Advertisement

Primates

, Volume 53, Issue 2, pp 171–179 | Cite as

Assessment of the release of rehabilitated vervet monkeys into the Ntendeka Wilderness Area, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: a case study

  • Amanda J. Guy
  • Olivia M. L. Stone
  • Darren Curnoe
Original Article

Abstract

In South Africa, vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops) are frequently persecuted, resulting in large numbers of injured and/or orphaned animals. Rehabilitation centres aim to care for these monkeys and ultimately return them to the wild whenever possible. However, it is unknown whether rehabilitation is successful in its goal of creating wild-living, independent, self-sustaining troops due to limited published research in this area. This study describes the release and subsequent fate of a troop of rehabilitated vervet monkeys over a 6-month period. A troop of 16 monkeys was released into the Ntendeka Wilderness Area, a protected part of Ngome Forest, by the WATCH (Wild Animal Trauma Centre and Haven) rehabilitation centre in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Monitoring data were evaluated with regard to survival, mortality, suitability of the release site, breeding, condition, troop composition, behaviour, group dynamics, ranging patterns and the effectiveness of monitoring tools. The release was considered to be a partial success in that the troop exhibited behaviour, group dynamics and ranging patterns similar to wild conspecifics. However, the survival rate was low and the troop was judged to be non-self-sustaining. The main problems identified were the limited lifetimes of radio collars, which resulted in missing animals and caused monitoring to be cut short, illegal hunting activities, predation and a small troop size with few adults. The authors recommend improvements that may increase success, such as retaining troops in release enclosures for longer periods, releasing a larger troop with more adults that more closely matches wild troop composition, selecting a release site at least 3 km from the nearest human settlement and the use of GPS collars to allow for a longer monitoring period encompassing all seasonal conditions. Furthermore, all primates for release should be medically screened so as to avoid potential negative impacts on wild populations.

Keywords

Conservation Rehabilitation Reintroduction South Africa Vervet monkey 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to Bruce and Sandi Cronk of the WATCH rehabilitation centre for collecting the data and answering numerous questions in relation to this study. Thank you to Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife for collating and providing data for this study, and to the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia for access to facilities and financial support.

References

  1. Animal Care Use Committee (1998) Guidelines for the capture, handling, and care of mammals as approved by the American Society of Mammalogists. J Mammal 79:1416–1431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker LR (2002) Guidelines for nonhuman primate re-introductions. Re-introd News 21:29–57Google Scholar
  3. Bennett J (1992) A glut of gibbons in Sarawak—is rehabilitation the answer? Oryx 26:157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (1981) Selective forces affecting the predator alarm calls of vervet monkeys. Behaviour 76:25–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (1983) Nonrandom dispersal in free-ranging vervet monkeys: social and genetic consequences. Am Nat 122:392–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chief Directorate: Surveys and Mapping of the Surveyor General South Africa (2010) 2731CD Ngome, digital 1:50,000 map. Chief Directorate: Surveys and Mapping of the Surveyor General South Africa, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  7. Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (1992) Ntendeka Wilderness (unpublished report). Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Forestry Branch, EshoweGoogle Scholar
  8. Grueson P (2007) A case study of the rehabilitation of a troop of captive yellow baboons (Papio cynocephalus) after release into a protected area in Zambia (masters thesis; publ. no. 1446153). State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Guy AJ, Stone OML, Curnoe D (2012) The release of a troop of rehabilitated vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops) in KwaZulu-Natal South Africa: outcomes and assessment. Folia PrimatolGoogle Scholar
  10. Harrison MJ (1984) Optimal foraging strategies in the diet of the green monkey, Cercopithecus sabaeus, at Mt Assirik, Senegal. Int J Primatol 5:435–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harrisson B (1963) Education to wild living of young orang-utans at Bako National Park, Sarawak. Sarawak Mus J 11:220–258Google Scholar
  12. Henzi P (1979) The vervet crisis. Afr Wildl 33:8–10Google Scholar
  13. Hijmans RJ, Cameron EE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Humle T, Colin C, Laurans M, Raballand E (2011) Group release of sanctuary chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in the Haut Niger National Park, Guinea, West Africa: ranging patterns and lessons so far. Int J Primatol 32:456–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Isbell LA, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (1991) Group fusions and minimum group sizes in vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops). Am J Primatol 25:57–65Google Scholar
  16. IUCN (2002) Guidelines for the placement of confiscated animals (prepared by the IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group). IUCN/ERWDA, Gland/Abu DhabiGoogle Scholar
  17. IUCN (2011) IUCN red list of threatened species. http://www.iucnredlist.org/. Accessed 5 Dec 2011
  18. Johnson C, Koerner C, Estrin M, Duoos D (1980) Alloparental care and kinship in captive social groups of vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops sabaeus). Primates 21:406–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee PC (1989) Family structure, communal care and female reproductive effort. In: Standen V, Foley RA (eds) Comparative socioecology. The behaviour and ecology of humans and other mammals. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 323–340Google Scholar
  20. Markham C, Altman J (2008) Remote monitoring of primates using automated GPS technology in open habitats. Am J Primatol 70:495–499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Molony SE, Dowding CV, Baker PJ, Cuthill IC, Harris S (2006) The effect of translocation and temporary captivity on wildlife rehabilitation success: an experimental study using European hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus). Biol Conserv 130:530–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Southern Africa Places (2011) Ntendeka Wilderness. http://www.places.co.za/html/ntendeka.html. Accessed 15 June 2011
  23. Sprague DS, Kabaya H, Hagihara K (2004) Field testing a global positioning system (GPS) collar on a Japanese monkey: reliability of automatic GPS positioning in a Japanese forest. Primates 45:151–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Struhsaker TT (1967a) Behavior of vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops). Univ Calif Publ Zool 82:1–64Google Scholar
  25. Struhsaker TT (1967b) Social structure among vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops). Behaviour 29:83–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Suarez CE, Gamboa EM, Claver P, Nassar-Montoya F (2001) Survival and adaptation of a released group of confiscated capuchin monkeys. Anim Welf 10:191–203Google Scholar
  27. Tappen NC (1960) Problems of distribution and adaptation of the African monkeys. Curr Anthropol 1:91–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Venter F, Venter JA (2005) Making the most of indigenous trees, 2nd edn. Briza, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  29. Whittsit F (1995) Social behaviour and rehabilitation of primates. In: Proc SASOL Symp on Wildlife Rehabilitation, Onderstepoort, South Africa, 27–28 Oct 1995, pp 101–105Google Scholar
  30. Willems EP, Hill RA (2009) A critical assessment of two species distribution models: a case study of the vervet monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops). J Biogeogr 36:2300–2312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wimberger K, Downs CT (2010) Annual intake trends of a large urban animal rehabilitation centre in South Africa: a case study. Anim Welf 19:501–513Google Scholar
  32. Wimberger K, Downs CT, Boyes RS (2010a) A survey of wildlife rehabilitation in South Africa: is there a need for improved management? Anim Welf 19:481–499Google Scholar
  33. Wimberger K, Downs CT, Perin MR (2010b) Postrelease success of two rehabilitated vervet monkey (Chlorocebus aethiops) troops in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Folia Primatol 81:96–108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre and Springer 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amanda J. Guy
    • 1
  • Olivia M. L. Stone
    • 1
  • Darren Curnoe
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Biological Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations