
von den Driesch A (1993) Affenhaltung und affenverehrung in der spätzeit des alte Ägypten. Tierärztlich Prax 21:95–101
Wallis J (2019) Chlorocebus aethiops. IUCN Red List Threatened Spec 2019:T4233A17957721
Wallis J (2020) Chlorocebus tantalus. IUCN Red List Threatened Spec 2020:T4233A17958272
Warburton DA (2014) Ancient Color Categories. In: Luo R (ed) Encyclopedia of Color Science and Technology. Springer, New York
Yeakel JD, Mathias MP, Rudolf L, Dominy NJ, Koch PL, Guimarães PR Jr, Gross T (2014) Gross collapse of an ecological network in Ancient Egypt. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:14472–14477
Acknowledgements
Our gratitude to all the people and institutions indicated in Urbani and Youlatos (2020a, b, 2022) and Binnberg et al. (2021). We appreciate the comments of two anonymous reviewers and the support of Segundo Jiménez (Venezuelan Institute for Scientific Research) in preparing Fig. 2a. Also, last of all, it is worth recalling, once more, Galileo Galilei’s (alleged) mutter: Eppur si muove [And yet it moves].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This is a review article. Therefore, it does not present information that implies studies with human and nonhuman primates conducted by the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Urbani, B., Youlatos, D. & Binnberg, J. Galilei’s mutter, archeoprimatology, and the ´blue´ monkeys of Thera: a comment on Pruetz and Greenlaw (2021). Primates 62, 879–886 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-021-00944-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-021-00944-4