Skip to main content
Log in

Amodal completion by baboons (Papio papio): contribution of background depth cues

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Primates Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four baboons (Papio papio) were tested in a computerized two-alternative forced choice task in which partially occluded graphic stimuli were shown either on linear perspective backgrounds depicting a corridor or on uniformly black backgrounds. The results indicated that baboons complete partly occluded stimuli and that amodal completion is facilitated by the display of pictorial background depth cues. Inter-individual differences emerged in the ability to extrapolate three-dimensional information from two-dimensional visual information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barbet I, Fagot J (2002) Perception of the corridor illusion by baboons (Papio papio). Behav Brain Res 132:111–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barbet I, Fagot J (2005) Control of the corridor illusion in baboons (Papio papio) by gradient and linear perspective depth cues. Perception (in press)

  • Benson C, Yonas A (1973) Development of sensitivity to static pictorial depth information. Percept Psychophys 13:361–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno N, Bertamini M, Domini F (1997) Amodal completion of partly occluded surfaces: is there a mosaic stage? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 23:1412–1426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cutting JE, Vishton PM (1995) Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration relative potency and contextual use of different information about depth. In: Epstein W, Rogers S (eds) Handbook of perception and cognition: perception of space and motion. Academic, San Diego, pp 69–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Deruelle C, Barbet I, Dépy D, Fagot J (2000) Perception of partly occluded figures by baboons (Papio papio). Perception 29:1483–1497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forkman B (1998) Hens use occlusion to judge depth in a two-dimensional picture. Perception 27:861–867

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forkman B, Vallortigara G (1999) Minimization of modal contours: an essential cross-species strategy in disambiguating relative depth. Anim Cogn 2:181–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita K (2000) What you see is different from what I see. Species differences in visual perception. In: Matsuzawa T (eds) Primate origin of human cognition and behavior. Tokyo, pp 28–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita K (2001) Perceptual completion in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and pigeons (Columbia livia). Percept Psychophys 63:115–125

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kanizsa G (1979) Organization in vision: essays on gestalt perception. Praeger, NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanizsa G, Renzi P, Conte S, Compostela C, Guerani L (1993) Amodal completion in mouse vision. Perception 22:713–721

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lea SEG, Slater AM, Ryan CME (1996) Perception of object unity in chicks: A comparison with the human infant. Infant Behav dev 19:501–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michotte A (1963) The perception of causality. Basic Books, NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer SE (1999) Vision science: photons to phenomenology. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt F (1979) The contribution of colour to three-dimensional ambiguities in paintings and drawings. Perception 8:157–173

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Regolin L, Vallortigara G (1995) Perception of partly occluded objects by young chicks. Percept Psychophys 57:971–976

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin N (2001) The role of junctions in surface completion and contour matching. Perception 30:339–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sato A, Kanazawa S, Fujita K (1997) Perception of object unity in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). Jpn Psychol Res 39:191–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekuler AB, Lee JAJ, Shettleworth SJ (1996) Pigeons do not complete partly occluded figures. Perception 25:1109–1120

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Solso RL (1994) Cognition and the visual arts. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugita Y (1999) Grouping of image fragments in primary visual cortex. Nature 401:269–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe S, Furuya I (1997) Usage of the video display for study of visual cognition in pigeons. Int J Comp Psychol 10:111–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman EA, DiPietro NT, Young ME (2001) The effects of occlusion on pigeons’ object recognition. Paper presented at the meeting of the Vision Sciences Society, Sarasota, Fla.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Marc Martin and Monique Chiambretto for their technical support; this research was supported by the CNRS-OMLL research program and by the Sedsu-Nest-012984.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joël Fagot.

Additional information

The procedure employed in this research was given the full approval of the regional “comité d’éthique pour l’expérimentation animale.”

About this article

Cite this article

Fagot, J., Barbet, I., Parron, C. et al. Amodal completion by baboons (Papio papio): contribution of background depth cues. Primates 47, 145–150 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-005-0165-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-005-0165-5

Keywords

Navigation