Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Welfare based primate rehabilitation as a potential conservation strategy: does it measure up?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Primates Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many primate species are threatened with extinction and are the focus of extensive conservation efforts including re-introduction, captive breeding and habitat conservation. Welfare-based rehabilitation (hereafter also ‘rehabilitation’) is a management strategy commonly used for primates, particularly those species targeted by the pet and bush meat trades. Rehabilitation of rescued primates typically has the dual motivation of welfare and conservation, but has not been assessed as a conservation strategy. As the species involved in rehabilitation are often endangered (e.g. chimpanzees, gorillas, orang-utans), it is important for rehabilitation projects to follow a ‘best practice’ model in order to increase positive outcomes. In this study, we compared the approaches of 28 welfare-based primate rehabilitation projects to the ‘IUCN guidelines for nonhuman primate re-introductions’, in addition to components of the ‘Best practice guidelines for the re-introduction of great apes’ in order to assess where additional work might be needed for released animals to contribute to conservation outcomes. Few projects examined complied with the guidelines for re-introduction, failing to incorporate important factors such as quarantine, long term post-release monitoring and training for predator awareness. Further development of species-specific rehabilitation guidelines may improve the outcomes of future rehabilitation projects. To support this, we recommend that detailed methods and results be published for all rehabilitation efforts, regardless of the outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker LR (2002) Guidelines for nonhuman primate re-introductions. Re-introd News 21:1–32

  • Beck BB (1994) Reintroduction of captive-born animals. In: Olney PJS, Mace GM, Feistner ATC (eds) Creative conservation: interactive management of wild and captive animals. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 265–286

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beck B, Walkup K, Rodrigues M, Unwin S, Travis D, Stoinski T (2007) Best practice guidelines for the re-introduction of great apes. Gland, Switzerland

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett J (1989) Gibbon rehabilitation in Sarawak. Sarawak Gazette 116:14–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett J (1992) A glut of gibbons in Sarawak—is rehabilitation the answer? Oryx 26:157–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britt A, Welch C, Katz A, Iambana B, Porton I, Junge R, Crawford G, Williams C, Haring D (2004) The re-stocking of captive-bred ruffed lemurs (Varecia variegata variegata) into the Betampona Reserve, Madagascar: methodology and recommendations. Biodivers Conserv 13:635–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camperio Ciani A, Palentini L, Finotto E (2001) Survival of a small translocated Procolobus kirkii population on Pemba Island. Anim Biodivers Conserv 24:15–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Champoux M, DiGregorio G, Schneider ML, Suomi SJ (1990) Inanimate environmental enrichment for group-housed rhesus macaque infants. Am J Primatol 22:61–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheyne SM (2004) Assessing rehabilitation and reintroduction of captive-raised gibbons in Indonesia. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, p 231

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheyne SM (2006) Wildlife reintroduction: considerations of habitat quality at the release site. BMC Ecol 6:5. doi:10.1186/1472-6785-6-5

  • Cheyne SM, Campbell CO, Payne KL (2012) Proposed guidelines for in situ gibbon rescue, rehabilitation and reintroduction. Int Zoo Yearb 46:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins R, Nekaris KAI (2008) Release of greater slow lorises, confiscated from the pet trade, to Batutegi protected forest, Sumatra, Indonesia. In: Soorae PS (ed) Global re-introduction perspectives. Re-introduction case-studies from around the globe. IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group, Gland, pp 192–196

  • Cook M, Mineka S, Wolkenstein B, Laitsch K (1985) Observational conditioning of snake fear in unrelated rhesus monkeys. J Abnorm Psychol 94:591–610

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cowlishaw G, Dunbar R (2000) Primate conservation biology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham AA (1996) Disease risks of wildlife translocations. Conserv Biol 10:349–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Silva GS (1971) Notes on the orang-utan rehabilitation project in Sabah. Malays Nat J 24:50–77

    Google Scholar 

  • de Veer MW, van den Bos R (2000) Assessing the quality of relationships in rehabilitating lar gibbons (Hylobates lar). Anim Welf 9:223–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon Morin T (1994) Gibbon rehabilitation project. Phuket, Thailand. Asian Primates 4:3–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Director of Human Resources (2011) OHS329 risk assessment and control procedure. Sydney: University of New South Wales. http://www.ohs.unsw.edu.au/ohs_policies/procedures/pro_risk_assessment.pdf. Accessed 30 Nov 2012

  • Du Toit D (2009) Vervet monkey foundation, Tzaneen. http://www.enviro.co.za/. Accessed 20 April 2012

  • Fernan-Vaz Gorilla Project (2010) FVGP rehabilitation. Fernan Vaz-Gabon

  • Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2000) An assessment of the published results of animal relocations. Biol Conserv 96:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goossens B, Setchell JM, Tchidongo E, Dilambaka E, Vidal C, Ancrenaz M, Jamart A (2005) Survival, interactions with conspecifics and reproduction in 37 chimpanzees released into the wild. Biol Conserv 123:461–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith B, Scott JM, Carpenter JW, Reed C (1989) Translocation as a species conservation tool: status and strategy. Science 245:477–480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grueson P (2007) A case study of the rehabilitation of a troop of captive yellow baboons (Papio cynocephalus) after release into a protected area in Zambia [Masters]. State University of New York, New York, p 95

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy AJ, Stone OML, Curnoe D (2011) The release of a troop of rehabilitated vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops) in KwaZulu-Natal South Africa: outcomes and assessment. Folia Primatol 82:308–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guy AJ, Stone OML, Curnoe D (2012a) Animal welfare considerations in primate rehabilitation: an assessment of three vervet monkey (Chlorocebus aethiops) releases in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Anim Welf 21:511–515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guy AJ, Stone OML, Curnoe D (2012b) Assessment of the release of a troop of rehabilitated vervet monkeys to the Ntendeka Wilderness area, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa: a case study. Primates 53:171–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harding JL (1998) The first stages of rehabilitation of a family of white handed gibbons Hylobates lar. Australas Primatol 12:2–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrisson B (1963) Education to wild living of young orang-utans at Bako National Park, Sarawak. Sarawak Mus J 11:220–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Humle T, Colin C, Laurans M, Raballand E (2011) Group release of sanctuary chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in the Haut Niger National Park, Guinea, West Africa: ranging ratterns and lessons so far. Int J Primatol 32:456–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2002) IUCN guidelines for the placement of confiscated animals. IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN/SSC Primate Specialist Group. (2008). IUCN Red List 2008: a new assessment of endangered primates. http://www.primate-sg.org/red_list_threat_status/. Accessed 11 Oct 2012

  • Kalaweit Project (2011) The association and the rehabilitation project. Kalaweit project. http://www.kalaweit.org. Accessed 10 March 2012

  • King T, Chamberlan C, Courage A (2006) Gorilla reintroduction, Republic of Congo. A report for the PASA/IUCN African primate reintroduction workshop, 20–22 April 2006, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands

  • Laurance WF (2007) Forest destruction in tropical Asia. Curr Sci 93:1544–1550

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason GJ (1991) Stereotypies: a critical review. Anim Behav 41:1015–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medici EP, Valladares-Padua CB, Rylands AB, Martins CS (2003) Translocation as a metapopulation management tool for the black lion tamarin, Leontopithecus chrysopygus. Primate Conserv 19:23–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Rijksen HD (1974) Orang-utan conservation and rehabilitation in Sumatra. Biol Conserv 6:20–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson HM (2007) Wildlife conservation and Perth Zoo; National Wildlife Rehabilitation conference 2007, Freemantle, Australia

  • Sabah Tourism Board (2011) Sabah Malaysia best of Borneo. Kota Kinabalu, Sabah Malaysia: Sabah Tourism Board. http://www.sabahtourism.com/. Accessed 11 Oct 2012

  • Schneider E (1992) Woolly monkey rehabilitation project. Primate Eye 47:16–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Shier DM, Owings DH (2007) Effects of social learning on predator training and postrelease survival in juvenile black-tailed prairie dogs Cynomys ludovicianus. Anim Behav 73:567–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siregar RSE, Farmer KH, Chivers DJ, Saragih B (2010) Re-introduction of Bornean orang-utans to Meratus protected forest, East Kalimantan, Indonesia. In: Soorae PS (ed) Global re-introduction perspectives: 2010 additional case-studies from around the globe. IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group, Abu Dhabi, pp 243–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez CE, Gamboa EM, Claver P, Nassar-Montoya F (2001) Survival and adaptation of a released group of confiscated capuchin monkeys. Anim Welf 10:191–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaisgood RR, Shepherdson DJ (2005) Scientific approaches to enrichment and stereotypies in zoo animals: what’s been done and where should we go next? Zoo Biol 24:499–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tingpalapong M, Watson WT, Whitmire RE, Chappl FE, Marshall JT (1981) Reactions of captive gibbons to natural habitat and wild conspecifics after release. Nat History Bull Siamese Soc 29:31–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Trayford H, Pratje P, Singleton I (2010) Re-introduction of the Sumatran orangutan in Sumatra, Indonesia. In: Soorae PS (ed) Global re-introduction perspectives: 2010 additional case-studies from around the globe. IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group, Abu Dhabi, pp 238–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutin CEG, Ancrenaz M, Paredes J, Vacher-Vallas M, Vidal C, Goossens B, Bruford MW, Jamart A (2001) Conservation biology framework for the release of wild-born orphaned chimpanzees into the Conkouati Reserve, Congo. Conserv Biol 15(5):1247–1257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viggers KL, Lindenmayer DB, Spratt DM (1993) The importance of disease in reintroduction programmes. Wildl Res 20:687–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel I, Glowing B, Saint Pierre I, Bayart F, Contamin H, de Thoisy B (2002) Squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus) rehabilitation in French Guinea: a case study. Neotrop Primates 10:147–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittsit F (1995) Social behaviour and rehabilitation of primates. Paper presented at the SASOL symposium on wildlife rehabilitation, Onderstepoort

  • Wild Frontiers Uganda (2011) Ngamba Island excursions—wild frontiers, Uganda Entebbe, Uganda: wild frontiers, Uganda. http://www.wildfrontiers.co.ug/. Accessed 11 Oct 2012

  • Wimberger K, Downs CT, Perin MR (2010a) Postrelease success of two rehabilitated vervet monkey (Chlorocebus aethiops) troops in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Folia Primatol 81:96–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wimberger K, Downs CT, Boyes RS (2010b) A survey of wildlife rehabilitation in South Africa: is there a need for improved management? Anim Welf 19:481–499

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woodford MH (1994) Disease risks associated with wildlife translocation projects. In: Olney PJS, Mace GM, Feistner ATC (eds) Creative conservation: Interactive management of wild and captive animals. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 178–200

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yeager CP (1997) Orangutan rehabilitation in Tanjung Puting National Park. Indonesia Conserv Biol 11:802–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the University of News South Wales, Sydney Australia for access to funding and resources to carry out this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Biological Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia

    Amanda J. Guy & Darren Curnoe

  2. School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia

    Peter B. Banks

Authors
  1. Amanda J. Guy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Darren Curnoe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peter B. Banks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda J. Guy.

About this article

Cite this article

Guy, A.J., Curnoe, D. & Banks, P.B. Welfare based primate rehabilitation as a potential conservation strategy: does it measure up?. Primates 55, 139–147 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-013-0386-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-013-0386-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation