Advertisement

Primates

, Volume 45, Issue 4, pp 267–270 | Cite as

Behavioral economic analysis of water intake in a laboratory rhesus macaque

  • Masumi WakitaEmail author
Short Communication

Abstract

Behavioral economics is useful for understanding the influence of environmental manipulation on a variety of behaviors, including drug self-administration, food intake, and stock behavior. The present study employed behavioral economics to investigate the psychologically satisfying amount of water intake in a laboratory rhesus macaque. Our institutional guidelines set a minimum amount of daily water intake. However, no study to date has determined whether that minimum amount is psychologically sufficient. In the present experiment, a monkey lived in an individual cage in which the only water available was delivered by chain pulling. A fixed number of responses was required for water delivery. This fixed ratio (FR) of responses per water delivery was progressively increased from FR 2 to FR 10. The study findings showed that during the FR 2 condition, demand for water was saturated at 131.3 ml/kg body weight (BW) (ranging from 95.1 to 211.2). The monkey’s daily intake of water decreased as FR size incrementally increased, approaching an asymptote under the FR 8 and FR 10 conditions. During the FR 8 and FR 10 conditions, responding ceased when this monkey earned 53.5 ml/kg-BW (ranging from 32.7 to 74.9) of water. Therefore, the amount of water obtained under these conditions might provide a psychologically satisfying amount. Although these values were obtained from the behavioral study of one monkey, they were almost equivalent to values in our institutional guidelines that were determined by veterinary observations. These findings imply that behavioral economics is useful for studying the welfare of laboratory animals.

Keywords

Animal welfare Behavioral economics Closed economy Rhesus macaque Water consumption 

References

  1. Bauman RA, Raslear TG, Hursh SR, Shurtleff D, Simmons L (1996) Substitution and caloric regulation in a closed economy. J Exp Anal Behav 65:401–422PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. DeGrandpre RJ, Bickel WK, Hughes JR, Layng MP, Badger G (1993) Unit price as a useful metric in analyzing effects of reinforcer magnitude. J Exp Anal Behav 60:641–666Google Scholar
  3. Hursh SR, Raslear TG, Shurtleff RD, Bauman R, Simmons L (1988) A cost-benefit analysis of demand for food. J Exp Anal Behav 50:419–440PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Wakita M, Kawamura H, Watanabe S (1993) Hoarding behavior in the pigeon (Columba livia): performance under the restriction of food availability. Behav Proc 31:167–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Widholm JJ, Silberberg A, Hursh SR, Imam AA, Warren B, Frederick R (2001) Stock optimizing in choice when a token deposit is the operant. J Exp Anal Behav 76:245–263PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre and Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Primate Research InstituteKyoto UniversityAichi 484-8506Japan

Personalised recommendations