Skip to main content
Log in

How many for dinner? Recruitment and monitoring by glances in capuchins

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Primates Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Group members present physical and physiological differences according to their age, sex or social status, which could generate motivation differences among individuals during travel. In spite of these divergences of interest among individuals, the group succeeds more often than not in making a collective decision about departure time and which direction to take. To reach a consensus decision, animals should exchange information relating to characteristics of group movement through different communication channels. The main purpose of this study is to understand the function of behaviour patterns displayed during movements of white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus). We designed experiments in which we provoked collective movements involving a binary choice. During experiments, a video camera recorded the behaviour of each capuchin, which enabled us to determine which individuals displayed a behavioural pattern during travel and how this behaviour influenced the other group members. We found that looking backwards seemed to permit the recruitment of group mates during collective movement. This behaviour also seemed to allow the quantification of the number of followers, since the emitter modified its locomotion speed according to this number. In this preliminary study, we showed that visual behaviour was used to recruit and monitor group mates during collective movements and provided information on mechanisms involved in maintaining cohesion and coordination among group members during travel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–266

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boinski S (1993) Vocal coordination of group movement among white-faced capuchin monkeys, Cebus capucinus. Am J Prim 30:85–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boinski S, Campbell AF (1995) Use of trill vocalizations to coordinate troop movement among white-faced capuchins: a second field test. Behaviour 132:875–901

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (1998) Principles of animal communication. Sinauer, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter CR (1934) A field study of the behaviour and social relations of howling monkeys. Comp Psychol Monogr 48:1–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Conradt L, Roper TJ (2005) Consensus decision making in animals. Trends Ecol Evol 20:449–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall KRL, DeVore I (1965) Baboon social behaviour. In: DeVore I (ed) Primate behaviour: field studies of monkeys and apes. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp 53–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt AH (1979) Social relationships between adult male and female mountain gorillas in the wild. Anim Behav 27:325–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingmanson EJ (1996) Tool-using behaviour in wild Pan paniscus: social and ecological considerations. In: Russon AE, Bard K, Taylor S (eds) Reaching into thought: the minds of great apes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 190–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause J, Ruxton GD (2002) Living in groups. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kummer H (1968) Social organization of hamadryas baboons. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Leca JB, Gunst N, Thierry B, Petit O (2003) Distributed leadership in semifree-ranging white-faced capuchin monkeys. Anim Behav 66:1035–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehlman PT (1996) Branch shaking and related displays in wild Barbary macaques. In: Fa JE, Lindburg DG (eds) Evolution and ecology of macaque societies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 503–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel EW Jr (1971) Communication about the environment in a group of young chimpanzees. Folia Primatol 15:220–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meunier H, Leca JB, Deneubourg JL, Petit O (2006) Group movement decisions in capuchin monkeys: the utility of an experimental study and a mathematical model to explore the relationship between individual and collective behaviours. Behaviour 143:1511–1527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moglich M, Maschwitz U, Holldobler B (1974) Tandem running: a new kind of signal in ant communication. Science 186:1046–1047

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson JG (1979) Vocal regulation of use of space by groups of titi monkeys (Callicebus moloch). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaller G (1963) The mountain gorilla: ecology and behaviour. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S, Castellan NJ (1988) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Struhsaker TT (1967) Auditory communication among vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aetthiops). In: Altmann SA (ed) Social communication among primates. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 281–324

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries H (1995) An improved test of linearity in dominance hierarchies containing unknown or tied relationships. Anim Behav 50:1375–1389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vries H (1998) Finding a dominance order most consistent with a linear hierarchy: a new procedure and review. Anim Behav 55:827–843

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • deVries H, Netto WJ, Hanegraaf PLH (1993) MatMan: a program for the analysis of sociometric matrices and behavioural transition matrices. Behaviour 125:157–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Waser PM (1977) Individual recognition, intragroup cohesion and intergroup spacing: evidence from sound playback to forest monkeys. Behaviour 60:28–74

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Louis Pasteur University Primate Centre, Strasbourg, France, and to Pierre Uhlrich for technical support for the experiments. We also thank Arianna De Marco for determining the hierarchy of this group, Bernard Thierry for statistical advice and Guillaume Salmon for his help collecting some of the data. H.M. appreciates helpful comments and discussion with Pau Molina-Vila. J.L.D. is a research associate sponsored by the Belgian National Funds for Scientific Research. We also thank the three anonymous reviewers for insightful comments on the manuscript. We wish to thank Ruth Knowles for English corrections on the manuscript. Observations and experiments were made in accordance with the CNRS guidelines.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hélène Meunier.

About this article

Cite this article

Meunier, H., Deneubourg, JL. & Petit, O. How many for dinner? Recruitment and monitoring by glances in capuchins. Primates 49, 26–31 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-007-0055-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-007-0055-0

Keywords

Navigation