Advertisement

Primates

, Volume 47, Issue 2, pp 131–139 | Cite as

Costs of twins in free-ranging white-bellied spider monkeys (Ateles belzebuth belzebuth) at Tinigua National Park, Colombia

  • Andres Link
  • Ana Cristina Palma
  • Adriana Velez
  • Ana Gabriela de Luna
Original Article

Abstract

A female spider monkey (Ateles belzebuth belzebuth) that gave birth to twins was studied during 13 months, and her activity budget and diet were compared to those of females with single offspring and females with no offspring to assess selective pressures that could influence litter size. We recorded qualitative information on the development and social interactions of the twins and three other single infants. Emi, the female that had the twins, had the highest proportion of resting time and the lowest proportion of feeding and moving time compared to other adult females and males. Emi also had the lowest average daily travel distance and relied more heavily on flowers and leaves than other group members who included a higher proportion of fruits in their diets. These results suggest that twins are energetically costly to spider monkeys because of the direct energy allocated into raising and carrying the twins and, also, because these costs have direct effects in the ability of a mother to obtain high-quality resources (e.g., fruits). The twins had a slower rate of physical and social development as well as a smaller body size compared to same-aged singletons by the end of the study. Thus, the extended periods of maternal care and the costs associated with rearing and carrying offspring are some of the factors that influence the evolution and maintenance of a litter size of one in most anthropoid primates.

Keywords

Ateles belzebuth Carrying costs Reproduction costs Spider monkeys Tinigua national park Twins 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Kosei Izawa for motivating and supporting part of this study and providing helpful information on the study groups’ composition and demography. We thank the valuable collaboration and dedicated work of Javier Cajiao. Yukiko Shimooka and Beatriz Ramirez provided helpful assistance in the field. Colin Chapman, Christina Campbell, Pablo Stevenson, Anthony Di Fiore, Luke Mathews, Rachel Dvoskin, and an anonymous reviewer made helpful comments to the manuscript. Pablo Stevenson provided us his phenological data from previous years and gave helpful advice for this study. We thank the ‘Vereda el Tapir’ for kindly receiving us and, in particular, Ramiro Montealegre, Alvaro Sanabria, and Nelson Silva who helped us directly at the study station. The Colombo-Japan agreement through Dr. Kosei Izawa,Carlos Mejia, Akisato Nishimura, and Koshin Kimura has allocated enormous efforts and support to promote research at the CIEM. U.E.S.P.N.N. and the staff from Tinigua National Park provided us with permits and logistical support.

References

  1. Ah-King M, Tullberg BS (2000) Phylogenetic analysis of twinning in Callitrichinae. Am J Primatol 51:135–156CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahumada JA, Stevenson PR, Quinones MJ (1998) Ecological response of spider monkeys to temporal variation in fruit abundance: the importance of flooded forest as a keystone habitat. Primate Conserv 18:10–14Google Scholar
  3. Bell G, Koufopanou V (1986) The cost of reproduction. In: Dawkins R, Ridley M (eds) Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3:83–131Google Scholar
  4. Bennett EL (1988) The occurrence of twins and accompanying behavioral changes in the banded langur, Presbytis melalophos. Primates 29:557–563Google Scholar
  5. Bicca-Marques JC, Calegaro-Marques (1994) Activity budget and diet of Alouatta caraya: an age-sex analysis. Folia Primatol 63:316–320Google Scholar
  6. Castellanos HG, Chanin P (1996) Seasonal differences in food choice and patch preference of long haired spider monkeys (Ateles belzebuth). In: Norconk NA, Rosemberg AL, Garber PA (eds) Adaptive radiations of neotropical primates. Plenum Press, New York London, pp 451–466Google Scholar
  7. Chapman CA (1989) Ecological constraints on group size in three species of neotropical primates. Folia Primatol 73:1–9Google Scholar
  8. Chapman CA (1990) Association patterns of spider monkeys: the influence of ecology and sex on social organization. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26:409–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chapman CA, Chapman LJ (1986) Development of howling monkey twins (Alouatta palliata) in Santa Rosa National Park, Costa Rica. Primates 27:377–381Google Scholar
  10. Chapman CA, Walker S, Lefebvre L (1990) Reproductive strategies of primates: the influence of body size and diet on litter size. Primates 31:1–13Google Scholar
  11. Charnov EL, Krebs JR (1974) On clutch size and fitness. Ibis 116:217–219Google Scholar
  12. Cody ML (1966) A general theory of clutch size. Evolution 20:174–184Google Scholar
  13. Dietz JM, Baker AJ, Miglioretti P (1994) Seasonal variation in reproduction, juvenile growth and adult body mass in golden lion tamarins (Leontopithecus rosalia). Am J Primatol 34:115–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Di Fiore A, Campbell C (2005) The atelines: Variation in ecology, behavior, and social organization. In: Campbell CJ, Fuentes AF, MacKinnon KC, Panger M, Bearder S (eds) Primates in perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford (in press)Google Scholar
  15. Digby LJ, Barreto CE (1996) Activity and ranging patterns in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). In: Norconk NA, Rosemberg AL, Garber PA (eds) Adaptive radiations of neotropical primates. Plenum Press, New York London, pp 173–185Google Scholar
  16. Dufour DL, Sauther ML (2002) Comparative and evolutionary dimensions of the energetics of human pregnancy and lactation. Am J Hum Biol 14:584–602CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellsworth JA, Andersen C (1997) Adoption by captive parturient Rhesus macaques: Biological vs. adopted infants and the cost of being a “twin” and rearing “twins”. Am J Primatol 43:259–264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Estrada A (1982) Surveys and census of howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) in the rainforest of Los Tuxlas, Veracruz, Mexico. Am J Primatol 2:363–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frankie GW, Baker HG, Opler PA (1974) Comparative phonological studies in tropical wet and dry forests in the low-lands of Costa Rica. J Ecol 62:881–919Google Scholar
  20. Froelichk JW, Thorington RW, Otis JS (1981) The demography of howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Int J Primatol 2:207–236Google Scholar
  21. Geissman T (1990) Twinning frequency in catarrhine primates. Hum Evol 5:387–396Google Scholar
  22. Gittleman JL, Thompson SD (1988) Energy allocation in mammalian reproduction. Am Zool 28:863–875Google Scholar
  23. Godfray HCJ, Partridge L, Harvey PH (1991) Clutch size. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 22:409–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goldizen AW (1987) Tamarins and marmosets: communal care of offspring. In: Smuts BB, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM, Wrangham RW, Struhsaker TT (eds) Primate societies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 34–43Google Scholar
  25. Goodall J (1986) The chimpanzees of Gombe: patterns of behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  26. Hsu MJ, Lin JF, Agoramoorthy G (2000) Occurrence of twins in wild Formosan macaques, Macaca cyclopsis, at Mt. Longevity, Taiwan. Folia Primatol 71:154–156CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Izawa K (1993) Soil eating by spider monkeys. Int J Primatol 14:229–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kimura K, Nishimura A, Izawa K, Mejia CA (1995) Annual changes in rainfall and temperature in the seasonal tropical forest of La Macarena Field Station, Colombia. Field Studies New World Monkeys, La Macarena, Colombia 9:1–3Google Scholar
  29. Lack D (1947) The significance of clutch size. Ibis 89:309–352Google Scholar
  30. Lack D (1954) Natural regulation of animal numbers. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  31. Leighty KA, Byrne G, Fragaszy DM, Visalberghi E, Welker C, Lussier I (2004) Twinning in tufted capuchins (Cebus apella): rate survivorship and weight gain. Folia Primatol 75:14–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Leutenneger W (1979) Evolution of litter size in primates. Am Nat 114:525–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Link A (2003) Insect eating by spider monkeys. Neotrop Primates 11:104–107Google Scholar
  34. Nakamichi M (1983) Development of infant twin Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata) in a free-ranging group. Primates 24:576–583Google Scholar
  35. Ogawa H (1998) Adoption and social interactions between a mother and “twin” offspring in Macaca fuscata. Folia Primatol 69:100–105CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Pasztor LM, Van Horn RN (1976) Twinning in prosimians. J Hum Evol 5:333–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pissinatti A, Coimbra-Filho AF, Rylands AB, Nogueira Rubiao EC (1999) A twin birth in Cebus xanthosternos. Neotrop Primates 7:21–24Google Scholar
  38. Portman (1970) Nutritional requirements (NCR) of non-human primates. In: Harris R (eds) Feeding and nutrition in non-human primates. Academic Press, New York, pp 87–116Google Scholar
  39. Prentice AM, Prentice A (1988) Energy costs of lactation. Annu Rev Nutr 8:63–79CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Price EC (1992) The costs of infant carrying in captive cotton-top tamarins. Am J Primatol 26:23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ramos-Fernandez G, Ayala-Orozco B (2002) Population size and habitat use of spider monkeys in Punta Laguna, Mexico. In: Marsh LK (eds) Primates in fragments: ecology and conservation. Plenum/Kluwer Press, New York, ppGoogle Scholar
  42. Richards AF (1985) Primates in nature. W.H. Freeman and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Ross C (2001) Park or ride? Evolution of infant carrying in primates. Int J Primatol 22:749–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sanchez S, Pelaez F, Gil-Bürmann C, Kaumanns W (1999) Costs of infant-carrying in the cotton-top tamarin (Saguinus Oedipus). Am J Primatol 48:99–111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Shimooka Y (2005) Sexual differences in ranging of Ateles belzebuth belzebuth at La Macarena, Colombia. Int J Primatol 26:385–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sikes RS (1995) Cost of lactation and optimal litter size in northern grasshopper mice (Onychomys leucogaster). J Mamm 76:348–357Google Scholar
  47. Sikes RS (1998) Unit pricing: economics and the evolution of litter size. Evol Biol 12:179–190Google Scholar
  48. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. WH Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Stevenson PR (2002) Frugivory and seed dispersal by woolly monkeys at Tinigua National Park, Colombia. PhD thesis, State University of New York at Stony BrookGoogle Scholar
  50. Stevenson PR, Quinones MJ, Ahumada JA (2000a) Influence of fruit availability on ecological overlap among four neotropical primates at Tinigua National park, Colombia. Biotropica 32:533–544Google Scholar
  51. Stevenson PR, Quiñonez MJ, Castellanos MC (2000b) Guía de los frutos del río Duda, La Macarena, Colombia. Asociación para la defensa de la Macarena-IUCN (Netherlands), Santa Fé de BogotáGoogle Scholar
  52. Strier KB (1991) Demography and conservation of an endangered primate, Brachyteles arachnoides. Conserv Biol 5:214–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Strier KB (1992) Atelinae adaptations: behavioral strategies and ecological constraints. Am J Primatol 88:515–524Google Scholar
  54. Suarez SA (2003) Spatio-temporal foraging skills of White-bellied spider monkeys (Ateles belzebuth belzebuth) in the Yasuni National Park, Ecuador. PhD thesis, State University of New York at Stony BrookGoogle Scholar
  55. Symington MM (1987) Ecological and social correlates in the black-handed spider monkeys, Ateles paniscus chamek. PhD thesis, Princeton University, N.J.Google Scholar
  56. Tardif SD (1994) Relative energetic cost of infant care in small bodied neotropical primates and its relation to infant care patterns. Am J Primatol 34:133–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tardif SD (1997) The bioenergetics of parental behavior and the evolution off alloparental care in marmosets and tamarins. In: Solomon NG, French JA (eds) Cooperative breeding in mammals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 11–33Google Scholar
  58. Tardif SD, Harrison ML (1990) Estimates of the energetic costs of infant transport in tamarins. Am J Phys Anthropol 81:306Google Scholar
  59. Taylor TD, Feistner ATC (1996) Infant rearing in captive Hapalemur griseus alaotrensis: singleton versus twins. Folia Primatol 11:229–237Google Scholar
  60. Tuomi J (1990) On clutch size and parental survival. Oikos 58:387–389Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre and Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andres Link
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ana Cristina Palma
    • 1
    • 3
  • Adriana Velez
    • 1
    • 3
  • Ana Gabriela de Luna
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Centro de Investigaciones Ecológicas, La Macarena (CIEM)La MacarenaColombia
  2. 2.New York University (NYU) and New York Consortium for Evolutionary Primatology (NYCEP)New YorkUSA
  3. 3.Departamento de Ciencias BiológicasUniversidad de Los AndesBogotaColombia

Personalised recommendations