Skip to main content

Dynamics of the temporal structures of playing clusters and cliques among wild chimpanzees in Mahale Mountains National Park

Abstract

The overall structure and temporally changing configuration of members of social play among the wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) of Mahale Mountains National Park, Tanzania, were described on both the microscopic ‘clique’ levels, conceptualized as directly connected configurations through social play behavior, and macroscopic ‘cluster’ levels, conceptualized as indirectly connected gatherings of members of adjacent multiple cliques at the same time and space. Most playing clusters started as dyads. Although the cumulative number of participants increased, each clique size remained at 2 for most of the observational units. Dyadic cliques were more stable and lasted longer than larger cliques. Of all clusters’ playing fields, 64.7 % had maximum diameters of 3 m. In summary, chimpanzees played stably in dyadic pairs in most of the time. As time passed, other chimpanzees often joined in the playing groups to form large polyadic clusters. Even when all chimpanzees in a cluster played socially at the same time, they normally did so in separate dyadic pairs, forming multiple dyadic cliques simultaneously in a small space. These social play dynamics may be explained assuming a hypothesis based on a balance model among socially playing chimpanzees, as the balanced cliques are limited only to those in which all the existing pairs form the mutual dyads, and they tend to avoid unbalanced and maintain balanced relationships during social play. As a result, larger cliques were difficult to maintain for long periods and tended to transition into dyadic mutual cliques. Thus, Heider’s balance theory can be one of the possible theories to explain not only human social phenomena, but also the proximate mechanism of the structure and the temporal change of social play among wild chimpanzees. Although both mutual and transitive relationships are known to be balanced in various human networks, only mutual relationships among socially playing chimpanzees were balanced.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown SG (1988) Play behaviour in lowland gorillas: age differences, sex differences, and possible functions. Primates 29:219–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt GM (2005) The genesis of animal play: testing the limits. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright D, Harary F (1979) Balance and clusterability: An overview. In: Holland PW, Leinhardt S (eds) Perspectives on social network research. Academic Press, New York, pp 25–50

  • Croft DP, James R, Krause J (2008) Exploring animal social networks. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • de Nooy W, Mrvar A, Batagelj V (2005) Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elder D, Hallinan MT (1978) Sex difference in children’s friendships. Am Sociol Rev 43:237–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodall J (1986) The chimpanzees of Gombe. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Harary F (1969) Graph theory. Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Harary F, Norman RZ, Cartwright D (1965) Structure models: an introduction to the theory of directed graph. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartup WW (1983) Peer relations. In: Mussen PH (ed) Handbook of child psychology. Socialization, personality, and social development, vol 4. Wiley, New York, pp 103–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayaki H (1985) Social play of juvenile and adolescent chimpanzees in the Mahale Mountains National Park, Tanzania. Primates 26:343–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heider F (1946) Attitudes and cognitive organization. J Psychol 21:107–112

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heider F (1958) The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holland PW, Leinhardt S (1971) Transitivity in structural models of small groups. Comp Group Stud 2:107–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland PW, Leinhardt S (1979) Local structure in social networks. Sociol Methodol 7:1–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itoh N, Nishida T (2007) Chimpanzee grouping patterns and food availability in Mahale Mountains National Park, Tanzania. Primates 48:87–96

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt D, Handcock MS (2007) Heider versus Simmel: emergent features in dynamic structures. In: Workshop on statistical network analysis, ICML 2006, Pittsburgh, June 29, 2006. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4503. Springer, Berlin, pp 14–27

  • Lansford JE, Parker JG (1999) Children’s interactions in triads: behavioral profiles and effects of gender and pattern of friendships among members. Dev Psychol 35:80–93

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis KP (2005) Social play in the great apes. In: Smith PK, Pellegrini AD (eds) The nature of play: great apes and humans. Guilford, New York, pp 27–53

  • Lubbers MJ, Snijders TAB (2007) A comparison of various approaches to the exponential random graph model: a reanalysis of 102 student networks in school classes. Soc Netw 29:489–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maestripieri D, Ross SR (2004) Sex differences in play among western lowland gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) infants: implications for adult behavior and social structure. Am J Physi Anthropol 123:52–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus N, Croft DB (1995) Play behaviour and its effects on social development of common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Primates 36:213–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrew WC (1972) An ethological study of children’s behavior. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McLoyd VC, Thomas EA, Warren D (1984) The short-term dynamics of social organization in preschool triads. Child Dev 55:1051–1070

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Merrick NJ (1977) Social grooming and play behavior of a captive group of chimpanzees. Primates 18:215–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moody J (2009) Network dynamics. In: Hedström P, Bearman P (eds) The oxford handbook of analytical sociology. Oxford University Press, USA, pp 447–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura M (2000) Is human conversation more efficient than chimpanzee grooming? Comparison of clique sizes. Human Nat 11:281–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura M (2003) ‘Gatherings’ of social grooming among wild chimpanzees: implications for evolution of sociality. J Hum Evol 44:59–71

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishida T (1979) The social structure of chimpanzees of the Mahale Mountains. In: Hamburg DA, McCown ER (eds) The great apes. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, pp 72–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishida T (1990) The Chimpanzees of the Mahale Mountains: sexual and life history strategies. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishida T, Zamma K, Matsusaka T, Inaba A, McGrew WC (2010) Chimpanzee behavior in the wild: an audio-visual encyclopedia. Springer, Tokyo

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Palagi E (2006) Social play in bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): implications for natural social systems and interindividual relationships. Am J Physi Anthropol 129:418–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palagi E (2007) Play at work: revisiting data focusing on chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Anthropol Sci 85:63–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Palagi E (2008) Sharing the motivation to play: the use of signals in adult bonobos. Anim Behav 75:887–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palagi E (2009) Adult play fighting and potential role of tail signals in ringtailed lemurs (Lemur catta). J Comp Psychol 123:1–9

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palagi E, Paoli T (2007) Play in adult bonobos (Pan paniscus): modality and potential meaning. Am J Phys Anthropol 134:219–225

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plooij FX (1984) The behavioral development of free-living chimpanzee babies and infants. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart CJ, Pellis VC, Thierry B, Gauthier CA, VanderLaan DP, Vasey PL, Pellis SM (2010) Targets and tactics of play fighting: competitive versus cooperative styles of play in Japanese and Tonkean macaques. Int J Comp Psychol 23:166–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimada M (2006) Social object play among young Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata) in Arashiyama, Japan. Primates 47:342–349

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimada M (2012) Social object play among juvenile Japanese macaques in provisioned Arashiyama troop, compared with that of non-provisioned Kinkazan troop. In: Leca JB, Huffman MA, Vasey PL (eds) The monkeys of stormy mountain: 60 years of primatological research on the Japanese macaques of Arashiyama. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 258–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel G (1950) The sociology of Georg Simmel. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner JE, Byrne RW (2010) Triadic and collaborative play by gorillas in social games with objects. Anim Cogn 13:591–607

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Oord EJC, Rispens J, Goudena PP, Vermande M (2000) Some developmental implications of structural aspects of preschoolers’ relations with classmates. J Appl Dev Psychol 21:619–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Lawick-Goodall J (1968) The behaviour of free-living chimpanzees in the Gombe Stream reserve. Anim Behav Monogr 1:161–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman S, Faust K (1997) Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wey T, Blumstein DT, Shen W, Jordan F (2008) Social network analysis of animal behavior: a promising tool for the study of sociality. Anim Behav 75:333–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank the Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute (TAWIRI), the Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology (COSTECH), and Tanzania National Parks (TANAPA) for permission to conduct this research and for their many forms of assistance in the country. This study was supported by MEXT Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (#19255008 to T. Nishida), a Grant-in-Aid for Research Activity Start-up #21820064, and a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) #24720399. I thank the members of the Working Group ‘Play, Evolution, and Sociality’ at the National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis (NIMBioS). Lastly, I am deeply indebted to the late Prof. T. Nishida for introducing me to Mahale and “Panthropology”.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masaki Shimada.

About this article

Cite this article

Shimada, M. Dynamics of the temporal structures of playing clusters and cliques among wild chimpanzees in Mahale Mountains National Park. Primates 54, 245–257 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-013-0348-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-013-0348-4

Keywords

  • Fritz Heider
  • Balance theory
  • Social play
  • Chimpanzee
  • Mahale Mountains National Park